Body/bodies choice
Old 03-21-2009   #1
fbf
Registered User
 
fbf is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,228
Body/bodies choice

Hi all. A question that has been bothering me for a while and I would appreciate any input, your experience, your current choice.

For the same amount of money, would you choose two cheaper bodies or one expensive body?
For example, 2000$ can get you a decent mp but you can easily get a nice m6 .85 + m2 for $2000.


Chris
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #2
david.elliott
Registered User
 
david.elliott is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,568
I would get two cheaper bodies. One expensive and one inexpensive. But that is mainly because I dont like to carry expensive items around DC.

If I lived out in the country, I would just get one body.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #3
thomasw_
Registered User
 
thomasw_'s Avatar
 
thomasw_ is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Langley, BC
Age: 53
Posts: 1,631
Hi Chris,

I use a M2 for shooting 35s, a M3 for 50s and a MP 0.85 for shooting my 75 or the 50s/35s without a handheld meter in social situations or situations where the MP's VF is critical. I have had the meterless bodies for some time, but the MP I started with only a couple of years ago. I view my M2 as a 35mm body and my M3 as a 50mm body, and my MP as a wonderful photographic luxury for shooting in situations where TTL metering is more effective. All of my Ms are tools but they are tools that I value and for which I have an attachment based on the quality of service they have provided. I highly recommend getting the M bodies that will function the way you want as well as being tools that you desire to reuse time after time because they have earned your trust through consistent, quality service. Now this is where other things like aesthetic form come into consideration. But these are secondary to functionality but closely connected to a sense of attachment and therefore related to usage.

So when it comes to spending money on a some Ms, I think it is best to save for the bodies you desire most. You will end up using them more.
__________________
f l i c k r
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #4
colker
-
 
colker is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: rio de janeiro
Posts: 763
well.... find another grand and buy an M8.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #5
payasam
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
 
payasam's Avatar
 
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 69
Posts: 4,429
A 0.85 M6 will do 35mm lenses, so an M2 would not be needed for that reason. An M3 may be good, as it will give you a finder with the highest available magnification (without eyepiece magnifiers) for use with fast and long lenses.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Olympus E-3, Sony A7; four Zuiko Digital lenses; Sony FE 28-70 zoom; Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor 35/2, Nikkor 50/1.4, Micro-Nikkor 55/2.8, Nikkor 85/2, Nikkor 105/2.5
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #6
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
 
visiondr's Avatar
 
visiondr is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,203
I'm all for simplicity. Single body, single film, single lens (OK, sometimes two lenses). It's very easy to get into this hobby and "go nuts" on gear when all you really need is quality gear you like using - and for me that includes choosing not to tote around multiple bodies per outing. Some of the finest photographers ever known to humanity made do with single body, single lens combinations.
__________________
Ron


“The enemy of art is the absence of limitations.”
Orson Welles

flickr (visiondrawn)

  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #7
Al Kaplan
Registered User
 
Al Kaplan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 76
Posts: 4,466
I've got a couple of M2's and an M3. I also have a Bessa L and a Leica CL. They look sort of like they were rescued from a junk yard then dragged home on a chain. They work great. Two grand should buy you a Weston Master V meter, 35 and 90mm lenses, and a pair of M bodies that function just fine.
__________________
RIP

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #8
photo4ls
Registered User
 
photo4ls's Avatar
 
photo4ls is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 360
I would love to have two bodies just
in case one happen to be down for
whatever reason, sure would be nice
to have the backup.
Nelson
__________________
M3 Summicron 50 f2 DR
Canon 50 f1.8 chrome
Elmar 90 f4
Nikon FM3a 45P f2.8
24 f2.8 28-105
Nikon FM2 135 f2.8 90 f2.5 Macro
50 f1.8
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #9
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 11,250
I know it's common here to consider the MP the best Leica ever built, but even in my worst times of GAS the idea of getting one has never crossed my mind - because one can get an M6 (with upgraded finder) for less than half the price. I find the M6 extremely functional and more robust than any brass body I have owned.

Of course, in the end, camera bodies are a very personal choice.

But two bodies make things so much easier. Lens changing, different films, different magnification, emergency replacement, etc.

Cheers,

Roland.

