Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

The Takumar Lenses
Old 01-05-2019   #1
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,321
The Takumar Lenses

No dedicated thread for Takumar lenses?

Post your pictures here. Film or digital, 35mm or medium format, anything with the Takumar word on it.

I'll make a start.

Takumar 55 f/2


__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #2
Larry Cloetta
Registered User
 
Larry Cloetta is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jackson, WY
Age: 69
Posts: 1,493
Nice idea, great lenses; as a group seemingly designed with an eye more towards pleasing rendering style than impressive mtf charts.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #3
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 8,735
I have three Super-Takumar screw mount lenses: 28mm, 50mm, and a 200mm. All were purchased between 1969 and 1971. My 50 is the radioactive model and really a great lens, The 28mm also great has just a slight vignette at wide open (F3.5) and I had to send it to the Pentax guy in the Carolinas to fix a lazy aperture, and the 200 is perfect except I never used it too much:

28mm, with H&W copy film using H&W developer, very fine grained but dynamic range was short:


H&W Copy Film; H&W developer by John Carter, on Flickr

50mm, again with H&W copy film and a no. 1 extension tube:


H&W copy film and with their developer by John Carter, on Flickr

200mm, this time with Plus-x handheld and after a couple of beers:


Plus X D-76 by John Carter, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #4
Greyscale
Registered User
 
Greyscale's Avatar
 
Greyscale is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Age: 59
Posts: 4,617
105/2.8 Super Takumar


Auto Takumar 55/2.2


SMC Takumar 55/1.8


SMC Macro Takumar


Super Multicoated Takumar 50/1.4


SMC Takumar 50/1.4


SMC Takumar 50/1.4


Super Takumar 105/2.8
__________________
my flickr

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #5
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 8,735
I have a couple of other Takumars; I forgot the Takumar Macro f 4.0 50mm screw mount (mid-60s but it is recent to me), and a really sharp radioactive 105, f 2.4 (6x7).

105mm:

Arista EDU ultra 100 HC-110h by John Carter, on Flickr

and:


Untitled by John Carter, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #6
CharlesDAMorgan
Registered User
 
CharlesDAMorgan is offline
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: South East UK
Posts: 857
8 element 50mm f1.4 Super Takumar

__________________
Film amateur with a few rangefinders - Leica III, M2/M3, Werra 3 and Zeiss Super Ikonta 534/16 medium format.

Apart from that have a Rolleiflex 3.5F, the odd Minolta XD7, Hasselblad 500cm, a Topcon Super D and an Intrepid 5x4 large format (not the half of it but I am clearing them out, honest).

I do all my own black and white developing at home.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #7
CharlesDAMorgan
Registered User
 
CharlesDAMorgan is offline
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: South East UK
Posts: 857
85mm f1.9 Super Takumar

__________________
Film amateur with a few rangefinders - Leica III, M2/M3, Werra 3 and Zeiss Super Ikonta 534/16 medium format.

Apart from that have a Rolleiflex 3.5F, the odd Minolta XD7, Hasselblad 500cm, a Topcon Super D and an Intrepid 5x4 large format (not the half of it but I am clearing them out, honest).

I do all my own black and white developing at home.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #8
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is online now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,862
The Takumar 55mm f2 and the f1.8 version produce nice OOF areas full bore and are very flare resistant to boot.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #9
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,321
Takumar 50f/1.4


__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #10
petronius
Registered User
 
petronius's Avatar
 
petronius is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Germany
Age: 55
Posts: 2,204


50mm/1,4 adapted to my EOS 650, Polypan F
__________________
My tumblr

My Rollei 35 tumblr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #11
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,509
There are some very nice photos in this thread, so much so it is difficult to select the ones I like the best. And it is also difficult to select the "best" Takumars - there are so many of them that are so darned good.

I am a long time collector / user of Takumars having started down the Asahi Pentax route perhaps 25 years ago when I discovered how good these lenses are for myself. But familiarity breeds contempt as they say (or perhaps complacency is a better term) and I have not used them so much in recent years as other more exotic lenses have come along and been within my grasp. This thread moves me to get them out once more and use them again seriously. I may start with the 50mm f1.4 and 55mm f1.8 both of which are superb performers. Or even the 135mm lenses. Or the ......well you see my problem - there is a surfeit of choice.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #12
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 8,735
Peter, start out with the 50mm f1.4, it is great for out of focus. You could really do some beauties with that cool post processing you do.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #13
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is online now
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 13,018
My Gal? Pentax 67II 4.0/135mm Macro Takumar


Give Me Blood! Pentax 67II 4.0/135mm Macro Takumar
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #14
Mackinaw
Think Different
 
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 3,563
50/1.4 on my black Spotmatic. Forgot the film.



