Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Old 1 Week Ago   #1601
Abbazz
6x9 and be there!
 
Abbazz's Avatar
 
Abbazz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Karori (Aotearoa)
Posts: 777
55mm f/4.0, expired Fuji Pro 400H:



Cheers!

Abbazz
__________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment décisif, et le chef-d'œuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaître et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz

The 6x9 Photography Online Resource

  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1602
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wellington NZ
Posts: 5,044
^ I recognise those hills :P
__________________
NO PRAISE
@gavinlagrange
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1603
Abbazz
6x9 and be there!
 
Abbazz's Avatar
 
Abbazz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Karori (Aotearoa)
Posts: 777
One more showing the Cook Strait and the South Island in the distance:



Cheers!

Abbazz
__________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment décisif, et le chef-d'œuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaître et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz

The 6x9 Photography Online Resource

  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1604
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,480
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Kodak 400TX, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 6 minutes.


2018.07.07 Roll #172-02787-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1605
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,480
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Fujifilm Fujicolor Pro 400H, expired in 2008, at E.I. 100.


2018.06.22 Roll #166-69870002.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1606
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,480
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03225-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1607
johannielscom
Ich bin ein Barnacker
 
johannielscom's Avatar
 
johannielscom is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Universitas Terre Threntiae
Posts: 7,333
really enjoying myself with this camera lately, pictures to follow soon...



This is with the S-M-C Takumar 6X7 55mm f/3.5 mounted.

I also have found a good but cheap S-M-C Takumar 6X7 75mm f/4.5, and a S-M-C Takumar 6X7 200mm f/4.0 even came for less than EUR 100!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC03675.jpg (25.5 KB, 104 views)
__________________
Gegroet,
Johan Niels

I write vintage gear reviews on www.johanniels.com |

flickr | instagram |
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1608
agoglanian
Reconnected.
 
agoglanian's Avatar
 
agoglanian is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 33
Posts: 920
Knew it was just a matter of time. Wound up buying the 55mm! I appreciate the images you all have shared and the insight you offered when I was inquiring about it. I think it along with the 105mm will be just right for me. Now I just have to restock on some 120, I'm running low!
__________________
- Abram

M-A | M10 | 500CM | P67II

Instagram. | Website.
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1609
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by agoglanian View Post
Knew it was just a matter of time. Wound up buying the 55mm! I appreciate the images you all have shared and the insight you offered when I was inquiring about it. I think it along with the 105mm will be just right for me. Now I just have to restock on some 120, I'm running low!
Congrats on the 55mm, look forward to seeing more of your images on the thread! Which version did you end up buying? I have the second S-M-C Takumar 55/3.5 version, one of the ones with the giant 100mm filter thread. I don't use it often, but I've posted some samples upthread.
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1610
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is online now
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 12,855
I wasn't aware there were two versions of the 3.5/55mm... what's the difference? I have both the 4.0/55mm lenses.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1611
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
I wasn't aware there were two versions of the 3.5/55mm... what's the difference? I have both the 4.0/55mm lenses.
The site I linked notes no optical differences, so perhaps just different coatings between the Super Takumar version and the second S-M-C Takumar version.

https://antiquecameras.net/pentax6x7lenses.html
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #1612
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,480
Just cross posted this site on The Takumar Lenses thread, but this site notes that Super Multi Coated (aka S-M-C or SMC) lenses had 7-layered lens coatings, whereas earlier Super Takumar lenses had single coatings:
https://takumarguide.weebly.com/takumarology.html
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 5 Days Ago   #1613
agoglanian
Reconnected.
 
agoglanian's Avatar
 
agoglanian is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 33
Posts: 920
Quote:
Originally Posted by dourbalistar View Post
Congrats on the 55mm, look forward to seeing more of your images on the thread! Which version did you end up buying? I have the second S-M-C Takumar 55/3.5 version, one of the ones with the giant 100mm filter thread. I don't use it often, but I've posted some samples upthread.
I bought the late model f/4 version as I thought that would pair best with my 105mm!
__________________
- Abram

M-A | M10 | 500CM | P67II

Instagram. | Website.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.