Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes

135 on M3
Old 03-09-2017   #1
thawkins
thawkins
 
thawkins's Avatar
 
thawkins is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 67
Posts: 357
135 on M3

Anyone use a 135mm lens on a Leica RF? If so, what are the pros and cons?
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-09-2017   #2
mpaniagua
Registered User
 
mpaniagua is offline
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
Age: 44
Posts: 702
I currently have an Hektor 135 on my bag. No issues and love the lens. mostly use it aroung F/8 so dont really notice soft corners, vignetting or falloff. Will look for a test picture on my files.

Also have the Elmarit 135, but, strange enough, havent use it yet after having it for 1 year. Dont really use that focus length that much and when I need tele, normally grab the Elmarit 90 or the Hektor.

Regards.

Marcelo
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-09-2017   #3
Ronald M
Registered User
 
Ronald M is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,190
The .91 viewfinder allows a large image so the 135 frame look about as large as 90 on .72 cameras.

Goggled lenses ,135 2.8, bring up 90 mm frame lines and block out much of the viewfinder so it is like looking thru a tunnel. Other 135 are "natural" viewfinder and .91 allows proper focus.

4.5 Hector is a decent lens stopped down to 6.3 or 8. 135 APO is probably the best lens. I use a 135 4.0 designed for viso flex. It is almost APO for a fraction of the price and the head comes off for use on viso, bellows, short focus mounts, tubes all of which I have. All the accessories are difficult to collect now.

Use the 135 2.8 on .72 camera ( all but M3 and digital M ). A 135 BL finder is a wonderful accessory as it is 1:1 or 100%. Goggled lenses focus ok on .72. Others are a touch more difficult on .72.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-09-2017   #4
wjlapier
Registered User
 
wjlapier's Avatar
 
wjlapier is online now
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,416
I used a Nikon 135 LTM on a M3. Easily flares, but other than that, pretty good lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-09-2017   #5
Gregm61
Registered User
 
Gregm61 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 278
The M3 should be about the best platform for a 135. I use a 135mm f4 Tele Elmar from 1970 with my digital M's. Fortunately those two cameras' rangerfinders (M9P and M262) are well matched with that lens and I get some really sharp resulting images.

The primary drawback for me, is the size of the 135mm frame in the finder. I picked up a Leica 1.4 magnifier to both increase the size of the box and effective rangefinder base for more accurate focusing but you lose enough contrast with the magnifier that I stopped using it. With your M3, no worries on that front.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:47.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.