Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Olympus RF

Olympus RF This forum is for the Olympus rangefinders.

View Poll Results: When do you think your XA's lens get sharp
it's always sharp! 80 32.52%
by f4 35 14.23%
by f5.6 76 30.89%
by f8 33 13.41%
by f11 0 0%
it never really gets that sharp 22 8.94%
Voters: 246. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 08-17-2008   #26
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
And yes, XA reminds me very much Pentax PC35AF, in terms of picture.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sample3-pc35af.jpg (185.2 KB, 255 views)
__________________
MyFlickr

Last edited by btgc : 08-17-2008 at 09:17.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2008   #27
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,931
I often use the Minox GT and the Olympus XA side by side. Both cameras have sharp lenses, and I have not discovered a clear advantage of the GT over the XA.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Duct Tape.....
Old 08-18-2008   #28
kuzano
Registered User
 
kuzano is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,653
Duct Tape.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
I find that holding the little camera steady is harder than a full sized camera. This could be one of the reasons why wide open images can appear rather soft with the XA. Test it wide open on a tripod.
Here in Beerfart NB, we use a lot of duct tape. In fact Beerfart uses more rolls per capita, per year than any other community in the USA.

It's not uncommon to find me in the crowd at the annual "Corn Shuckin and Hog Callin Festival" parade, taping my XA to sign posts along the parade route to get those memorable shots.

But once you anchor that lil sucker down, the lens delivers on the goods. Good as anything anybody else in Beerfart owns. And wide open that little bit of subject-containing vignette in the corners is JUST right!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-21-2008   #29
Lilserenity
Registered User
 
Lilserenity is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Worthing, W Sx
Age: 29
Posts: 1,044
I've always found my XA to be acceptably sharp at f/2.8, in fact I find it hard to fault except for the slightly faint in broad daylight rangefinder patch.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-24-2008   #30
DavidC
Registered User
 
DavidC is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 35
My XA has pretty much outlived its useful life of 20 plus years. I am beginning to get irritated by the difficult to see rangefinder patch and the hair trigger shutter. But if you need a small camera that takes film and can still pack a punch in the picture dept. then the XA can still come in handly. In particular if you are contemplating a long hike on the Great Wall of China. Your big rfdrs will become a real pain and you will wish you had your XA instead.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-26-2008   #31
caperunner
Registered User
 
caperunner is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 86
BTGC.. Great photo! Whereabouts did you take this one?
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-26-2008   #32
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
Thanks, caperunner! With kindergarten kids celebrated ancient fairy Ūsiņi - dedicated to Sun and Ūsiņš who manifested Sun in old times, also served as protector of horses. Also had some dancing and games supplemented by live music. Geographically this happens in Latvia.

Hope not obscuring original XA topic too much...
__________________
MyFlickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2008   #33
caperunner
Registered User
 
caperunner is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 86
Not obscuring XA topic at all. I play the GHB - great highland bagpipes and this pic caught my eye. What pipes are these?
Definitely a Celtic scene with fiddle, drums and pipes, or even medieval. This is why I liked your pic. Haven't I seen this scene on a woodcut before?
Back to XA good little camera...
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-28-2008   #34
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
That could be Irish bagpipes. Truly speaking, I don't know much of them...Once I tried to play; this is good work for lung and relaxation for mind.
XA2 also is good palm-sized camera
__________________
MyFlickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-28-2008   #35
tan131
reminiscence
 
tan131's Avatar
 
tan131 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Singapore
Age: 31
Posts: 48
The XA has allowed me to shoot some pictures which I had never shot before mainly for two factors, its size (which I ended up carrying everywhere) and its discreet looks (which allowed me to take shots without drawing attention). As for the lens quality, its as good as any top notch camera of its time

http://www.flickr.com/photos/2814486...7606995532022/
__________________
It's hard to let go of things you know may never happen, but its even harder to let go of things you know its all you ever wanted

My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28144868@N05/
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-30-2008   #36
iceman
Registered User
 
iceman's Avatar
 
iceman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malaysia
Age: 29
Posts: 28
i find it acceptably sharp at all fstops, but i rarely open it wide though.

my only gripe about the XA is the RF patch. both of mine has faded quite a bit so i dont bother with focusing as much now. just use hyperfocal and enjoy.

__________________
-blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-30-2008   #37
KenD
Film Shooter
 
KenD's Avatar
 
KenD is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: on the Bay of Fundy, Canada
Posts: 256
On mine the lens is a lot sharper than the focusing capacity of the dim rangefinder patch )

KenD
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2008   #38
racoll
Registered User
 
racoll is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Monticello, IN
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by btgc View Post
And yes, XA reminds me very much Pentax PC35AF, in terms of picture.
I wish my PC35AF, either one of them, took pictures that looked as good as those from my XA, but they just don't quite get there. Close, but not quite. It's a great camera, the PC35AF, another great design that I like just as much as the XA, but I love the results from the XA a lot better. In response to the original question, mine is always sharp and I'm always impressed by the pictures I get from the XA. Once in a fit of stupidity, I sold my 3 XAs, my XA2, and my XA1. That's when I realized how much that camera means to me, so I had to get another and will never part with it again.

Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-30-2008   #39
Moto Mark
Registered User
 
Moto Mark is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 38
Lightbulb

Oh the XA! It's been a long time since I had mine but to this day it was one of the best pocket size cameras I've ever used. I never had a problem with the quality of the lens and even wide open the photos were just magic.

All this XA talk is making me want to fire up eBay and have a look
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-30-2008   #40
rovnguy
Registered User
 
rovnguy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 261
I have 5. Come over to my house and I'll give you one. They all seem to work quite nicely for me.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=141'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-30-2008   #41
gnarayan
Gautham Narayan
 
gnarayan's Avatar
 
gnarayan is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 135
I finally traded my XA this past weekend at PHSNE Photographica show for a motor winder for my OMs. One thing I rarely used for another thing I probably will rarely use. Cute little thing but never quite did it for me. Yes it was small but might I was always stopping it down since the VF and RF were useless and in that case might as well just use a digital compact.
__________________
-Gautham Narayan
http://flickr.com/photos/gnarayan/
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-30-2008   #42
Moto Mark
Registered User
 
Moto Mark is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by rovnguy View Post
I have 5. Come over to my house and I'll give you one. They all seem to work quite nicely for me.
I might have to take you up on that At least that will give me an excuse to go back to San Diego, one of me all time favorite cities.
  Reply With Quote

I agree whole-heartedly.....
Old 09-30-2008   #43
kuzano
Registered User
 
kuzano is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,653
I agree whole-heartedly.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Wilkinson View Post
I agree, Raid, - but it's a great little pocket camera. Mine has largely been replaced by a .....gulp!....digicam, these days, so I'll be looking for a new home for it shortly

Dave.
I too will be looking for a home for my digicam and starting to carry the XA again, or one of my XA2's. I wish the digicam could upstage either of them, but I guess it's a $500 lesson I just had to learn.

Welcome back when you sell your digicam. In my case the $ loss was harsh, but warranted by the image quality of my XA
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-09-2008   #44
mh2000
Registered User
 
mh2000's Avatar
 
mh2000 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 892
well... I started this thread because over the years I've only been so-so satisfied with this lens... but in preparing for a little exhibition I decided I wanted to put up one photo taken with the XA and even though the proofs and scans looked prety mediocre, my 8x12" print looks quite good... I doubt it would go much bigger, but at 8x12" the camera is quite decent stopped down... certainly capable of making quality images.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-24-2008   #45
st3ph3nm
Itinerant Photographer
 
st3ph3nm's Avatar
 
st3ph3nm is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 280
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid View Post
The XA is not meant to be used wide open all the time.
I use it at 5.6-11 most of the time.
Is any lens "meant" to be used at *any* aperture "all the time"?
The best photo I ever took of my wife was with my XA fully open at a street cafe, with a really busy background. Her face is really clear. I only wish my scanner still worked so I could re do my gallery!

I'll agree with some here - I've never liked the shape of the lens flare (the square aperture doesn't do much for me) when it happens, and the vignetting you can get is sometimes more than I'd like, but at the end of the day, I shoot far more with my XA than I do with my SLR, and I love it. It can be difficult to focus accurately in low light with the XA's rangefinder, and combined with low depth of field, this can be another drawback. I don't think the XA is the perfect low light camera.

Cheers,
Steve
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2008   #46
Henryzx
Registered User
 
Henryzx is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stockton, CA, US
Age: 38
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by btgc View Post
And yes, XA reminds me very much Pentax PC35AF, in terms of picture.
I bought a brand new PC34AF-M (motor drive) in the box for 5 bucks a few years back and never use it (too busy with my oly's), I didn't know that it would be comparable with the XA., prob. put on a roll and test it next week.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2008   #47
btgc
Registered User
 
btgc's Avatar
 
btgc is online now
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henryzx View Post
I bought a brand new PC34AF-M (motor drive) in the box for 5 bucks a few years back and never use it (too busy with my oly's)
I'd be happy had Pentax model aperture control and zone focus. Lens is really nice.
__________________
MyFlickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2009   #48
jamxo
work in progress
 
jamxo's Avatar
 
jamxo is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Age: 24
Posts: 100
Love my Xa, in terms of having a little manual focus rangefinder its just awesome.
Use it wide open alot, and it delivers, and I did that little trick when you marker pen in the rangefinder spot so its easier to focus. Some shots:


__________________
35: Leica M6, Hexar AF, Fuji Klasse S
120: Plaubel Makina 67, Mamiya 7, Pentax 67
Digi: 5d Mark II, Pen Ep-2
-
JAMIESTOKERDOTCOM
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-26-2009   #49
John Lawrence
Registered User
 
John Lawrence is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,921
Foolishly I sold my XA about a year ago, but in the years I had it I found the lens to be very sharp (for the time the camera was produced). Obviously it got better when stopped down a bit, but really I had no problems with it at all. Not for nothing was it christened, "the camera the Pros take on holiday with them"!
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-26-2009   #50
Gradskater
Registered User
 
Gradskater is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamxo View Post
Love my Xa, in terms of having a little manual focus rangefinder its just awesome.
Use it wide open alot, and it delivers, and I did that little trick when you marker pen in the rangefinder spot so its easier to focus. Some shots:


That second picture is amazing. Well done!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:10.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.