Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Bigger than 35 RF's > 120 RF Folders

120 RF Folders 120/220 Format Folding Rangefinders, including the various classic Zeiss Ikontas, Voigtlander Bessas, and their Ruskie copies.

Main Menu
:






The Forums
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Home made 6X9 Wide Angle camera from old folder
Old 01-07-2010   #1
Mael
Registered User
 
Mael's Avatar
 
Mael is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Home made 6X9 Wide Angle camera from old folder

Here's the story. I wanted a cheap lightweight 6X9 WA camera.

It had to be only built from dead camera parts. To begin the project I already had :

-A 1930 Voiglander folder wreck (made of very soft aluminium)
-A 65mm f/8 Super Angulon lens with Compur 00 shutter
-A 65mm Fotoman helicoid but with Compur 0 hole.



I have put the camera in boiling water with lemon juice to remove the leather and most of the corrosion. I had then to check if the camera was still light tight because it was very very oxydized.



Preparing the body for painting :



Black wrinckle finish achieved :



After having determined the lens register, I built the elements with 3mm plywood (the Varifocal finder is just for fun)



First blank try to put all the parts together, seems fine, but I was waiting a stainless steel ring to reduce the helical hole from 0 to 00 size.



Light sealing was made using aircraft windshield glue. It is black, it is strong.

When I had finally installed the shutter on the helical, I realized I made a 6mm mistake in determining the lens register.

The camera already finished.



Added an old german rangefinder on the top, a bubble lever. Main trouble was a correct viewfinder, did not want to spend 150 Euro in a 28mm finder, so I built this first tiny VF from Kiev scrap. Not sufficiently wide.



Finally built this from an Ikoflex viewing lens, Moskva intermadiate element and press camera front glass :

(I have enormous barrel distorsion in this VF but I have my full image.)



And the camera works. Film flatness is not perfect on such folders, but lens stopped to f/16 f/22 sharpness is acceptable.

__________________
Some pictures I took with vintage cameras are here :

http://www.photo-technique.com/galer...e/Galeries.htm

(english pages will be available soon)
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #2
sevo
Unrestricted User
 
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 1,037
Neat work. But if you should consider doing it over again: Using a Mamiya Press film holder rather than a old folder would have delivered a more accurate transport and better film planarity, and might even have saved some work.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #3
Mael
Registered User
 
Mael's Avatar
 
Mael is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Yes I know about the film backs. But the goal was to build it only from what I had !
__________________
Some pictures I took with vintage cameras are here :

http://www.photo-technique.com/galer...e/Galeries.htm

(english pages will be available soon)
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #4
Gary E
Registered User
 
Gary E's Avatar
 
Gary E is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 180
This is a commendable effort indeed. I've always wanted to make a wide from the Mamiya Press, but to do it with what you've got on hand is such a "Macguyver" thing to do! Congrats
__________________
Minolta 7s & Leica M4-2
Yashica D TLR
Assorted evil SLR's

For Pete's sake, they're all good. Just get out there and shoot with what you've got!

Last edited by Gary E : 01-07-2010 at 01:33. Reason: spelling
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #5
Solinar
Analog Preferred
 
Solinar's Avatar
 
Solinar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,051
That Fotoman helical is the key ingredient. What a convenient item to have laying around. It probably was the nexus of the project.

The Schneider 65 SA should give good coverage for 6x9, since you'll only be using an image circle of approximately 100mm, which is a portion of its 160mm coverage for a 4x5.

Fotoman never got around to introducing their 6x9 camera. So, it looks like that you beat them to it. I've seen other DIY built WA 6x9's based on an a Graflex XL stripped down to a basic body shell. Those are larger and heavier - plus they utilize a Graflok back.

Good work - you now have a compact hand-held WA medium format camera.
__________________
- Andrew in Austin, Texas -

35mm Gear Bessa R, Leica IIIf RD/ST, IIIg, M3
Medium Format Fuji GW 690III / Minolta Autocord
MF Folders Agfa Record III and Super Isolette / Voigtlander Perkeo II and Bessa II
Digital a D80 with a some fast primes

"Who spilled the Dektol on the bathroom carpet?"
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #6
buzzardkid
Ansel Buzzardkid
 
buzzardkid's Avatar
 
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands, 050-ish
Age: 39
Posts: 2,498
Thanks Mael for posting the work-in-progress shots.

