Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Leicas and other Leica Mount Cameras > Leica General Discussion / News / Rumors

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

At what age did you start to have trouble focusing?
Old 11-03-2016   #1
SaveKodak
Registered User
 
SaveKodak is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 572
At what age did you start to have trouble focusing?

I'm 32 years old and yesterday I discovered that I could not accurately focus the 75/1.8 Heliar wide open (on an M 262). I am not a glasses wearer, and have never had vision problems! This makes me wonder if I should ever even bother buying a 50/1.4 over a 50/2. Or perhaps there is simply a Contax G2 in my future. (scary!)
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #2
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 45
Posts: 19,746
Once I hit 41 years old, I saw drastic changes in my low light and close-up vision. And I've been a glasses wearer for 30 years. It hasn't affected my focusing yet though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #3
Godfrey
somewhat colored
 
Godfrey's Avatar
 
Godfrey is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 8,971
I started wearing glasses when I was in third grade.

I've not yet had any difficulties focusing a camera, and I've passed my 62nd birthday.

Focusing a camera is a matter of technique, not vision, unless your vision is truly deficient; I can't read (unless the typeface is very large) without my glasses on but I can focus either the M or the SL without any problems even without my glasses.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #4
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 30,362
When I hit 60.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007

http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #5
Ko.Fe.
Kostya Fedot
 
Ko.Fe.'s Avatar
 
Ko.Fe. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MiltON.ONtario
Posts: 7,116
I was not sleeping enough for three days. Yesterday I was not able to see dual images of the eye in M-E RF patch at 1-2 meters. Had good sleep last night, checked exactly same light, place, eye this morning, I could see it again.

Since I've started to heavily use iPhone and iPad my close up vision declined to +1.25. Well, if not Apple, then my age, because I could see better in the dark if driving and using my wife glasses. It happened around 48.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #6
frequencies
Registered User
 
frequencies is offline
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9
At around 33 here, but didn't realize it until recently (I'm 35 now). I've been contemplating switching to a rangefinder to fix the problem, but apparently that won't work, either?
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #7
JP Owens
Registered User
 
JP Owens is offline
Join Date: Dec 2014
Age: 68
Posts: 357
I started noticing it in my 40's. I'm now 66. Fortunately, accurate autofocus became common about the time that started. And for manual focus lenses, thank the stars for EVF and magnifying the images.
__________________
_______

"Nothing exists beyond the edges of the frame."
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #8
MikeMGB
Registered User
 
MikeMGB's Avatar
 
MikeMGB is offline
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 211
I turn 50 next month and it hasn't happened yet.
__________________
35mm, 120, 127, 620, 116, LTM, M, M42, TLR
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #9
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 8,643
I have missed focuses since 1960, but I find it harder and harder to get them right since I was 62. I even bought a cheap (now) Pentax ZX-5 and a Pentax SF1n which are auto focus. I still manually focus most shots but it seems to take me longer to 'get it right.' The AF SLRs are great for travel when I don't have the time to really work hard. My TLRs and SLRs are the hardest for me, my RF cameras are the easiest. For some reason I hardly ever miss with the Mamiya Super 23, but there are so many steps with that camera I usually goof one of those up.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #10
leica M2 fan
Registered User
 
leica M2 fan's Avatar
 
leica M2 fan is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NorCal
Age: 82
Posts: 19,112
I started wearing glasses at 14. Didn't notice any big changes till I was in my early
50's when I had to go to progressive lenses. Now that I'm 80 I've noticed much
difficulty in focusing manually. I guess it gets worse with time!
__________________
Good Light and Good Luck (thanks to Edward R Murrow)


TONY
Leica M2 l Nikon D 700 l Sony A7 I

MyGallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #11
narsuitus
Registered User
 
narsuitus's Avatar
 
narsuitus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,218
Up to age 26, I was able to obtain quick and accurate focusing with a Nikon B (ground glass type) view screen. After age 26, I had to start using a Nikon A (split-image rangefinder type) screen to obtain quick and accurate focusing.

