boojum
Mentor
Got this on Halloween, fittingly. I have been playing with it since. It is a wonderful camera. It will run from full auto to full manual. Images at ISO 25600 are amazingly sharp. The color is great. It functions easily and is natural to use. The menu system is simple enough that I can understand it, well, most of it. And you know the back-of-napkin specs: 16 bit color, 15 stops of dynamic range, seven stops of stabilization. I have not marched for miles with it but the weight is not a problem. It falls well to the hand and is a joy to use.
Is it worth the money? It is to me. As usual, YMMV.
I am posting a few pics with links to them in Flickr so that the full 75 - 100MB image can be seen. Cheers.
Is it worth the money? It is to me. As usual, YMMV.
I am posting a few pics with links to them in Flickr so that the full 75 - 100MB image can be seen. Cheers.
ptpdprinter
Mentor
The first image looks out of focus. The second image looks sharp and well exposed. The third image has a lot of "glow" with the lights on the shack. Did you use one of those diffusion filters you bought on this image? The face in the fourth image looks pretty sharp, but not razor sharp. Exposure is okay. The fifth image looks underexposed, but that may be your preference for the image.
boojum
Mentor
Get your eyes checked.
Dan
Let's Sway
Why in the world would you post that first picture as an example of this camera? It is out of focus and not sharp due to camera movement. Embarrassing!
boojum
Mentor
It is the second shot with the camera. I guess I got this one wrong. Do you need an apology? I am not in the least embarrassed but will accept yours in stead of mine.
I do not believe the problem to be camera movement as there is a quite sharp spider web on the left jaw fang. It is shot wide-open, f/2.5, as the ISO is 64, and very close. So the depth of field is very shallow as is with medium format cameras especially up close. As with so many, many things in this life there is a learning curve.
But thanks for the comments anyway.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
It is kinda obvious to be not OOF, but motion blur.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
Did you checked the EXIF? It is one sec exposure, hand held for sure.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
The question is - does the sensor suffers like FujiFilm dMF does for moiré?
boojum
Mentor
I am looking at the image on my computer and when enlarged a great deal that little spider web strand is sharp not smeared. Were there a motion problem it would be smeared. I just downloaded the image from Flickr and find the result the same as the image I uploaded: the spider web is not smeared. But this is really sort of pecksniffian. But have at it. Green can be flattering.
ptpdprinter
Mentor
Could be both. Let's just say it is fuzzy.
Ansel Adams famously once said: "There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept." I think he was wrong. In my mind, there is nothing worse than a fuzzy image of a fuzzy concept. If you have a sharp image of a fuzzy concept, at least you know how to use your camera properly.
ptpdprinter
Mentor
Hasselblad introduced an "eco-friendly" camera strap for the X2D and a couple of other models for a "not-wallet-friendly" price of $299. $299 for a strap? It comes in subtle shades of cream and international orange. Also introduced were CPL, ND and UV filters at prices that would make even Leica fans spit out their coffee.
https://petapixel.com/2022/12/08/has...-camera-strap/
https://petapixel.com/2022/12/08/has...-camera-strap/
Vince Lupo
Untitled
Yeah I saw that strap too on Hasselblad’s FB page. Beautiful strap, but then I checked the price and uh, um, no thanks.
Actually if you want an interesting selection of straps, Etsy has some neat offerings. My personal faves are from Couch Guitar Straps out of California.
hap
Well-known
Cute......
cboy
Well-known
2c...The 100mb pixel peeping files are fantastic insofar that one is doing pp to take advantage of that extra data to use for such things as highlight/ shadow recovery, and or enlarging. Beside not getting the exposure right the first time it's just bloated storage space for the end user...YMMV
It's a system one is buying into. That's means the ridiculously priced lens to take advantage of the resolution. Otherwise using legacy glass is just magnifying the inherent imperfections
Reminds me of Leica m11 lol.
Anyway awesome nice looking clean images btw!
It's a system one is buying into. That's means the ridiculously priced lens to take advantage of the resolution. Otherwise using legacy glass is just magnifying the inherent imperfections
Reminds me of Leica m11 lol.
Anyway awesome nice looking clean images btw!
boojum
Mentor
Recent shots
Yokosuka_Mike
Abstract Clarity
^ Ahoy there Boojum! It looks like you and the X2D are getting along just fine with each other. That's a nice set of photographs you've just posted. I hope you'll be sharing more with us.
All the best,
Mike
All the best,
Mike
boojum
Mentor
Thanks. It is all timing. Getting there when the light is good. And the camera, the camera is a honey. I no longer regret selling the wife and children into bondage in order to buy the camera. I hope they understand.
boojum
Mentor
We are a fishing community. This is the harbor in Warrenton, OR, and the boats are quit likely shrimpers but I am not sure. They damned sure fish. The lamps at the top of the masts are sodium vapor and cast an orange light, bright as anything. They can be seen as they cross the Columbia Bar and all the way in to the fish processors in the Astoria West Mooring Basin, floating bright orange lights, especially delightful when it is foggy.
boojum
Mentor
Down at the RR restoration shed again. Women like shiny little stones, guys like shiny big mechanical parts. This one is part of the drive line on the locomotive.
boojum
Mentor
So you have seen the locomotive, here is a car to be restored now sitting on track across the street from the shed where the locomotive sits. It is a baggage and passenger car.
Link to original:
Link to original: