Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Coffee With Mentors > Tom Abrahamsson of RapidWinder.com

Tom Abrahamsson of RapidWinder.com It is almost never that an inventor improves on a Leica product so that it is better than the original Leica product. Tom holds that distinction with his RapidWinder for Leica M rangefinders -- a bottom mounting baseplate trigger advance. In addition Tom manufacturers other Leica accessories such as his very popular Soft Release and MiniSoftRelease shutter releases. Tom is well known as one of the true Leica rangefinder experts, even by Leica. IMPORTANT READ THIS: CWE Forum hosts have moderation powers within their forum. Please observe copyright laws by not copying and posting their material elsewhere without permission.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 10-17-2009   #81
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,058
Michael,

I think it is better than the screw mount red scale Elmar 50mm f/3.5. It must be recomputed, because it gives no unsharp corners, as all the screw-mount Elmar 50mm's do. But maybe it is only better because of the better build quality.
It is a great little lens, very underrated.

Erik.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-17-2009   #82
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
[quote=mabelsound;1168883]You have 140 IXMOOs?!? No wonder they cost 20 bucks apiece out here in the real world!

Actually I have 200+ IXMOOS - I just got bored loading them and I have to thaw out another XX 400ft can. I have accumulated these over the years as I have always been using them and now and then i still find them in Camera stores junkbins and at Swapmeets. They are getting a bit tricky to find these days and the prices have gone up - unfortunately.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-17-2009   #83
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
Micheal. I will just corroborate Eric's statement. The M-mount 503.5 is a better lens than the LTM version - partly because it is easier to use (at least you can set f-stop without finger prints on the glass!).
It works fine on a SOMKY and is actually very good as a close up lens - though I would stop it down to f8 for that.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-17-2009   #84
robklurfield
eclipse
 
robklurfield's Avatar
 
robklurfield is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 7,861
First pictures of my new M2...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3994830823/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3996994766/

...
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-17-2009   #85
robklurfield
eclipse
 
robklurfield's Avatar
 
robklurfield is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 7,861
... and from the first roll taken with my new M2
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/4020293769/


I've owned an M4, a CL and an M6. I like this one the best.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/4021049746/
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #86
Fraser
Registered User
 
Fraser is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,530
M2 you can't beat them I love mine!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #87
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
I like that one - a well seasoned M2 with a 'Lux 35 on it. That and a bag of film is really all you need - though it is nice to have choices now and then.
That looks like a M1 by the way. Did you have it converted to a M2 rangefinder - or are you shooting " scale focussing" with it?
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #88
Fraser
Registered User
 
Fraser is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,530
No its a M2 but was originally chrome.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #89
Michael Markey
Registered User
 
Michael Markey's Avatar
 
Michael Markey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Blackpool ,England
Age: 66
Posts: 3,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by mabelsound View Post
You have 140 IXMOOs?!? No wonder they cost 20 bucks apiece out here in the real world!
Actually he may have more... minus one .I bought one from a batch bound for Tom last month from Jem. Don`t feel too bad now I know that you have plenty to spare
Interesting that you seem to favour the CV 40 SC. I use mine all the time and thinking of getting the 35 SC for my M2. Either that or the MC version. Can`t decide.

Last edited by Michael Markey : 10-21-2009 at 11:21.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #90
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,058
I like your BP M2, Simon. Was that rewinder on it when you got it? Would like one myself, you know.

Erik.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #91
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
That rewind is known as the "Magnum Rewind" as most of them are found on ex-magnum users cameras!
Hmm, I better connect with Jem - just to stop him from selling off any more IXMOO's. I am short about 10 for doing 1200 ft of film!!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-21-2009   #92
robklurfield
eclipse
 
robklurfield's Avatar
 
robklurfield is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 7,861
TA, 1200 ft? That should last you about a week. Right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom A View Post
That rewind is known as the "Magnum Rewind" as most of them are found on ex-magnum users cameras!
Hmm, I better connect with Jem - just to stop him from selling off any more IXMOO's. I am short about 10 for doing 1200 ft of film!!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2009   #93
gcsk76
Registered User
 
gcsk76's Avatar
 
gcsk76 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 150






Photos taken in Bangkok, with M2 (below) and Cron IV, Velvia 100.

