Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Evil SLRs

Evil SLRs For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm their evil nature.

Main Menu
:






The Forums
View Poll Results: In my opinion, I feel the Leica S2 is:
Lovely, good looking! 104 34.21%
Ugly! So ugly, give me a break! 27 8.88%
I don't care about its looks. 70 23.03%
I will keep using my M, this is not my style. 103 33.88%
Voters: 304. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 09-22-2008   #51
NIKON KIU
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
 
NIKON KIU's Avatar
 
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
Strangely, Nikon does not have a press date set!!

This is the perfect definition of an EVIL SLR:



Kiu
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #52
Ben Z
Registered User
 
Ben Z is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,084
I wish Leica all the success in the world on each new product they sell, and I wouldn't presume to judge who might or might not want such a camera as this. I can only say, it isn't me. At different times I lusted after and bought (used) Nikon F5, Canon 1VHS, Leica R8, Pentax 67, and Hasselblad setups, but when I had them in the bag I hated the bulk and weight. I am so over the camera-lust phase. I just can't lug around anything bigger or heavier than an M and 3-4 lenses when I travel, and that's when I do 90% of my photography. After 15 years I've got all the shots of winter wading birds and various flowers that I can stand, so for the little shooting I do involving macro or telephoto, my 20D is more than up to the task. I don't think the camera looks ugly though (not that how a camera looks makes any difference to me).
__________________
MY GALLERY
  Reply With Quote

S2
Old 09-22-2008   #53
gchao
Registered User
 
gchao's Avatar
 
gchao is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: CALIFORNIA, USA
Posts: 46
Smile S2

Confirmed that the S2 will have AF lenses and priced around $23,000USD.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #54
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
 
Ronald_H's Avatar
 
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 39
Posts: 975
Quote:
Originally Posted by photomoof View Post
Wait until you see the prices on this puppy, and I can almost guarantee that is is NOT autofocus.
Wanna bet?

Read The D*mn Text!

On another note, I see severe rejection symptoms by the M-crowd for this system. As for myself, my flabber is ghasted. If they can do this, digital R10's and FF M9's suddenly seem possible.

Whatever happens, this will take the industry sit up and take notice. Look at what a stir it causes already!

And, just to be a bit mean, will this need IR filters too?

*Ducks and runs*
__________________
"The only substitute for Tri-X is more Tri-X"

My Flickr

My regular website: www.lookupinwonder.nl
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #55
peter_n
~
 
peter_n's Avatar
 
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, USA
Posts: 8,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnastovall View Post
The way a camera body looks doesn't matter it's the images it produces. Have you ever seen Josef Sudek's camera?
Indeed. What an incredible man. He more-or-less made his own panoramic too, from the remains of an old Kodak plate camera from the 1800's. All with one arm. He was truly a giant, and at last recognition is happening in the west. Two new books will be published next month!
__________________
_
~Peter


My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #56
jmarcus
Registered User
 
jmarcus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 225
I just want Leica to make money, so they can continue to build better digital rangefinders
__________________
Epson R-D1s

Zeiss 35mm f/2.0 Biogon T*
Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 Nokton
Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 Nokton
Leica 28mm f/2.8 ASPH
Leica Elmar C 90mm f/4.0
Flickr
=======================
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #57
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
 
HuubL's Avatar
 
HuubL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmarcus View Post
I just want Leica to make money, so they can continue to build better digital rangefinders
...Right!!
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #58
cole
Registered User
 
cole's Avatar
 
cole is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 118
I think this is a fantastic move on Leica's part - someone down there is finally thinking out of the box.

I'm a passionate M user, but I also work with 4x5" for fashion and portrait work, and from the initial look at this camera, it would easily sway me to move into digital photography again - if the price isn't astronomical. As has been previously pointed out, this isn't a direct competitor for the H3DII or similar cameras - it's aimed at something in-between. Hopefully the price can reflect an 'in-between' stance as well.

To be honest, I'm salivating.

Congratulations, Leica.
__________________
Cole Peters
http://www.colepeters.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #59
tmfabian
I met a man once...
 
tmfabian's Avatar
 
tmfabian is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boston & Tampa
Posts: 606
this is a spectacular move. This is going to sell, and that bodes well for leica. I'm quite happy with this announcement, it's about time leica brought in some diversity to their line...this lil puppy should open up a whole new market for them.
__________________
Thomas M. Fabian II
For Eternity Photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #60
John Shriver
Registered User
 
John Shriver is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA, USA
Posts: 1,056
The sensor size is the same as all the "medium format" digital backs, which are all a crop from 4.5x6cm. Heck, this is the same 37mp Kodak sensor several of them use.

