Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

View Poll Results: Your favourite FSU 50-52 mm lens
Industar 22 (50mm f3.5) 34 6.60%
Industar 50 (50mm f3.5) 27 5.24%
Industar 26 (52mm f2.8) 14 2.72%
Industar 61 (52mm f2.8) 88 17.09%
Jupiter 8 (50mm f2.0) 228 44.27%
Jupiter 3 (50mm f1.5) 138 26.80%
other 35 6.80%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 515. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Which is your favorite FSU "normal lens" and why?
Old 11-19-2010   #1
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 41
Posts: 785
Which is your favorite FSU "normal lens" and why?

Which FSU lens is your favorite 50-52 mm lens?
Why did you choose it and what are its (optical) benefits?
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #2
Welsh_Italian
Registered User
 
Welsh_Italian's Avatar
 
Welsh_Italian is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 133
My favourite is the I-61 because the photos I produce with it always surprise me with their clarity and detail.

I have also used the J-3, I-50, Fed-50 collapsible.
__________________
Flickr favourites : BlueZero2 : user:number1
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #3
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 6,364
Helios-103
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #4
ebolton
Number 7614
 
ebolton's Avatar
 
ebolton is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Age: 61
Posts: 327
I have the I-61, the J-8, and a collapsible Fed-50. They're all pretty good optically. The I-61 is easiest to use.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #5
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,912
Jupiter-3.


I suspect the OP is asking about LTM lenses.

I also have a Helios-103 and Menopta 53/1.8. Those are in Contax Mount, but i have made a Helios-103 in LTM.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #6
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
 
rbiemer's Avatar
 
rbiemer is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cortland, NY
Age: 59
Posts: 4,974
I currently own and use one or two ;
I have Industar 50 (both the rigid and collapsible), Industar 26, Industar 61L/d, and a Jupiter 8. I had a J-3 that, thanks to Brian, was set up correctly.
I like the J-8 the best of all: it is my primary 50mm. I enjoy several things about it, starting with the price I paid for it (something around 25 USD) and proceeding to the focus tab which lets me prefocus fairly close with out having to look at it. And I have come to like the lack of click stops; I don't have to decide whether to set just a bit too small or too large and aperture.
Add to the physical things about the lens that I like the fact that I have used this lens to take some of my favorite photographs and it has become a lens I will not lightly part with.
I know there are lots of better(in quite a few objective measures ) 50mms out there but I like this one!
Rob
__________________

You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
--Mark Twain
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #7
MV72
Marc VERRIERE
 
MV72's Avatar
 
MV72 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Le Mans (France)
Age: 65
Posts: 1,535
The Helios 103 and the Jupiter-8 are probably my favourites in terms of sharpness (one on a Kiev and the other on a Canon P). But the 26 and 61 are not bad either once relubed for convenience sake. I'll get an idea of how the I-50 can performs when I've finished the film left in my FED-2.

As I haven't run a side by side comparison shooting the same "target" with each 50mm lens I can't be more specific. I'll post some shots asap.

Maybe some of you lads have done that test. But mainly we know russian glass is very good for the money.

Marc
__________________
Marc
----------------
My RFF gallery

My Flikr

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #8
MV72
Marc VERRIERE
 
MV72's Avatar
 
MV72 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Le Mans (France)
Age: 65
Posts: 1,535


Helios-103

__________________
Marc
----------------
My RFF gallery

My Flikr

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #9
januaryman
"Flim? You want flim?"
 
januaryman's Avatar
 
januaryman is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,446
I favor the Industar 61 l/d

Reason? results.



I do love the Helios 103 as well, but the Kiev 4AM I own? I just don't like it very much. Too much backwinding to ensure proper frame spacing.
__________________
Jim

"There is no special way a photograph should look."
- Garry Winogrand

Flickr - PhotographicIntrigue - NAPP Portfolio



Last edited by januaryman : 11-19-2010 at 04:46.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #10
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lapine, in deep south Alabama
Age: 68
Posts: 9,581
I-61 because of the aperture click stops, tabbed I-26 because it looks so stinking cool, and is just about a match for the I-61 on images ...
__________________
Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind ...
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #11
jwnash1
Registered User
 
jwnash1 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Old Dominion
Age: 75
Posts: 178
Helios-103 and J-3


20620004 by jwnash1, on Flickr

Taken with Helios-103 on Kiev 4AM

Last edited by jwnash1 : 11-21-2010 at 16:59.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #12
Mablo
Registered User
 
Mablo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,928
Jupiter-8 is a great lens but I always fumble with the click-less aperture so it's Industar-61 for me.
__________________
Mablo
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #13
OlliL
Registered User
 
OlliL's Avatar
 
OlliL is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 32
Posts: 784
I like these threads.
Just bought a I-61 for 10€.
__________________
Kind regards,
Oliver
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #14
Brian Legge
Registered User
 
Brian Legge is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,685
I may love the J3, but I haven't had the pleasure of shooting with one yet.

