 |
Increasing demand at professional labs: Detailed Numbers |
 |
04-12-2019
|
#1
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Increasing demand at professional labs: Detailed Numbers
Hi,
disclaimer first: This posting is not adressed to all the "doom and gloom" prayers here. They will be hurt by the content  , and therefore should stop reading immediately at this point  .
This posting is just a bit more detailed information and facts for all of those here on rff who really shoot film and want a realistic picture of the situation on the market.
Found this today on Jobo facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/JOBOanalog/
Detailed business/demand numbers and statistics of professional lab Sreda in Moscow:
https://sreda-photo.livejournal.com/393188.html
This situation is not unique for a professional lab. Lots of lab owners have reported similar developments at their labs recently. E.g. NationPhoto (Paris) has also seen such strong demand increases: At Photokina they said that meanwhile they process about 1,000 rolls a day (!) at their two lab locations in Paris. The Darkroom in the U.S. has explained that they get up to 500 film packages a day (and one customer package has mostly several films in it - often more then ten - because shipping costs are then the lowest per film). So they also process a 4-digit number of films every day.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#2
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 20,059
|
I'm going start to believe you... when I see major new mainstream roll film cameras being offered. That would truly be a revival. In the meantime, this uptick is good for photography in general. More options is always good.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#3
|
Ian M.
Takkun is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sunny South Seattle
Posts: 794
|
Waiting on this too. I was glad to hear Leica coming out with new film bodies (though I couldn’t hope to afford one for what they are), happy to hear reports that the F6 is still sporadically produced.
I’m not holding my breath too hard though for the near future. Much like it was discussed in a thread I started last year about wanting a good batch scanner like the old coolscans, I think there’s just way too much out there on the used market for it to make financial sense for the big guys just yet. Leica gets away with a $4k film camera because people will pay at least half that for a 40 year old camera.
Then again, Nikon blew everyone away with the Df. So who knows.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#4
|
Registered User
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 8,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkun
Waiting on this too. I was glad to hear Leica coming out with new film bodies.
|
Leica is coming out with new film bodies??? Or do you mean they are still selling film cameras?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkun
Then again, Nikon blew everyone away with the Df.
|
Really? Me and many others were extremely disappointed with the DF as it was such a half baked effort. Essentially a reskinned D600 with a D4 sensor and no video.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#5
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 20,059
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss
Really? Me and many others were extremely disappointed with the DF as it was such a half baked effort. Essentially a reskinned D600 with a D4 sensor and no video.
|
While I was initially disappointed because it wasn't a digital FM2, once I used it I really enjoyed it. It was light and small (for a FF DSLR), had classic controls, and the fact that it didn't have a huge grip or video was, to me, a great thing. The only thing that I could honesty say I didn't like was that it had the D610 AF and not the D750 AF.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#6
|
Registered User
Timmyjoe is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit
While I was initially disappointed because it wasn't a digital FM2, once I used it I really enjoyed it. It was light and small (for a FF DSLR), had classic controls, and the fact that it didn't have a huge grip or video was, to me, a great thing. The only thing that I could honesty say I didn't like was that it had the D610 AF and not the D750 AF.
|
In total agreement with you on this, love the Df and find it to be a great "in between" camera; a bridge between film/digital.
Also really loving the Ektachrome revival and it's causing me to shoot my Nikon S2 and Leica M film bodies a lot more. Still like the convenience of digital, but having a color slide film again, that renders colors as I see them (Fuji never worked for me) is making using my old film bodies a whole lot of fun.
Jan, have you talked with the folks at Dwayne's in Parsons Kansas, they've been doing my Ektachrome and doing a very fine job of it. Would love to know if their numbers are up as well. We need these labs to stay in business.
Best,
-Tim
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#7
|
Ian M.
Takkun is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sunny South Seattle
Posts: 794
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huss
Leica is coming out with new film bodies??? Or do you mean they are still selling film cameras?
