Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Leicas and other Leica Mount Cameras > Leica General Discussion / News / Rumors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

Why do you WISH you had decided NOT to buy a Leica Digital M?
Old 08-05-2017   #1
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 78
Posts: 6,033
Why do you WISH you had decided NOT to buy a Leica Digital M?

Actually I don't really wish I had decided not to buy one. I've questioned my decision at times though. Sensor problems, long wait time for repair/replacement; the nuisance of lens coding; sensor crop issue with the M8; UV/IR filters. All that, as opposed to just mounting a lens on the D700 and everything works fine.

What say you?
__________________
May the light be with you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #2
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
 
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
 
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,976
I was a working photographer and needed a reliable camera system.

Phil Forrest
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #3
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 78
Posts: 6,033
And what was your reliability problem with your Digital Leica?
__________________
May the light be with you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #4
Ken Ford
Refuses to suffer fools
 
Ken Ford's Avatar
 
Ken Ford is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Suburban Chicago, IL USA
Age: 57
Posts: 3,030
My aging eyes aren't up to a traditional RF any more, so the M-P 240 is going away.
__________________
"If you can control yourself and just loathe us quietly from a distance then by all means stay." - Joe

Leica: M-P Typ 240 - M6 - Leicavit M - RapidWinder - Motor M - 21 Super-Elmar - 28 Ultron - 35 Summicron ASPH - 40 Summicron - 75 APO-Summicron ASPH - 75 Summarit-M - 75 Color-Heliar - 90 Elmar-C
Nikon RF: S2 - S3 2000 - 35/2.5 - 50/2 - 50/1.4 Millennium - 105/2.5 - 135/3.4
X-Pro2, X-M1, X100s, NEX-7, dp0 Quattro, N1V1, N1V2, oodles of other stuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #5
splitimageview
Registered User
 
splitimageview is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,996
After the M8 and the Q...nope. In my Q service case, the quote was 3 weeks; took 7 months. This was with one of their high-profile dealers pushing them behind the scenes...
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #6
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands
Posts: 8,384
I don't. If I did, I'd have sold it.
__________________
Jaap

jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #7
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
 
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
 
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob-F View Post
And what was your reliability problem with your Digital Leica?
I got an M8 about a year after it was released. Factory guaranteed used model. After three months, it needed the sensor remapped. This happened two more times during my year + owning the camera. Each trip to Leica for repair was 2-3 months. So, I owned the camera for ~18 months and about 7 months, the camera was out for repair.

I purchased an M9 in October of 2010 and sold it in June of 2012. On day three of ownership, the dreaded vertical line popped up (same as the M8) and the camera went immediately back to Leica for service. Came back in December and then it had a good run of a few months then another sensor remap from several vertical lines. 3 months out. Next time it happened, the camera got a shutter overhaul. Just under 2 months out. Final time I had a problem was in December of 2011 when the sensor developed a horrible set of thick magenta and cyan bands. Sent back to Leica for 3 months and the sensor was replaced as well as the shutter. All told, the camera was out for about 10-11 months over only 22 months of ownership. About 50% of my time owning the camera was spent out for repair. Ridiculous. I treated it with kid-gloves from the time it got back to the time I sold it. Barely shot with it because it was such a fragile piece of gear. I was a poor barely working stiff and I didn't get the gourmet treatment that many folks (a few on this forum, a few on other lists) get from Leica because I don't have as much invested in Leica gear, nor can I afford it. Leica drew their line in the sand with me then and I'll never buy another new piece of Leica gear, nor will I ever buy a Leica digital device, new or used. The Leica M9 was the worst financial and gear decision I ever made. Sold at a loss of 30% in spite of it being near mint and having come back from Leica just prior, with a new warranty. I traded it for a Nikon SP with a 5cm f/1.4 and a big wad of cash. That was one of the best gear decisions I ever made.

My 1969 M4 is a fantastic camera with a wonderful DR Summicron and a custom modified adapter to fit a 2.1cm O-Nikkor but those are arcane, ancient pieces of gear, not the host of Leica lenses I owned and used from 21 up to 135mm when I had the digital. From then on out, I used Nikon digital cameras for work that had a deadline and whatever film camera that suited my fancy for everything else.

