Rangefinderforum.com

Rangefinderforum.com (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   SLRs - the unRF (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=126)
-   -   The Takumar Lenses (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167272)

p.giannakis 01-05-2019 05:17

The Takumar Lenses
 
No dedicated thread for Takumar lenses?

Post your pictures here. Film or digital, 35mm or medium format, anything with the Takumar word on it.

I'll make a start.

Takumar 55 f/2



Larry Cloetta 01-05-2019 05:29

Nice idea, great lenses; as a group seemingly designed with an eye more towards pleasing rendering style than impressive mtf charts.

charjohncarter 01-05-2019 07:20

I have three Super-Takumar screw mount lenses: 28mm, 50mm, and a 200mm. All were purchased between 1969 and 1971. My 50 is the radioactive model and really a great lens, The 28mm also great has just a slight vignette at wide open (F3.5) and I had to send it to the Pentax guy in the Carolinas to fix a lazy aperture, and the 200 is perfect except I never used it too much:

28mm, with H&W copy film using H&W developer, very fine grained but dynamic range was short:


H&W Copy Film; H&W developer by John Carter, on Flickr

50mm, again with H&W copy film and a no. 1 extension tube:


H&W copy film and with their developer by John Carter, on Flickr

200mm, this time with Plus-x handheld and after a couple of beers:


Plus X D-76 by John Carter, on Flickr

Greyscale 01-05-2019 07:57

105/2.8 Super Takumar


Auto Takumar 55/2.2


SMC Takumar 55/1.8


SMC Macro Takumar


Super Multicoated Takumar 50/1.4


SMC Takumar 50/1.4


SMC Takumar 50/1.4


Super Takumar 105/2.8

charjohncarter 01-05-2019 08:12

I have a couple of other Takumars; I forgot the Takumar Macro f 4.0 50mm screw mount (mid-60s but it is recent to me), and a really sharp radioactive 105, f 2.4 (6x7).

105mm:

Arista EDU ultra 100 HC-110h by John Carter, on Flickr

and:


Untitled by John Carter, on Flickr

CharlesDAMorgan 01-05-2019 08:23

8 element 50mm f1.4 Super Takumar


CharlesDAMorgan 01-05-2019 08:24

85mm f1.9 Super Takumar


xayraa33 01-05-2019 08:34

The Takumar 55mm f2 and the f1.8 version produce nice OOF areas full bore and are very flare resistant to boot.

p.giannakis 01-05-2019 08:35

Takumar 50f/1.4



petronius 01-05-2019 09:49



50mm/1,4 adapted to my EOS 650, Polypan F

peterm1 01-05-2019 11:26

There are some very nice photos in this thread, so much so it is difficult to select the ones I like the best. And it is also difficult to select the "best" Takumars - there are so many of them that are so darned good.

I am a long time collector / user of Takumars having started down the Asahi Pentax route perhaps 25 years ago when I discovered how good these lenses are for myself. But familiarity breeds contempt as they say (or perhaps complacency is a better term) and I have not used them so much in recent years as other more exotic lenses have come along and been within my grasp. This thread moves me to get them out once more and use them again seriously. I may start with the 50mm f1.4 and 55mm f1.8 both of which are superb performers. Or even the 135mm lenses. Or the ......well you see my problem - there is a surfeit of choice.

charjohncarter 01-05-2019 12:51

Peter, start out with the 50mm f1.4, it is great for out of focus. You could really do some beauties with that cool post processing you do.

Doug 01-05-2019 13:41

My Gal? Pentax 67II 4.0/135mm Macro Takumar


Give Me Blood! Pentax 67II 4.0/135mm Macro Takumar

Mackinaw 01-05-2019 14:32

50/1.4 on my black Spotmatic. Forgot the film.



Jim B.

Barry Kirsten 01-05-2019 15:41

1 Attachment(s)
I love the m42 Takumars. I have a 35/3.5, a 28/3.5 and a 50/1.4 7-element, all of the Super-Multi-Coated variety. Here is a shot with the 35/3.5 on expired Tmax 100, YG filter, developed in PMK (no sharpening or other PS fiddling).

nikon_sam 01-05-2019 19:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry Kirsten (Post 2859482)
I love the m42 Takumars. I have a 35/3.5, a 28/3.5 and a 50/1.4 7-element, all of the Super-Multi-Coated variety. Here is a shot with the 35/3.5 on expired Tmax 100, YG filter, developed in PMK (no sharpening or other PS fiddling):

Scotch Thistle Takumar by Barry Kirsten, on Flickr

Barry,
I have the same set of lenses...currently have the 28mm 3.5 mounted on my a6000..

Oren Grad 01-05-2019 20:19



Pentax SV / 35/2 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar / XP2 Super

narsuitus 01-05-2019 22:16


Pentax System by Narsuitus, on Flickr

I use the following lenses on my Pentax Spotmatics:
Asahi 300mm f/6.3 preset Tele Takumar (left)
Asahi 200mm f/5.6 Super Takumar
Asahi 135mm f/3.5 Super Takumar
Asahi 105mm f/2.8 Super Takumar (right)
Asahi 50mm f/1.4 Super Takumar (8-element) (on black body)
Asahi 35mm f/3.5 Super Takumar (not in photo)
Asahi 28mm f/3.5 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar (on chrome body)

narsuitus 01-05-2019 22:24


Portrait by Narsuitus, on Flickr

Taken with Asahi 105mm f/2.8 Super Takumar on a Fuji X-Pro1.

peterm1 01-05-2019 23:26

You know the optical characteristics of many of the photos on this thread are in my opinion amongst the best I have ever seen on this site......says a lot for those old Takumars. Honest to God if there were not so many around on the market I have a hunch that people would be willing to pay big bucks to get their hands on them.