Jim B.
__________________
My fancy-schmancy gallery:
http://snowcountryphotography.com

My RFF Gallery:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...user=1453&sl=m
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #15
Barry Kirsten
Registered User
 
Barry Kirsten's Avatar
 
Barry Kirsten is offline
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Brookfield, Victoria, Australia
Age: 76
Posts: 58
I love the m42 Takumars. I have a 35/3.5, a 28/3.5 and a 50/1.4 7-element, all of the Super-Multi-Coated variety. Here is a shot with the 35/3.5 on expired Tmax 100, YG filter, developed in PMK (no sharpening or other PS fiddling).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Scotch Thistle Takumar copy.jpg (85.5 KB, 6 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #16
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 4,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Kirsten View Post
I love the m42 Takumars. I have a 35/3.5, a 28/3.5 and a 50/1.4 7-element, all of the Super-Multi-Coated variety. Here is a shot with the 35/3.5 on expired Tmax 100, YG filter, developed in PMK (no sharpening or other PS fiddling):

Scotch Thistle Takumar by Barry Kirsten, on Flickr
Barry,
I have the same set of lenses...currently have the 28mm 3.5 mounted on my a6000..
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #17
Oren Grad
Registered User
 
Oren Grad is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 267


Pentax SV / 35/2 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar / XP2 Super
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #18
narsuitus
Registered User
 
narsuitus's Avatar
 
narsuitus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,249

Pentax System by Narsuitus, on Flickr

I use the following lenses on my Pentax Spotmatics:
Asahi 300mm f/6.3 preset Tele Takumar (left)
Asahi 200mm f/5.6 Super Takumar
Asahi 135mm f/3.5 Super Takumar
Asahi 105mm f/2.8 Super Takumar (right)
Asahi 50mm f/1.4 Super Takumar (8-element) (on black body)
Asahi 35mm f/3.5 Super Takumar (not in photo)
Asahi 28mm f/3.5 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar (on chrome body)
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #19
narsuitus
Registered User
 
narsuitus's Avatar
 
narsuitus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,249

Portrait by Narsuitus, on Flickr

Taken with Asahi 105mm f/2.8 Super Takumar on a Fuji X-Pro1.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #20
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,509
You know the optical characteristics of many of the photos on this thread are in my opinion amongst the best I have ever seen on this site......says a lot for those old Takumars. Honest to God if there were not so many around on the market I have a hunch that people would be willing to pay big bucks to get their hands on them.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2019   #21
Ccoppola82
Registered User
 
Ccoppola82 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 323
The 85mm 1.8 is my favorite portrait lens and the 35 3.5 is a tack driver
__________________
Leica M2/M6
Hasselblad 500CM

Instagram
Coppola_Art
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #22
Sarcophilus Harrisii
Brett Rogers
 
Sarcophilus Harrisii is online now
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,637
I have not used my Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5 enough. When I saw this rare image made with it I was reminded of how sharp it is. FP4 Plus in ID-11 1 + 3 loaded in a Zeiss Ikon Icarex 35S TM.

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #23
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,321
The Takumar 50 f/1.4. Film is ilford HP5+


__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #24
Greyscale
Registered User
 
Greyscale's Avatar
 
Greyscale is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Dodge Iowa
Age: 59
Posts: 4,617
Super-Takumar 135/2.5

__________________
my flickr

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #25
ChrisPlatt
Thread Killer
 
ChrisPlatt's Avatar
 
ChrisPlatt is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens NYC
Age: 58
Posts: 2,825
SMC Pentax 35/3.5 lens is the later PK-mount bayonet version of the M42 screwmount Takumar.
All versions are outstanding.

