Rangefinderforum.com

Rangefinderforum.com (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/index.php)
-   RFF News (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=71)
-   -   Fuji film price hike in the offing (http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=167752)

BillBlackwell 03-03-2019 15:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Striker (Post 2873061)
Wrong. The facts are clearly against what you suggest. ...

http://time.com/4649188/film-photogr...stry-comeback/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toron...aphy-1.4757070
https://sleeklens.com/film-making-comeback/

dourbalistar 03-03-2019 16:24

There seems to be a circle of confusion. Some think Fujifilm is zooming toward extinction and that's all there is Touit. But only time will tele whether they keep producing film or whether the focus will shift to other products.

Faintandfuzzy 03-10-2019 16:52

The fact that film demand has been increasing for many years is a proven fact and not open to debate. The issue in Fuji's case is that unlike Kodak, I.ford and others, they were not able or willing to invest in equipment designed for lower volumes tha there were at the peak of film sales.

Saying demand is down is completely false.

dourbalistar 03-10-2019 19:16

I think this is a well researched and balanced article. We may not agree with or like the discontinuations, but it puts Fujifilm's business decisions in some perspective:
https://emulsive.org/articles/though...of-the-fittest

richardHaw 03-10-2019 20:54

i dont mind if film costs go up a bit so long as it keeps it going. :eek::eek::eek:

dourbalistar 03-10-2019 21:12

I hope there won't coma time when film prices increase so much we can't f/4 it. Otherwise, we will f/2 shoot... digital. :eek:

brbo 03-10-2019 23:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faintandfuzzy (Post 2874451)
The issue in Fuji's case is that unlike Kodak, I.ford and others, they were not able or willing to invest in equipment designed for lower volumes tha there were at the peak of film sales.

Kodak and Ilford need to keep making film to survive. Fuji doesn't. Fuji's cost of making film might be much much higher than Kodak's when you also take into account the opportunity costs of Fuji's film production (Fuji could probably convert their film production capacities to something much more profitable and future-proof). The incompetence of Kodak to (successfully) transition into other branches could actually save colour film.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dourbalistar (Post 2874463)
I think this is a well researched and balanced article. We may not agree with or like the discontinuations, but it puts Fujifilm's business decisions in some perspective:
https://emulsive.org/articles/though...of-the-fittest

I especially liked his closing arguments that we will always have Instax (still waiting for the answer how he managed to put Instax into Xpan) and that it's just a matter of time when there will be new colour films flying out of garage size "factories". Seem like he really knows what he's saying...

Teemō 03-11-2019 02:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by brbo (Post 2874478)
The incompetence of Kodak to (successfully) transition into other branches could actually save colour film.

Eastman Kodak is largely a Printing Systems and Industrial Chemical manufacturer. Consumer film and industrial chemicals generate one of the minor portions of revenue. Whether you consider that enough diversification is up to opinion.
Kodak's problem is that they have a lot of debt (which they pay a lot of interest on), but they also spend a lot on Research and Development - for what? For a company that was haemorrhaging hundreds of millions of dollars every year not long ago, to be back to minor profitability is still quite a success. However, if they were to stop producing film tomorrow, they would increase their profits because right now the whole Consumer and Film segment is running at a loss.

I still think there's a lot of consumer market potential that Kodak could tap into beyond the popularity of their name only, and there's certainly many technologies related to the production of coated thin-films and that is a global market still with a lot of growth even if they are only a part-supplier and not a producer of finished products.
Think solar panels, intelligent building cladding, superior micro building wraps, solar panels, television/computer/smartphone/camera displays/aerospace products.

Why has Kodak not produced photographic lenses again under an external supplier like Cosina or Tamron (autofocus)? They should be able to sell the MOQ on hype alone.

It looks like they are trying to move into Consumer 3D Printing... but why not just serve the small-scale commercial manufacturing segment instead? CNC machines, extruders, casting machines, presses etc. and maybe those larger metal 3D printers - things that Kodak already uses in their day to day operations. The sort of things that local businesses will buy.

They have swathes of unused patents, surely they didn't need to lower themselves to (struggling) to produce a simple Super 8 camera? If Fuji can make decent money selling digital cameras, in a market that is totally bloated, surely Kodak can sell a few lenses every year. Having so many different camera mounts on the market should make it a breeze.

Larry Cloetta 03-11-2019 05:30

Ten years from now it will be interesting to look back on this thread and see who could read the writing on the wall, and who couldn’t.

Teemō 03-11-2019 06:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Cloetta (Post 2874512)
Ten years from now it will be interesting to look back on this thread and see who could read the writing on the wall, and who couldn’t.

Well, it's probably a decent time to buy Kodak shares if you ever wanted them. :p

dourbalistar 03-11-2019 10:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Cloetta (Post 2874512)
Ten years from now it will be interesting to look back on this thread and see who could read the writing on the wall, and who couldn’t.

If you've Cosina the writing on the wall, the Bessa solution is to stock up now while you can. Otherwise, you may end up banging you head on the wall. :bang:

chipgreenberg 03-11-2019 11:22

Film is Cheap
 
Thanks for posting the Emulsive article. Interesting. Especially the current cost comparisons adjusted for inflation.

When I was in college the Professors would preach "Film is cheap." Don't skimp on film not to get the shot you need.

Easy for them to say. I was making $3/hr working part time and living on peanut butter and jelly. Didn't seem so cheap but I understood their message.

