Best paper size for 35mm
Old 01-12-2020   #1
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
 
LeicaFoReVer's Avatar
 
LeicaFoReVer is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Turkey
Posts: 1,369
Best paper size for 35mm

Hi guys,

I have done printing only a couple of times. I am a beginner. I am confused with the paper sizes. I only shoot 35mm and the paper I bought wasnt covering all 35mm frame. I bought ıilford 8x10 but I realize 8x11 is also not ideal so which paper gives 1.5 ratio like full frame. by math it looks like it should be 8x12 but this isnt a common paper size as far as I see in the stores. I saw in the "last prints" thread here people post photos with black line around suggesting the prints covering the full frame (?).
__________________
Leica M6 TTL x.72
Leica iiif
Leica Elmar-M 5cm f2.8 (rare early version)
Canon 50mm f/1.2 LTM
Voightlander Color Skopar PII 35mm f2.5
Contax G2 + 45mm & 28mm
Contax RX + Zeiss 50mm f1.4
Olympus OM-4 + 24mm f2.8 + 35mm f2
Fed 3 + jupiter-12
Sony NEX 7


websites:
http://www.blurb.com/user/store/aykutkaraca
http://flickriver.com/photos/2851236...r-interesting/
http://sites.google.com/site/aykutphoto/Home
http://aykutkaraca.webs.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #2
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Central Washington, USA
Posts: 13,399
You can use a paper cutter to take some off the long side to narrow the paper to the proportions you prefer. Then use that slice of paper, maybe cut further, as test strips as you prepare to print an image. Or, some people crop every image to fit 8x10. Alternately, you may find that not all images are suited for the 2:3 proportions of the typical 35mm film frame, and call for some other proportion. That can make things more complicated when it comes to framing them, though!
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

11 x 14
Old 01-13-2020   #3
fdarnell
Registered User
 
fdarnell is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 205
11 x 14

Used to do most of my 35mm full frames on 11 x 14, cutting a 2 inch strip off for a test strip to give a 9 x 14 working size (roughly). Mounts and matts nice on 16 x 20. Pretty economical.

Oh, the Portriga Rapid days!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #4
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeicaFoReVer View Post
Hi guys,

I have done printing only a couple of times. I am a beginner. I am confused with the paper sizes. I only shoot 35mm and the paper I bought wasnt covering all 35mm frame. I bought ıilford 8x10 but I realize 8x11 is also not ideal so which paper gives 1.5 ratio like full frame. by math it looks like it should be 8x12 but this isnt a common paper size as far as I see in the stores. I saw in the "last prints" thread here people post photos with black line around suggesting the prints covering the full frame (?).
I'm on the same boat with you on this, started printing on 8x10 and it does leave uneven space but I have a guillotine and this sorts it out.
__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #5
Freakscene
Deregistered user
 
Freakscene's Avatar
 
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdarnell View Post
Used to do most of my 35mm full frames on 11 x 14, cutting a 2 inch strip off for a test strip to give a 9 x 14 working size (roughly). Mounts and matts nice on 16 x 20. Pretty economical.

Oh, the Portriga Rapid days!!
My standard small prints are about 6x9 full frame on 8x10 paper. These are good for scanning on an A4 size flatbed scanner. Exhibition prints are about 10x15 on 12x16 inch paper - given that you are closer to Europe than the US that should be an available size.

Adox are making 21x29.7cm A4 size photo paper that is very close to 2:3 aspect ratio.

Marty
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #6
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
 
LeicaFoReVer's Avatar
 
LeicaFoReVer is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Turkey
Posts: 1,369
Thank you guys. Ok I feel good now. I thought I chose wrong sizes all the time. So there is no standard. I wonder why.

Cutting is a good idea which I should have thought However I dont have a paper guillotine to use in the darkroom in order to use the cut pieces as test strip. That is a good idea also.
__________________
Leica M6 TTL x.72
Leica iiif
Leica Elmar-M 5cm f2.8 (rare early version)
Canon 50mm f/1.2 LTM
Voightlander Color Skopar PII 35mm f2.5
Contax G2 + 45mm & 28mm
Contax RX + Zeiss 50mm f1.4
Olympus OM-4 + 24mm f2.8 + 35mm f2
Fed 3 + jupiter-12
Sony NEX 7


websites:
http://www.blurb.com/user/store/aykutkaraca
http://flickriver.com/photos/2851236...r-interesting/
http://sites.google.com/site/aykutphoto/Home
http://aykutkaraca.webs.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #7
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 20,274
It is always smart to print smaller than the paper... especially if you want to mat and frame the photo. I even think it always looks better to leave a border on the paper as well even if not matting and framing.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #8
Freakscene
Deregistered user
 
Freakscene's Avatar
 
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeicaFoReVer View Post
So there is no standard. I wonder why.
The paper sizes became ‘standard’ before 35mm film was widely used, possibly before it existed (my earliest paper catalogue is from 1913).

Marty
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #9
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
 
LeicaFoReVer's Avatar
 
LeicaFoReVer is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Turkey
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freakscene View Post
The paper sizes became ‘standard’ before 35mm film was widely used, possibly before it existed (my earliest paper catalogue is from 1913).