Phil Forrest
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #8
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 19,953
Used the M8 for awhile and liked it. I bought the M9 brand new, sold it after a year... it was great when I used it, but I also used Fuji cameras. After awhile, I decided that I prefer mirrorless AF cameras. I still prefer aperture rings and shutter dials though, but my manual focus days are over unless my style of photography changes.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #9
RichC
Registered User
 
RichC is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 1,331
I bought an M8 in large part because of the promised perpetual upgrade. Turns out Leica lied to me. Will never trust them again. Scum.
__________________

-=Rich=-


Portfolio: www.richcutler.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #10
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The Show Me state
Age: 78
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
I bought the M9 brand new, sold it after a year... it was great when I used it, but I also used Fuji cameras.
Yes, I have found you really can't go wrong with Fuji!
__________________
May the light be with you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #11
splitimageview
Registered User
 
splitimageview is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichC View Post
I bought an M8 in large part because of the promised perpetual upgrade. Turns out Leica lied to me. Will never trust them again. Scum.
I had forgotten about that debacle.

At this point they do offer a perpetual repair program; keep sending them in and they'll keep taking much too long to repair them.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #12
YouAreHere
Registered User
 
YouAreHere's Avatar
 
YouAreHere is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 198
I question my decision of buying the M-E brand new. Its upgrade was a very very lightly used M-D, purchased just four months ago. And I paid $1,200 less than the M-E!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #13
Chris101
summicronia
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,365
I decided not to buy a digital M, even though I love my M4-P. I have a plethora of digicams, but none of them try to emulate film cameras (the three Nikon DSLRs not withstanding.) Digital Leicas (in my most humble opinion) are trying to fool the photographer (and viewer) that they are film cameras (but better.)

ps, YouAreHere, I really dig your avatar picture. It's a great example of the 1950s commercial images, which is a thing for me. Do you by any chance, have a large version of this? I'd like to see it if you do!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #14
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 30,759
My eyesight is still very good, and I love my Leica digital RF cameras. Leica is a very special company, and its products are special.
__________________
- Raid

________________


http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #15
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 46
Posts: 19,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris101 View Post
Digital Leicas (in my most humble opinion) are trying to fool the photographer (and viewer) that they are film cameras (but better.)
How would they fool the viewer?
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #16
Ko.Fe.
Kostya Fedot
 
Ko.Fe.'s Avatar
 
Ko.Fe. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MiltON.ONtario
Posts: 7,400
Why just digital Leica? To me if you need just digital picture, no buy Leica, it sucks in general for digital, M10 is included.

But I'm RF shooter and this is it. RF is Leica.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #17
fireblade
Vincenzo.
 
fireblade's Avatar
 
fireblade is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob-F View Post
Actually I don't really wish I had decided not to buy one. I've questioned my decision at times though. Sensor problems, long wait time for repair/replacement; the nuisance of lens coding; sensor crop issue with the M8; UV/IR filters. All that, as opposed to just mounting a lens on the D700 and everything works fine.
What say you?
As above, but wanting a compact i tried a few and sold them until i bought the 109, no regrets there.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
How would they fool the viewer?
A fool and his folly are hard to separate.
__________________
Vincenzo

"No place is boring, if you've had a good night's sleep and have a pocket full of unexposed film."
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #18
Rayt
Registered User
 
Rayt's Avatar
 
Rayt is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,895
I own the Monochrom (but it is in Germany waiting for sensor replacement) and mostly shoot b/w film. Liveview can replicate any benefits of a rangefinder so there no need to go for the M's when there are alternatives. These alternatives are not only cheaper but more reliable. I would not bother with digital Leica if I shot color at all. I will likely sell the MM when I get it back.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #19
Huss
Registered User
 
Huss is offline
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 7,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichC View Post
Turns out Leica lied to me. Will never trust them again. Scum.
Don't feel too bad. It wasn't just you.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #20
x-ray
Registered User
 
x-ray's Avatar
 
x-ray is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tennessee USA
Age: 70
Posts: 4,625
Mother board failure, sensor failure, slow small buffer, Leica lens compatibility issues, terrible quality LCD all made for a really bad experience with my M9. I bought it new and it spent nearly half of its life in the shop. It was on par speed and feature wise with the Nikon D1 that I bought when it came out but the M9 was much less reliable. The M9 was obsolete when it came out. Overall image quality was no better than the images I get routinely from my Nikons and Canons I had owned. It was so unreliable I couldn't carry it on a job without a backup Nikon.

In the end I had to threaten Leica with a lawsuit to get issues fixed.

I almost forgot the terrible customer service. Extremely slow with no pro support and I often had to return the camera at my expense to get the repair that was botched fixed.

