View Single Post

Old 03-15-2012   #91
May contain traces of nut
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 5,806
Originally Posted by sc_rufctr View Post
I live in "hope" that the M10 will be the same thickness as a classic film M.
That always put me off the M8, 8.2 and 9...
There are pretty obvious technical reasons why this is impossible.
The front-to-sensor distance is fixed (lens register has to be 27.8 mm to be compatible with M lenses).
The sensor-to-back distance is always going to be bigger than with a film M, simply because the package "sensor assembly plus circuit board plus body shell" is necessarily thicker than the package "film plus back door"

In other words, there will never be a digital M that is as thin as a film M.
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote