Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Kiev 4: Meter or no?
Old 06-10-2013   #1
CliveC
Registered User
 
CliveC is offline
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 677
Kiev 4: Meter or no?

If I were to look to acquire an early Kiev 4 (let's say pre-1970), should I be more interested in models with or without a meter? (Assuming the meter works.) I like the look of the Kiev 4 without a meter, yet I know I would find the meter handy, so I'm a little torn.

I'm still getting my eye trained for light so while I know indoors is basically f/2.8 at 1/60 on ASA400 and I know the Sunny 16 rule, I still need to do some mental gymnastics for everything else.

I've only seen a Kiev 4 once at a camera show and the meter looked a little foreign to me. I also understand it would be using the GOST system of film speed, but that shouldn't be an issue with a few conversions under my belt, no?
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2013   #2
Sid836
Registered User
 
Sid836 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,132
I would opt for a Kiev 4a (the one without the meter). Odds are that the meter will be either dead, or inaccurate. Having one without a meter will be one reason less to worry about.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2013   #3
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 6,364
GOST is easy to deal with - it boils down to ANSI minus 10%. But regardless whether on a Contax or Kiev, the meter is a ugly bulge that disrupts the design of the camera. And as the meter is not finder or scale integrated and has to be read from the top and manually transferred, it has no advantages over a small hot-shoe mounted meter other than that it can't be lost.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2013   #4
Penny Lane
Hopelessly Citrophile
 
Penny Lane's Avatar
 
Penny Lane is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Netherlands (far end of)
Posts: 305
Just last week a ribbon snapped in my Kiev 4a. I happily popped the top off to put it on my (far better) Kiev 4. The meter on mine even gave useable readings, but I still never used it so now I got rid of it (ish, after repairs I'll still have a metered Kiev unless someone is up for a trade of top castings...).

No real rationale behind it though :-)

Derk
__________________
"The scientific name of an animal that does not either fight or flee from it's enemies is 'Lunch'"
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2013   #5
biomed
Registered User
 
biomed's Avatar
 
biomed is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle Area (North)
Posts: 3,405
I had a Kiev with a meter that worked. I do think that the meterless Kiev is better looking. I gave mine to a friend - I could never get comfortable with the ergonomics.
__________________
biomed
Things are more like they are now than they’ve ever been before.

2019 Photos

rff Gallery

Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2013   #6
pakeha
Registered User
 
pakeha is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 901
No doubt they 'look' better without a meter. Mine has a meter and is the dreaded mid 70`s production. Works like a charm , meter is accurate against 4 other meters and is easy to use and get used to.As sevo mentioned gost is easy to deal with by a 10% guess.The meter is actually quite a useful design and easy to use even though you have to read from the top of the camera.There were plenty in the U.K. - meters would not have seen much sunlight so good chance they still work.Mine came from Scotland -meter as good as the day it left the factory [ on a tuesday..:-) ]
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2013   #7
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
 
rbiemer's Avatar
 
rbiemer is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cortland, NY
Age: 59
Posts: 4,988
I would choose between the 4 and 4a based on the overall working condition of each camera. The meter, when working, is decent but the 4 is not as svelte as the 4a.
That said, I found the meter to be useful and not nearly as big as it always seemed to me in the photos of the 4 I'd seen.
One other thing you may want to consider: parallax may be more of an issue with the 4 and accessory viewfinders (if you use 'em)--the meter housing does raise the cold shoe quite a bit.
Rob
__________________

You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
--Mark Twain
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2013   #8
Rodchenko
Olympian
 
Rodchenko's Avatar
 
Rodchenko is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Exiled from Hyperborea
Posts: 2,990
My Kiev was meterless, and I used a cheap handheld, which was fine. I did yearn for a metered one, but now I reckon there's no point. The meterless ones definitely look better.
__________________
Auspicious Light on Mount Takachiho
E-PL1
35SP





  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2013   #9
wolves3012
Registered User
 
wolves3012's Avatar
 
wolves3012 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wolverhampton, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 2,817
Agreeing with the majority on here, the meterless model is aesthetically much more pleasing. Bearing in mind that many of the meters don't work or are inaccurate, a separate meter if you are unable to cope without one is not much of a hardship. Even if the meter works properly, it's anybody's guess how much longer that will be the case. However, if you only have one example with/without to choose from, working condition of the camera is more important.
__________________
Zorki: 1e (x2), 2C, 3M, 4, 4K, 5, 6
FED: NKVD, 1g, 2e
Kiev 4, 4A
Leica IIIC
Yashica Minister III
Zenith C, Zenit C, Zenit E
Minolta XG-M, XD-5
Nikon P50
Panasonic Lumix G2, 14-42 Kit lens + 45-150mm

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." - Benjamin Franklin
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2013   #10
David Hughes
David Hughes
 
David Hughes's Avatar
 
David Hughes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,518
I'm with the others. No meter is one less thing to go wrong and there are better meters. Anyway, if it fails you'll have an ugly dead lump on the top of it. The plain model is classic, imo. Then you can get a Contax II to go with it...

Regards, David
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2013   #11
john341
camera user
 
john341's Avatar
 
john341 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbekistan, Oz
Posts: 371
Well I have two Kiev 4 cameras with working meters..both produce identical readings though one is a 1969 model the other a 1974 model. I like the look of the meterless models but having a working meter on a camera I use frequently is a plus. Cheers to all.
__________________
Leica M2, Nikon S2,Kiev II
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2013   #12
kievan81
Registered User
 
kievan81 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 37
get the meter-less kiev, and if you need a meter, get that voigtlander VC meter
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2013   #13
pschauss
Registered User
 
pschauss is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 578
+1 on the VC meter. I have two Kievs with working meters and one meterless. The built in meters are accurate enough but the area that they cover is too broad and some lighting conditions tend to fool them into under exposing. I get more consistent negatives with the VC meter.
__________________
- Peter Schauss
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.