What it doesn't have is all the baggage of being strapped onto a large camera originally designed for 4.5x6cm or 6x6cm.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #61
John Shriver
Registered User
 
John Shriver is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA, USA
Posts: 1,056
Looking at the picture, no aperture ring. Obviously an electronic mount. Presumably USM focusing motor. The leaf shutters are probably also electronically controlled.

Gutsy move, shows that they are willing to invest a lot of capital.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #62
Ray Nalley
-
 
Ray Nalley is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 305
Has anyone determined whether it is a real camera or just a prototype. That isn't really clear.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #63
padraigm
Registered User
 
padraigm is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 62
I hear the ISO noise above 640 is terrible......LOL
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #64
kevin m
Registered User
 
kevin m's Avatar
 
kevin m is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Eastern Connecticut
Posts: 2,091
More pics from another site: http://www.1854.eu/2008/09/leica_s2_...f_the_new.html
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #65
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
 
Bobfrance's Avatar
 
Bobfrance is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire, England
Age: 40
Posts: 957
Anyone else think it looks like Darth Vader?

__________________
Leica M8, Fuji GS 645, Ricoh GR-1, Ricoh GR-D, Canon QL25, Zenit ES, Olympus E420 (with Zuiko 25mm Pancake).

Flickr gallery
RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #66
urban_alchemist
Registered User
 
urban_alchemist's Avatar
 
urban_alchemist is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel/London, UK
Posts: 605
It looks great... I want bad. And I haven't said that about any SLR since...

Well, I can't actually remember...
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #67
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
 
HuubL's Avatar
 
HuubL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin m View Post
It's starting to grow on me....

Us M-users got to love that little red dot on the lenses
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #68
Double Negative
Canon DSLR Refugee
 
Double Negative's Avatar
 
Double Negative is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,009
What a unique design... Darth Vader, heh. Yeah - I can see that.
__________________
Leica M8, M9 & Zeiss Ikon; CV 1,2/35 Nokton, 3,5/28, 2,5/35 and 2,5/50 Color Skopars, Leica 2,8/90 Elmarit-M
Zeiss ZM 4/18 Distagon, 2,8/25 Biogon, 2/35 Biogon, 1,5/50 Sonnar and 2/50 Planar
Mamiya 7II; N50mm f/4.5L, N65mm f/4L, N80mm f/4L and N150mm f/4.5L
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #69
JonasYip
Registered User
 
JonasYip's Avatar
 
JonasYip is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 375
More details here:
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/sho...ml?page=816234
__________________
-
-
The album is finally officially released! More info at perfectnines.com

Jonas Yip

www.jonasyip.com
The Perfect Nines

12-15-21-28-28-35-40-50-50-50-75-90
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #70
totifoto
Registered User
 
totifoto's Avatar
 
totifoto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iceland
Posts: 316
I kinda like this. Leica is in the medium format market now, and this camera is more portable that any medium format digital camera on the market.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #71
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Age: 55
Posts: 13,865
Maybe this really is another major breakthrough for Leica marketing. Ugly the camera is, but it is smaller than any of of the clumsy looking large cousins that use the large sized sensor. If I had an extra $35,000 to spend, would I spend the money on this camera? Food for thought.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...y.php?cat=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #72
HuubL
hunter-gatherer
 
HuubL's Avatar
 
HuubL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Netherlands
Age: 58
Posts: 1,437
Ohh...., I want one in chrome!
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #73
cam
the need for speed
 
cam's Avatar
 
cam is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: paris no more
Posts: 470
but to show it off with a Summarit lens?

i know, i'm probably being a terrible snob here, but i wish they had put a Cron or a Lux on it...
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #74
Ray Nalley
-
 
Ray Nalley is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 305
One dial on the top. Must be totally menu controlled.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #75
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski's Avatar
 
jarski is online now
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: evropa
Age: 34
Posts: 772
I never have afford this camera, but to me it has specs of a winner for what its meant for. yes, result of out of the box thinking that not many would have expected from Leica lets see now will e.g. Canon muscle something similar in short while.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.