Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > RFF Polls

View Poll Results: Do you bulk load your own film?
Yes I do 266 68.56%
No I can't be bothered 122 31.44%
Voters: 388. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 02-20-2010   #51
Thebes
Registered User
 
Thebes is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 46
I used to. Now that I have gotten back into film I don't think I will, its really quite a pain and another step which can be messed up. The only reason I might is if I start stockpiling film, then a 100ft takes a lot less freezer space before its put on cartridges.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-20-2010   #52
Mablo
Registered User
 
Mablo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,777
Ordered a few 100ft cans of Neopan from digitaltruth.co.uk (special offer!). So I guess I'll roll my own cartridges for a considerable time from now on.
__________________
Mablo
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-21-2010   #53
pesphoto
Registered User
 
pesphoto's Avatar
 
pesphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: R.I.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,890
Ive tried it but always get lazy and go back to cassettes
__________________
My blog



My dad's Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-21-2010   #54
ethics_gradient
Registered User
 
ethics_gradient's Avatar
 
ethics_gradient is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 320
I've been kicking around the idea of using a bulk-loader for a while, but I mostly shoot Arista 400 B&W, so it seems barely worth it. What other films are the rest of you guys bulk loading?
__________________
Flickr Photostream
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-2010   #55
regularchickens
Registered User
 
regularchickens's Avatar
 
regularchickens is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 184
I have bulk-loaded APX100 for well over a year, because when I was looking, bulk rolls were the only form I could find it in. When the current roll runs out, I'll probably get either some Tri-X or some Fomapan 100.
__________________
flickr | tumblr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-2010   #56
Rayt
Registered User
 
Rayt's Avatar
 
Rayt is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,227
It just isn't worth it especially when Arista Premium is so cheap already.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-14-2010   #57
Mablo
Registered User
 
Mablo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,777
LegacyPro bulk rolls have flanges on both sides of the roll. That's a good idea but unfortunately flanges make the bulk roll just a bit too wide for my daylight loader (Dayroll) and it won't close up correctly. I've been loading film by hand in the changing bag. I would prefer a loader though.

What daylight loader are you using with LegacyPro bulk rolls?
__________________
Mablo
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-02-2010   #58
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mablo View Post
LegacyPro bulk rolls have flanges on both sides of the roll. That's a good idea but unfortunately flanges make the bulk roll just a bit too wide for my daylight loader (Dayroll) and it won't close up correctly. I've been loading film by hand in the changing bag. I would prefer a loader though.

What daylight loader are you using with LegacyPro bulk rolls?


Hmmm ... I just encountered that same situation with Legacy Pro myself. Loaded a roll into my Computrol and it jammed the spool when I closed it.

It was ok in the Watson though!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-02-2010   #59
gdi
Registered User
 
gdi is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: West-Central Connecticut
Posts: 2,315
I do it now and then because I can use cheap expired bulk rolls I have picked up over the years. I found two NIB Lloyds loaders when I was dumping my garbage and recently bought 2 80's vintage Trix 100ft rolls for $5 each. That makes it worth it.

A lot of people are afraid of way-expired film, but most seems ok to me. My test roll of the 80's trix looked acceptable to me....
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #60
sniki
Registered User
 
sniki's Avatar
 
sniki is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Rome, Italy
Age: 55
Posts: 257
At this moment in time just the film I can't get in rolls, like the EFKE ORTH 25 available only in bulk: worth the time.
__________________
sniki
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #61
JohnTF
Registered User
 
JohnTF's Avatar
 
JohnTF is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Home is Cleveland, Summers often Europe, Winters often Mexico.
Posts: 2,060
If you take care to choose your cartridges carefully and keep your hands off the button opposite the crank, it is OK, and it is economical in terms of storage for 100' rolls in the freezer, plus there are films that are hard to find otherwise. Some cartridges are easy to get to turn in the loader leaving a loop of film touching the loader door and scratching the base of the film. Never cared for plastic cartridges.

I keep my cartridges in ziploks, and with all the care, there is the chance of scratches, but anything commercially processed runs a higher risk of scratches.

So, yes I bulkload, and yes I appreciate factory loads when I can get em.

Would love to be as proficient as Tom A. in his demo video. ;-)

Regards, John
__________________
To capture some of this -- I suppose that's lyricism.

Josef Sudek
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #62
JohnTF
Registered User
 
JohnTF's Avatar
 
JohnTF is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Home is Cleveland, Summers often Europe, Winters often Mexico.
Posts: 2,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by regularchickens View Post
I have bulk-loaded APX100 for well over a year, because when I was looking, bulk rolls were the only form I could find it in. When the current roll runs out, I'll probably get either some Tri-X or some Fomapan 100.
The 200 may be a better choice if you can get it, the speed is really a bit less, and the tonal range is at least one tone more. The Foma 100 is a much older technology film, but you may be looking for that. There is something special about the 200, one of my favorite films for 35mm.

Regards, John
__________________
To capture some of this -- I suppose that's lyricism.