When I started shooting Nikon APS-C digital cameras, I started relying on auto focus because nothing I did allowed me to obtain quick and accurate manual focus.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #12
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 30,362
I went for the first time ever to have my eyes examined when I was in my fifties. The doctor at the end of the exam told me "if we had more people with your eye sight, we would be broke." I still don't wear glasses or contacts.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007

http://raid.smugmug.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #13
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 6,364
Far-sightedness will only become evident as the accommodation range of the eyes decreases. Which usually goes past the critical threshold somewhere between thirty and fifty.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #14
Larry Cloetta
Registered User
 
Larry Cloetta is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jackson, WY
Age: 69
Posts: 1,418
As you get older, even getting out of bed gets harder, but a 50/1.4 is going to be more iffy than focusing a 50/2 for anybody, no matter how good your vision is. I admit I am not understanding why, short of macular degeneration, age would have much if anything to do with it. I'm 67 and wear trifocals; I have difficulty with exposure, composition, and remembering what film is in what body, but I don't have any more difficulty with focusing than I did when I was 16.

With corrective lenses, vision can be corrected, in most people, to 20/20; astigmatism can be corrected usually as well.
20/20 is 20/20 is 20/20, no matter how old you are. The only reason one would be unable to focus as well as when they were 20, once they got to 50, 60, 70 or whatever, is that their vision is not corrected as well as it could be.
It is only if your vision can't be corrected to 20/20 for some reason that age should enter into it. Even then, that is an individual problem, and not an age problem per se.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #15
Timmyjoe
Registered User
 
Timmyjoe's Avatar
 
Timmyjoe is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,920
In my early 40's I started wearing reading glasses for close up work. By mid-50's I started having to add diopters to my old film cameras (Nikon F, S2, Leica M series). My digital cameras all have adjustable diopters, so that's nice. But yeah, the eyesight starts to deteriorate as we age.

One thing, if you've never tried a diopter on a camera, it's quite an eye opening experience (pun intended). For years I found it harder and harder to focus an old M camera I had, and was getting more and more out of focus shots. Couldn't figure out why everything in the viewfinder was just a little bit blurry. Sent the camera in for a CLA, got it back and still the same problem. Had the camera with me in a camera shop one day, and just out of curiosity tried a few different diopters. Was totally blown away. Brought back the joy of shooting with this camera, like when I was young. I could see everything, sharp and bright and clear. Eight diopters later, now all my cameras are fun to use again.
__________________
http://www.timcarrollphotography.com

New Photo Books
Sturgis Stories
& Scenes From Sturgis
now available
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #16
Ko.Fe.
Kostya Fedot
 
Ko.Fe.'s Avatar
 
Ko.Fe. is offline
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MiltON.ONtario
Posts: 7,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by frequencies View Post
At around 33 here, but didn't realize it until recently (I'm 35 now). I've been contemplating switching to a rangefinder to fix the problem, but apparently that won't work, either?
I'm very skeptical about internet talks how good RF is for f1.5 with its large Leica RF base. I think it is the case for tripod based, still life photography.
If you holding it and breath and taking alive person picture at f1.5, RF is not going to make it easy. Any camera with AF and eye recognition will outperform manual RF.
Also RF patch is in the middle, if you focus and recompose even at f2 on close distances it is going to be OFF.

Vision difficulties or not, RF will fail with moving people and large apertures, close distances photography. But if you like to capture something quick at 3 meters distance and have lens with focus tab (mostly if not only RF lenses have it) RF is handy and not so obstructive way to verify if object is within the DoF.

To me RF is great if to be focused on the silhouette, contours, not on eyes and letters.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #17
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 23,947
Wear a monocle...

I have, for over 25 years.

Cheers,

R.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #18
Peter Wijninga
Registered User
 
Peter Wijninga's Avatar
 
Peter Wijninga is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,977
Quote:
At what age did you start to have trouble focusing?
A few years back. Cataract surgery took care of that.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #19
rhl-oregon
Cameras Guitars Wonders
 
rhl-oregon's Avatar
 
rhl-oregon is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,916
It's all about the Dioptrics, baby [humming "When I'm 64"]. I got em on M5, GF670, XPro, Hexar RF, etc.
__________________
Robert Hill Long
Southern Pines, North Carolina USA


http://rhl.photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #20
mpaniagua
Registered User
 
mpaniagua's Avatar
 
mpaniagua is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
Age: 46
Posts: 1,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hicks View Post
Wear a monocle...