I really like the looks of that camera, as well as the 6x9 format and the images it produces! 'Acceptable sharpness' is a bit of an understatement, I'd say!
__________________

Cheers,
Johan



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #7
buzzardkid
Ansel Buzzardkid
 
buzzardkid's Avatar
 
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands, 050-ish
Age: 39
Posts: 2,498
PS, I love the portrait 'Melissa' you have in that gallery!

Must have been ground glass focusing, seeing how fast the sharpness drops off with the f8 aperture? How did you achive this?
__________________

Cheers,
Johan



  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #8
newspaperguy
Registered User
 
newspaperguy's Avatar
 
newspaperguy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern Maryland US of A
Posts: 874
Congratulations on the ultimate recycling project.
__________________
Rick Beckrich

"We photographers deal in things
which are continually vanishing,
and when they have vanished,
there is no contrivance on earth
which can make them come back again.

"We cannot develop and print a memory."


HENRI CARTIER-BRESSON, The Decisive Moment, 1952
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #9
Frank Petronio
Registered User
 
Frank Petronio's Avatar
 
Frank Petronio is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
Posts: 1,109
Very Nice.

Now add a shift and ground glass ;-)

Some people gut an old cheap 35mm SLR lens to make a helicoid for even less money.
__________________
Blog and Static Galleries http://frankpetronio.com
Flash Galleries http://frankpetronio.net

Olympus Stylus; HTC Incredible; Nikon D300 w 35/1.8 AFS; 5x7 original metal Toyo Field w 180/5.6 Schneider Linhof lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #10
gandalfk7
Matteo Gandolfi
 
gandalfk7's Avatar
 
gandalfk7 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bologna, Italy
Age: 22
Posts: 127
this is a very nice work indeed!!
__________________
My Leica is full-frame. Filmsy full-frame, of course!

self developing rolls
my flickr my RFF PhotoGallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #11
fotoman617
Registered User
 
fotoman617 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solinar View Post
That Fotoman helical is the key ingredient.
Fotoman never got around to introducing their 6x9 camera. So, it looks like that you beat them to it.
Actually, we did build our 6x9 camera (only 50 units), of which the very last unit shipped just this past week.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #12
Mael
Registered User
 
Mael's Avatar
 
Mael is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLE-RF View Post
PS, I love the portrait 'Melissa' you have in that gallery!

Must have been ground glass focusing, seeing how fast the sharpness drops off with the f8 aperture? How did you achive this?
I focused on the ground glass and put the sharpness where I wanted it to be. The bigger negative you use, the less depth of field you get at an equivalent aperture. In this case, forgot to correct the bellows factor, negative's underexposed, difficult to print...
__________________
Some pictures I took with vintage cameras are here :

http://www.photo-technique.com/galer...e/Galeries.htm

(english pages will be available soon)
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #13
Mael
Registered User
 
Mael's Avatar
 
Mael is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Another picture made with this thing...



Sharpness acceptable, even if there's a slight fall off in the corners. That's life !

__________________
Some pictures I took with vintage cameras are here :

http://www.photo-technique.com/galer...e/Galeries.htm

(english pages will be available soon)
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #14
pagpow
Registered User
 
pagpow is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 490
Camera looks good; so do photos. Thanks for sharing.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #15
MaxElmar
Registered User
 
MaxElmar's Avatar
 
MaxElmar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 148
A very nice project! Well done.

The homebrew finder is especially impressive!
__________________
Chris L.

Alles festhalten - mit der Leica!

Last edited by MaxElmar : 01-07-2010 at 07:32.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #16
David Murphy
Registered User
 
David Murphy's Avatar
 
David Murphy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 1,584
Very nice!
__________________
Leica M2, Contax IIa, Canon VI-L, Nikon S, Rolleiflex 2.8D, and several others
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #17
zumbido
bees.
 
zumbido's Avatar
 
zumbido is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 134
Awesome. I've been working on a digital WA frankencamera with a pair of sony pocket digicam sensors inside a cannabalized FED-2... if I ever have a chance to get it working properly I'll share it here.
__________________
-brian hayden

traffic noise. machine hum.
http://fed-2.org
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #18
chippy
Adelaide
 
chippy's Avatar
 
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,879
what a great thread, i love it when we see these 'how it came to be' cameras with some illustrating pics the results [pics] look interesting too!

