Rangefinderforum.com

Rangefinderforum.com (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Canon Leica Screw Mount Film Rangefinders (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Any opinions out there on the Canon 100mm f2 lens? (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93655)

Vickko 08-11-2010 20:17

Any opinions out there on the Canon 100mm f2 lens?
 
Any opinions out there on the Canon 100mm f2 lens?

Thanks in advance,

Vick

back alley 08-11-2010 20:32

has a good rep

never tried one myself
looks too big for a good time

kkdanamatt 08-11-2010 20:41

Get one!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Vickko (Post 1388476)
Any opinions out there on the Canon 100mm f2 lens?

Thanks in advance,

Vick

I have one and love it. I used it on a Leica CL to shoot professional billiards players during high-stakes money games. Shooting 3200 ASA Konica color film (now gone, sadly), I was shooting wide open at 1/125. The CL is quiet enough and the metering with the 100mm lens was perfect. Great color, medium contrast, very sharp in the center where it counts, less so on the edges. I don't believe that I've ever shot it stopped down, but I also had a 135mm Canon lens of similar vintage and it was excellent stopped down. Outdoors it required a UV or sky 1A filter to cut down on the excess blue near the ocean.
The 100mm f/2 is not nearly as big and heavy as the early 90mm Summicron, focuses just as smoothly and is almost equal in performance. Of course, I may get slammed for saying that, so YMMV.

raid 08-11-2010 20:41

I had one but traded it then. It is supposedly first class and even better than the 90mm Summicron of the same vintage,

bennyng 08-11-2010 22:24

I still have mine. Whilst it's a large lens by RF standard, it's not really heavy. Good sharpness and nice colors for a fraction of what the Summicron 90mm cost. Nice out of focus rendition too. Has 58mm filter threads which makes it easy to get filters and caps.


@ minimum focusing distance


@ infinity

Cheers,

Mackinaw 08-12-2010 05:41

I have the "R" version, for the original Canonflex, which, from what I read, is the same lens. The R version is very good, even wide-open. My only comment about the rangefinder version is that any 100mm lens, to me, is a stretch when used on a Canon 7/7s. Very hard to focus accurately especially when shooting wide-open and at close distances.

Jim B.

pagpow 08-12-2010 11:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mackinaw (Post 1388708)
I have the "R" version, for the original Canonflex, which, from what I read, is the same lens. The R version is very good, even wide-open. My only comment about the rangefinder version is that any 100mm lens, to me, is a stretch when used on a Canon 7/7s. Very hard to focus accurately especially when shooting wide-open and at close distances.

Jim B.

Hi Jim,

I was looking for just this information awhile ago. Truth?
I've got one (R version) with sticky diaphragm blades and was a bout to pass it on, rather than fix it ($80+ bucks by estimate) and then I started wondering, and then I saw recent eBay closing above $300.

Maybe I should bite the bullet and put it back in service; glass is in great shape.

Giorgio

ethics_gradient 08-12-2010 12:04

It's awesome, just took some shots with it on my NEX-3 this afternoon (adapter just arrived from China). I was originally going to sell it since I got it as part of a package deal, but I don't think I can now :(


Vickko 08-12-2010 12:12

That is a beautiful shot. Well done.

raid 08-12-2010 12:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by bennyng (Post 1388549)
I still have mine. Whilst it's a large lens by RF standard, it's not really heavy. Good sharpness and nice colors for a fraction of what the Summicron 90mm cost.

A vintage 90mm Summicron costs about $450 in used condition, and so does a Canon 100/2. Maybe you mean the later model Summicrons.

alexnotalex 08-12-2010 16:03

Wow the shots are amazing.
Is the 10 cm f3.5 in the same league? I just stumbled upon one in need of a clean right in my budget range...
Thanks for any experience.
Alex

bennyng 08-12-2010 18:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by raid (Post 1389052)
A vintage 90mm Summicron costs about $450 in used condition, and so does a Canon 100/2. Maybe you mean the later model Summicrons.

Yes Raid. This lens is very often compared with the modern/late pre-APO/ASPH Summicron 90mm as JSU and many others (on other threads) have pointed out.

Cheers,

squirrel$$$bandit 08-13-2010 10:05

Superb, but freaking enormous. The aperture ring turns with the focus, so it's hard to find your aperture a lot of the time.

I sold mine. Replaced it with the much more manageable thin T-E.

raid 08-13-2010 21:35

Do not forget about the amazing Nikkor 105mm/2.5.
I kept it but traded off the Canon 100/2.

raid 08-14-2010 17:49

JSU: The LTM version and the earlier SLR version both are Sonnar designs. I have both lenses.

raid 08-14-2010 18:55

Canon 100/2:


bennyng 08-14-2010 23:51


Canon 7sZ with Canon 100mm f/2.0 LTM
Shot with Canon 100mm f/2.0 @ f/8.0 on Epson R-D1.


Canon 7sZ with Canon 100mm f/2.0 LTM
Shot with Panasonic LX3

Cheers,

ethics_gradient 08-19-2010 08:55

A few more from last weekend (Sony NEX again)






Yep, definitely decided to keep this lens :D

WJJ3 12-08-2019 03:47

I stumbled upon one of these lenses the other day in good condition at a price I could not pass up. Shot one test roll, but still working out how to use it. Not sure if I'm going to keep it or not yet, but so far like what I'm seeing.

Shot with my M3 on Fuji Super Premium 400, scanned on the Pakon


small shrine


Nagano street


layers


灯篭

WJJ3 02-12-2020 01:32

Canon 100mm f2 on the Leica M9. Aperture f8 + polarizer.



Goryu dake


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.