| Olympus RF This forum is for the Olympus rangefinders. |
|
View Poll Results: When do you think your XA's lens get sharp
|
|
it's always sharp!
|
 
|
80 |
32.52% |
|
by f4
|
 
|
35 |
14.23% |
|
by f5.6
|
 
|
76 |
30.89% |
|
by f8
|
 
|
33 |
13.41% |
|
by f11
|
 
|
0 |
0% |
|
it never really gets that sharp
|
 
|
22 |
8.94% |
08-17-2008
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
And yes, XA reminds me very much Pentax PC35AF, in terms of picture.
Last edited by btgc : 08-17-2008 at 09:17.
|
|
|
|
08-17-2008
|
#27
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,931
|
I often use the Minox GT and the Olympus XA side by side. Both cameras have sharp lenses, and I have not discovered a clear advantage of the GT over the XA.
|
|
|
|
 |
Duct Tape..... |
 |
08-18-2008
|
#28
|
|
Registered User
kuzano is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,653
|
Duct Tape.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid
I find that holding the little camera steady is harder than a full sized camera. This could be one of the reasons why wide open images can appear rather soft with the XA. Test it wide open on a tripod.
|
Here in Beerfart NB, we use a lot of duct tape. In fact Beerfart uses more rolls per capita, per year than any other community in the USA.
It's not uncommon to find me in the crowd at the annual "Corn Shuckin and Hog Callin Festival" parade, taping my XA to sign posts along the parade route to get those memorable shots.
But once you anchor that lil sucker down, the lens delivers on the goods. Good as anything anybody else in Beerfart owns. And wide open that little bit of subject-containing vignette in the corners is JUST right!
|
|
|
|
08-21-2008
|
#29
|
|
Registered User
Lilserenity is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Worthing, W Sx
Age: 29
Posts: 1,044
|
I've always found my XA to be acceptably sharp at f/2.8, in fact I find it hard to fault except for the slightly faint in broad daylight rangefinder patch.
|
|
|
|
08-24-2008
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
DavidC is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 35
|
My XA has pretty much outlived its useful life of 20 plus years. I am beginning to get irritated by the difficult to see rangefinder patch and the hair trigger shutter. But if you need a small camera that takes film and can still pack a punch in the picture dept. then the XA can still come in handly. In particular if you are contemplating a long hike on the Great Wall of China. Your big rfdrs will become a real pain and you will wish you had your XA instead.
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008
|
#31
|
|
Registered User
caperunner is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 86
|
BTGC.. Great photo! Whereabouts did you take this one?
|
|
|
|
08-26-2008
|
#32
|
|
Registered User
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
Thanks, caperunner! With kindergarten kids celebrated ancient fairy Ūsiņi - dedicated to Sun and Ūsiņš who manifested Sun in old times, also served as protector of horses. Also had some dancing and games supplemented by live music. Geographically this happens in Latvia.
Hope not obscuring original XA topic too much...
|
|
|
|
08-27-2008
|
#33
|
|
Registered User
caperunner is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 86
|
Not obscuring XA topic at all. I play the GHB - great highland bagpipes and this pic caught my eye. What pipes are these?
Definitely a Celtic scene with fiddle, drums and pipes, or even medieval. This is why I liked your pic. Haven't I seen this scene on a woodcut before?
Back to XA good little camera...
|
|
|
|
08-28-2008
|
#34
|
|
Registered User
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
That could be Irish bagpipes. Truly speaking, I don't know much of them...Once I tried to play; this is good work for lung and relaxation for mind.
XA2 also is good palm-sized camera 
|
|
|
|
08-28-2008
|
#35
|
|
reminiscence
tan131 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Singapore
Age: 31
Posts: 48
|
The XA has allowed me to shoot some pictures which I had never shot before mainly for two factors, its size (which I ended up carrying everywhere) and its discreet looks (which allowed me to take shots without drawing attention). As for the lens quality, its as good as any top notch camera of its time
http://www.flickr.com/photos/2814486...7606995532022/
|
|
|
|
08-30-2008
|
#36
|
|
Registered User
iceman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malaysia
Age: 29
Posts: 28
|
i find it acceptably sharp at all fstops, but i rarely open it wide though.
my only gripe about the XA is the RF patch. both of mine has faded quite a bit so i dont bother with focusing as much now. just use hyperfocal and enjoy.