Mael, the crinkle black finish was achieved how? special paint designed for the purpose or a particular other technique
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #19
FPjohn
Registered User
 
FPjohn's Avatar
 
FPjohn is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,121
Kudos

yours
FPJ
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2010   #20
Mael
Registered User
 
Mael's Avatar
 
Mael is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by chippy View Post

Mael, the crinkle black finish was achieved how? special paint designed for the purpose or a particular other technique
It is wrinckle finish paint for car restoration. One first coat, a second 10 min later, and after 2 hours a large last heavy coat. Paint do not work under 25°C so needed to put in the oven.

Next project will be trying to modify the camera with interchangeable lenses...
__________________
Some pictures I took with vintage cameras are here :

http://www.photo-technique.com/galer...e/Galeries.htm

(english pages will be available soon)
  Reply With Quote

Franken camera : it's alive, aliiiiive !
Old 02-21-2010   #21
jeanba3000
Registered User
 
jeanba3000 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Cool Franken camera : it's alive, aliiiiive !

Hello Mael and everyone

I had a similar idea sometime ago, to use of an old crapy folder and some old Super Angulon like yours, but my laziness… So Mael's creation reminded me this idea and finally, I did it (my way).

The project was not as ambitious as Mael's, I kept the cheap look, missing leatherette, old glue stains and rust… I removed the folder panel and its mecanism, the lens and the bellow, then I made the dark chamber with a soap carton box, glued on the body camera with stick cement and painted in black inside with artist acrylic paint I had from my time in art-school. I pierced the top and the front of the body to pass a shutter release cable, and glued on top an accessory mount taken from an old Lubitel, so I could use a two bubble level. And I don't have a finder, so I checked the field with a ground glass and engraved some markings on top to figure the horizontal field.

The lens is a tiny f/8 47mm Super Angulon from the '60s (nearly 90° horizontal field in 6x9 !), with a dedicated focusing mount. I chose a fixed rise of the lens, about 6 mm, to have the horizon under the center of the field.
The camera weights about 600g, pretty light.



I tried it the other day in Passage Jouffroy in Paris, a beautiful place, but not very luminous at the end of the day, so I had 1/2s exposure hand held, and the first results are from not very sharp to not sharp at all, but I think the camera is easily usable at 1/8s or 1/4s since it has no mirror relase and no curtain focal shutter, and it's pretty silent. Here is two pictures I like from the roll :



  Reply With Quote

Old 02-21-2010   #22
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeanba3000 View Post
The lens is a tiny f/8 47mm Super Angulon from the '60s (nearly 90° horizontal field in 6x9 !), with a dedicated focusing mount. I chose a fixed rise of the lens, about 6 mm, to have the horizon under the center of the field.]
Out of curiosity, where did the lens come from with the dedicated focusing mount? The pictures at 1/2 second hand held is doing pretty good.. Love to see the results once you have good lighting...

Thanks
Gary

Last edited by GaryLH : 02-21-2010 at 11:08.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-21-2010   #23
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 93
Mael

You did an amazing job. The results of all your hard work looks great.

Gary
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-21-2010   #24
jeanba3000
Registered User
 
jeanba3000 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Gary, I got the lens in a Plaubel Peco Jr 6x9 complete set, and found the helicoid mount on eBay months later, it was advertised as dedicated to the 47mm and with a #00 shutter mount. I gess I was lucky to find it.

Another time, I found an old Angulon (not Super) 65mm on an helicoid mount that was the focusing part of a 24x36 lens ! By the way, the Angulon 65 is an impressively small lens and would be a perfect candidate for such a pocket DIY camera. Since we don't use movement such as we do with a technical view camera, we don't really need the large image circle of a Super Angulon and the Angulon is enough for 6x9.

6x9 format has a ~100mm diagonal (I mesured 103mm on my Franken'), the Super Angulon f/8-47 has a 113mm image circle, the Angulon f/6,8-65 has a 109,6mm image circle and the Super Angulon f/8-65 has a 155mm image circle, according to Schneider's 1963 datasheets.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-21-2010   #25
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 93
thanks for the update jeanba3000

I know what to be on the look out for. I have a 65mm SA on a 2x3 folder. I have always like it. Have fun with your new setup

Gary
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:09.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.