I'm one that will never buy another Digital Leica and never buy a new Leica product.

There are too many superior choices unless you absolutely feel you must have an RF.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #21
Lss
Registered User
 
Lss is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob-F View Post
What say you?
I only wish I had bought a digital Leica sooner.
__________________
Lasse
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-05-2017   #22
RichC
Registered User
 
RichC is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichC View Post
I bought an M8 in large part because of the promised perpetual upgrade. Turns out Leica lied to me. Will never trust them again. Scum.
To add insult to injury, the camera had to be returned to fix a fault, which took a zillion years (I see nothing has changed in the decade since!). And then the shutter failed.

Not to mention the camera's weird quirks such as the firmware occasionally freezing - the solution being to yank the battery out, then replace it, just like you do with the mains plug when your computer glitches!



I spent what was a huge amounts of money to me to buy a new digital Leica, seduced by Leica's reputation. But the company turned out to be dishonest, and the camera poor quality and unreliable.

Today, with a decade's worth of water under the bridge, the fact that Leica lied to me still rankles. We can't always keep our promises, but rather than being humble and honourable - apologising and providing recompense for the perpetual upgrade disaster - they treated customers like me with contempt.
__________________

-=Rich=-


Portfolio: www.richcutler.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #23
splitimageview
Registered User
 
splitimageview is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,996
They are, after all, computers, so it's not unusual for them to crash. I can live with this on occasion, although it seems to be less common these days among all brands
  Reply With Quote

Why do you WISH you had decided NOT to buy a Leica Digital M?
Old 08-06-2017   #24
Talus
pan sin sal
 
Talus is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Connecticut / Honduras
Posts: 294
Why do you WISH you had decided NOT to buy a Leica Digital M?

I had bought a pristine M9-P early last year. Everything was going fine until I noticed a red line in all of my images. Sensor problem. I sent to Leica NJ and had one heck of a time getting any communication from them. I was at PhotoPlus in NYC a month later and had a very candid talk with one of the reps at the Leica booth about how I haven't had any updates. He turned out to be a big wig over at Leica NJ. Afterwards I received multiple email updates and a phone call. But, in the end, my Leica is my hobby camera, I use a DSLR for my workhorse. It was very frustrating to have the one camera that I really enjoy using sit for over 3 months waiting for a sensor. It returned to me on a Monday and I sold it on Tuesday. Perhaps the newer bodies are more reliable, but at this point I'm not going to go down that road again. Im happy with my M6.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #25
Out to Lunch
Registered User
 
Out to Lunch's Avatar
 
Out to Lunch is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vietnam
Posts: 5,404
Je ne regrette rien.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #26
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ko.Fe. View Post
... it sucks in general for digital, M10 is included.

...
Would you expand on the M10's shortcomings?

Data shows the M10's technical image quality (signal-to-noise ratio & dynamic range) is equal to or better than the highest performing 24 X 36mm sensor DSLRs and mirrorless competitors.
__________________
Basically, I mean, ah—well, let’s say that for me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it’s interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states—which has to do with the . . . contest between content and form.
Garry Winogrand
williamchuttonjr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #27
willie_901
Registered User
 
willie_901's Avatar
 
willie_901 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by splitimageview View Post
They are, after all, computers, so it's not unusual for them to crash. I can live with this on occasion, although it seems to be less common these days among all brands
Uh... it is unusual for computers to crash. Otherwise, in 2017 practically nothing would work.
__________________
Basically, I mean, ah—well, let’s say that for me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it’s interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states—which has to do with the . . . contest between content and form.
Garry Winogrand
williamchuttonjr.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #28
airfrogusmc
Registered User
 
airfrogusmc is offline
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,661
I like them so much I own 4. Leica MM (original). Leica M-E, Leica M 262 and the finest digital camera i have ever shot with the M 10.

With the exception of the sensor recall I had more problems with my digital Canons over the same time/same frame count. I had a 1DsMkIII from CPS dead on arrival. In 2012 while shooting for NATO here in Chicago I had a complete shutter failure. I have not had any issues with my Leica M's other than the recall. Knock on wood.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #29
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 13,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Wijninga View Post
Je ne regrette rien.
Non, rien de rien... You could put that to music, Peter!
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #30
ptpdprinter
Registered User
 
ptpdprinter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Wijninga View Post
Je ne regrette rien.
...rien encore.
__________________
ambientlightcollection.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #31
JeffS7444
Registered User
 
JeffS7444 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 179
I was a very early M8 buyer and also bought a demo M9 while it was still a current model. No regrets, but I never had any expectations that these would be flawless, and that probably made all the difference. At the time, these were some of the smallest cameras with the largest sensors, and that was a pretty awesome combination.