I have, for over 25 years.

Cheers,

R.
Whoa thats cool! Ive been wearing glasses for 2 years (Im 43 now) but havent notice any problem when focusing. I cant read a thing without my glasses but seems Ive no problems with my rangefinders or slr. Most focusing issues I ever had have mostly due to my sloppiness not my vision.

Personally,I find it easier to focus a RF than an SLR, although a SLR with a bright lens algo help (1.4 or so are a pleasure to use).
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #21
dmr
Registered Abuser
 
dmr's Avatar
 
dmr is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere in Middle America
Posts: 4,520
I just passed the big six-o a few years ago (I am still in denial!) and I consider myself lucky that I have not been a victim of presbyopia, so far, at least. I've been nearsighted for many decades and wear glasses for driving and distance but I still have excellent reading, computer, and close-up vision. I've never done contacts.

I've found that I can focus both the SLR and rangefinders reasonably accurate with or without glasses. I've never had a need for those correction eyepieces that some people swear by.
__________________
My (NEW) Gallery
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #22
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is online now
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St Johnsbury VT
Posts: 8,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Clark View Post
My focusing problem began on the first day of school.
Hah! Me too.

With the cameras I only noticed it when I got my first Rollei at age 48 or so. Couldn't focus without the pop up magnifier or my reading glasses on.

No trouble with the RF cameras.

I've always used a loupe with the 810.

I'm now 54.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #23
barnwulf
Registered User
 
barnwulf's Avatar
 
barnwulf is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ankeny, Iowa
Age: 81
Posts: 1,406
I have never given this much thought but, I started to wear glasses when I was 5 years old and I have been shooting photos since 1959 at around age 20. I managed somehow and don't recall ever being concerned about it. Around 2003 I bought a Pentax 67 and I had some trouble and just used correctional diopters in the viewfinder and got by with that just fine. Now I have corrected plastic lenses in my eyes since my cataract removel so I don't need to wear glasses and I can get along fine with my Leicas and of course AF is no problem. - jim
__________________
"Basically, I no longer work for anything but the sensation I have while working."
- Alberto Giacometti (sculptor)
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #24
Peter Wijninga
Registered User
 
Peter Wijninga's Avatar
 
Peter Wijninga is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,977
Quote:
My focusing problem began on the first day of school.
You're not the only one...
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #25
Mark C
Registered User
 
Mark C is offline
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 406
So is the problem that you can't see to line up the rangefinder, or that you do and the pictures are out of focus? M camera rangefinders need to be adjusted fairly precisely for lens like that, and the lens has to be right too. Either way that is a challenging fl/aperture to focus accurately.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #26
John Bragg
Registered User
 
John Bragg's Avatar
 
John Bragg is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Penwithick, Cornwall U.K.
Age: 58
Posts: 1,267
Since 50,I have problems seeing the settings on the camera in bad light, but focussing is no problem. I think adjustable dioptric correction helps and I have this on Nikon F5 and F100, but I have no issues with my Leica M6 or Olympus OM1n as both are very precise in operation.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #27
lxmike
Barnack fan
 
lxmike's Avatar
 
lxmike is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Co Durham NE England
Age: 53
Posts: 3,245
My eyesight started to 'go' when l got into my 40's, now I am in my 50's l need all the help l can get and often rely on depth of field and luck
__________________
Currently loaded: Leica IIIc. IIIg and Bronica ERTS.

Glass currently in regular use: Voigtlander 15mm 4.5 Helliar

Soon to arrive Leica MDa

myblog:lifefromawindow
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #28
jim0266
Registered User
 
jim0266 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 122
Literally the morning I turned 40 farsightedness kicked in. At 50 I have have no problems focusing an SLR or rangefinder. To use my Rolleiflex TLR I have to use my computer/reading glasses.
__________________
My Web Site
My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #29
Timmyjoe
Registered User
 
Timmyjoe's Avatar
 
Timmyjoe is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by sepiareverb View Post
Hah! Me too.