Chris
__________________
Bring back the latent image!
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #26
Photon42
burn the box
 
Photon42's Avatar
 
Photon42 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Neutral Zone
Posts: 624
Got a 6x7 with 55/105/165. Here is a shot with the 105:



Here is she with the machine:

__________________
My Gallery
My Instagram
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #27
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,321
One more, Takumar 50 f/1.4 on ilford XP2


__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #28
CharlesDAMorgan
Registered User
 
CharlesDAMorgan is offline
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: South East UK
Posts: 857
That's stunning Pan!
__________________
Film amateur with a few rangefinders - Leica III, M2/M3, Werra 3 and Zeiss Super Ikonta 534/16 medium format.

Apart from that have a Rolleiflex 3.5F, the odd Minolta XD7, Hasselblad 500cm, a Topcon Super D and an Intrepid 5x4 large format (not the half of it but I am clearing them out, honest).

I do all my own black and white developing at home.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #29
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesDAMorgan View Post
That's stunning Pan!
Thanks Charles,
One more from that roll - Edinburgh 2008. Camera is a Zenit 12XP

__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2019   #30
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 4,944
Super-Takumar 28mm 3.5
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #31
dmr
Registered Abuser
 
dmr's Avatar
 
dmr is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in Middle America
Posts: 4,521
"Positively 12th. Street"

For the most part, I like the Takumar 28-80 zoom. It covers most of whatever I want to shoot and it's reasonably compact. However, when zoomed out wide it does show some barrel distortion, like an almost-fish-eye.

This particular one was shot on the Rollei Digibase film, a C41 film without that amber mask.

Pentax MG.

__________________
My (NEW) Gallery
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #32
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 8,735
I received one of these lenses with a body I bought. I never used it but recently gave it to my grandson with my Pentax K10d. He is going nuts with it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #33
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is online now
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 30,619
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?
__________________
- Raid

________________


http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #34
Swift1
Registered User
 
Swift1's Avatar
 
Swift1 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Talent, Oregon.
Posts: 1,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?
Yes it is. I have a S-M-C version that I bought last June for a whopping $30.


Untitled by Colton Allen, on Flickr
Asahi Pentax SV
S-M-C Takumar 28/3.5
Kodak Ektar 100
Nikon Coolscan V ED
__________________
Colton

If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk. The Ugly
My Flickr
My Website
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #35
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,869
Couldn’t agree more. Compact, beautifully made, perform well and seem to like digital sensors. Well done to the photographers too - nice work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterm1 View Post
You know the optical characteristics of many of the photos on this thread are in my opinion amongst the best I have ever seen on this site......says a lot for those old Takumars. Honestly if there were not so many around on the market I have a hunch that people would be willing to pay big bucks to get their hands on them.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #36
jawarden
Registered User
 
jawarden is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by p.giannakis View Post
Takumar 50f/1.4


Very nice!
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #37
narsuitus
Registered User
 
narsuitus's Avatar
 
narsuitus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?
In 2010, I paid $70 US for one in excellent condition (shipping included).

I use it when I do not wish to put my Zeiss 28mm f/2 Distagon in jeopardy.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #38
p.giannakis
Pan Giannakis
 
p.giannakis's Avatar
 
p.giannakis is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Stafford - UK
Posts: 2,321
Ilford HP5+
Takumar 50 f/1.4

__________________
Regards,
Pan


The Monochrome Archives
Instagram



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #39
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 8,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift1 View Post
Yes it is. I have a S-M-C version that I bought last June for a whopping $30.


Untitled by Colton Allen, on Flickr
Asahi Pentax SV
S-M-C Takumar 28/3.5
Kodak Ektar 100
Nikon Coolscan V ED
Nice shot with your 28mm f3.5 SMC Takumar, I have the Super-Takumar version and love it. I've loved it since 1970 when I paid $60 new.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2019   #40
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is online now
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 13,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?
I have the 28mm f/3.5 SMC Takumar, bought new for $158.43 on Jan 8 1972. Four days later it went back to Honeywell for warranty repair of a diaphragm defect, wouldn't open all the way to f/3.5.

Here's what the Pentax blurb said about this lens:
"A new super-wide angle lens of 7 elements, designed and produced to meet the most exacting of the professional requirements, this is the lens of professionals and advanced amateurs need to shoot more artistic photographs. Equipped with full automatic diaphragm; ideal for architecture, fast action, and artistic photography."

I also have the 28mm f/2 SMCP-M but it's bayonet mount, and not a Takumar. In addition for unknown reasons I later bought the Zeiss 28mm f/2 Distagon T* ZK, also bayonet mount and large, weighs a ton... 530g!
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:28.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.