Marty
Thank you Marty for the information!!!
and I wonder the photo frame standards, do they follow the paper standards? In that case trimming creates another problem to frame it later on if you want to hang them on the wall. Sorry for the basic questions. Google isnt best place to ask sometimes.
__________________
Leica M6 TTL x.72
Leica iiif
Leica Elmar-M 5cm f2.8 (rare early version)
Canon 50mm f/1.2 LTM
Voightlander Color Skopar PII 35mm f2.5
Contax G2 + 45mm & 28mm
Contax RX + Zeiss 50mm f1.4
Olympus OM-4 + 24mm f2.8 + 35mm f2
Fed 3 + jupiter-12
Sony NEX 7


websites:
http://www.blurb.com/user/store/aykutkaraca
http://flickriver.com/photos/2851236...r-interesting/
http://sites.google.com/site/aykutphoto/Home
http://aykutkaraca.webs.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #10
Deardorff38
Registered User
 
Deardorff38's Avatar
 
Deardorff38 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 987
"However I dont have a paper guillotine to use in the darkroom in order to use the cut pieces as test strip. That is a good idea also."

Under a safelight you can easily pre-trim your paper with a steel ruler & utility knife. I shoot a lot of 6x6 negatives & regularly trim paper for test strips.

" I wonder the photo frame standards" While there are pre-made frames, companies like "Neilsen" make frames to order. Many photographers standardize their mat and frame sizes so as to economize on mat board & # of frames.

"https://www.framedestination.com/blog/picture-frames/guide-to-frame-and-mat-dimensions-for-common-print-sizes" I used to use custom sizes, but in the past 5 years I've standardized after reading Bruce Barnbaum's book "The Art of Photography"

A professional matting & framing job adds to the quality of your image.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #11
Malcolm M
Registered User
 
Malcolm M's Avatar
 
Malcolm M is offline
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 71
A4 size (1:414) is not far off 35mm (1:1.5). Certainly closer than 8x10.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #12
Ko.Fe.
Kostya Fedot
 
Ko.Fe.'s Avatar
 
Ko.Fe. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MiltON.ONtario
Posts: 8,090
Learn how to take pictures without need of cropping.
Print entire picture on 8x10. Use extra white space to hang and then hold the print.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #13
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 20,274
A 6x9” print on 8x10” paper looks pretty good on its own.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #14
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 76
Posts: 3,845
LeicaForEver: I suggest you step back and objectively determine if the 1 x 1.5 aspect ratio (35mm full frame) is absolutely essential to you. It is no more than an arbitrary ratio determined by 35mm camera manufacturers. Just don't believe the voices on the internet insisting you must use the entire frame. If that is what works best for you, fine then use it. But you can use other aspect ratios as well.

Personally, the 4x5 aspect ratio (8x10) usually works best for me. That is not driven by paper size but by what I believe looks best with my photos. Others differ. But I am not bothered in the least to crop off the ends of a 35mm negative or the top and bottom of a 6x6 negative.

Realize you have choices.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
internet forums appear to have an abundance of anonymous midgets prancing on stilts
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #15
megido
Registered User
 
megido is offline
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 267
A 18x12cm print looks very elegant on 18x24cm paper due to the equal borders. The print size retains the tones and details from a 35mm neg.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #16
BernardL
Registered User
 
BernardL is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 157
Quote:
LeicaForEver: I suggest you step back and objectively determine if the 1 x 1.5 aspect ratio (35mm full frame) is absolutely essential to you.
+1
I print 35mm on 5x7" (12.7x17.8cm~13x18) first, then, for a smaller selection, on 7x9.5" (17.8x24.1cm~18x24), different aspect ratio. I am generally not bothered by cropping out the long sides to fill the paper format. And I feel the 1.5:1 ratio is too wide. YMMV.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #17
KenR
Registered User
 
KenR is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 707
I generally print 9x13.5 on 11x14 sheets from both 35mm and 6x9 negs. For smaller pix I cut an 11x14 sheet in half and print 7x11. For square negs I cut the paper down to 11x11 with plenty of ends left over for test strips. As someone said, you have to find what works for you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #18
mike rosenlof
Insufficient information
 
mike rosenlof is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Colorado
Age: 61
Posts: 378
I had a while that I did 11x7 (inch) prints (cut from 11x14) for 6x9 negs -- same 1.5 aspect as 35mm. It worked pretty well with narrow borders.


These days I tend to print about 6x8 on 8x10 paper leaving a nice border.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #19
View Range
Registered User
 
View Range is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 293
Your next discovery will be that pre-made frame / mat manufacturers use a whole different set of sizes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-13-2020   #20
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 79
Posts: 6,313
Pretty much what Bernard L said. I usually print my 35mm negatives on Ilford 5 x 7 paper. Occasionally when a shot seems worth it, I go to 8 x 10 or 11 x 14. 5 x 7 is often big enough, fits the frame well, and is more economical than larger sizes.
__________________
May the light be with you.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:55.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.