With the cameras I only noticed it when I got my first Rollei at age 48 or so. Couldn't focus without the pop up magnifier or my reading glasses on.

No trouble with the RF cameras.

I've always used a loupe with the 810.

I'm now 54.
I had a similar experience. Had a Rollei years ago which I had no problem focusing. Sold it. And didn't get another one for about ten years. When I got the latest one, even with the pop-up magnifier, things were still blurry. Thought it was the camera. Put on my reading glasses, with the pop-up, and suddenly everything is sharp.

Wish there were some type of diopter for the Rollei, because I don't like shooting with my reading glasses on.
__________________
http://www.timcarrollphotography.com

New Photo Books
Sturgis Stories
& Scenes From Sturgis
now available
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #30
greyelm
Malcolm
 
greyelm's Avatar
 
greyelm is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,361
I am approaching 70 and I've never had problems focussing, this is probably because I was a microbiologist for 44yr and used a microscope daily. As a microscopist focussing almost becomes something that is done instinctively and the same technique of focussing is the same with a camera. The technique is to focus in and out a few times quickly and with practice the brain instinctively recognises the in-focus point.

For the 'middle aged' whose eyes have deteriorated don't give up hope, at my current age I am lucky in that my eyesight has improved over time from mixed long sight/short sight to only needing glasses for reading.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #31
Pete B
Registered User
 
Pete B's Avatar
 
Pete B is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaveKodak View Post
I'm 32 years old and yesterday I discovered that I could not accurately focus the 75/1.8 Heliar wide open (on an M 262). I am not a glasses wearer, and have never had vision problems! This makes me wonder if I should ever even bother buying a 50/1.4 over a 50/2. Or perhaps there is simply a Contax G2 in my future. (scary!)
It sounds to me that the lens might not be calibrated to your M. When I got my M I went through all my lenses to see which focused correctly. A couple wouldn't. I sent my Noctilux away for calibration and it was perfect after calibration.
My 90 Elmar also doesn't focus correctly but I don't use it much so can't justify having it calibrated. I've learned that, when focusing close, I just have to offset the rangefinder images a touch and this gives me perfect focus.
My previous 50 Summicron didn't focus properly so I swapped it for another owned by a Sony user who didn't need it to be rangefinder calibrated. My 50 is perfect now.
There's a good chance the problem is not your eyes but a need for calibration of your Voigtlander. You'll probably find a recent 50 Summilux focusses fine. Mine does, as do my many other Leica lenses, some of which date from the 50s.
Pete
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #32
zuiko85
Registered User
 
zuiko85 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,865
At 45, give or take, I started to need reading glasses. Otherwise I've always been near sighted with about -2.75 in the right and -1.5 in the left. Now at 67 I just use wide angle lenses and scale focus and small apertures. That is the right way to use a RF isn't it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #33
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 23,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by greyelm View Post
I am approaching 70 and I've never had problems focussing, this is probably because I was a microbiologist for 44yr and used a microscope daily. As a microscopist focussing almost becomes something that is done instinctively and the same technique of focussing is the same with a camera. The technique is to focus in and out a few times quickly and with practice the brain instinctively recognises the in-focus point.

For the 'middle aged' whose eyes have deteriorated don't give up hope, at my current age I am lucky in that my eyesight has improved over time from mixed long sight/short sight to only needing glasses for reading.
This is it. It's not so much eyesight as technique. Though with Evil SLRs, some screens are a lot easier than others.

Cheers,

R.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #34
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 23,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by zuiko85 View Post
At 45, give or take, I started to need reading glasses. Otherwise I've always been near sighted with about -2.75 in the right and -1.5 in the left. Now at 67 I just use wide angle lenses and scale focus and small apertures. That is the right way to use a RF isn't it.
Nah. Buy an Alpa 12-series. Scale focus only!