I've used the I50, I50 collapsible, I10 collapsible, I64 LD and J8. I've had more keepers with the J8 than anything else. I do have a soft spot for the I50 collapsible though for its compact size.

I don't really have any complaints about any of these lenses, assuming they are in good condition. I have entirely too many of these lenses at the moment and need to sell a few once I decide if I'm going to keep anything beyond the two called out above.
__________________
Shooting whatever I can get my hands on.
Recent Work
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #15
gho
Registered User
 
gho's Avatar
 
gho is offline
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berlin
Age: 46
Posts: 794
Clearly the trusty J8. It is sharp, delivers nice contrast, has minimal distortion and is fast enough for low light work, not to speak of its compact size.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #16
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,912
"not on the List", because of rarity, but a favorite.

1949 ZK Sonnar 5cm F1.5, wide-open, on the M8.

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-19-2010   #17
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,912
Hard to find a Helios-103 in LTM, much easier to use on a Contax/Kiev or Nikon.



The Menopta is a rebranded Helios-103, came out in the 90s.

Helios-103 on the Nikon RF:

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-20-2010   #18
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 41
Posts: 785
Thank you for all your replies!

The Helios seem to be a really nice lens, judging by the pictures.
Too bad ist seems to be hard to get with LTM...
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-20-2010   #19
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,912
I've found that the collapsible I-50 is virtually identical in performance to my post-war Coated Elmar.


  Reply With Quote

Old 11-20-2010   #20
Elmar Lang
Registered User
 
Elmar Lang's Avatar
 
Elmar Lang is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern Italy
Posts: 279
Hello,

in my opinion, the best normal lens is the Jupiter-8, immediately followed by the Jupiter-3. the lack of the click-stop (on the J-3) is not a real problem.

I use both with my Kiev outfit.

Being honest, in the practical use, I don't even see significant differences between the Jupiter-3 and the CZJ Sonnar 50-1,5 "T" (my example should be from 1941/42).

Best wishes,

Elmar Lang
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-20-2010   #21
gb hill
Registered User
 
gb hill's Avatar
 
gb hill is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Carolina
Age: 60
Posts: 5,871
I like the Jupiter 3 50/1.5. When one is shimmed right for whatever camera, only much more expensive lenses can out preform it. MOF wide open it's better than most any Canon rf lenses & I have seen. Besides it looks awesome on my silver & black Bessa R. I have several russian lenses & one lens I wish to try more is the rigid 50/3.5. It'a a great portrait lens that I found out quite by accident.
__________________
Greg
flickr
Bessa R & L
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-21-2010   #22
wdeskiew
Registered User
 
wdeskiew's Avatar
 
wdeskiew is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 28
My absolutely favourite is Helios-103. Sometimes I use Zorki-4 then I put the I-61 on it.
__________________
What I like the most in the analog photography is the smell of cameras and of a darkroom chemistry...

My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-21-2010   #23
Wahoo
Washing on Siegfried Line
 
Wahoo's Avatar
 
Wahoo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdeskiew View Post
My absolutely favourite is Helios-103.
Are these any good ? I've got about a dozen plus the one on a Kiev 5.

I shall just have to try a couple.

Here's a photo with a '66 I-61 panda from last year.

  Reply With Quote

Old 11-21-2010   #24
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,912
The only problem with the Helios-103 is that the aperture blades are shiny and can produce an off flare. I blackened the ones in my copies.
  Reply With Quote

Helios 103 - using a Sharpie
Old 11-21-2010   #25
Wahoo
Washing on Siegfried Line
 
Wahoo's Avatar
 
Wahoo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 168
Helios 103 - using a Sharpie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Sweeney View Post
The only problem with the Helios-103 is that the aperture blades are shiny and can produce an off flare. I blackened the ones in my copies.
Yes Brian, I read your informative sticky post about three years ago using a Sharpie.