Ccoppola82 01-05-2019 23:39

The 85mm 1.8 is my favorite portrait lens and the 35 3.5 is a tack driver

Sarcophilus Harrisii 01-06-2019 00:21

I have not used my Super Takumar 35mm f/3.5 enough. When I saw this rare image made with it I was reminded of how sharp it is. FP4 Plus in ID-11 1 + 3 loaded in a Zeiss Ikon Icarex 35S TM.


p.giannakis 01-06-2019 04:07

The Takumar 50 f/1.4. Film is ilford HP5+



Greyscale 01-06-2019 07:43

Super-Takumar 135/2.5


ChrisPlatt 01-06-2019 08:16

SMC Pentax 35/3.5 lens is the later PK-mount bayonet version of the M42 screwmount Takumar.
All versions are outstanding.

Chris

Photon42 01-06-2019 08:54

Got a 6x7 with 55/105/165. Here is a shot with the 105:



Here is she with the machine:


p.giannakis 01-06-2019 10:53

One more, Takumar 50 f/1.4 on ilford XP2



CharlesDAMorgan 01-06-2019 10:54

That's stunning Pan!

p.giannakis 01-06-2019 11:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlesDAMorgan (Post 2859594)
That's stunning Pan!

Thanks Charles,
One more from that roll - Edinburgh 2008. Camera is a Zenit 12XP


nikon_sam 01-06-2019 11:22

Super-Takumar 28mm 3.5

dmr 01-07-2019 09:02

"Positively 12th. Street"

For the most part, I like the Takumar 28-80 zoom. It covers most of whatever I want to shoot and it's reasonably compact. However, when zoomed out wide it does show some barrel distortion, like an almost-fish-eye.

This particular one was shot on the Rollei Digibase film, a C41 film without that amber mask.

Pentax MG.


charjohncarter 01-07-2019 09:32

I received one of these lenses with a body I bought. I never used it but recently gave it to my grandson with my Pentax K10d. He is going nuts with it.

raid 01-07-2019 09:46

Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?

Swift1 01-07-2019 09:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by raid (Post 2859806)
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?

Yes it is. I have a S-M-C version that I bought last June for a whopping $30.


Untitled by Colton Allen, on Flickr
Asahi Pentax SV
S-M-C Takumar 28/3.5
Kodak Ektar 100
Nikon Coolscan V ED

zuikologist 01-07-2019 10:33

Couldn’t agree more. Compact, beautifully made, perform well and seem to like digital sensors. Well done to the photographers too - nice work.

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterm1 (Post 2859506)
You know the optical characteristics of many of the photos on this thread are in my opinion amongst the best I have ever seen on this site......says a lot for those old Takumars. Honestly if there were not so many around on the market I have a hunch that people would be willing to pay big bucks to get their hands on them.


jawarden 01-07-2019 10:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by p.giannakis (Post 2859411)
Takumar 50f/1.4



Very nice!

narsuitus 01-07-2019 11:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by raid (Post 2859806)
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?

In 2010, I paid $70 US for one in excellent condition (shipping included).

I use it when I do not wish to put my Zeiss 28mm f/2 Distagon in jeopardy.

p.giannakis 01-07-2019 12:20

Ilford HP5+
Takumar 50 f/1.4


charjohncarter 01-07-2019 12:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swift1 (Post 2859811)
Yes it is. I have a S-M-C version that I bought last June for a whopping $30.


Untitled by Colton Allen, on Flickr
Asahi Pentax SV
S-M-C Takumar 28/3.5
Kodak Ektar 100
Nikon Coolscan V ED

Nice shot with your 28mm f3.5 SMC Takumar, I have the Super-Takumar version and love it. I've loved it since 1970 when I paid $60 new.

Doug 01-07-2019 13:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by raid (Post 2859806)
Isn't the 28/3.5 very inexpensive and also very excellent?! Who has it?

I have the 28mm f/3.5 SMC Takumar, bought new for $158.43 on Jan 8 1972. Four days later it went back to Honeywell for warranty repair of a diaphragm defect, wouldn't open all the way to f/3.5.

Here's what the Pentax blurb said about this lens:
"A new super-wide angle lens of 7 elements, designed and produced to meet the most exacting of the professional requirements, this is the lens of professionals and advanced amateurs need to shoot more artistic photographs. Equipped with full automatic diaphragm; ideal for architecture, fast action, and artistic photography."

I also have the 28mm f/2 SMCP-M but it's bayonet mount, and not a Takumar. In addition for unknown reasons I later bought the Zeiss 28mm f/2 Distagon T* ZK, also bayonet mount and large, weighs a ton... 530g!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:44.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.