boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
There have been lots of predictions of what the Pixii can or cannot do, what it will or will not do. Included features have been criticized and ridiculed, until they have turned up on other cameras where they also work well. So suggesting what the Max will do or will not do is dangerous. The A2572 image quality is quite good as well as its color. Pixii is justifying its place in the market. And its trick of being able to do RAW color and RAW mono has been criticized and ridiculed but here it is and it is working. RAW mono or color in the same camera. The concept of being able to upgrade your camera without having to buy a new one is a refreshing idea.
So while there were a lot of folks who said it cannot be they are now more quiet. Pixii is novel, quality and it works.
I have a number for my upgrade to the Max and it will be done, hopefully, in September. If not in October. It will be done and I will move from APS-C to Full Frame in the same Pixii box. And those M body lenses will now all be what they say they are. ;o) I will post images as soon as I have some.
So while there were a lot of folks who said it cannot be they are now more quiet. Pixii is novel, quality and it works.
I have a number for my upgrade to the Max and it will be done, hopefully, in September. If not in October. It will be done and I will move from APS-C to Full Frame in the same Pixii box. And those M body lenses will now all be what they say they are. ;o) I will post images as soon as I have some.
agentlossing
Well-known
I haven't listened to this episode yet, having subscribed to the podcast after your post and am on episode #4Not sure if this has been mentioned previously in this thread, but David Barth appeared recently on a podcast that I listen to: Prime Lenses Episode 13 - David Barth — Iain Farrell.
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Thanks for mentioning Prime Lenses ... I was looking for another "talk podcast" and I'm enjoying the first episode now.Not sure if this has been mentioned previously in this thread, but David Barth appeared recently on a podcast that I listen to: Prime Lenses Episode 13 - David Barth — Iain Farrell.
G
Disappointed_Horse
Well-known
You’re quite welcome!Thanks for mentioning Prime Lenses ... I was looking for another "talk podcast" and I'm enjoying the first episode now.
G
Disappointed_Horse
Well-known
Glad you’re enjoying it.I haven't listened to this episode yet, having subscribed to the podcast after your post and am on episode #4![]()
Maximilian
Established
I am very into photography, but haven’t been keeping up to date with cameras in the past few years. I never knew about Pixii cameras until I somehow stumbled across them somewhere on the Internet a couple days ago. Very cool! Been in full research mode since!
I just took the plunge and pre-ordered the new Max. I realize I’m rolling the dice a bit here, but I’m very excited about it! Hope to have something to share when I eventually receive it.
I just took the plunge and pre-ordered the new Max. I realize I’m rolling the dice a bit here, but I’m very excited about it! Hope to have something to share when I eventually receive it.
boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
I am very into photography, but haven’t been keeping up to date with cameras in the past few years. I never knew about Pixii cameras until I somehow stumbled across them somewhere on the Internet a couple days ago. Very cool! Been in full research mode since!
I just took the plunge and pre-ordered the new Max. I realize I’m rolling the dice a bit here, but I’m very excited about it! Hope to have something to share when I eventually receive it.![]()
FWIW, I'm a bit of a PIxii fanboy. I have been using the camera for a few years now. I got it initially as the A1571, got it upgraded to the A2572, got the + upgrade but never got around to sending it in for the upgrade and am now awaiting my call to send the A2572 in for the + and the Max upgrade.
I like the images the camera offers, mono and color. I do not like the shutter button but otherwise it is a good camera. And I am an ardent Francophile so that helps their case, too. There is a Pixii group on FB that is fun so you might want to swing by there and see what is happening.
Cheers
Last edited:
sojournerphoto
Veteran
FWIW, I'm a but of a PIxii fanboy. I have been using the camera for a few years now. I got it initially as the A1571, got it upgraded to the A2572, got the + upgrade but never got around to sending it in for the upgrade and am now awaiting my call to send the A2572 in for the + and the Max upgrade.
I like the images the camera offers, mono and color. I do not like the shutter button but otherwise it is a good camera. And I am an ardent Francophile so that helps their case, too. There is a Pixii group on FB that is fun so you might want to swing by there and see what is happening.
