Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > Olympus RF

Olympus RF This forum is for the Olympus rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Notes to self: VERY low light focusing
Old 10-29-2006   #1
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 8,253
Notes to self: VERY low light focusing

Tonight I went to the monthly jam at Johnny's Irish Pub here in Rochester. Tons of fun, and this time I got chummy with some of the regulars, etc. I had Tri-X in an Oly 35SP, a 35LC, and Fuji Superia Xtra 800 in an XA. Metering with a handheld meter and rating the Tri-X at 12800 a la merciful, I was shooting at f2.8 1/30s. The XA has no underexposure override, so wide open the exposure would be 1/4 @ f2.8. We'll see how things fared!

Anyway, some mental notes about the three cameras...

The SP is the easiest to focus in such dim conditions. With effort you can see the patch and be pretty sure of focusing. The LC is not nearly as good (at least my sample) and the viewfinder is dimmer. With a LOT of effort I could sometimes be fairly certain of my focus, but I'm not hopeful.

The XA patch was pretty much invisible. Only when focusing on some neon lights in a far window, or on the leg of a white folding chair, could I even begin to get a focus confirmation.

Between the LC and the SP, the LC has the better/quieter shutter noise. I believe Rich Silfver has mentioned this too. The XA is perhaps as quiet as the LC, but is a totally different pitch.

Next time I will definitely leave the LC at home. It's a nice shooter, but in this environment, with music and conversation going, a quieter shutter isn't important at all. Since this was the first roll through the LC since I got it back from CLA, it's not a fair test of the camera. A roll of Tri-X at reasonable EI (200) is next up, but I have some exposures left on the current roll.

One other problem I encountered was that with such a low light level, I initially made quite a few exposures at an incorrect shutter speed; I just couldn't see the shutter speed dial on the SP correctly. Next time I'll take one of my AAA Mini Mag lights. DOH! Yeah, I could have turned all the way to 1/500 and clicked back, but I hadn't yet had enough Guiness to think clearly.

Earl
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
And NOW ... Fuji X-Pro1 w/ 18-55, 18/2 & adapted Zuikos and Hexanons
http://zuikoholic.tumblr.com
https://www.instagram.com/e.r.dunbar/
http://weedram.blogspot.com

Last edited by Trius : 10-29-2006 at 18:02.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-29-2006   #2
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,239
Here's an alternative to risking losing a Mini Maglight in an ale-induced fog: Carry one of those little squeeze-type keychain flashlights, the kind that uses a red LED. I got mine as a giveaway at a motor show about three years ago, and it's still going strong. I put the keychain ring around one of my fingers, and wear it with the light part hanging down into my palm. This keeps it handy, and it's small enough not to be in the way when I'm gripping a camera (or beer glass, or whatever.)

The key advantage is that a red light is supposed to preserve your eyes' dark adaptation better than a bright white light.
__________________
"Never trust a graph without error bars."
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-30-2006   #3
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 8,253
jlw: What a great suggestion! I'll seek out a couple of those lights; I know I'll lose at least one!
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
And NOW ... Fuji X-Pro1 w/ 18-55, 18/2 & adapted Zuikos and Hexanons
http://zuikoholic.tumblr.com
https://www.instagram.com/e.r.dunbar/
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-30-2006   #4
Pherdinand
the snow must go on
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: by the river called the Gender
Age: 42
Posts: 7,765
just don;t forget to show us the resulkts
You know, one image tells thousand words.
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-30-2006   #5
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 8,253
I will. The Tri-X will have to be souped (with trepidation) and scanned, so it make take awhile for those, but I'll try to be quick. ;-)

The Superia I can have developed and scanned at my usual place once I finish off the roll.

Earl
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
And NOW ... Fuji X-Pro1 w/ 18-55, 18/2 & adapted Zuikos and Hexanons
http://zuikoholic.tumblr.com
https://www.instagram.com/e.r.dunbar/
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-27-2006   #6
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 8,253
One Tri-x roll was a bust; highlights but no other detail, so I'm sure that my metering was off. A Superia shot (XA), both colour and a b&w conversion, are in my Flickr gallery, but inserted here.





I went again last night, but without Tri-X or a penlight. I had Superia 800 in an SP and 400BW in the LC. I was shooting the SP & 1/2 with some bracket shots at 1 sec(!) and thought the camera was malfunctioning. The shutter speed seemed way too fast. What I finally discovered was that the sound of the shutter closing was so much quieter than the initial opening noise, that I hadn't heard it because of the music. So those shots will be bunged. But once I figured that out, I should be OK except for the normal "too slow to handhold" issues. So this is a case where a shutter was too quiet, at least partially. The LC's shutter opening and closing sounds were at equal volume.

I'll have the films from last night processed later this week.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
And NOW ... Fuji X-Pro1 w/ 18-55, 18/2 & adapted Zuikos and Hexanons
http://zuikoholic.tumblr.com
https://www.instagram.com/e.r.dunbar/
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2006   #7
varjag
Eugene Zaikonnikov
 
varjag's Avatar
 
varjag is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bergen, Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 2,963
Trius, you really need a faster lens there.
__________________
Eugene

My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-30-2006   #8
Abbazz
6x9 and be there!
 
Abbazz's Avatar
 
Abbazz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Karori (Aotearoa)
Posts: 763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trius
The SP is the easiest to focus in such dim conditions. With effort you can see the patch and be pretty sure of focusing. The LC is not nearly as good (at least my sample) and the viewfinder is dimmer. With a LOT of effort I could sometimes be fairly certain of my focus, but I'm not hopeful.

The XA patch was pretty much invisible. Only when focusing on some neon lights in a far window, or on the leg of a white folding chair, could I even begin to get a focus confirmation.
Earl,

For easy focusing in complete darkness, try the "Focuspot" trick (courtesy of Kalart Corp. see this link). It's quite simple: you use the rangefinder the other way round by shining a laser pointer through the eyepiece and adjusting the focus to cause the two red spots projected on your subject to merge. Just make sure not to focus on the eyes of the aforementioned subject

Cheers,

Abbazz
__________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment décisif, et le chef-d'œuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaître et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz

The 6x9 Photography Online Resource

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-30-2006   #9
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 8,253
Eugene: No sh#t! It was with the XA, at largest aperture, f2.8. The Tri-X in the SP and LC (both @ 1.7) wasn't exposed properly, so no results.

Abbazz: Thanks for the tip. I'll check that out. Even with a focus aid like that, the DOF will be very shallow. I'm also going to try the tape on the rangefinder window trick, though that may make the view too dim. I have a few other ideas up my sleeve.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
And NOW ... Fuji X-Pro1 w/ 18-55, 18/2 & adapted Zuikos and Hexanons
http://zuikoholic.tumblr.com
https://www.instagram.com/e.r.dunbar/
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oly 35sp: low light thumb rule ruben Rangefinder Photography Discussion 4 08-13-2007 09:01
Pocketable light Meter for low light situations gustav[] pEña Rangefinder Photography Discussion 3 05-14-2006 08:34
Annoying Zorki-6 light leak AndersG FSU Former Soviet Union RF 4 08-10-2005 13:28
Low Light Focusing / Blurry RF Patch jpmccormac Canon Leica Screw Mount Film Rangefinders 7 12-19-2004 12:13
Canon 50/1.2 in very low light merciful Leica M Film Cameras 16 09-26-2004 04:21



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.