Originally Posted by traveler_101
I have a IIIf with a new (well now three year old) beam splitter and I find it very easy to focus - and I've always wondered whether it might actually be easier to focus than a M. Always wanted a M2 or M6, but never pulled the trigger. At my age with my eyesight perhaps I should leave well enough alone?
I do find the Ms to be easier to focus in low light, even after I had the beam-splitter replaced on my II.
wandering the Earth with an Leica I (conv II), Leica M2, Nikon F2, Nikon FM2n, Nikon FM3a, a bunch of old lenses, and occasionally a Makina W67 or Isolette III.
current stuff https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/