Einstein
Established
Well I have decided to take the plunge on a full conversion update on this camera. An extremely awkward machine to hold but I simply can not resist the desire to see a negative from this beast in the flesh. It will be fun to do a test comparison with my 6x9 Zeiss Opton Super Ikonta. Tripods compulsive……..
mothertrucker
Well-known
Dan Daniels converted mine. I actually have no problem with the camera shape personally. I carry it in the bottom half of the case, which gives it a little grip and doesn’t add much bulk.
Einstein
Established
Yes, I have Dan working on mine as well. I am intending to use it for black and white that I process and wet print myself. I have a UV filter but will want to find a yellow and lens hood for her.
Are you impressed with the image quality of the Kodak lens, some of the examples I have seen are simply astounding ???
Are you impressed with the image quality of the Kodak lens, some of the examples I have seen are simply astounding ???
peefeeniz
Never Again
I had one of the last Ken Ruth converted. The lenses are from the height of Kodak's powers, post WWII, when they were the highest quality optical company (left) in the world. This carried them into the 60s. Unlike modern medium format Zeiss/Mamiya you're getting a really smooth yet sharp rendition that still has a nice pop. The 1950s Commercial Ektars were great (shutters, not so much).
It's really a study in reverse ergonomics, making the camera as clumsy and awkward as possible. When you press the shutter you are pushing a lever attached to a pivoting ball head (your hand) and need to keep shutter speeds higher than normal lest you get shake. The magnified rangefinder is amazing if you can sight what it is centered on.
Personally I think it was the German emigres who formulated and ground the glass while some diesel mechanics did the body.
Have fun. Sometimes I like making photography more difficult but not all the time ;-p
It's really a study in reverse ergonomics, making the camera as clumsy and awkward as possible. When you press the shutter you are pushing a lever attached to a pivoting ball head (your hand) and need to keep shutter speeds higher than normal lest you get shake. The magnified rangefinder is amazing if you can sight what it is centered on.
Personally I think it was the German emigres who formulated and ground the glass while some diesel mechanics did the body.
Have fun. Sometimes I like making photography more difficult but not all the time ;-p
Moto-Uno
Moto-Uno
Had one for a few years , picture quality is hard to improve on
! Bought a few modified rolls from Blue Moon machine ( excellent work)
and simply rerolled my own afterwards . You had to wonder if the person(s) who designed it ever used it ? Peter
and simply rerolled my own afterwards . You had to wonder if the person(s) who designed it ever used it ? Peter
mothertrucker
Well-known
OlivierAOP
medium format
I've had GAS for the Medalist for a while, but I'm turned off by the 620 film plus I have a GW690. But it's such a fine camera.
dfranklin
Established
I got my Medalist II, converted to 120, from Dan Daniels. I love the camera. Gorgeous lens.
Einstein
Established
After seeing the article from Rockwell it became obvious to me that I had to get one of these cameras. The images in the article are absolutely MAGNIFICENT.
Pál_K
Cameras. I has it.
After seeing the article from Rockwell it became obvious to me that I had to get one of these cameras. The images in the article are absolutely MAGNIFICENT.
I hadn’t seen his review of the Medalist before. Ken really does a good job of photographing cameras and lenses. His reviews and photos of older equipment is what attracted me to his site long ago.
furcafe
Mentor
I also have a Medalist II that was converted to 120 by Ken Ruth (Photography on Bald Mountain). I hadn't heard of Dan Daniels before seeing this thread, but I'm happy to learn that other techs are still working on them & doing conversions.
sooner
Well-known
Just FYI, Dan Daniels also converts Kodak Chevron cameras. Maybe not considered on a par with the Medalist, but still a lovely camera that I've been tempted by.
Einstein
Established
Well Dan has just given me a price of $400 to service and convert the camera. I told him I want to recover it and he suggested Griptac as it is thinner than other coverings. Apparently regular coverings do not go on the back cover properly. I have Griptacon my Zeiss Super Ikonta and the stuff is brilliant for holding an odd shaped camera.
Got a yellow filter and a lens hood for a mere $12 all I need now is a decent leather case for it, but I am not holding my breath on that find.
So after a $50 purchase price and this for $462 I should have a super taker of Black and White negatives in my collection.
Got a yellow filter and a lens hood for a mere $12 all I need now is a decent leather case for it, but I am not holding my breath on that find.
So after a $50 purchase price and this for $462 I should have a super taker of Black and White negatives in my collection.
peefeeniz
Never Again
Laura Gilpin used a Medalist for her later career. For those unfamiliar she was a West Coast f/64 Ansel Adams - Edward Weston adjacent female photographer who was at least equal to her better known peers. Personally I hold her in higher regard as she had a harder row to hoe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Gilpin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Gilpin
TheFlyingCamera
Well-known
Just FYI, Dan Daniels also converts Kodak Chevron cameras. Maybe not considered on a par with the Medalist, but still a lovely camera that I've been tempted by.
Between this thread and another over on Photrio, I was convinced to give a Chevron a try. TBH, it's so good it is making me question my Rolleiflex 2.8E. I'm not going to give up the Rollei, ever, because it is a very special camera, but hoo boy, the lens on that Chevron is just tack sharp, and the transition from in focus to out of focus is smooth like butter, as are the out of focus areas. About my only beefs with it are the manual cocking shutter and the no automatic double-exposure prevention. I just had mine CLA'd here in DC at ProPhoto, and they made the camera feel like new in operation.
neal3k
Well-known
My Medalist II is working great for me. I've only had it a short time but have shot about 5 rolls so far. I find it quite easy to respool from 120 to 620 and wouldn't consider paying to have the camera converted to 120. It takes me about 1 minute per roll.
sooner
Well-known
I also have a converted Medalist II. I love the quality of the lens and just overall metal/mechanical beauty of it, but the shape is a bit awkward and I find the shutter button requires a bit of force to actuate, so I'm always worried about camera shake. I'd love to hear more about the Chevron, especially as the online reviews are decidedly mixed.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.