Really? Me and many others were extremely disappointed with the DF as it was such a half baked effort. Essentially a reskinned D600 with a D4 sensor and no video.
|
1. Yep. MP and M-A. former's been out for a while now, latter is relatively new.
2. When I said "blew everyone away" I suppose I meant as a camera it came as a surprise to the industry, rather than users' impressions. I assisted for a professor that used one and while I didn't have a whole lot of experience with it, liked it in concept: more physical controls, more lens compatibility, selectively stripped down features. A camera for someone whom the D4 and video was overkill but an alternative to the D800 (was that the second-tier FX at the time? I don't keep track)
Reason I brought it up was that it was a specific niche product that didn't fit neatly into existing market categories. The F6 was a similar 'last hurrah' of high-end film cameras, too: full support for newer lenses, built in data back, better AF and generally an upgrade from the F5/F100, but still pared down from the digital equivalent.
I'd guess any new film cameras would be similar. If I'm shooting film, I don't need 8fps motor drive and vice versa, or the latest 80 or whatever point AF. But I might still want AF and a winder, and little things like multi-metering and an interval timer. Features that get dropped or shoved deep into menus on lower-tier cameras.
It's a shame Contax went under and Olympus dropped their OM line—AF and digital left them behind, but they'd have a great target market right about now.
Re: Ektachrome, I stumbled into my local shop a few days after it dropped and picked up some of the first rolls for sale around here last summer. I haven't gotten around to shooting them yet, but as soon as the weather dries out...
|
|
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#8
|
Registered User
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,997
|
I’m thinking that this good news varies a great deal by location. For some of us who still use film mail order has proved to be the barrier hard to overcome. Not just financially but I miss face to face contact with labs when there is a problem. We have not had a local C-41 processor since Costco discontinuing theirs about 8 years ago. B&W is no problem, been doing that for 50 years. But, at 70, I don’t want to start and learn home C-41. So, just lazy I guess.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#9
|
Registered User
ptpdprinter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,698
|
Why is mail order a barrier hard to overcome?
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#10
|
Registered User
Ambro51 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 180
|
I just splurged on a dozed E6 mailers BH/ Dwayne’s for $11 each. Postage on my end usps $3. Makes lab hunting obsolete. I just want development only.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#11
|
Camera hacker
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 4,034
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptpdprinter
Why is mail order a barrier hard to overcome?
|
Risk of loss. No face to face customer service. A faceless entity to complain to when the new guy at the lab botches the chemistry. A faceless entity to complain to when the rollers on the machine print stains on the film. There's other hurdles. A lot of photographers thrive on control. The USPS does not fill one with the most confidence in this regard.
Phil Forrest
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#12
|
Registered User
Skiff is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 967
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zuiko85
B&W is no problem, been doing that for 50 years. But, at 70, I don’t want to start and learn home C-41. So, just lazy I guess.
|
C41 and E6 at home is even easier than BW, because these processes are standardised. No problem to get perfect quality (even better compared to prof. labs), especially with a JOBO processor. It's even significantly cheaper doing color at home, and faster, too.
|
|
|
 |
Be not afraid! |
 |
04-12-2019
|
#13
|
Thread Killer
ChrisPlatt is online now
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens NYC
Age: 58
Posts: 2,856
|
Be not afraid!
I used Kodak and later Qualex mail order processing for my Kodachrome and Ektachrome films.
In dozens of orders not a single roll was ever lost in the mail or botched by the lab.
Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#14
|
Registered User
Skiff is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 967
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisPlatt
I used Kodak and later Qualex mail order processing for my Kodachrome and Ektachrome films.
In dozens of orders not a single roll was ever lost in the mail or botched by the lab.
Chris
|
Same here: Before I started processing color at home some years ago, too (have done that with BW since my youth), I send out my color films via mail order to the best labs in my country. Not a single film was ever lost by the mail service.
So yes: Don't be afraid by using mail order labs.
And:
Don't be afraid by color processing at home, too: Perfect quality, very easy, very cheap, lot's of fun  .
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#16
|
Registered User
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 8,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptpdprinter
Why is mail order a barrier hard to overcome?
|
What I hate about it is the delay. It's about a 2 week turnaround - ship there, process, ship back. And if they screw something up - I'm talking about you TheDarkroom - it is a huge pain.
And I'd have to wait until I had a whole bunch of rolls to mail, as the cost to mail one or many is the same.