I would prefer to read the post again before attempting the 'operation'

I've seen some excellent photos on RF taken with the 103.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-21-2010   #26
Sonny Boy Havidson
Registered User
 
Sonny Boy Havidson's Avatar
 
Sonny Boy Havidson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leguevin near Toulouse, France
Age: 39
Posts: 162
I have owned a FED 50/3,5, colapsible Industars 22 and 50, a 1975 Jupiter 8 and a Leica Summar (not FSU). I prefer the Industars 50 and 22 for there great performance, flare resistance (especially when compared to the Juptier 8), contrast and collapsibility. As far as bokeh is concerned, the winner is the Jupiter 8 but - as previously said - it is really prone to flare even with a hood and its aluminium construction made it less durable. The Summar was a bokeh machine but not versatile enough.

My current
__________________
What uses having a great depth of field, if there is not an adequate depth of feeling? - W. Eugene Smith
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2010   #27
paw080
Paw080
 
paw080 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 4
Hi Guys, My favorite "Normal" lens is two lenses actually. So I don't know why
the query is restricted to 50-52mm sizes; My two all time favorite normal lenses
are the Helios 103 53mm-f1.8 on my Kiev and the Helios -44M 58mm F2 on my Zenit TTLs
and my Zenit 12xps. These lenses just make better images than my other
"Normal " FSU lenses. I have 2-3 examples of all the FSU lenses listed in the
poll. They also are very good performers.
Yes I know, the Zenits are SLRs...but that Helios - 44M is darned good...

Tony

Last edited by paw080 : 11-24-2010 at 21:27. Reason: clarification...
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-26-2010   #28
tbarker13
shooter of stuff
 
tbarker13's Avatar
 
tbarker13 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,669
I only have one - a J-3, that was worked on by Brian. I use it for portraits - and just love the results.








  Reply With Quote

Old 11-26-2010   #29
Livesteamer
Registered User
 
Livesteamer is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winston Salem North Carolina
Posts: 1,415
I voted for the I 22 perhaps because I got a good one and my I 50 is not as nice. I love the small size of these lenses. More often I use a J 8 with a focusing tab. It has really clean glass and delivers wonderful images. I think it's from 1956 Joe
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-29-2010   #30
kievman
Kievman
 
kievman is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 214
Any of those lens can produce excellent results. I have every russian 50 except the j-3 and the I-26/22 and I really have a hard time deciding wihich is best. the Bokeh on the J-8 is fantastic and the helos-103 is so sharp. it really is hard to beat in that catagory. it reminds me of some zeiss glass I own. and it has great color rendition, plus its so cheap compared to German and Asian Glass. it really cant be beat!!!!!!!! Brian, great photos!!!!!!!!!!!!! Kievman
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-30-2010   #31
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 41
Posts: 785
Tim, that are really nice portraits!
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-30-2010   #32
Spider67
Registered User
 
Spider67's Avatar
 
Spider67 is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,125
Great portraits Tim!
I like the I 61 Panda
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-01-2010   #33
sweathog
Registered User
 
sweathog's Avatar
 
sweathog is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Age: 32
Posts: 888
In my time I've owned a J8 and a J3.
The J8 was great, easy to use, great results.

However, I then got a J3 (quite possibly from Krosya). I guess I got lucky, but it worked a treat on my Bessa R. I really loved that lens. Why did I love it? Because it gave me shots like this:

Stephy by Tom Swanborough-Nilson, on Flickr

I'm actually currently looking for a J8 to go on my new Bessa. Unless I find a J3 at a bargain price. Currently it seems that it's cheaper for me to buy a Zorki with a J8 than a J8 on its own. Odd.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-02-2010   #34
David Murphy
Registered User
 
David Murphy's Avatar
 
David Murphy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California
Age: 63
Posts: 2,458
Without a doubt it's the Industar 61, the sharpest 50mm class lens for the money I've ever seen. However it's quite often badly made and said to be radioactive, so my vote actually went to the Industar 22, an amazing bargain of a lens (if the condition is acceptable).
__________________
Canon L1, Leotax S, Bessa R2C, Konica Autoreflex, Canon FX, Pentax Spotmatic, Minolta SRT-101, Nikon F, Exakta VX, Miranda Automex II, Leotax K3, Yashica Mat LM, Leotax S, Pen FT, Rollei 35S, Ricoh Singlex TLS, Kowa Six, Pentax K1000, Canonflex, Praktina, Voigtlander R2C

http://legacycamera.wordpress.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2010   #35
Thomas78
Registered User
 
Thomas78 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Düren, Germany
Age: 41
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweathog View Post
...

