Originally Posted by robert blu
From a rational point of view I think the CL is a better choice, modern and more similar to a camera!
The T series, now the TL2 is interesting for me as concept, the interface makes it easy to be used by my wife as well, she's not very familiar with multipage menus.
My idea is to keep it beside the M10 (when traveling) for the few times when I want to photograph a detail (and 28 or 35 too wide) or a portrait with only face in it. With a 50 it would be a 75...
I`m scaling down my gear.
My Canon lenses have gone apart from the 70-200/2.8 and my prime body now is the A7R2 .
I`ve invested in two Batis lenses for it and am very pleased with both weight, image quality and focus speed.
The A7R2 also continues to serve as a digital back for my leica lenses although I`ve recently been impressed by the CL .
Handled one in Leica Manchester with a 35 Summicron asph and it felt compact and balanced .
That and reading Godfrey`s posts re the CL make me think that could be a better digital solution for my manual Leica glass sometime in the future.