Old 11-19-2018   #41
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
This may not be the best example, but it is some Ultrafine Extreme 400 35mm shot this month.

I exposed it at box speed a couple of weeks ago in the Leica III using my trusty Elmar 50. It is developed in Rodinal 1+25 for 7 minutes and 30 seconds at 68F. It was agitated continuously for the 1st minute then 4 agitations per minute after.



I have not used it a lot and am still not totally happy with the results. Either the Rodinal is creating too much grain in the film or the scanner is creating too much noise when I scan. However this will probably improve once I discover the right exposure/development/scanning process to get the best out of this film.

Exposure/development and scanning issues aside, the biggest problem with this film is scratches. The emulsion, or perhaps the film base, seems very sensitive and no matter which camera I have tried so far I am getting serious scratching. It could also be coming from the developing reel I am using so I' try changing that next time I use it. If you use it you will want to be very gentle.
__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2018   #42
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
Another from the same roll.

Leica III - Elmar 50 - Ultrafine Extreme 400 - Rodinal 1+25
__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2018   #43
Ccoppola82
Registered User
 
Ccoppola82 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 367
Heres a bunch shot in 35mm
Developer and some lens info is given on the Flickr Tags

27-22.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr
34-17.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr34-16.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr29-33-Edit.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr2919-Edit.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr291-Edit.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr2916.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr2910.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr2911-Edit.jpg by Chris Coppola, on Flickr
__________________
Leica M2/M6
Hasselblad 500CM

Instagram
Coppola_Art
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2018   #44
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
 
ChrisPlatt's Avatar
 
ChrisPlatt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens NYC
Age: 58
Posts: 2,858
The Ultrafine Xtreme 400 data sheet says development time for HC-110 Dilution B is 5 minutes @ 68.
5 minutes doesn't give much room for error so I'd probably opt for Dilution H. Has anyone tried this?

Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2018   #45
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisPlatt View Post
The Ultrafine Xtreme 400 data sheet says development time for HC-110 Dilution B is 5 minutes @ 68.
5 minutes doesn't give much room for error so I'd probably opt for Dilution H. Has anyone tried this?

Chris
I have a roll in my Spottie right now. As soon as I finish it I'll give some dilution H a try.
__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2018   #46
Ccoppola82
Registered User
 
Ccoppola82 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 367
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisPlatt View Post
The Ultrafine Xtreme 400 data sheet says development time for HC-110 Dilution B is 5 minutes @ 68.
5 minutes doesn't give much room for error so I'd probably opt for Dilution H. Has anyone tried this?

Chris
I used hc110 for at least 1 batch. Ill try to find my notes on it tonight
__________________
Leica M2/M6
Hasselblad 500CM

Instagram
Coppola_Art
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-22-2018   #47
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
If anybody is looking to stock up, Photo Warehouse is having a Black Friday/Cyber Monday holiday promo:

Ends MONDAY the 26th @ 12 PM (PST) Midnight
10% OFF EVERYTHING IN THE STORE
Enter Coupon Code TENOFF at checkout

Not a huge discount, but not nothing either.
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-23-2018   #48
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
I just developed a roll using HC-110 dilution h. Since I use continual agitation I reduced the 10 minute development to 8.5 minutes at 20C. The negatives seem to look OK but I'll scan and post a few once things dry.
Curious that the Massive Development chart doesn't show this time for UFX400?
__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Ultrafine Xtreme 400 - HC-110 Dilution H
Old 11-24-2018   #49
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
Ultrafine Xtreme 400 - HC-110 Dilution H

Exposed at box speed using Pentax Spotmatic ES II and Takumar 24mm/3.5 lens.

Developed in HC-110 1+63 (Dilution H) for 8 minutes and 30 seconds at 20C. Used continuous agitation in Jobo tank. (The development time was reduced 15% from 10 minutes to account for the continuous agitation.) (Photo Warehouse recommends 5 minutes using dilution B.)

These examples were scanned with Plustek Optic-Film 7600i using Silverfast software. Used USM and SRDX dust reduction. Reduced to web size using Photoshop with some very minor cropping and a bit of additional dust spotting.






Observations - Emulsion seems to be more susceptible to scratching compared to other films currently used such as Fomapan 400 and Ilford HP5+.

The film curls lengthwise quite substantially making it difficult to place in scanning holder but I doubt that this is caused by the developer.