__________________
I'm Done. Maybe not.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2009   #94
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 61
Posts: 4,290
gcsk76: Fabulous work!
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2009   #95
gcsk76
Registered User
 
gcsk76's Avatar
 
gcsk76 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by amateriat View Post
gcsk76: Fabulous work!
Thanks amateriat, must be the ostrich skin on the M2.
__________________
I'm Done. Maybe not.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2009   #96
Vince Lupo
Registered User
 
Vince Lupo's Avatar
 
Vince Lupo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA; Toronto, Ont, Canada
Posts: 3,975
The M2 is (IMO) one of the best cameras Leica made.

Some shots from my ELCAN M2....



























__________________
Check Out Our Redesigned Website! http://www.directiononeinc.com

flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/direction-one-inc/sets/

'Mapping the West' - Named as one of the Best Photo Exhibits of 2016 by the Washington City Paper: https://www.flickr.com/photos/direction-one-inc/sets/72157635064297991/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-28-2009   #97
Erik van Straten
Registered User
 
Erik van Straten's Avatar
 
Erik van Straten is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,058
Truly great pictures Vince!

Erik.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2009   #98
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
Vince. love the stuff you posted!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2009   #99
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 61
Posts: 4,290
Can't argue with Vince: been having a ball with mine:


Seventh Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, June 2009

(Technical: Leica M2, 35 f/2 Summicron [1st gen], Kodak BW400NC)

At the moment, my M2 is laid low by a loose rewind knob (actually, the top/outer portion came off). I'll try and run it by Nippon this week for a hopefully-inexpensive fix, and it'll be back in action. No more need to regale me with lofty Leica lore (henceforth referred to as L3): I'm hip now.


- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2009   #100
Sparrow
Registered User
 
Sparrow's Avatar
 
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 65
Posts: 12,462
I didn't know you had been subducted Barrette ... what happened to the Hexars
__________________
Regards Stewart

Stewart McBride

RIP 2015



You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.

flickr stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2009   #101
fbf
Registered User
 
fbf is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,227
I might be wrong but I remember Barrette bought a set of m2 with lens from a friend of his for good price... It's been too long. Sorry if I have mistaken anything.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2009   #102
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 61
Posts: 4,290
Stewart & fbf: The Hexen are alive and well and very much in-use. The M2, in fact, makes for a hell of a great trio (I've wanted a third, non-motorized M body for a long time, and the M2–on long-term loan to me from a client, who hopefully will eventually sell–is a pleasant, "high-mech" counterbalance to the Hexar RF's high-tech élan. Shooting with it on a regular basis has made me appreciate the Leica M's gestalt more than I ever have from sporadic shooting with assorted Ms belonging to friends and colleagues.

Funny thing is, the first time I ever perused the idea of getting an M, the M2 was at the bottom of my list because–heavens to Mergatroid!–the frame-counter seemed primitive and uncool compared to the one on the M3/4/6. Yes, a silly thing for me to think, but, obviously, I got over it.

Hard? Easy? Expensive? Cheap(ish)?

And, as luck would have it, there is a roll in the thing right now.

- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.

Last edited by amateriat : 12-17-2009 at 07:35. Reason: Whoops...wrote M3 when I meant M2!
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-16-2009   #103
behhl
Registered User
 
behhl is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 43
Having a fun time with mine ...

  Reply With Quote

Old 12-17-2009   #104
vkomu
Registered User
 
vkomu's Avatar
 
vkomu is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 36
Thanks Vince, you save my dark cold day. Truly inspiring pics.
__________________
My Flickr and website www.fleikki.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-01-2010   #105
Instantclassic
Hans
 
Instantclassic's Avatar
 
Instantclassic is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 211
Love my M2:s too. Got two now and one M3. I proudly walk around with one M2/Cron IV and one M3/SA. And my battered but perfectly working M2 on the shelf, just standing by ready for action...

Pics will come when my scanner arrives.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-01-2010   #106
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
 
coelacanth's Avatar
 
coelacanth is online now
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,453
Lately, my M2 is getting even more action than the MP.







All with Elmar-M 50/2.8
__________________
- Sug

b/w guy.

flickr | Instagram

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-01-2010   #107
helenhill
Beauty in Shadow & Light
 
helenhill's Avatar
 
helenhill is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Yawk
Posts: 4,996
Well VINCE, my jaw dropped ....Ultra Fab

everyone seems to have a MAGIC M2....miss mine ;(

Cheers- H
__________________
Flickr.

