Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Rangefinder Forum > RFF Polls

View Poll Results: Would you consider participating in an RFF classic RF rental scheme?
Yes, I'd definitely be interested. 3 10.71%
I might be interested. 7 25.00%
Probably would not be interested. 11 39.29%
No way would I participate in such a nutty idea. 7 25.00%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Classic RF rental - would it work?
Old 02-07-2007   #1
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,239
Classic RF rental - would it work?

I tossed off this idea in response to a reply to my classified ad -- but then I got to thinking, "Maybe it's not such a crazy idea..."

Here's the concept. Probably many of us have RF cameras that we don't use very often. Also, probably most of us have a mental "wish list" of cameras we'd like to try -- but not necessarily spend the money to buy.

So, what if we set up a system on RFF where people could rent out their seldom-used RFs to other people who wanted to try them?

Just sketching out the idea, I imagine it might work like this:

-- Participants would have to be registered RFF members.

-- Rentors ("cameralords"?) would list what they have available, its full value, the deposit amount (I'm thinking maybe 1/3 the full value?) and the rental amount.

-- If I've got a camera you'd like to rent, you contact me and we set up a transaction: you send me the deposit, rental amount, and shipping amount via PayPal; I ship the camera to you via insured post.

-- If Something Bad happens to the camera while it's in your custody, you PayPal me the balance of the full value.

-- Otherwise, at the end of the rental term, you ship the camera back to me via insured post and I refund your deposit via PayPal.

-- People who abuse the system get ruthlessly exposed and excoriated on the RFF "rental forum."

This idea might sound risky to some people -- but when you think about it, it doesn't really seem any riskier than sellling or buying a camera from an online classified or eBay. (If anything, it's less risky, since the amounts involved typically would be smaller.)

So what do you think? Is this nuts, or might it be fun and useful?
__________________
"Never trust a graph without error bars."
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #2
erikhaugsby
killer of threads
 
erikhaugsby's Avatar
 
erikhaugsby is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Innsbruck
Age: 30
Posts: 1,894
Hey, as long as there is some form of standardized rental fees and shipping methodology I'd be more than supportive.
__________________
Hello World
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #3
Kim Coxon
Moderator
 
Kim Coxon's Avatar
 
Kim Coxon is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 3,363
I don't think I would take part in a "camera rental" scheme. Not against the idea but just not that interested.

However, what I would find very interesting would be a lens "swap" scheme. It could be a good way to try different lenses and the "swap" would get rid of all the problems of deposits, Paypal etc.

Kim
__________________
Hakuna Matata
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #4
Al Patterson
Ferroequinologist
 
Al Patterson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbus GA USA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,737
Seeing that some folks around here appear to buy and sell every few months, one could argue that this site is ALREADY a classic RF rental outfit...
__________________
Al Patterson

Canon QL17 GIII
Leica CL 40mm Summicron-C 50mm Hexanon
Yashica Electro 35 GSN
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #5
bobkonos
Registered User
 
bobkonos's Avatar
 
bobkonos is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Age: 65
Posts: 1,077
Funny, I thought about this the other day. One reservation/concern I have is the handler in between the loaner and the renter, i.e., the shippers. The odds of something being lost or damaged may be low but it does happen, and if it happened to one of my cameras I would not be happy. This is different than shipping with an eBay sale or purchase: if you sold something and a shipping problem occurred, then, well, you wanted to get rid of it any way and you'd work out a settlement. If a shipping problem happened on something you bought, well, you never had it anyway and a settlement would be worked out (I am scary near this predicament right now). But if you've owned something for awhile, and you lost it in a rental situation, well, that's disheartening...just because I do not use a camera much does not mean I do not enjoy owning it and seeing it and using it if even occasionally. There is an emotional tie. Thoughts?
__________________
I have a thing for trigger winders!

My b&w Flickr

My color Flickr

Mechanical cameras and lenses
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #6
arbib
Registered User
 
arbib's Avatar
 
arbib is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Indiana - USA
Age: 65
Posts: 510
The real only down side has been mentioned. A lot of OLD Classic gear that may or may or may not work with next roll. AND how about insurance for loss damage?