Conclusion - I was actually pretty happy with the results using HC-110 and feel that this is a very good option for anyone working with Ultrafine Extreme 400. Resolution was good considering that the Takumar 24mm f3.5 lens used for these examples is not considered an extremely sharp lens.
__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-25-2018   #50
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
 
ChrisPlatt's Avatar
 
ChrisPlatt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens NYC
Age: 58
Posts: 2,858
The scans of the 35mm negatives look a little grainy. Were they exposed at EI 400?
If so I'd probably overexpose and underdevelop a little; it might yield an improvement.

I see neither Ultrafine nor Digitaltruth publish a time for Xtreme 400 in HC110 Dilution H.
Either it is not recommended or (more likely) a little experimentation will be required.

Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-26-2018   #51
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisPlatt View Post
The scans of the 35mm negatives look a little grainy. Were they exposed at EI 400?
If so I'd probably overexpose and underdevelop a little; it might yield an improvement.

I see neither Ultrafine nor Digitaltruth publish a time for Xtreme 400 in HC110 Dilution H.
Either it is not recommended or (more likely) a little experimentation will be required.

Chris
As noted, the film was exposed at box speed (ISO 400).

I'm not sure about the grain that everyone seems to notice in my scans. I think that the grain may be coming from the scanner more than the film itself. I don't mind a little grain so it normally doesn't bother me. If it is too bad I run it through DeNoiz but with this type of work I rarely do that.

I usually scan all my 35mm film on my Optic Film 7600i but I will try re-scanning these negatives on my Epson V500 to see if there is any difference between the grain that shows up on the scans. I already know that the detail I get from 35mm negatives scanned on the little Plustek scanner is better then what I get from the Epson.

Once I get my darkroom set up again I will try printing a few of these as well to see how much (or how little) grain the prints themselves show.

However, I will certainly try some Ultrafine Xtreme 400 at EI 200 and under develop a bit. Perhaps 20% less time then the 10 minutes which would be recommended for dilution H.

EDIT - This may not happen for a couple days as I have domestic duties that are taking priority right now.
__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-27-2018   #52
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Perhaps it's my way of metering/shooting/developing, but I think this film is not particularly well suited for high contrast, backlit scenes like this one. Anybody else find this to be the case?

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2018.09.01 Roll #178-02813-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2018   #53
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Hasselblad 500 C/M, Zeiss Planar T* 80mm f/2.8 CF, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2018.06.09 Roll #161-02424-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-30-2018   #54
Pioneer
Registered User
 
Pioneer's Avatar
 
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 65
Posts: 3,157
Leica M-A; 90/2.8 Elmarit; Ultrafine Xtreme 400; EI-200; lo contrast lighting. Develop in HC-110 1+63; Continuous agitation for 8.5m. Scan with Plustek OpticFilm 7600i. Resized for web in Photoshop CS6. Contrast adjustment by black point selection. No noise control, no sharpening.




__________________
You gotta love a fast lens;

It is almost as good as a fast horse!
Dan
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2019   #55
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2018.09.01 Roll #178-02801-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2019   #56
j.scooter
Registered User
 
j.scooter's Avatar
 
j.scooter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto-ish
Posts: 1,341
Ultrafine Xtreme 400 135 @800 D76 1+1
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-02-2019   #57
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
American LaFrance, 900 Series.

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2018.09.01 Roll #178-02816-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-10-2019   #58
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03243-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-10-2019   #59
bitfeng
Registered User
 
bitfeng is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 243
Yes I agree with you. I cannot get the grains down though. Sometimes I feel the anti-halation is not enough.
8' 1:31 HC110 68F. Rollei 35S.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dourbalistar View Post
Perhaps it's my way of metering/shooting/developing, but I think this film is not particularly well suited for high contrast, backlit scenes like this one. Anybody else find this to be the case?
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 90mm f/2.8 LS, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


__________________
Rollei 35S
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2019   #60
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Under less difficult light, this film performs well. Here the late afternoon sun is behind me.

Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03225-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-28-2019   #61
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03231-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-30-2019   #62
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03237-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-04-2019   #63
kiemchacsu
Registered User
 
kiemchacsu is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 38
Posts: 1,037
with the inncrease of Kentmere 400 price recently ($50 at B&H), Ultrafine Xtreme 400 has become the best bang for the bucks
<<<<< Leica M2, 35mm f2.8 Summaron, Ultrafine Xtreme 400 developed in Hc-110 (H) 12 mins >>>>>
1906_UF400_35F2M2_09_snBen_p1 by trung nguyen, on Flickr
__________________
Cheers,
Trung Nguyen

RF
F
photo essays: Hanoi | Hoi An | Ha Giang | Fish Market
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-04-2019   #64
DanskDynamit
Registered User
 
DanskDynamit's Avatar
 
DanskDynamit is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 440
that 105 f2.4 draws beautifully.
__________________
DanskDynamit
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-04-2019   #65
d.dulin
Registered User
 
d.dulin's Avatar
 
d.dulin is offline
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 106
this was the first film i bulk loaded. i really loved it for price and performance. the field i think was shot with my summaron 35 3.5 and the other 2 are with a lomo lc-a
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 000288870030.jpg (37.3 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg 000276400012.jpg (32.3 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg 000276400004.jpg (29.3 KB, 15 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-04-2019   #66
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanskDynamit View Post
that 105 f2.4 draws beautifully.
Indeed it does!

PSA, Ultrafine is having a July 4th sale. Use the code TENOFF to get 10% off site-wide. The sale runs through the holiday weekend until Sunday night July 7th. Not a huge discount, but also not nothing.
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-05-2019   #67
mothertrucker
Registered User
 
mothertrucker's Avatar
 
mothertrucker is offline
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 179
Here's some ultrafine 400 shot, pushed a stop, on a leicaflex with super angulon F3.4 (lock-up version)

Subject is the abandoned Princess Theater in Beardstown, Illinois.

__________________
argentography.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-26-2019   #68
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03234-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-01-2019   #69
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03219-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-04-2019   #70
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03216-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-10-2019   #71
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Pentax 6x7, S-M-C Takumar 6x7 105mm f/2.4, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.01.26 Roll #196-03222-Pano-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-25-2019   #72
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Finally got around to shooting some Ultrafine Xtreme 400 in 135. This is from my first roll, loaded from bulk. Coming from ORWO N74+, the grain is much finer, but N74+ seems to hold highlights better. The film base seems thinner, but it dries completely flat, which is great for scanning and digitizing. I used 5.5 minutes to match my own times for 120, but it might take me a few rolls to see whether I want to adjust down to match the manufacturer's recommended time of 5 minutes in HC-110 Dilution B.

Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.08 Roll #218-03922-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-2019   #73
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.08 Roll #218-03890-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-06-2019   #74
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.08 Roll #218-03889-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.09.08 Roll #218-03897-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.09.08 Roll #218-03918-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-17-2019   #75
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.08 Roll #218-03906-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.09.08 Roll #218-03907-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-30-2019   #76
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.25 Roll #221-04058-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.09.25 Roll #221-04062-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr


Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.10.10 Roll #223-04067-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.10.10 Roll #223-04074-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.10.10 Roll #223-04077-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2019   #77
45govt
Registered User
 
45govt's Avatar
 
45govt is offline
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by dourbalistar View Post
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.25 Roll #221-04058-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.09.25 Roll #221-04062-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr


Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.10.10 Roll #223-04067-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.10.10 Roll #223-04074-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.10.10 Roll #223-04077-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



Looks like you are in San Jose, I lived around the corner from The Sherwood Inn on Rubino.


Which film do you feel works best with the Legacy Pro developer?
Thanks
Don
__________________
Thank You
Don
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2019   #78
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by 45govt View Post
Looks like you are in San Jose, I lived around the corner from The Sherwood Inn on Rubino.

Which film do you feel works best with the Legacy Pro developer?
Thanks
Don
Good eye! I work in San Jose off Hillsdale, and I drive by the Sherwood Inn every day. The sign caught my eye a long time ago, but I finally got around to taking a picture of the green cow in late afternoon light recently.

As far as "works best", I have no idea. I've used LegacyPro for the past few years with various film stocks, but I haven't experimented with many developers. It works well enough for me, so I've continued using it since switching from Rodinal. If you browse my Flickr albums, you can see all the different films I've developed in it. Since it's a clone of HC-110, I guess it works well as a general purpose developer.
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-05-2019   #79
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.25 Roll #221-04030-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.09.25 Roll #221-04034-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr


Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.25 Roll #221-04048-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 4 Weeks Ago   #80
dourbalistar
Registered User
 
dourbalistar's Avatar
 
dourbalistar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,547
Nikon FM2n, Nikkor-S Auto 55mm f/1.2, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.08 Roll #218-03915-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr



2019.10.10 Roll #223-04072-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr


Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Ultrafine Xtreme 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.


2019.09.25 Roll #221-04063-positive.jpg
by dourbalistar, on Flickr
__________________
I like my lenses sharp as a tank and built like a tack.

flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:30.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.