Josef Sudek
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #63
funkpilz
Registered User
 
funkpilz is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Berlin.
Posts: 218
I do, and I love it, but it does have its drawbacks. For example, on my last roll of Foma 400, I must have accidentally lifted up the lid of the 100ft tin, because on the first 5-10 rolls I processed, I got this nasty fog covering up half the film strip.
__________________
I like taking pictures. Want to see them?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #64
flip
良かったね!
 
flip's Avatar
 
flip is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by funkpilz View Post
I do, and I love it, but it does have its drawbacks. For example, on my last roll of Foma 400, I must have accidentally lifted up the lid of the 100ft tin, because on the first 5-10 rolls I processed, I got this nasty fog covering up half the film strip.
I feel your pain. I am now convinced that i lost some vacation shots because my bulk rolled film went bad in the Xray machine. I suspect that if I used metal instead of plastic cassettes, I might have had more protection. Also had an issue with a shirley wellard cassette where the door was open when I thought it closed. oops.
__________________
Very happy with my Shintaro BP M2. Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #65
JohnTF
Registered User
 
JohnTF's Avatar
 
JohnTF is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Home is Cleveland, Summers often Europe, Winters often Mexico.
Posts: 2,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
I feel your pain. I am now convinced that i lost some vacation shots because my bulk rolled film went bad in the Xray machine. I suspect that if I used metal instead of plastic cassettes, I might have had more protection. Also had an issue with a shirley wellard cassette where the door was open when I thought it closed. oops.
Not likely, so it was not your fault, I just do not like any of the plastic cartridges I have seen because of mechanical problems.

Once I did have a friend drop a roll to pop off the end of the cartridge, so there are concerns with loading your own, but there are films around in bulk that are hard to find factory loaded.

If you really get curious about film problems, I suspect you can scan some, as enough of us have screwed up in various ways to recognize the usual suspects, and the folks that made the film should be able to give it a look see.

Kodak once looked at some E4 slides I had a problem with, they told me the precise bottle cap that was bad in the storage of the solutions. I did not have enough bottles and recycled some with one being contaminated.

Konica once sent a negative back to Japan to be examined, though they never found the problem.

Regards, John
__________________
To capture some of this -- I suppose that's lyricism.

Josef Sudek
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #66
imokruok
Registered User
 
imokruok is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 299
No, I don't bulk load, but I would if I was going to use a film that was not available on cassettes (e.g. Kodak movie film.)
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2010   #67
Frankd
Registered User
 
Frankd's Avatar
 
Frankd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17
I bulk load TriX with an Alden loader. The only problem I have is a fogged last frame occasionally.

I like bulk loading because I try to get 30 exposures per roll. That way I can fit 6 rows of 5 frames per Print File sheet. That way I can fit my 30 frame roll on a single 8x10 sheet of paper in my proof frame. I hate the fact that with 36 exposures I have to proof an additional half sheet for another row of negatives.
__________________
Leica M4-2, Rollieflex 3.5F, Canon 5DmkII.
http://www.frankdina.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-10-2010   #68
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankd View Post
...I like bulk loading because I try to get 30 exposures per roll. That way I can fit 6 rows of 5 frames per Print File sheet. That way I can fit my 30 frame roll on a single 8x10 sheet of paper in my proof frame. I hate the fact that with 36 exposures I have to proof an additional half sheet for another row of negatives.
Frank, that's exactly my reasoning too, when I bulk load.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-10-2010   #69
ChrisN
Striving
 
ChrisN's Avatar
 
ChrisN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 4,256
I stop at 35 exposures, since I can fit 6 strips of 5 exposures on an 8x10 sheet, if I take the negs out of the sleeve first. I used to store them in strips of 6 negs, but since I got my darkroom up and running I'm doing contacts rather than just scanning.
__________________
Chris


"The mission of photography is to explain man to man and each to himself. And that is the most complicated thing on earth."
Edward Steichen


I hardly know her

My Top 10
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2010   #70
winoto
Registered User
 
winoto's Avatar
 
winoto is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 78
definitely roll my own. have got 4 different bulk film loaders with HP5, Tri X, FP4, and Tmax 100. like chris from canberra, i too stop at 35mm to fit the 7x5 strips on contact sheets. i wish i had more ixmoos. they are more reliable than the easily dislodged/opened generic film cassettes...maybe i'm just accident prone.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-11-2010   #71
tj01
Registered User
 
tj01's Avatar
 
tj01 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 550
I also do contacts on 8x10 using 6 rows of 5 each. Bulk roll on some Leica cassettes in the dark. Since I've got short arms width, they are usually below 30 frames. Any more and i get those long horizontal scratches. Doing it in the dark is best as I really dislike the last frame fogging up. Room doesn't have to be totally dark, just dark enough that you can't see what you are doing.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2010   #72
Vics
Registered User
 
Vics's Avatar
 
Vics is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,353
I am in the process of switching from Arista Premium 400 to Ilford FP4+. There's not much savings with the AP400, but FP4+ has gotten so expensive- $6.09 at Freestyle and $7+ at my local shop- I can save half that by going back to rolling my own. Gives me something mindless to do with my hands while I'm listening to music evenings. I use a Lloyd's loader.
Vic
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2010   #73
Brian Legge
Registered User
 
Brian Legge is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,884
I just started recently. I currently have a roll of Neopan 400 loaded but am looking forward to wrapping it up and loading some Tri-X.

There aren't any bulk rolls of 1600 or 3200 around, are there? Neopan 1600 would probably be one of my go-to films if I could get it more cheaply.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-08-2010   #74
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by ethics_gradient View Post
I've been kicking around the idea of using a bulk-loader for a while, but I mostly shoot Arista 400 B&W, so it seems barely worth it. What other films are the rest of you guys bulk loading?
TMAX400 version 2. Bulk loading cuts the cost almost in half.

Neopan 100 and Neopan 400 ACROS are so economical from Freestyle that there's no point to bulk loading.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/

Last edited by semilog : 06-08-2010 at 17:00.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2010   #75
karthiks
Nomadic Photographer
 
karthiks is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brussels
Posts: 57
Definitely roll my own but running into a huge issue of scratched film

Guess time to look for a new loader or buy cheap cassettes. But, in Europe, is anything cheap?
__________________
I see, I shoot, I develop

http://www.flickr.com/photos/maddyks
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.