Last edited by ferider : 03-21-2009 at 10:53.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #10
RichardB
Registered User
 
RichardB is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 316
I usually carry two bodies, one with WA and the other short tele, a holdover from my photojournalist days.
But faced with the choice for a manual camera, an M6 and M2 is ok because you don't gain anything with an MP and you can use the M6 to meter for the M2..
Now M7 is a different story and I would rather have one M7 than two manual M's.-Dick
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #11
b.espahbod
Optophile
 
b.espahbod's Avatar
 
b.espahbod is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 192
I usually prefer buying lenses but M6 ttl and a nice Bessa will do just fine
__________________
IIIfRDST, IIIg, sold all Ms keeping two M7s, R6.2
P2, F2, MasterTechnika, 503CW, 903SWC, SWC/M
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #12
mojobebop
Registered User
 
mojobebop's Avatar
 
mojobebop is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: nyc
Posts: 243
i'd get 2 instead of 1.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #13
lic4
Registered User
 
lic4's Avatar
 
lic4 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Korea
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbf View Post
For example, 2000$ can get you a decent mp but you can easily get a nice m6 .85 + m2 for $2000.
This is my combo. It's perfect for me in many ways, even though I use a 28mm and a 50mm (no 28 frame lines on either camera!)

Strangely, the M2 feels like it should be more expensive than the M6 ,and the quality is incredible. I don't think going from MP to M2 is a step down, but I like shooting with a separate meter so it depends on your needs. My friend w/ an MP wants to change to my setup b/c he's afraid to take his expensive camera out sometimes. He also doesn't find there to be a big enough difference between the MP and M6 in regular pro/personal working conditions (my M6 has a VF upgrade).
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #14
samoksner
Who stole my light?
 
samoksner's Avatar
 
samoksner is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 187
I would go for 2 bodies, but a different setup if it were me. Get an m3 (.92x mag) and a .72x m6 or an m4-2 or m4-p or even an m2. The m6 .85x does have a reputation for flaring up the rangefinder.

Obviously, using a non metered camera doesn't bother you, if you want the 28mm frames, grab an m4-p otherwise, an m2 + m3 combo should do you well.
__________________
The right moment is when the shutter hides the fly.

Blog: http://samoksner.blogspot.com/
Flickr:http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-21-2009   #15
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS's Avatar
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada, eh.
Age: 62
Posts: 19,391
Two M2s here. Two bodies allows use of different films, or same film and different lenses without having to switch, also a back-up should one body stop functioning.
__________________
my little website: http://frankfoto.jimdo.com/

photography makes me happy
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-23-2009   #16
maddoc
... likes film.
 
maddoc's Avatar
 
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 名古屋
Age: 53
Posts: 7,301
Imagine dropping an $2000 MP on the pavement or a $1000 M6 ... $2000 are good for an M6 ($850) + M2 ($450) and you still have ~ $700 in your wallet.
__________________
- Gabor

flickr
pBase
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-23-2009   #17
ray*j*gun
Registered User
 
ray*j*gun's Avatar
 
ray*j*gun is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 2,317
I always take 2 bodies on anything that is going to be interesting and I know it advance. One B&W and one color. I have an M6 Classic and an M4-P.... this way I have a meter in those cases where I feel I need to check my instincts or if I am shooting chromes. If you like the M experience I have never found either of my cameras to be lacking in any way.
__________________
Raymond
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-23-2009   #18
EZfan
RF Shooter
 
EZfan's Avatar
 
EZfan is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Lone Star state
Posts: 100
Yep, 2 M bodies is always better than 1 body. Cheers.
__________________

Camera/lens accumulator and seasonal painter.
________________________


<img src=http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=28907&dateline=1235974840 onload=if(this.width > 1024) {this.width=1024;this.alt='Click here to see a large version';} onmouseover=if(this.alt) this.style.cursor='pointer'; onclick=if(this.alt) window.open('http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=28907&dateline=1235974840'); border=0 />
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-23-2009   #19
Merkin
For the Weekend
 
Merkin is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 867
If you tend to only carry one body at a time, just go with one body. If you prefer always or almost always carrying two, go with two. If you tend to be clumsy and are worried about dropping one, go with two cheapies. If you think you would be happier with an MP, or you would use an MP more, go with the MP. The key is to not rush your decision. The best deal for you will come along when you are ready.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-23-2009   #20
Erik L
Registered User
 
Erik L's Avatar
 
Erik L is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: pekin, city of pollution
Age: 38
Posts: 479
i use more than one body so i have a film choice when shooting.
usually slides in one body and negitives in the other. (its not usually both leicas at the same time though)
__________________
GW670II M2 M4-P Minolta α507SI AE-1P and a few lenses
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:45.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.