A Lover of Leica M's...
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-01-2010   #108
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
Maybe there is some magic to the M2! Somehow, there is less "stuff" to contend with. You just stick a 35 on it, load it and shoot. No fiddling with dials, no "extra" frames to be confused by - just pure photographic joy. It is truly a minimalist camera. Exposures can be guessed, it is easy to hyper focal shoot it. Few things to go wrong - and they tend to last a long long time. After a while a M2 just slips in to your hand and fits it. Instincts take over. You will often find yourself getting ready to shoot and finding out that you have the shot already - pure instinct.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2010   #109
Disaster_Area
Gadget Monger
 
Disaster_Area's Avatar
 
Disaster_Area is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 877
Ever since I got my M2 all my other cameras have been seriously neglected... my Canon digital line up has been relegated to paying gigs only... my TLR's sit on the shelf... and my R3A has seen almost zero action. I'm so in love with the viewfinder of the M2 that I'm thinking of selling my R3A to fund a second. I thought shooting without a meter would be a pain... I used the Leica MR meter that came with the M2 for about 4 days... now I double check my exposures once in a while with a handheld meter but for the most part just guestimate... and the weirdest thing is my exposures have gotten BETTER, especially the ones at night which is exactly the opposite of what I would have thought.

One question... I've seen so many beautiful shots of aged and brassed black paint M's... but I can't seem to find any pics of similarly abused chrome ones... did pro's just not shoot chromes and as such they just didn't see as much use as the black paints? I just want to know what my chrome M2 will look like 30 years from now so I have something else to look forward to

__________________
http://jbhildebrand.com

Last edited by Disaster_Area : 03-18-2010 at 15:52.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2010   #110
literiter
Registered User
 
literiter's Avatar
 
literiter is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canadian Rockies
Posts: 1,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disaster_Area View Post
One question... I've seen so many beautiful shots of aged and brassed black paint M's... but I can't seem to find any pics of similarly abused chrome ones... did pro's just not shoot chromes and as such they just didn't see as much use as the black paints? I just want to know what my chrome M2 will look like 30 years from now so I have something else to look forward to
I wonder the same thing about my chrome M2, but it's 48 years old now and looks pretty good, chrome wise. I think you would have to say that chrome wears far better than paint.

I'd think your camera will look pretty good 100 years from now.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2010   #111
mabelsound
Registered User
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 47
Posts: 6,204
Rereading this thread made me realize I was neglecting my M2. It's loaded up and ready to go (with Summar) for the weekend.

Vince's run of pictures up there is just stunning.
__________________
flickr insta twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2010   #112
Tom A
RFF Sponsor
 
Tom A's Avatar
 
Tom A is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 74
Posts: 6,088
i have seen "brassy" chrome M2's - but that usually meant that they were worn down everywhere else too. One that I had - had the metal below the advance worn to the thickness of paper. It would actually 'flex" when you advanced the film!!! The chrome is more resistant to wear - but it looks uglier when worn.
It would take a 10-15000 rolls to really get it down to bare brass though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2010   #113
cidereye
Film Freak
 
cidereye's Avatar
 
cidereye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London
Age: 53
Posts: 360
I've just been bitten by the M2 bug also this week after getting my hands on one, now I know why Tom has so many in his collection - I had to smuggle it into the house past the wife but I think the bright DHL van outside gave it away.

It just feels so right in the hands, can't explain it & my M8 just does not feel like it despite it being within a few mm the same size/shape almost.
__________________
"What's the point of getting killed if you've got the wrong exposure?" Don McCullin
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-19-2010   #114
Disaster_Area
Gadget Monger
 
Disaster_Area's Avatar
 
Disaster_Area is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 877
anyone have any pics of a really well used chrome M2? I've searched google and flickr in vain to find a pic of a beat up brassed one... they all look so nice.
__________________
http://jbhildebrand.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-19-2010   #115
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 61
Posts: 4,290
I'm putting in entry #130 (or thereabouts) in this thread. I'd call that a good deal of M2 love.

The one in my possession (chrome) has had relatively little wear. Which is a good thing, sinc it's going to get a workout once I get the blasted rewind knob thingy fixed properly!


- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2010   #116
mabelsound
Registered User
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 47
Posts: 6,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disaster_Area View Post
anyone have any pics of a really well used chrome M2? I've searched google and flickr in vain to find a pic of a beat up brassed one... they all look so nice.
I have to admit, I kind of idly rub mine with my thumbs while I'm walking sometimes...there's an engraving on the back (somebody else's name) and I would love to wear it off eventually. But I can't bear the thought of intentionally taking some sandpaper to it.

The chrome seems amazingly sturdy--more so than the black chrome on my M7, which is more visibly worn, even in just the year I've had it.
__________________
flickr insta twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2010   #117
Lilserenity
Registered User
 
Lilserenity is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Worthing, W Sx
Age: 34
Posts: 1,028
I notice I commented on this a year ago, just over. Since then I have taken a good few thousand frames with my M2, and it's need of a CLA big time (shutter blinds sticking, rewind knob is loose...) but then I have got great use from it.

The problem is I can't afford the CLA at the moment, it could cost me £250 or so if I need new shutter blinds.

Sometimes it's fine, other times you get this bright overexposed strip, not more than a mm across probably less, but it can appear right down the middle of the frame ruining a shot.

But I can be happy about it too, because since getting the M2, I have almost completed my first real documentary project (the Milton Keynes one), which I have had one exhibition of, one coming up, and 2 more with dates tbc. So it's been a good camera to me. I even sold my first photo last week, so you know. Baby steps.

But it sure ain't paying for the bills yet. Not by a long shot, maybe never, but it's fine. It just needs fixing up a bit.

Vicky
__________________
Thank you to all those who registered for my book, Impression Milton Keynes - The book IS NOW OUT. Purchase your copy of the book
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2010   #118
wgerrard
Registered User
 
wgerrard's Avatar
 
wgerrard is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilserenity View Post
I notice I commented on this a year ago, just over. Since then I have taken a good few thousand frames with my M2, and it's need of a CLA big time (shutter blinds sticking, rewind knob is loose...)
Vicky, I bought on an M2 last month and it's a great camera. It is also 48 years old and cost as much as a new Bessa. Is the Bessa built as well? Probably not. (I have an R4M.) It's also not 48 years old. Is the M2 a dead cinch to be more reliable than the Bessa? Not at all, I think.
__________________
Bill
-------------------------------------
This is my only legible signature.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2010   #119
literiter
Registered User
 
literiter's Avatar
 
literiter is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canadian Rockies
Posts: 1,192
Quote:
Originally Posted by wgerrard View Post
Vicky, I bought on an M2 last month and it's a great camera. It is also 48 years old and cost as much as a new Bessa. Is the Bessa built as well? Probably not. (I have an R4M.) It's also not 48 years old. Is the M2 a dead cinch to be more reliable than the Bessa? Not at all, I think.
Hard to say, about reliability. I've seen inside a Bessa L, I'm afraid and would put little stock in the thing lasting as long as a 48 year old Leica.

What I have seen of the Bessa L:
-The base is not metal, but very thin plastic held on with tiny self threading screws. Very bad.
-The escapement has at least two plastic gears. Very bad.
-The internal metal parts I've seen so far are stamped tin.
-The top is plastic.
-All the knobs are plastic.
-The shutter is metal but really crappy.
-The advance lever is stamped thin metal covered with a thin sheath of plastic.
-The camera back is all plastic.
-I think wherever plastic could be used it was used.

-It ain't a Leica M
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2010   #120
wgerrard
Registered User
 
wgerrard's Avatar
 
wgerrard is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by literiter View Post
Hard to say, about reliability. I've seen inside a Bessa L, I'm afraid and would put little stock in the thing lasting as long as a 48 year old Leica.

What I have seen of the Bessa L:
-The base is not metal, but very thin plastic held on with tiny self threading screws. Very bad.
-The escapement has at least two plastic gears. Very bad.
-The internal metal parts I've seen so far are stamped tin.
-The top is plastic.
-All the knobs are plastic.
-The shutter is metal but really crappy.
-The advance lever is stamped thin metal covered with a thin sheath of plastic.
-The camera back is all plastic.
-I think wherever plastic could be used it was used.

-It ain't a Leica M
A Bessa R4* is not a Bessa L. Your description of the L does not match my R4M.

Besides, being made of metal -- brass, zinc, or otherwise -- is no guarantor of reliability. Modern plastics are often lighter and stronger than metals. If you doubt this, I suggest you don't fly.
__________________
Bill
-------------------------------------
This is my only legible signature.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:06.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.