Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > Kodak Retina and Ektra Rangefinders

Kodak Retina and Ektra Rangefinders This forum is for 35mm Kodak Retinas and Ektras rangefinders. The Retinas are known for their German engineering, relatively modest price and superb lenses. The Ektras are known as by far the finest 35mm American made rangefinder ever made.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

This little thing is pretty awesome
Old 04-03-2011   #1
ajmartinez
film is fun
 
ajmartinez is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 13
This little thing is pretty awesome

So, I really only bought my Retina IIa because it looks cool. Then I actually used it and have rethought my whole abandonment of 35mm film (and carrying an Agfa Isolette III as my walk-around camera). The Schneider-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 50/2 is awesomely sharp.

My frame counter is broken, and half the time I forget to manually adjust it which means the end of the roll comes as a complete surprise. I've read that it's easy to destroy the shutter cocking mechanism by attempting to force a tight lever, so I try to take care not to get too happy with it.

Anyway, this is clearly worthless without pics so:



Rail - Velvia 100


Bluebonnets - Velvia 100


Just a couch from my first test roll through the camera (Delta 100 in DD-X)
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2011   #2
Keith
On leave from Gallifrey
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,406
They are a really pretty camera IMO ... I've often thought about getting one!

Nice pics too!
__________________
---------------------------
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2011   #3
Brian Legge
Registered User
 
Brian Legge is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,683
I've had similar rants here. I picked up a IIIc I found at an antique store on the vague recollection someone had good things to say about it. No real expectations going in.

It has since become my go to camera when I want sharp negatives. I almost picked up a IIa since for the smaller size. I occasionally carry the IIIc and a TLR or folder for times where I want to take faster snapshots between large negative shots.
__________________
Shooting whatever I can get my hands on.
Recent Work
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2011   #4
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington NZ
Posts: 5,032
Are these made in the US?
__________________
NO PRAISE
@gavinlagrange
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2011   #5
Todd Frederick
Todd Frederick
 
Todd Frederick's Avatar
 
Todd Frederick is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dos Palos, California
Age: 77
Posts: 214
I think that they were made in Germany.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2011   #6
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington NZ
Posts: 5,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Frederick View Post
I think that they were made in Germany.
Interesting... A pretty little camera for sure!
__________________
NO PRAISE
@gavinlagrange
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2011   #7
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 6,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Frederick View Post
I think that they were made in Germany.
Positive. It was made by Kodak AG, who bought Nagel (of Stuttgart) in 1931.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2011   #8
ajmartinez
film is fun
 
ajmartinez is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevo View Post
Positive. It was made by Kodak AG, who bought Nagel (of Stuttgart) in 1931.
^ What he said!

It's a great little camera. I'm still underwhelmed by the size of a 35mm negative but for the purpose of an 'always on me' camera I can see the benefit of having three times the number of exposure opportunities even if the resulting negatives are roughly a quarter of the size of a 6x6 frame. The coupled rangefinder certainly makes the Kodak better suited for springing quickly into action and yielding sharp, in-focus, images than my Isolette III with its uncoupled rangefinder.
__________________
Blog / Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2011   #9
ajmartinez
film is fun
 
ajmartinez is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 13


Scan of a darkroom print I made from a Tri-X negative (pushed to 1600 in DD-X) taken in my Retina IIa.

This camera has solidified its position as my walk-around camera.
__________________
Blog / Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2011   #10
CNNY
Registered User
 
CNNY's Avatar
 
CNNY is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,426
My IIIc ended up in a drawer at my parents house years ago, but I remember having a lot of fun with it. Folded it becomes a really rugged package, with rounded corners that fits in any pocket. I also always thought the bottom winder on the IIIc was really neat. Not at all awkward.
__________________
instagram and some bits at
otopho on Shapeways
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-05-2011   #11
ajmartinez
film is fun
 
ajmartinez is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 13
It's quite heavy for its size, but I do like how solid it feels. Slips right into a pocket and the lens is very sharp. Does fantastic with both B&W and color films (slide and negative). My counter is broken, and I seldom remember to advance it manual after each shot, so the end of the roll tends to sneak up on me. I usually have a decent idea of when it's coming, but it's been a complete surprise at least twice.
__________________
Blog / Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-05-2011   #12
Kolame
Registered User
 
Kolame is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 173
I've got a Retina Ia here, I like it. But it misses a rangefinder and the 50mm 3.5-lens isn't too fine, either … Maybe I should get another one.
__________________
Some pictures of mine [blog].
Life’s unfair, but think, not always for your disfavour.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-05-2011   #13
crawdiddy
qu'est-ce que c'est?
 
crawdiddy's Avatar
 
crawdiddy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: left of center
Posts: 1,602
I have 4 Retinas. of which only 2 work.

My first Retina was a IIIc. It has the most beautiful lens, but the shutter was flaky. About 80% of the time, the shutter didn't actually open. I found a procedure for fixing the cocking rack, but it didn't work for me. As a result, the shutter now does not fire at all.

That's why I acquired the other 3 Retinas. I have an old Retina I, I believe. It's beautiful, but it has a film transport problem.

Then I have a IIa and a IIc, both of which work very well in all aspects. I admit, I am very careful with the film advance, knowing what I know.

But the Schneider Kreuznach lenses are superb.
__________________
--Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-06-2011   #14
ajmartinez
film is fun
 
ajmartinez is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 13
Indeed, the lenses are great. I'm also quite careful with the film advance having read numerous horror stories. Each time I use it is smooth and deliberate. If there's a hint of hesitation, I stop. Breaking the cocking rack is certainly not on my list of things to do!
__________________
Blog / Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-06-2012   #15
Jack Conrad
Registered User
 
Jack Conrad's Avatar
 
Jack Conrad is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,613
Xenon f2
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-06-2012   #16
ajmartinez
film is fun
 
ajmartinez is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Age: 35
Posts: 13
Yep, I'm a big fan of this camera still. Even bought another 35mm SLR, but I find myself only using the Kodak.