|
|
|
|
08-30-2008
|
#37
|
|
Film Shooter
KenD is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: on the Bay of Fundy, Canada
Posts: 256
|
On mine the lens is a lot sharper than the focusing capacity of the dim rangefinder patch  )
KenD
|
|
|
|
09-20-2008
|
#38
|
|
Registered User
racoll is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Monticello, IN
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btgc
And yes, XA reminds me very much Pentax PC35AF, in terms of picture.
|
I wish my PC35AF, either one of them, took pictures that looked as good as those from my XA, but they just don't quite get there. Close, but not quite. It's a great camera, the PC35AF, another great design that I like just as much as the XA, but I love the results from the XA a lot better. In response to the original question, mine is always sharp and I'm always impressed by the pictures I get from the XA. Once in a fit of stupidity, I sold my 3 XAs, my XA2, and my XA1. That's when I realized how much that camera means to me, so I had to get another and will never part with it again.
Andy
|
|
|
|
09-30-2008
|
#39
|
|
Registered User
Moto Mark is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 38
|
Oh the XA! It's been a long time since I had mine but to this day it was one of the best pocket size cameras I've ever used. I never had a problem with the quality of the lens and even wide open the photos were just magic.
All this XA talk is making me want to fire up eBay and have a look 
|
|
|
|
09-30-2008
|
#40
|
|
Registered User
rovnguy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 261
|
I have 5. Come over to my house and I'll give you one. They all seem to work quite nicely for me.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=141'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
09-30-2008
|
#41
|
|
Gautham Narayan
gnarayan is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 135
|
I finally traded my XA this past weekend at PHSNE Photographica show for a motor winder for my OMs. One thing I rarely used for another thing I probably will rarely use. Cute little thing but never quite did it for me. Yes it was small but might I was always stopping it down since the VF and RF were useless and in that case might as well just use a digital compact.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2008
|
#42
|
|
Registered User
Moto Mark is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rovnguy
I have 5. Come over to my house and I'll give you one. They all seem to work quite nicely for me.
|
I might have to take you up on that  At least that will give me an excuse to go back to San Diego, one of me all time favorite cities.
|
|
|
|
 |
I agree whole-heartedly..... |
 |
09-30-2008
|
#43
|
|
Registered User
kuzano is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,653
|
I agree whole-heartedly.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Wilkinson
I agree, Raid, - but it's a great little pocket camera. Mine has largely been replaced by a .....gulp!....digicam, these days, so I'll be looking for a new home for it shortly
Dave.
|
I too will be looking for a home for my digicam and starting to carry the XA again, or one of my XA2's. I wish the digicam could upstage either of them, but I guess it's a $500 lesson I just had to learn.
Welcome back when you sell your digicam. In my case the $ loss was harsh, but warranted by the image quality of my XA
|
|
|
|
10-09-2008
|
#44
|
|
Registered User
mh2000 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 892
|
well... I started this thread because over the years I've only been so-so satisfied with this lens... but in preparing for a little exhibition I decided I wanted to put up one photo taken with the XA and even though the proofs and scans looked prety mediocre, my 8x12" print looks quite good... I doubt it would go much bigger, but at 8x12" the camera is quite decent stopped down... certainly capable of making quality images.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-24-2008
|
#45
|
|
Itinerant Photographer
st3ph3nm is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid
The XA is not meant to be used wide open all the time.
I use it at 5.6-11 most of the time.
|
Is any lens "meant" to be used at *any* aperture "all the time"?
The best photo I ever took of my wife was with my XA fully open at a street cafe, with a really busy background. Her face is really clear. I only wish my scanner still worked so I could re do my gallery!
I'll agree with some here - I've never liked the shape of the lens flare (the square aperture doesn't do much for me) when it happens, and the vignetting you can get is sometimes more than I'd like, but at the end of the day, I shoot far more with my XA than I do with my SLR, and I love it. It can be difficult to focus accurately in low light with the XA's rangefinder, and combined with low depth of field, this can be another drawback. I don't think the XA is the perfect low light camera.
Cheers,
Steve
|
|
|
|
 |
11-01-2008
|
#46
|
|
Registered User
Henryzx is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stockton, CA, US
Age: 38
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by btgc
And yes, XA reminds me very much Pentax PC35AF, in terms of picture.
|
I bought a brand new PC34AF-M (motor drive) in the box for 5 bucks a few years back and never use it (too busy with my oly's), I didn't know that it would be comparable with the XA., prob. put on a roll and test it next week.
|
|
|
|
11-01-2008
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henryzx
I bought a brand new PC34AF-M (motor drive) in the box for 5 bucks a few years back and never use it (too busy with my oly's)
|
I'd be happy had Pentax model aperture control and zone focus. Lens is really nice.
|
|
|
|
01-07-2009
|
#48
|
|
work in progress
jamxo is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Age: 24
Posts: 100
|
Love my Xa, in terms of having a little manual focus rangefinder its just awesome.
Use it wide open alot, and it delivers, and I did that little trick when you marker pen in the rangefinder spot so its easier to focus. Some shots:

__________________
35: Leica M6, Hexar AF, Fuji Klasse S
120: Plaubel Makina 67, Mamiya 7, Pentax 67
Digi: 5d Mark II, Pen Ep-2
-
JAMIESTOKERDOTCOM
|
|
|
|
01-26-2009
|
#49
|
|
Registered User
John Lawrence is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,921
|
Foolishly I sold my XA about a year ago, but in the years I had it I found the lens to be very sharp (for the time the camera was produced). Obviously it got better when stopped down a bit, but really I had no problems with it at all. Not for nothing was it christened, "the camera the Pros take on holiday with them"!
|
|
|
|
01-26-2009
|
#50
|
|
Registered User
Gradskater is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 259
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamxo
Love my Xa, in terms of having a little manual focus rangefinder its just awesome.
Use it wide open alot, and it delivers, and I did that little trick when you marker pen in the rangefinder spot so its easier to focus. Some shots:

|
That second picture is amazing. Well done!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:10. |
|
|