Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Leicas and other Leica Mount Cameras > Leica Q / CL/ T / X Series

Leica Q / CL/ T / X Series For the Leica Q, CL, T, X series digital cameras

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Question about the Q2
Old 01-16-2020   #1
Registered User
andrew00 is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 128
Question about the Q2


I've been comparing the Q2 (ideal) and the Ricoh GR III (more likely) and I think in most situations the GR3 will be fine for me. I'd love a viewfinder but the Q2 is naturally much more expensive.

Where I do think the Q2, from what I've seen, seems to really shine is wide open with that f1.7 lens.

There's something about some images I've seen like that that seems really intriguing. I feel like if I got a Q2 I'd put it wide open most the time.

Can anyone with the camera let me know your experiences wide open. Do you feel, from your shots, that there's magic here?

The GR3, with it's APS-C sensor and f2.8 lens is going to be, what, f4 equivalent for the Q2?

I think the GR3 is a wicked camera but I'm really considering the Q2 for it's general advantages (viewfinder, resolution etc) but mostly for that wide open lens.

Can anyone speak to that please, thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2020   #2
jsrockit's Avatar
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 20,195
I`m a GR3 user that sometimes contemplates a Q. Of course the 1.7 lens on a FF camera will allow for shallower depth of field, but at 28mm...I`ve found the greater the depth of field the better for this FOV. It is something to think about. When I want shallower depth of field, a different focal length is generally better for me. I would say if 28mm is your favorite focal length, then the Q2 is a smart buy. If not, go for the GR3.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2020   #3
Registered User
keytarjunkie's Avatar
keytarjunkie is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 567
Have you considered the original Q? If the lens and viewfinder are big deals to you, the Q has the same lens and a perfectly good viewfinder at a much lower price. You miss out on the sensor resolution and a handful of other features like weather-sealing and 4K video you wouldn't get with the GRIII anyway. These cameras also handle quite differently, you've probably thought about this but just mentioning it. I don't have a Q or Q2, but I'm currently considering both of them depending on my budget. I will probably go with the original and use the remaining money for something else.
Nikon S3 2002 | Nikon F | Linhof Tech V
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2020   #4
genius and moron
sepiareverb's Avatar
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St Johnsbury VT
Posts: 8,400
GR3 is not as useful as the previous model (GR2) as there is no flash. But then neither does the Q have a flash. Very different cameras. I've got the GR3 and have messed about with the original Q. The Q2 is a much, much bigger file.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-19-2020   #5
Registered User
JMQ is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 829
Andrew, I used a Q2 for about 8 months now. I cannot speak to the GR3, but I can tell you the experience is very different than using an M-series camera. The images are superb (yes, the files are big), and there is a digital crop in camera that will give you 35/50/75 frame lines . Even at 35mm crop, you are still at 30 mp. Best of call, the camera is weather-sealed, and I was shooting in a snowstorm with no issues. If you are in the NYC area, I'll be happy to let you try it out for yourself.
  Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17.

vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.