On expired Agfa APX400 pushed to 3200 in DD-X

Around town by Anthony J. Martinez, on Flickr


Around town by Anthony J. Martinez, on Flickr
__________________
Blog / Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2012   #17
rbelyell
Registered User
 
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,341
this is truly a great, historic and underrated line of cameras. even though they bear the kodak name, they were all made in germany, as were the lenses, mostly by schneider-kreuzach and rodenstock.

i have used the 'reflex' series cams, which are interchangeable lens cams where the aperture setting is built into the camera lens housing. the III and IV are split screen focus, the S is a rangefinder, all with metering, the S having it on the camera top which makes it far less convenient than the 'in vf' III and IVs. interestingly the accompanying lenses are almost all interchangeable between the rf S and the slr-like III and IVs, except for some 50/1.9 lenses. what an amazing feature that i have not seen on any other camera system(s).

for those of us who use mirrorless cameras on the digital side take special note that the 'reflex' lenses for the III, IV and S can easily be used to great effect with commonly sold dkl>whatever adapters, which allow for aperture adjustment. i personally have the entire lens set and love how they render on my ep2, actually better rendering than my otherwise excellent zeiss planar contax lenses. while the 135 and 200 really lack contrast, the 35,85,50/1.9&28 are really great, listed in order of IQ quality, imo.

one has to be careful with any camera in this line, folder, rf or slr, because the complex shutter arrangement easily breaks and virtually no one fixes them.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2012   #18
colyn
ישו משיח בנו של אלוהים
 
colyn's Avatar
 
colyn is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CowTown, Texas
Age: 65
Posts: 4,463
This is a fantastic little camera. I have 2 as well as a couple of IIIc's.
__________________
Colyn

The Lone Star State....

Leica M2 | M3 x 2 | IIIa x 2 | IIIc | IIIf black dial | Kodak Retina IIIc | Kodak Retina IIIC |


Flickr

My website

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2012   #19
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS's Avatar
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada, eh.
Age: 61
Posts: 19,408
Everyone needs a retina lla!


__________________
my little website: http://frankfoto.jimdo.com/

photography makes me happy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-25-2012   #20
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
 
rhl-oregon's Avatar
 
rhl-oregon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,879
I concur with Frank. So I got one. Here are a couple from the first roll, taken from a dark interior of a bright late winter day facing west:




__________________
Robert Hill Long
Ferndale California USA


http://rhl.photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2012   #21
optiluks
Registered User
 
optiluks is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Agree with the previous posts. I have a Retina IIa and IIIc (small c), both are fantastic cameras. The IIIc was missing the flip up lid for the meter, so I had to buy a parts camera to get the lid. Little did I know that depending on when the camera was made that the lids are designed differently. My IIIc had a lid catch on the bottom right of the meter bezel, the parts camera lid had the catch on the left side. Luckily the meter was working in the junker, so I was able to swap the entire meter assembly which included the lid.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2012   #22
Pirate
Guitar playing Fotografer
 
Pirate's Avatar
 
Pirate is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Highland, Mi.
Age: 48
Posts: 1,865
I just got a IIa with a bent focusing ring. I rebuilt the rangefinder but have to fabricate a spanner wrench to take out the lens to get to the focusing ring, then I can fix it and put everything back together and calibrate the rangefinder. A lot of work to be done, but I'm loving it - and I'm learning every little bit about rebuilding these things! And this thing has no serial number. I have it apart and can not see one anywhere.

A picture from yesterday:
__________________


Leica II IIIc M3, Mamiya C2, Nikon F, F3P, F5, Hasselblad 500C/M, SW/C, Crown Graphic 4x5, Rollei 3.5F / SLX / Baby Gray, Sinar F and P 4x5, Polaroid 100 & 450 Land, Kodak Retina II and IIa, Fuji GW690II, Graphic View II 4x5.

http://dudewithad700.deviantart.com/
http://arolloffilm.blogspot.com/
My Top 10(12) Best!



  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2012   #23
Chris Sherlock
Registered User
 
Chris Sherlock is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 59
G'day Pirate,
The reason this camera has no serial number is that originally the serial number was stamped on the accessory shoe, which would have been fixed with screws from the inside of the top cover. They were prone to coming adrift. The shoe fitted at the moment came from a later Retina or Retinette, and it looks like it has been fixed with rivets.
Regards, Chris
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-30-2012   #24
Pirate
Guitar playing Fotografer
 
Pirate's Avatar
 
Pirate is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Highland, Mi.
Age: 48
Posts: 1,865
Thanks, Chris, it is indeed fixed with rivets. I was really wondering about that. I might use this as one of my Black Paint models. And you were right about how thin the chrome is. I was using a scotch-brite pad to knock off some gunk on it and it went right through the chrome. Very, very thin.

Chris
__________________


Leica II IIIc M3, Mamiya C2, Nikon F, F3P, F5, Hasselblad 500C/M, SW/C, Crown Graphic 4x5, Rollei 3.5F / SLX / Baby Gray, Sinar F and P 4x5, Polaroid 100 & 450 Land, Kodak Retina II and IIa, Fuji GW690II, Graphic View II 4x5.

http://dudewithad700.deviantart.com/
http://arolloffilm.blogspot.com/
My Top 10(12) Best!



  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.