Freakscene
Obscure member
Ooops. But apt!Lower mud tones - perfect
agentlossing
Well-known
Do you have an example of an edited file with this pattern? I'm not sure I've run into it at all.With the Pentax you’ll never see the pattern noise unless you go crazy with the manipulations. With a Leica Monochrom you run into them much more quickly, which was why I generally accept the tonality and let my photos have darker shadows and lower mud tones than I’d like.
Marty
Freakscene
Obscure member
Do you have an example of an edited file with this pattern? I'm not sure I've run into it at all.
From ISO 204800 you can easily see it in the background. I use this example because it’s from Ricoh. I emphasize again that the pattern noise is much less obvious than in the Leica Monochroms.
Last edited:
agentlossing
Well-known
From ISO 204800 you can easily see it in the background. I use this example because it’s from Ricoh. I emphasize again that the pattern noise is much less obvious than in the Leica Monochroms.
Is it visible at 100%? I wonder how possible it is that this might just be an artifact of downsizing. Digital files get really weird with lots of noise speckles, especially ones as high-contrast as those from monochrome sensors.
Freakscene
Obscure member
Yes, it’s not resizing or lens corrections. It is most apparent in uncorrected raw files at 100%. I think it’s just what happens when signals from sensors get interpreted.Is it visible at 100%? I wonder how possible it is that this might just be an artifact of downsizing. Digital files get really weird with lots of noise speckles, especially ones as high-contrast as those from monochrome sensors.
vitaly66
slightly tilted
sojournerphoto
Mentor
Don’t suppose anyone has used the 16-50 to compare with the 20-40?
Just asking for a friend…
Reinvention
Member
Rockin' photo!
agentlossing
Well-known
vitaly66
slightly tilted
Freakscene
Obscure member
It’s interesting; the ZK lenses have very different tonality to the Pentax lenses.
vitaly66
slightly tilted
For sure, the distagon shows a tonal response/character that's quite different from the Pentax lenses -- I'm still on the learning curve with it.It’s interesting; the ZK lenses have very different tonality to the Pentax lenses.
vitaly66
slightly tilted
Freakscene
Obscure member
And you got the ZK 35mm in addition to the 25mm!For sure, the distagon shows a tonal response/character that's quite different from the Pentax lenses -- I'm still on the learning curve with it.
sojournerphoto
Mentor
The Zeiss 2/35 Distagon is a lovely lens. I had one in canon mount years ago and would love to find one in Nikon, or Pentax, mount
vitaly66
slightly tilted
agentlossing
Well-known
Oregon State Hospital is pretty terrifying all around.
vitaly66
slightly tilted
Zuiko-logist
Well-known
Care to elaborate on the differences?The Zeiss 2/35 Distagon is a lovely lens. I had one in canon mount years ago and would love to find one in Nikon, or Pentax, mount
sojournerphoto
Mentor
The only difference is the mount - I no longer have any Canon EF mount bodies, but the lens is available in Nikon F and Pentax K mounts. The lens is one of those Zeiss lenses that, when you get it right, has real pop and punchy sublime colour. The out of focus is smooth and not distracting - just gets out of the way leaving focus on the subject.Care to elaborate on the differences?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.