When photography paid the bills I realized film was cheap. Sure, it helped that somebody else was paying for it. It was billable. But in the BIG PICTURE (sorry) of producing a commercial shoot film cost was pretty insignificant. I remember one of the last jobs we did we had a model with make up/stylist in front of a small private jet we rented at a small airport in NJ. With all those costs going on nobody would complain if I shot a few more rolls to make sure it was covered.

No that photography is an avocation film is the cheapest part of my hobby. Table equipment costs for now, that's another discussion. I don't burn a lot of film. My goal is to have fun and make images that make me smile that if I really like I hang on the wall.

I shot this great abandoned old house the other day. Shot 4 frames of 120. I did 2 different angles and 2 exposure brackets of each. So the 4 frames cost me about $2.65. Processing, scanning, printing are much more expensive. If I like the image and want to frame it, with Museum Glass, that's expensive!

So if my film for that shot cost me $3.65 would it make a difference? Naw.

Hogarth Ferguson 03-11-2019 14:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by dourbalistar (Post 2874547)
If you've Cosina the writing on the wall, the Bessa solution is to stock up now while you can. Otherwise, you may end up banging you head on the wall. :bang:


Are these puns funny to you? They are incredibly annoying to read.

Yokosuka_Mike 03-11-2019 14:37

I think the puns are funny and I enjoy reading them.

Dourbalistar, your puns are very clever and creative, please keep ’em coming.

Mike

bjolester 03-11-2019 15:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by dourbalistar (Post 2874547)
If you've Cosina the writing on the wall, the Bessa solution is to stock up now while you can. Otherwise, you may end up banging you head on the wall. :bang:

These puns are immensly disruptive for these of us trying to follow the comments on topic. Why not start a new 100% puns thread in the humor section of RF?

pyeh 03-11-2019 16:06

I'm a fan of dourbalistar's punning too. It adds levity to this circular, polarizing topic.

CMur12 03-11-2019 16:46

I'm in agreement with Bjørn. A little joking/punning is fine, but when it interferes with finding the intended subject matter of the thread, it's a major hijack and it becomes trying.


- Murray

dourbalistar 03-11-2019 18:27

Fair enough, apologies for the disruption - I didn't mean to hijack the thread, just trying to have a little fun. Out of respect for the OP and those who are trying to stay on topic, I've started a new pun thread. I didn't actually find a humor section on the forum, so for now, I've posted in the Photography General Interest sub-forum, where the other joke thread lives.

CMur12 03-11-2019 19:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by dourbalistar (Post 2874463)
I think this is a well researched and balanced article. We may not agree with or like the discontinuations, but it puts Fujifilm's business decisions in some perspective:
https://emulsive.org/articles/though...of-the-fittest


I just read this article and found it very well thought out and probably closer to the truth of the matter. Thanks for sharing it with us!


I also like your idea of starting a separate photographic pun thread. :D


- Murray

Ted Striker 03-14-2019 06:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teemō (Post 2874520)
Well, it's probably a decent time to buy Kodak shares if you ever wanted them. :p


Kodak shares have ripped higher for the past 2 weeks. It has been on an absolute tear. Not sure why. No news has been published that I can find.

Mackinaw 03-14-2019 07:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Striker (Post 2875149)
Kodak shares have ripped higher for the past 2 weeks. It has been on an absolute tear. Not sure why. No news has been published that I can find.

Probably because of their new CEO. Year's ago, Microsoft's stock shot up, after Steve Balmer left.

Jim B.

Ted Striker 03-14-2019 07:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mackinaw (Post 2875153)
Probably because of their new CEO. Year's ago, Microsoft's stock shot up, after Steve Balmer left.

Jim B.


Steve Ballmer was awful. Perez was the awful CEO for Kodak and he is long gone.


I dont think it's because of the new CEO. Kodak just sold off their most profitable and fastest growing part of their company. It seems odd that the stock would rip higher after that. What's left has very little growth to show. Regardless, the numbers dont lie, although Kodak is down sharply today.


I believe there's an earnings report after the bell today so maybe some news will come from that.

dourbalistar 03-14-2019 09:56

Kodak stock, as of this posting, is $3.49 per share. Meanwhile, a 36-exposure roll of Tri-X from B&H is $5.79.

Ted Striker 03-14-2019 14:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by dourbalistar (Post 2875173)
Kodak stock, as of this posting, is $3.49 per share. Meanwhile, a 36-exposure roll of Tri-X from B&H is $5.79.

I bought 4 shares today with what was left in my brokerage account. It traded up to $3.50 so I have made $0.04.

dourbalistar 03-14-2019 16:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Striker (Post 2875215)
I bought 4 shares today with what was left in my brokerage account. It traded up to $3.50 so I have made $0.04.

If you had quadrupled your initial investment, you'd be able to afford one frame from a roll of Tri-X with your profits. Sadly, hoarding and re-selling discontinued Fujifilm flim stock (no pun intended) might get you better return. :bang:

Ted Striker 03-17-2019 14:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by dourbalistar (Post 2875237)
If you had quadrupled your initial investment, you'd be able to afford one frame from a roll of Tri-X with your profits. Sadly, hoarding and re-selling discontinued Fujifilm flim stock (no pun intended) might get you better return. :bang:

I have 50 pro packs of Neopan Acros in the freezer so my film investments are doing nicely.

dourbalistar 03-17-2019 16:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Striker (Post 2875811)
I have 50 pro packs of Neopan Acros in the freezer so my film investments are doing nicely.

Got it. Instead of cold, hard cash, you have cold, hard film. :cool:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:39.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.