Cheers
You are a great salesman for Pixxi and I am delighted by their success to date. I haven’t succumbed but it’s not for a lack of enthusiasm about their product and willingness to take the risk of building it.
boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
You are a great salesman for Pixxi and I am delighted by their success to date. I haven’t succumbed but it’s not for a lack of enthusiasm about their product and willingness to take the risk of building it.
I am honestly quite fond of the camera for a few reasons. One of those reasons is the image. Here are Pixii images. I post them not a good photos but as examples of how the camera sees:


Last edited:
ranger9
Well-known
FYI, Pixii Max live shooting demo here:
And to address the most controversial point so far: no, the video does NOT actually call Leica M users "Farquaads"... it just notes that when using an M in public, you may LOOK like one (meaning, of course, Lord Farquaad, the aristocratic character in "Shrek" who enjoys displaying his wealth...)
And to address the most controversial point so far: no, the video does NOT actually call Leica M users "Farquaads"... it just notes that when using an M in public, you may LOOK like one (meaning, of course, Lord Farquaad, the aristocratic character in "Shrek" who enjoys displaying his wealth...)
Charles2
Newbie
Seems to me that lots of his shots of still scenes are out of focus. After all the time he's been doing Pixii fanboy videos. Sets a bar for potential new rangefinder-ites.FYI, Pixii Max live shooting demo here:
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
I wonder how often issue with LED lights appears in personal use, while taking family, frends, museum, subway and so on pictures.
boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
I wonder how often issue with LED lights appears in personal use, while taking family, frends, museum, subway and so on pictures.
No need to wonder. It depends on shutter speed. IIRC <1/60 and no banding. Understand, you are under no obligation to buy one. Are you in the market for one and this is the stumbling block?
Freakscene
Obscure member
When I tried one, too often for me. There was banding under a lot of kinds of artificial light.I wonder how often issue with LED lights appears in personal use, while taking family, frends, museum, subway and so on pictures.
Charles2
Newbie
I use a Hasselblad X1Dii with electronic shutter for adapted M-mount lenses. The shutter readout time is 300 ms! But shots ruined by artificial lights are rare for me. But it's good that I don't try to photograph the vehicle sideshows on the streets of my city.I wonder how often issue with LED lights appears in personal use, while taking family, frends, museum, subway and so on pictures.
boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
When I tried one, too often for me. There was banding under a lot of kinds of artificial light.
Not incandescent or fluorescent. LED's will confound the electronic shutter. When I have the MAX I will see how that one works. They need to find a solution for this problem. OTOH, I do not shoot a lot under LED's. Nothing actually. This is a Pixii problem though.
Coldkennels
Barnack-toting Brit.
This is an electronic shutter issue shared by all cameras with electronic shutters. I learned it the hard way when playing with various Fuji X bodies. Any artificial light source? Make sure you're on mechanical. I even spotted it yesterday while playing with the M240's live view in my living room - noticeable "ripples" across the LCD.They need to find a solution for this problem. [...] This is a Pixii problem though.
Here in the UK, there's LCD lighting everywhere. Electronic shutter is a liability, sadly.
sojournerphoto
Veteran
I could be in the market to buy one - I’m delighted there is an alternative to Leica and applaud and like to support people trying new and brave things. The LED banding would be an issue for me if it was an only camera - what use is more important than pics of family and friends. All our lighting is now led.No need to wonder. It depends on shutter speed. IIRC <1/60 and no banding. Understand, you are under no obligation to buy one. Are you in the market for one and this is the stumbling block?
I’m really pleased that Pixxi exists.
boojum
Ignoble Miscreant
I get the banding at > 1/60. I do not shoot indoors with it. I have to send it back to France for the upgrade to Max. To be honest no camera is perfect. But this camera does just fine other than around LED's at 1/60 or greater. I am aware of this flaw and just live with it.
I get the same banding with the electronic shutter on another camera but it is OK with the leaf shutter, of course.
I get the same banding with the electronic shutter on another camera but it is OK with the leaf shutter, of course.
Freakscene
Obscure member
Fluorescent especially. The lights flicker at 50hz (here, or the frequency of your electricity wherever you are).Not incandescent or fluorescent. LED's will confound the electronic shutter. When I have the MAX I will see how that one works. They need to find a solution for this problem. OTOH, I do not shoot a lot under LED's. Nothing actually. This is a Pixii problem though.
Last edited:
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.