Henri Cartier-Bresson's first Leica camera.

Cyriljay

Leica Like
Local time
10:55 AM
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
432
I had a chance to get this photo during an exhibition in photography Foundation of Cartier -Bresson's in Paris.
Cartier-Bresson's_first_Leica.jpg

I had a chance to get this photo during an Exhibition in" Photography Foundation of Henry -Cartier Bresson " In Paris.
Just only looking at this photo shows how a person should be to master to bring such perfections many of his photos to a such aspect of journalistic eye and approach in all ways.
So I am wondering why we are nowhere near in anyway with at least one or two ingredients to compare to his vision the photos we see
Is the ISO is not enough ?
Are the lenses are not good enough in autofocusing technology?
Are the shutter are loud and noisy ?
Are the lenses not good enough clarity to capture images? Or our brains more occupied/struggling with gear techniques than making pictures ?? What is missing here!!
 
Cool photo—thanks for sharing.

If I'm following you, I think your point is that artistic/creative vision is much more important than the technical capability of our cameras. On that I agree with you completely. I have more "advanced" cameras, including a DSLR, but my photos are never any better with my DSLR than they are when I use my simple cameras like my Pentax SL or K1000.
 
Thanks for posting that historic scene.
I don't think it is true that there is not similarly good work being done today. There is just a lot more bad work to wade through to get the the valuable stuff.
It is inspiring to see the relatively simple gear that CB had to work with. However, at the time that was the cutting edge camera for the style he chose. If CB were just starting out today, what kind of gear do you think he would be using?
 
Head, eye, and heart. He also had a good understanding of the human condition and how to capture it.

'I am a visual man," the great French photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson told Life magazine in 1963. "I watch, watch watch. I understand things through my eyes." A successful photograph, Cartier-Bresson said, required the alignment of the head, heart and eye.

I believe there’s a video interview of him expressing this sentiment somewhere on the internet.
 
Probably the latter - technology getting in the way I would say.

I
Love how compact the camera and lens are. No excuse for not carrying it.
 
If CB were just starting out today, what kind of gear do you think he would be using?
I love this thought-game. Something very discreet, pocketable, quick. He used his camera as a sketchpad. Probably something like the Ricoh GR series. Certainly digital - HCB wasn't fond of darkroom work.
 
I don't think technology is a hindrance. Lots of photographers are doing great work right now, with contemporary equipment, even on the mold of HCB's style. But the diminutiveness of the early Leicas was certainly a big plus in the hands of Cattier-Bresson. They provided for agility and stealthiness, where it was needed. His most astounding piece of work was done in these early days with a similar (this?) camera. The photographs from Spain and Mexico are top notch a hundred years later. He had a vision, sure, tremendous talent too. But people were much more open, or even indifferent in being photographed. We are much more aware and defensive now. Then again, the ground rules of that type of photographing have been laid down for us. So, it's a bit harder -- and easier at the same time.
 
Some good observations and anecdotes in this thread on HCB's approach:
 
This is the basis for all photo forums!
I can't agree more!!
I love this thought-game. Something very discreet, pocketable, quick. He used his camera as a sketchpad. Probably something like the Ricoh GR series. Certainly digital -
He is not one of us perhaps.

I don't think technology is a hindrance. Lots of photographers are doing great work right now, with contemporary equipment, even on the mold of HCB's style. But the diminutiveness of the early Leicas was certainly a big plus in the hands of Cattier-Bresson. They provided for agility and stealthiness, where it was needed. His most astounding piece of work was done in these early days with a similar (this?) camera. The photographs from Spain and Mexico are top notch a hundred years later. He had a vision, sure, tremendous talent too. But people were much more open, or even indifferent in being photographed. We are much more aware and defensive now. Then again, the ground rules of that type of photographing have been laid down for us. So, it's a bit harder -- and easier at the same time.
You got certain points too. The photography aspect of the environments are changed a lot. It is the evolution in our living styles that has changed so that we have to overcome many defensiveness and aware ness in the public. Also we have laid some ethic of crossing the lines to put cameras against public faces. Many boundaries and rules to cross lines in concerning the public privacy. It is harder than the the post war time when CB did his documentary. But still in my openion we have many more opportunities to replicate many of his concept to copy his "Humanitarian photography " in lot of ways.

I think 50mm is the ideal lens to get more closer photo to match with our eye sight as the standard. The more closer we approach the more broad vision we get. That is the best way to ZOOM IN...WHICH I like.
 
HCB did use the 50mm! In Japan, due to closeness and crowds, may images done with 35mm. Ernst Haas. I too preferred the 50mm but often must use 35mm. I still use my Pentax Spotmatic !
 
He had a very strong personal style. The composition of his photographs is inspired by the paintings he liked. He composed always in the same frame, 2:3. His camera was like a sketch book. He foresaw the moment when by the movement of the subject the composition was best. He pressed the button when that moment was there.

Erik.
 
Last edited:
William-klien.jpg
Many a time, photographers had something called "a style" and they are the outcome of what they shot continually and when they looked at their work of many years they found a similarity of a pattern continued through their ( body of work or bunch of shooting ) so they named that selection as a series. So that pattern or the similarity well spoke of their tools they used. So CB had used different cameras and his series photos has different focal points too. Whatever it is, C-Bressons opened his vision by introducing his work to the public in his time period. I love his major books. I am sure he did a beautiful job to influence his type of photography and love his " decisive moments" in environment photo portraits.

So as the other master photographers had different tools too. This is one of my favourite sneaked snap of William Klein In Paris.
But his photography is phenomenal and his vision is unique.He only used wide angles 35mm to 21MM lens. Also He only used SLR and never used a RF. This is a proof to say any lens or gear is one's personal choice but that is always the base of ons's own vision. You can copy or replicate/ by moddling some skills or styles.
Ralph Gibson is Another famous master photographer who only used 50mm Leica and used a different composing
I really appreciate the work of many many masters. I always had many things to learn from them.

This photo is done with a 50mm Leica Summicron. This is also an interesting photos to show how many of known photographers did their work, and what tools they mostly used. Of course my posting may looks annoying or sounds like BS to some others but please bare up with it as they are my own personal experience and knowledge. They are completely personal to me. but I always open for others ideas too.
 
Last edited:
L1038170-copy.jpg
French Postal stamp series of the dedication for photography masters in France.
Seems the known favourite iconic lens has chosen to make the excellence in their work.
 
20130524_5530-copy.jpg
My souvenir from Martine Franck ( H Cartier-Bressons wife ) Autographed to me when she did exhibited her work in MEP photo gallery in Paris before she passed away. It is sad to going that moment.
 
Back
Top