msendin
Member
I think it could be interesting to know how many of us have had any problem with our new M8 that needed service under warranty or change by our dealer.
So the answers are simple:
- No, my M8 never needed to be sent to service or substituded.
- Yes I had to send my M8 once to sevice under warranty or was changed once by my dealer.
- Yes I had to send twice or more times my M8 to service under warranty or had to be changed more than once by my dealer.
Of course service because drop or damage is not the subject of this poll.
So the answers are simple:
- No, my M8 never needed to be sent to service or substituded.
- Yes I had to send my M8 once to sevice under warranty or was changed once by my dealer.
- Yes I had to send twice or more times my M8 to service under warranty or had to be changed more than once by my dealer.
Of course service because drop or damage is not the subject of this poll.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
A bit doubtful about this kind of poll. It tends to create a huge silent majority.
J. Borger
Well-known
Agree ..... i belong to the silent majority BTW.......jaapv said:
palker
Established
Like any statistic .. can be read any which way you want ..
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
And this one has the risk of attracting trolling.....
Avotius
Some guy
oh to hell with it, im interested as a prospective buyer in seeing some things other then "oh my f'ing m8 has so many problems" this or that, bring on the poll, there are enough trolls around anyway.
spysmart
Established
Don't want to be accused of being a troll, but all the M8 issues did permanently put me off buying one. I've a pair of M6s and a full suite of fast ASPH M lenses, but with price rises, IR filters and Leica talking confidently about a M9 with full frame, I'm prepared to wait another year.
Conversely I felt I could trust Olympus even with first batch. So as a compliment to M series, I gave in and bought a E3 and 25 f/1.4 + 7-14. The E-3 certainly seems to right first time.
The E3 was a make or break camera for them in the pro/prosumer market - the M9 will have similar expectations. So I hope lessons learnt will ensure, a perhaps late, but full debugged M9.
Conversely I felt I could trust Olympus even with first batch. So as a compliment to M series, I gave in and bought a E3 and 25 f/1.4 + 7-14. The E-3 certainly seems to right first time.
The E3 was a make or break camera for them in the pro/prosumer market - the M9 will have similar expectations. So I hope lessons learnt will ensure, a perhaps late, but full debugged M9.
chuckcars
Member
What a waste of time. Who cares?
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
spysmart said:
Not that is interesting - where did you hear/see that? It would be a sensation in the Leica world.
spysmart said:
I have a feeling you should give up reading internetforums....
spysmart
Established
jaapv said:
In German : http://www.welt.de/welt_print/article1418788/Drei-Stufen-Plan_fuer_Leica.html
or via google translate: http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welt.de%2Fwelt_print%2Farticle1418788%2FDrei-Stufen-Plan_fuer_Leica.html&langpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8
"Thus far been known to work meticulously to developers primarily on three innovations. First, there will be M9 viewfinder camera with a full-size sensor. That brings the highest picture quality. Moreover, a R10-Spiegelreflexkamera with übergroßem chip and autofocus in the works - a new complex to the closure and the lenses. And finally, should provide a kind of "small" digital M on the market."
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
spysmart said:
Deutsch sollte kein Problem sein - You are the first to pick this one up. They don't give a source - it may be that they are repeating internet rumours.
The original text is a lot more careful than the Google translation. It does not say " there will be a..." but "there is supposed to be.." which sounds a considerably different. Nor does it say " Thus far....innovations" That translates better as: " As far as known up till now the developers are fiddling primarily with three innovations. On one hand there is supposed to be an M9 rangefindercamera with full-frame sensor. That makes for maximum image quality. Further they are working on a R10 DSLR with an extra large chip and autofocus, a complicated development, especially the shutter and the lenses. And finally there is the possiblity that some kind of " small" digital M should come on the market."
It sums up what we find on LUF but tells us nothing about actual developments, as "The company tells us little about the future model lineup".....
But it would be good for Leica.However, sales would probably never approach the M8. I would expect a price around the 10.000 $.
Last edited:
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
Unfortunatly my M8 will be travelling back to solms,
All my images have a nice blue line of F*cked up pixels.
I also suffer from my camera freezing and the shutter not activating and I have to remove the battery and cross my fingers every time.
It also has a habit of going to sleep and not waking up.
All my images have a nice blue line of F*cked up pixels.
I also suffer from my camera freezing and the shutter not activating and I have to remove the battery and cross my fingers every time.
It also has a habit of going to sleep and not waking up.
Olsen
Well-known
cmogi10 said:
This sounds bad. I havn't had any problems. So far. After about 9 months of use. But I use mine very little. May be I have had 1000 exposures so far. And you? How heavy have you been using yours?
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
I used mine really heavy for a while, I'm not sure the exact number of exposures. These past 2 months or so it hasn't seen a lot of use but it's never sat on the shelf for more then a day.
Olsen
Well-known
I fully agree with you.jaapv said:
The German text sounds more like an suggestion or speculation, on the writer/journalist's part. It surely isn't an official Leica statement. Further; a full frame M9 is an impossible technical proposition today. And for the foreseeable future.
Strong rumors talk of a CLM sort of digital solution. With a 1,5 crop sensor and a affordable price tag. Sounds a lot more realistic.
Photon42
burn the box
cmogi10 said:
You can extract it from the "image unique" tag in the files. It's hexadecimal. In case you run an OSX Mac and got exiftool:
bla=$(exiftool myfile.jpg | grep -i "image unique" | awk ' { print $5} ') && echo "ibase = 16
$bla" | bc
Thud
Established
How many times do some of you need to dig up the same dirt. Think of something unique........:bang:
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
The post before yours was from the 6th of January....
bottley1
only to feel
70% of the 122 so far to have contributed to the poll have never had a problem with their camera, surely that says something?
carylwithay
Newbie
My M8 died last Jan and had to be sent back to be overhauled. It took 2 months. My tri-elmar lens also had a problem. It loosened up so that i could not change F stops. That repair took months also. Everything seems to be fine now.
Caryl
Caryl