Best thing I did was discover DSLR film scanning. The reason I was mailing my film is because I also wanted it scanned. Now that I do that with a digicam, I drop it off at my local Samy's, pick it up same day if it is C41. (None of my local shops offer decent and/or affordable scanning).
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#17
|
Camera hacker
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 4,034
|
These days, in the USA, in some of the bigger cities, I think we're seeing what the market demands of our postal service and as a result, we're getting less than stellar delivery and far less confidence. I live in Philadelphia, PA and over the last decade I've seen our postal service get worse and worse. We've regularly had packages get lost and have had to file claims. Only on low-dollar items were we not remunerated. The hassle is the big part too.
So, we've seen the film market dwindle down to all but nothing and make a little comeback. During the dwindle time, only two labs in Philly have remained open and they do not have the uptick as has been seen other places. This is driven by our market here in this city, the region and the country as a whole. Add to that the fact that the USPS uses a lot of temps during busy seasons and times when full-time employees want leave. All this adds up to why I process my film at home. I'm not sending it out via USPS. I'm not going to use the local labs because they have had to increase their prices due to increased taxation here in the city with the recent city-wide assessment. All this adds up to far more risk than I want for my film. For those snarky folks out there who would say that I shouldn't live in Philadelphia, well I can't move simply for the sake of film.
Phil Forrest
|
|
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#18
|
Registered User
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,997
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptpdprinter
Why is mail order a barrier hard to overcome?
|
These are my reasons, important to me and possibly no one else.
#1. Don’t want to pay postal rates going and coming. When C-41 processing was local you dropped it off when running other errands and thus incurred no extra expenses other than film. For B&W no problem, been doing that at home for 50 years. I’m 70 now and don’t want to start/learn at home C-41.
#2. As my post said, I like to transact business face to face, especially if there is a problem.
About #1. No, I don’t want to save up a years worth of film to amortize shipping costs. I probably wouldn’t shoot much color and it would take at least a year to get 10 rolls ready.
So....for color I could just print in my laundry room and get out the coloring pencils. Hey, fun for the whole family.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#19
|
Devin Bro
B-9 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,324
|
I have to honestly say I can relate zuiko.
Lately tho! I’ve been coming around.
I value my time and have looked outside home for process more and more.
I’ll always play with BW at home.
My habits permit shipping bulk.
__________________
Made in Michigan
RangefinderGuy @ Instagram
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#20
|
Registered User
splitimageview is online now
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,099
|
For labs like the Darkroom it is easy to believe. There used to be labs on every corner, they are gone now so the remaining business has to go somewhere.
But that doesn’t necessarily imply a resurgence of film use, only a consolidation among those labs that court mail order business.
|
|
|
04-12-2019
|
#21
|
Registered User
benlees is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 47
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by splitimageview
For labs like the Darkroom it is easy to believe. There used to be labs on every corner, they are gone now so the remaining business has to go somewhere.
But that doesn’t necessarily imply a resurgence of film use, only a consolidation among those labs that court mail order business.
|
This was my thought as well. There used to be a few pro labs in my city. Not any more. It wouldn't surprise me if a lab in Vancouver might have an up tick in business as they are now getting all the work from western Canada...
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-12-2019
|
#22
|
Ian M.
Takkun is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sunny South Seattle
Posts: 794
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlees
This was my thought as well. There used to be a few pro labs in my city. Not any more. It wouldn't surprise me if a lab in Vancouver might have an up tick in business as they are now getting all the work from western Canada...
|
That’s certainly true, and there’s the other thread going on about Kodak’s financial health. Film is downsizing but it’s not disappearing, thankfully.
We are lucky here in Seattle to have a few pro labs including one that relocated and reopened. Plus a public lab, and at least two at UW.
Zuiko, I also relate. I hate mailing anything irreplaceable, and hate the distance and potential for what could go wrong with a relatively anonymous lab. Though on that latter point I suppose that could have happened at the local Walgreens or Costco, too.