Cheers,

R.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #35
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is online now
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St Johnsbury VT
Posts: 8,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmyjoe View Post
...Wish there were some type of diopter for the Rollei, because I don't like shooting with my reading glasses on.
Yeah, the tangle of glasses on a cord and camera strap is a real buzz kill. Added to my greying hair and general look of befuddled annoyance I rarely get the lusting glances I used to...

Quote:
Originally Posted by greyelm View Post
... For the 'middle aged' whose eyes have deteriorated don't give up hope, at my current age I am lucky in that my eyesight has improved over time from mixed long sight/short sight to only needing glasses for reading.
Already been through that. I used to need glasses for driving only, long distance stuff. In my late 30s my eyesight shifted so that I could see both distance and close fine, then needed glasses for up close only, but sadly I am now getting a narrower and narrower range of unassisted vision. I don't wear glasses much, not for walking around and not for at the computer, and only for delicate tasks in the kitchen such as peeling garlic or dicing (I want to keep my fingers). But for reading a book/newspaper/iPhone or driving I am behind the frames.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #36
Richard G
Registered User
 
Richard G's Avatar
 
Richard G is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 37,47 S
Posts: 5,076
1. Is it difficulty deciding on the focus? Consider checking vertical alignment of the RF. If this is even a little bit out then there is no satisfying snap into focus.
2. As advised above, is it the experience taking the photograph, or the results you get? RF again, or lens.
I've always had glasses and not having much trouble at 56.
__________________
Richard
  Reply With Quote

At what age did you start to have trouble focusing?
Old 11-03-2016   #37
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,917
At what age did you start to have trouble focusing?

.......At what age did you start to have trouble focusing?

When I first noticed girls ........ I got distracted for quite a while.


As far as focusing the camera, I will be 65 this month and still OK but not as good/quick as I used to be in certain lighting situations. Some day it will be autofocus for sure but not ready to pass on the M's and other manual focus cameras just yet.
__________________
______________________

Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
M Monochrom ~ M-P (240), M6 TTL & MP ~ Mamiya 7 II ~ GF1 ~ K5IIs
~ Rolleiflex f3.5 with Carl Zeiss 75mm Planar (type 4) ~
The hardest part of starting a new project is starting it ~ Keith Carter
Flickr Sets: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/sets/
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #38
kpembo
Registered User
 
kpembo's Avatar
 
kpembo is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois USA
Posts: 33
I had an interesting experience with my changing eyesight recently. I had my annual eye exam and was given a new prescription. I had to leave my glasses with the store, so I used the new sample contact lenses they gave me. The left eye prescription was too weak in my opinion. However, I noticed I could see the RF patch in my Canon 7 RF much better with my left eye than my right. I suspect this would be similar to using a +1 diopter. I had used the camera extensively about seven years ago, and never had a problem. Recently, I thought the camera needed repair since it did not look clear and focused to me. I actually had DAG CLA the camera. He said it looked typical for a Canon 7RF. My guess is that my eyesight changed and I could no longer cover the range of focusing my eyes that I could handle just a few years ago. I'm 55. My eyesight first changed at about 48.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #39
summar
Registered User
 
summar is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 297
It's interesting (or not) that the degree of middle-age sight relates to the brightness of available light. In full sunlight I can read a newspaper without reading glasses -- the pupil stops down, so to speak, and I get greater depth of field. In a darkroom lit with a safelight I need powerful reading glasses
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-03-2016   #40
Darthfeeble
But you can call me Steve
 
Darthfeeble's Avatar
 
Darthfeeble is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Logtown, California, USA
Age: 72
Posts: 1,468
I found out something that surprised me when I decided to go to contacts. I tried the monovision thing where one is the reader and one is the looker. Had the reader in my right eye so I'd be able to see the patch in the VF. It doesn't work that way, the patch is a mirror and required that I have the distance vision contact to be able to see it clearly. Also I was surprise in that the distance Rx in contacts allows me to see better close up than the distance one in my glasses. Makes wearing the damn things a little more tolerable.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.