Most Photography Stores that rent, require a FULL Price Deposit + daily fee.

But this may blossom into a workable deal.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #7
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,404
I think it's a good idea but the stress of coveted gear being in transit at someone elses whim may be too much for some of us. Within countries it could work but country to country would rule it out for me! Oz is a long way from anywhere!
__________________
---------------------------
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #8
VinceC
Registered User
 
VinceC's Avatar
 
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,925
I think the only way it will work is if the refundable deposit is the full replacement value of the camera, plus 25 percent. Otherwise it gets too stressful.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery

Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a

Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #9
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 55
Posts: 5,259
I think I like Kim's swap idea best - if you're holding one of mine then I'm holding one of yours. Cameras or lenses. That's the only workable system I can see.

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #10
AusDLK
Famous Photographer
 
AusDLK's Avatar
 
AusDLK is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 993
Sounds too risky to me.

Mainly, I wouldn't want to risk something happening, even only minor wear-and-tear, to something I own during the rental period, so I would very unlikely to ever offer up anything for rental.

Being a renter seems less risky but frankly if I want to try something out, I just find someone selling whatever it is (like Gid's Bronica RF645 and two lenses) and just buy it. If I don't like it, I just flip it -- this is usually close to a break-even deal everything I go for it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-07-2007   #11
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
 
rbiemer's Avatar
 
rbiemer is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cortland, NY
Age: 58
Posts: 4,924
I like the idea but don't think I'd want to play. My worry would be as a renter--I do take good care of the gear I use but still sometimes things break. I would be too worried about that happening to some one else's beloved gear. And that would inhibit how I would use it.
If I lived somewhere that there was a camera rental store, that would be a different scenario: I doubt the commercial places have any emotional investment in the gear they rent.
I would love to do it if the gear came from a commercial establishment but not if it's some individual's prized classic RF.
Not a bad idea, but, in my opinion, fraught with danger.
Rob
__________________

You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
--Mark Twain
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2007   #12
Ash
Selflessly Self-involved
 
Ash is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,196
In theory it's great. In practice it will get messy.

I'd prefer to meet up with other RFF members personally (on a group meet) and get my grubby mitts all over other's equipment that way. I wouldn't mind taking other stuff along for others to try out for the few hours too, but to be honest I get a sick feeling in my stomach everytime I see someone touch a camera I own.

Blame my upbringing, but slippery fingers guys....
__________________
www.nps160.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2007   #13
shutterfiend
cheap and lazy
 
shutterfiend is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 173
I checked "No way..." only because I don't want to end up behind bars for stealing a 50 year old "junk".
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-08-2007   #14
RML
Just live it.
 
RML's Avatar
 
RML is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Holland or Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Age: 48
Posts: 4,795
How about insurance? 1/3 deposit of the value is only 33%. If the camera breaks, and it might, who is going to cough up the rest of the dough? Besides, who will appreciate the camera before it gets rented out? I think this is fraught with danger. I can't bear the loss of 2/3s of my Bessa R, M2 or (heaven forbid) my R-D1. And my insurance company won't take kindly to my renting out a camera to a stranger (perhaps even abroad) and then knocking on their door for money because the camera got broken (accidentally, because of age, in a raging fit, etc).
__________________
My photo blog

Join the Rangefinder Blog/Site Ring.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Summing up- and a Decision jaapv Leica M9 / ME 107 01-12-2007 16:37
Mamiya 7 RF alignment trev2401 120 / 220 film RF's 0 12-13-2006 15:08
Photo Mythbusters - Does R-D 1 RF patch move in the frame? jlw Epson R-D1 Leica M mount Digital Rangefinder 6 08-08-2006 04:39
Fast or compact lenses, the RF way fitzihardwurshd Rangefinder Photography Discussion 56 07-07-2006 09:03
Another Classic Camera Contest Gordon Coale Rangefinder Photography Discussion 12 03-24-2005 08:08



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.