I’ve been working with Adrian Bacon in the Bay Area for my color and medium format work. I’m still trusting my film with USPS, but he’s a very attentive and communicative technician.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#23
|
Registered User
maigo is offline
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 338
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlees
This was my thought as well. There used to be a few pro labs in my city. Not any more. It wouldn't surprise me if a lab in Vancouver might have an up tick in business as they are now getting all the work from western Canada...
|
London Drugs, a chain of dozens of pharmacy, household goods and electronics stores across Western Canada, has recently brought an 135 E6 processing machine online in one of their Richmond BC stores.
They have about 6 stores with C41 processing labs.
Previously they only processed C41 in house and E6 was farmed out to a professional lab.
This is good news as it indicates an increase in film volume through the largest photography lab group in Western Canada.
Note:
1. They do not even sell transparency films.
2. For decades London Drugs only sell Fuji and Ilford films. (And Polaroid and Instax). No Kodak.
Here is a twitter video post that shows some of the E6 handling workflow.
Prepping film and loading machine:
https://twitter.com/ldphotolab/statu...702051845?s=21
https://twitter.com/ldphotolab/statu...162401280?s=21
Mounting slides:
https://twitter.com/ldphotolab/statu...029803008?s=21
https://twitter.com/ldphotolab/statu...830366208?s=21
Michael.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#24
|
Registered User
Ted Striker is offline
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmyjoe
In total agreement with you on this, love the Df and find it to be a great "in between" camera; a bridge between film/digital.
Also really loving the Ektachrome revival and it's causing me to shoot my Nikon S2 and Leica M film bodies a lot more. Still like the convenience of digital, but having a color slide film again, that renders colors as I see them (Fuji never worked for me) is making using my old film bodies a whole lot of fun.
Jan, have you talked with the folks at Dwayne's in Parsons Kansas, they've been doing my Ektachrome and doing a very fine job of it. Would love to know if their numbers are up as well. We need these labs to stay in business.
Best,
-Tim
|
Note- The poster above lives in Chicago, a city and suburban area of more than 5 million people and *still* has to mail his film to an out of state lab.
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#25
|
Registered User
RObert Budding is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
Note- The poster above lives in Chicago, a city and suburban area of more than 5 million people and *still* has to mail his film to an out of state lab.
|
Not true. There are 9 E6 processors listed on yelp in the Chicago area. And, of course, far more that process C-41.
__________________
"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true."
~Robert Wilensky
"He could be right, he could be wrong. I think he's wrong but he says it in such a sincere way. You have to think he thinks he's right."
~ Bob Dylan
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#26
|
Registered User
Timmyjoe is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Striker
Note- The poster above lives in Chicago, a city and suburban area of more than 5 million people and *still* has to mail his film to an out of state lab.
|
I have a long working relationship with Dwayne's, which is why I send my color film to them. There are places in Chicago where I could have it developed, but I try to support businesses that have done good work for me over the years.
Best,
-Tim
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#27
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RObert Budding
Not true. There are 9 E6 processors listed on yelp in the Chicago area. And, of course, far more that process C-41.
|
Exactly.
"Ted Striker" is again doing what he is always doing here:
- demonstrating that he has absolutely no knowledge about the industry
- spreading FUD and misinformation.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#28
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by splitimageview
For labs like the Darkroom it is easy to believe. There used to be labs on every corner, they are gone now so the remaining business has to go somewhere.
But that doesn’t necessarily imply a resurgence of film use, only a consolidation among those labs that court mail order business.
|
The situation that labs closed because of general decreasing film demand already stopped about 2-5 years ago (depending on the region/country).
So the increasing demand labs are now seeing is not because of other labs closing down, but because of general increasing demand.
And despite the fact that there are now even new labs in business, founded in the last 2-3 years.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#29
|
Registered User
brbo is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,473
|
Can somebody inform Fuji about the film revival so they bring back Provia 400X. Kodak could also do some Portra NC runs...
__________________
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#30
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Takkun
Film is downsizing but it’s not disappearing, thankfully.
|
No, film is not 'downsizing' anymore. Demand is up in the major markets. That is what all film companies have confirmed to us rff members at Photokina. That is why new film products are coming to the market, new labs and film camera shops are opening.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#31
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmyjoe
Jan, have you talked with the folks at Dwayne's in Parsons Kansas, they've been doing my Ektachrome and doing a very fine job of it. Would love to know if their numbers are up as well. We need these labs to stay in business.
