Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex

TLR Forum - Twin Lens Reflex another alternative to the dreaded SLR way of seeing, this forum for all format TLR cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Something wrong with Rolleiflex 2.8F lens?
Old 1 Week Ago   #1
pacco
Registered User
 
pacco's Avatar
 
pacco is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 163
Something wrong with Rolleiflex 2.8F lens?

Hello everybody, I just got myself a second hand Rolleiflex 2.8F. It was promised to be in a used but fully working condition. After a closer check, however, I found the following two issues:


1. There is a mirror in the view finder that can be used to focus when setting up the sports finder - i.e. by using the magnifying glass at the back of the finder. However, I realised that I can flip over the door to enable the sports finder view - but the mirror seems to be stuck and does not move out of its compartment. This would be needed to bring the mirror in the right position to allow focussing on the ground glass.


2. Looking into the lenses from the front of the camera, everything seems to be fine. However, when I look into the taking lens from the back, there seems be some dirt inside -see picture below. What do you think?


__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #2
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
 
Chriscrawfordphoto's Avatar
 
Chriscrawfordphoto is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Age: 44
Posts: 9,027
That's not dirt, it is fungus. It needs to be cleaned or it will get worse and can spread to other lenses you own, destroying them.


If the fungus has been there a long time, it can actually etch the surface of the glass permanently. In that case, the lens is ruined. The lens will need to be disassembled to clean it; fungus usually grows inside lenses, not on the outside.
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #3
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 30,796
Can you return this camera to the seller?
__________________
- Raid

________________


http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #4
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
 
rhl-oregon's Avatar
 
rhl-oregon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,142
That is not working condition, that is a fungal time bomb—especially in a warm humid climate. The inaccessibility to the ground glass because the hood mechanics are screwed up is an entirely separate justification for return/refund.

I practiced cleaning fungus from Nikon and Kowa lenses that a Zen priest, once a serious photographer, wanted to sell to raise funds for the monastery. (Yes, it’s a droll story.) They’d been stored in a non-air conditioned room in crammed boxes in the humid U.S. South. Some lenses were salvageable, others not—the latter went into the trash where they couldn’t infect more lenses.

Overhauling a Rolleiflex is expensive. Maybe another knowledgeable member, or a Rolleiflex repair guru (e.g. Harry Fleenor in the U.S.) can judge from the photo whether your lens can be cleaned. As Chris says, an-fungus etched lens is a ruin. If you can return it, that’s the least expensive option. Good luck.
__________________
Robert Hill Long
Southern Pines, North Carolina USA


http://rhl.photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #5
Sarcophilus Harrisii
Brett Rogers
 
Sarcophilus Harrisii is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,651
Being an F series the finder is easily removed. I would expect that articulating the sports finder with the finder off the camera, ought to make the reason for the failure of the mirror to resume the proper location, apparent.

Does the camera have the Planar or Xenotar? Personally I'd be interested to find out how well the lens cleaned up. But that is something I would do myself and might best be a problem for the seller to confront. I'd see the Planar as a slightly riskier proposition. Unlike the Xenotar the front lens is a cemented doublet and I'm wondering if any of that damage has got into the joint. Yes, the 80mm Xenotar, indeed features some composite glass also, but these are rarely prone to split unlike the 80mm Planar front. I don't think there's any separation happening with this one but there's too much haze and fungus to be certain, and some of that is in a ring around the circumference so to me it is an amber light, at least. The cement may not be separating, but that doesn't necessarily mean some of that fungus hasn't got into the joint (if it is a Planar, that is), and that's a much bigger problem to fix, than simply disassembling and cleaning the internal glass surfaces.
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #6
pacco
Registered User
 
pacco's Avatar
 
pacco is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Posts: 163
Thank you all for your feedback. I assumed this to be fungus, too, but was not sure because it looks a bit different when compared to other cases I encountered before. The lens is indeed the Planar one, by the way. Interestingly, the fungus can be only seen when looking from the back into the camera, but not the front.



The camera was sold by a professional seller, thus I will opt for a return of the Rolleiflex.
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 1 Week Ago   #7
Highway 61
Revisited
 
Highway 61's Avatar
 
Highway 61 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,799
Very nice case of fungus. Being located at the center of the elements and not looking like growing filaments starting from the edge of the glass unit, I would suspect it to be anaerobic fungus, the most prone to etch the glass, the most difficult to clean up. IMO that lens is ruined already. Surprisingly, the photographic results may not be affected and this Planar may still produce beautiful photographs. But, at the price of a 2.8F nowadays, it must be sent back to the seller immediatly, of course. Finding a 2.8F with a perfect taking lens hasn't become impossible yet.

About fungus in one lens "infecting" other lenses : fungus appears when spores trapped inside the lens when it was built (remember, there are spores everywhere) can grow into fungus under appropriate circumstances (not ventilated area, very strong humidity, darkness, camera always stored in its original leather case etc). This can take time but this can happen very quickly too (many series of Canon EF lenses built in a certain factory have developed terrible fungus quite a short time after they got marketed in the 1990s).

A lens in which fungus has grown up will not "infect" other lenses in which it has not. If several lenses stored together have developed fungus, this is because of their common background, not because of any "infection" transmitted from one lens to another.

Fungus ain't malaria.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:15.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.