Stephy by Tom Swanborough-Nilson, on Flickr

...
This picture shows a very nice atmosphere.

How did you do the lighting?
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2010   #36
wolves3012
Registered User
 
wolves3012's Avatar
 
wolves3012 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wolverhampton, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 2,815
I voted for Jupiter 8 and Industar 22. The J-8 I like very much but I prefer the I-22 when minimum bulk is needed and the light isn't poor. I'm also impressed by the I-61 and very impressed with the H-103. Actually, come to think of it, I have *no* bad FSU lenses!
__________________
Zorki: 1e (x2), 2C, 3M, 4, 4K, 5, 6
FED: NKVD, 1g, 2e
Kiev 4, 4A
Leica IIIC
Yashica Minister III
Zenith C, Zenit C, Zenit E
Minolta XG-M, XD-5
Nikon P50
Panasonic Lumix G2, 14-42 Kit lens + 45-150mm

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." - Benjamin Franklin
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2010   #37
julio1fer
Registered User
 
julio1fer's Avatar
 
julio1fer is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Uruguay
Posts: 476
I have used Industar -50 (collapsible) and -61, Jupiter-8 and Helios-103. The Tessar-types I-61 and I-50 are sharp and pretty serious lenses. The Jupiter-8 has the best OOF, while the Helios-103 is, IMHO, the best overall lens - considering sharpness, contrast and OOF rendition.

I know, I should try the Jupiter-3!

The Helios-44 mentioned above is also an excellent normal lens, but it is for the evil SLR Zenit series.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2010   #38
Rhodes
Time Lord
 
Rhodes's Avatar
 
Rhodes is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Figueira da Foz, Portugal
Posts: 486
POssibly jupiter-8. But I also enjoy my I-26, quite sharp and loved how the photos come up. I sold it with my zorky-4. My jupiter 8 contax mount is going today with the kiev 4 and now I down to my trusty J-8 (ltm).
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-06-2010   #39
myM8yogi
Registered User
 
myM8yogi's Avatar
 
myM8yogi is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Age: 42
Posts: 204
I agree with Greg.

My choice is a 1953 J-3 re-lubed and shimmied for Leica-M, then close-focus modified. This is a fantastic all-rounder regardless of the price.

It's fast. It's very lightweight. It looks like a cheap old lens, and nobody objects to having their photo taken with it. It's almost like they look at the age of the lens and subconciously understand that every facial blemish will not be recorded in exacting detail.

At 1.5 or f/2 it is just great for portraits and low light work. Not too sharp, but not soft either. Lots of "glow" in black and white. In good light I mostly shoot this lens at f/2 for depth of field reasons, but I really appreciate having an extra stop when I need it in low light.... which I frequently do.
By f/5.6 onwards it is a different lens - properly sharp and precise. I really value this for landscapes and detail shots. Because the character changes so much when stopping down, it's almost like having two lenses in one. I have never had a lens that changes it's character so much, and I find that I am considering this change of character for creative reasons just as much as depth of field. So it really is a lens that affects the way I visualise a scene. Hard to explain, and kind of weird for a "standard/boring" focal length, but it has wormed it's way into my brain for sure.

Criticisms....
1) It can flare spectacularly on occassion. I am talking about a full-on curved rainbow streaking across the bottom of images. I use a vented hood, and I only see this effect in very bright backlit scences, but it sometimes gives such a strange ambience to a scence that I just have to bin the shot or .
2) I wish it had a focussing tab ..... any ideas Brian???
3) No apperture stops, and they work in the wrong direction for my VF exposure meter. Not a deal-breaker, but something I would put right if I were designing a new one.

This is my first 50 sonnar, and I am pretty much in love with what it offers for such a small size. If I ever have the misfortune to do anything horrible to it, I would very seriously consider the ZM 50 sonnar because i love what the J3 has given me, but would like the above three drawbacks addressed. But unless I actually break the J3 I simply cannot justify the cost of a new ZM given my extreme satissfaction with the J3.

After my experience with the J3 I really do consider the 50mm sonnar design in general to be the perfect walk-around standard lens for me on a 35mm rangefinder.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2010   #40
OlliL
Registered User
 
OlliL's Avatar
 
OlliL is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Germany
Age: 32
Posts: 784
Industar 61 at f4




F1000004 von oliverleschke auf Flickr

I couldn't get lower, since the film was rated ASA400.
I like the OOF area of the lens and won't complain at 10€.
__________________
Kind regards,
Oliver
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:02.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.