Actually, the biggest pain was in selling them: Digital M buyers are so nervous!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #32
benmacphoto
Registered User
 
benmacphoto's Avatar
 
benmacphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Age: 32
Posts: 899
I've had two M8s, an M9, and now a 240.
I got the M8 in early 2009 and my regret with that camera was at the time a used Noctilux was around the same price as the used M8.
And then a few months later the M9 came out, so should have waited.
No real regret with the M9, sold it right as the sensor corrosion issue came out.
I just felt like I had to be careful with the camera, as if it seemed delicate.

Now with the 240 I am really enjoying the camera and feel like it is the right Leica digital for me.
__________________
Instagram

Website
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2017   #33
splitimageview
Registered User
 
splitimageview is offline
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie_901 View Post
Uh... it is unusual for computers to crash. Otherwise, in 2017 practically nothing would work.
Modern operating systems mean the application may crash but it won't take down the entire system. Camera computers do crash on occasion; Fuji cameras for example. I operate the largest/oldest Fuji forum and user threads show it *does* happen. And I've also experienced it on several brands. Every computer has bugs and as new firmware updates are released they are quashed, so over time the reports diminish.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-07-2017   #34
Fraser
Registered User
 
Fraser is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,720
Once you have the lenses you really have no choice, back in the film days the lenses didn't seem that expensive maybe when I bought my M8 if fuji had been an alternative I would have not bothered with a digital M. I still have my M9 which I still enjoy using when I'm not working but lately my df has taken over because of all the cheap Nikkors!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-19-2017   #35
noisycheese
Normal(ish) Human
 
noisycheese is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,287
Above we read of much grief that M8 and M9 owners have experienced.

That has not been my experience with my first digital camera, the M240 or the M-P 240 which I upgraded to. Each functioned as advertised, although the M240 buffer was too small and would become sluggish.

I did have 2 or 3 instances of the M240 freezing up on me; that was corrected by shutting down then removing and reinstalling the battery. I attribute the freezeups to the small buffer capacity.

It seems like with the M-P 240, Monochrom 246 and M10, Leica has finally gotten it right.

They could have handled the original Monochrom's sensor corrosion problem in a more owner friendly manner, though. Still, I will not hesitate to acquire an M246 and/or M10 when finances permit.
__________________
The Leica M passion: From the inside it's hard to explain; from the outside it's hard to understand.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-19-2017   #36
Mudman
Registered User
 
Mudman's Avatar
 
Mudman is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,136
I've made wonderful images with my m8. It's quirky but I knew that going in. No regrets.
__________________
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships."
~Ansel Adams
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-19-2017   #37
Mudman
Registered User
 
Mudman's Avatar
 
Mudman is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,136
Also am I the only one with a positive experience with Leoca NJ?
__________________
"Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships."
~Ansel Adams
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2017   #38
noisycheese
Normal(ish) Human
 
noisycheese is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,287
I had to send my M240 to Leica NJ to get the rangefinder adjusted after I dropped my camera bag and the RF was knocked out of alignment.

As I recall, I had the camera back in two weeks time. That was about three years or so ago, though.

About five years prior to that, I had to send my 50 Summilux in for a check after it had fallen out of my camera bag and landed on a tile floor. It was returned to me in about three weeks at no cost since it was still under warranty.
__________________
The Leica M passion: From the inside it's hard to explain; from the outside it's hard to understand.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2017   #39
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 9,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisycheese View Post
I had to send my M240 to Leica NJ to get the rangefinder adjusted after I dropped my camera bag and the RF was knocked out of alignment.

As I recall, I had the camera back in two weeks time. That was about three years or so ago, though.

About five years prior to that, I had to send my 50 Summilux in for a check after it had fallen out of my camera bag and landed on a tile floor. It was returned to me in about three weeks at no cost since it was still under warranty.
Perhaps you should get a camera bag with a better strap?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2017   #40
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis, Netherlands
Posts: 8,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob-F View Post
Quote:
Why do you WISH you had decided NOT to buy a Leica Digital M?
What say you?
That this is a question in the "What time of the day do you beat your wife?" class.
__________________
Jaap

jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:51.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.