Best,
-Tim
|
Tim, different labs have different business strategies. Lots of US labs like Richard Photo Lab, Photo Vision Prints, Indie Film Lab, The Darkroom, The Find Lab, Goodman, State Film, Fast Film Lab, Old School Film Lab, North East Photographic etc. are adressing their customers directly and via advertisizing by social media.
Some others - like E6 specialist AgX - are recommended by satiesfied customers and "mouth to mouth" advertizing.
And Dwaynes business model is mostly based on being the major US player in the B2B area: They develop films for other photo shops (with no own lab) and drug store chain shops. And the BH/mailer business is very big for them, too.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#32
|
Likes Leicas
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 79
Posts: 6,144
|
I've been happy with Agx imaging in Sault Set. Marie, Michigan for E6.
I think what we may be seeing, with the recent increase in film use and processing, is that trends tend not to continue forever in the same direction. I think that when there is a strong initial trend towards A and away from B, then eventually things will regress to a mid-point, leaving A and B in balance. So film may never again be as strong as it was, but there will always be enough demand so that it won't disappear, either.
__________________
May the light be with you.
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#33
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 20,059
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ko.Fe.
|
To me it is... it was a DSLR that had classic controls and no grip...like I said in my other post.
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#34
|
Registered User
Out to Lunch is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,578
|
Quote:
Increasing demand at professional labs
|
I suppose that film sales determine the business numbers of film services. Not sure how relevant the US market is in this regard. China, India, Germany, Vietnam...this is where the numbers are. On a related topic...Fuji-FILM increasing it's film prices by 30% to stay competitive is not a good omen.
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#35
|
Registered User
benlees is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 47
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maigo
|
Indeed. If I drop off film at local London Drugs it goes to... Vancouver.
|
|
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#36
|
Registered User
frank-grumman is offline
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SoCal/PA
Posts: 259
|
Philadelphia Photographics decided to hang it up after 20+ years. Though I am a clear amateur, they nonetheless treated me as if I were their most important client. They did it all.....wonderful group of folks... Sorely missed.
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#37
|
Registered User
ptpdprinter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,698
|
How much of the reported increase is as a result of consolidation as other labs close?
|
|
|
04-13-2019
|
#38
|
Registered User
ptpdprinter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by frank-grumman
Philadelphia Photographics decided to hang it up after 20+ years. Though I am a clear amateur, they nonetheless treated me as if I were their most important client. They did it all.....wonderful group of folks... Sorely missed.
|
Is there still a lab in Philadelphia that will do 4x5 in E6 and C41?
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#39
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Wijninga
I suppose that film sales determine the business numbers of film services. Not sure how relevant the US market is in this regard.
|
1. Yes.
2. It is very relevant: A huge market. And an increasing market.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Wijninga
China, India, Germany, Vietnam...this is where the numbers are.
|
Not only, fortunately other European countries also see increasing demand. Australia, too. Other Asian countries like Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Phillipines, HongKong, Taiwan and South Korea, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Wijninga
On a related topic...Fuji-FILM increasing it's film prices by 30% to stay competitive is not a good omen.
|
Well, it is a good omen: Fujifilm is committted to film and wants to continue production.That means staying profitable. That means asking fair prices, which also cover costs for investements in new machinery and education of new, young engineers. You really should watch this explanation of the situation by ADOX CEO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...8A&app=desktop
The whole industry needs these higher prices for a sustainable future. Despite the huge collapse in photo film sales from 2004 to 2015 (about 99%) most of the films are still cheaper today (inflation included) compared to film peak times. Of course that cannot be sustainable in the long term.
If we accept a bit higher prices, we will have the film we need for many decades to come.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
 |
04-13-2019
|
#40
|
Registered User
HHPhoto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,701
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptpdprinter
How much of the reported increase is as a result of consolidation as other labs close?
|
None. I have explained that above in one of my posts, please look there.
And in most major markets the number of labs is already increasing, therefore increasing demand at the labs despite more labs in total.
Cheers, Jan
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:39. |
|
|