Cascadilla
Well-known
+1 on the Pentax LX--I used 4 of them for pro work for long time and they were extremely reliable, with only one repair despite lots of use. The fact that they looked great was icing on the cake!
Mos6502
Well-known
Exakta VXIIB and Travemat by Berang Berang, on Flickr
Exakta VXIIB with the Schact Travemat TTL finder, and Schacht Travelon 1.8/50 lens.
Exakta VXIIB with the Schact Travemat TTL finder, and Schacht Travelon 1.8/50 lens.
Pál_K
Cameras. I has it.
Aaahhh!!!!Exakta VXIIB and Travemat by Berang Berang, on Flickr
Exakta VXIIB with the Schact Travemat TTL finder, and Schacht Travelon 1.8/50 lens.
I almost bought a Travemat - a wonderful device - but the meter was not working at all.
That’s nice - congratulations!
Mos6502
Well-known
Another beauty from the early days of the 35mm SLR. Miranda C (the very similar but "budget" Miranda D is also beautiful). In 1959 the Miranda C cost $279, or about the same as a Leica M2. Shown here with the M42 adapter and that rare and spectacular lens the Petri Orikkor 2/50. Still, cheaper than an Exakta from the same era.
MISH
Well-known
The XD-11was the last camera I ever bought new, I was highly influenced by the review in Modern Photography Magazine and there high praise for the black chrome body. It served me well well for many years but unfortunately I gave it to my daughter to use and she lost it at the Madrid Airport during one of her travels. I always found this camera to be very attractive and I never suffered the leatherette shrinkage seen on many of these cameras, I purchased mine in Canada so I don’t know if that made any difference. A couple of years ago when feeling nostalgic for my old camera I purchased a used XD which is what it was marketed as in Japan. I had read that these were also less likely to have the shrinkage problem and so far it has been good.
I would also like to add my vote as one that thinks the F2 is much more attractive than the Nikon F, having owned both. I think a F2 with a non Ai lens with the scalloped focus ring is the best looking camera that Nikon ever made
I would also like to add my vote as one that thinks the F2 is much more attractive than the Nikon F, having owned both. I think a F2 with a non Ai lens with the scalloped focus ring is the best looking camera that Nikon ever made
Attachments
kkdanamatt
Well-known
I believe the thinnest 35mm full-frame SLR body was the Alpa, not Canon's FD cameras.
The Alpa's short distance from the mounted lens' optical center to the film plane allowed many adapted lenses to reach infinity focus.
The Alpa's short distance from the mounted lens' optical center to the film plane allowed many adapted lenses to reach infinity focus.
kkdanamatt
Well-known
I never warmed up to Canon FD cameras because the viewfinder information was in a different plane than that of the image on the focus screen.
It was a pain in the ass for me to refocus my eye each time, from readout info to image.
Never had that problem with Nikon or Minolta SLRs.
It was a pain in the ass for me to refocus my eye each time, from readout info to image.
Never had that problem with Nikon or Minolta SLRs.
Bill Blackwell
Leica M Shooter
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I'm a bit mystified by the choice of the Pen F ... clever camera but a plain jane in my opinion.
halvmesyr
Established
571514m3
Established
I have always found this beautiful in a form follows function way. Like a Merc W123.
There is truth in 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder', but it explains nothing. What is it that we find beautiful in a camera? For me the starting point is experiencing tactile satisfaction and that experience making me look at the tool (and that is really all a camera is) with enjoyment. Then comes that little bit of magic, the connection with the tool because of respect for how it helps me do what I like to do. Does that make sense? Every time I use Wiss Aviation shears on sheet metal I also look at them and think 'thanks for being in my tool bag!'
I have four cameras:
F2AS Photomic kit- NOT beautiful at all but great experience. But surely beautiful with that small prism.
Fed2 with Jupiter 8 - lovely tactical experience and beautiful in the way a 1970s Batavus Flying Dutchman bicycle is.
Leica M (4 and M-D) - amazing to hold and use, and looking down/up that curve each end and parallel body with flat top/bot is just so beautiful.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
There is a beauty in black paint finish Canon FTbs too, both version 1 and version 2 look stunning and solid.
AAlfano
Well-known
AlexMogens
Established
Hard to argue with the Spotmatics.View attachment 4823033I'm in both the Nikonian and Pentaxian camps, but I think for looks my favorites are the Spotmatic series. Here's my SL, just back from service by Eric Hendrickson. I liked it so much I bought the T-shirt.
skopar steve
Well-known
analoged
Well-known
Was wondering when someone was going to mention Leicaflex in this thread!
Yes, Porsche Design.All though I had a T90 for a while and really enjoyed it. The Contax RTS is a better looker IMHO.
hap
Well-known
I have an SL leicaflex. After acquiring a Leica R-E, I still pick up the SL.Was wondering when someone was going to mention Leicaflex in this thread!
analoged
Well-known
I started Leica R with an R3, then R-E, found Leicaflex's and got all three versions! Eventually sold them all and now use a R6.2 and R7 which is a nice pair, but not that classic feel of Leicaflex's!I have an SL leicaflex. After acquiring a Leica R-E, I still pick up the SL.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.