 |
X-E1 and half-frame lens |
 |
02-08-2013
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Lawrence Sheperd is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Charleston SC
Age: 54
Posts: 181
|
X-E1 and half-frame lens
Would the imaging circle of a lens, such as the Industar 69 or for an Oly Pen, for a half-frame camera cover the sensor of the X-E1? I suppose since the crop factor is 1.5 then it might vignette the corners?
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
jpfisher is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Glen Ridge, NJ
Posts: 158
|
I shot a very little bit with the Industar-69 on the NEX-5N, which is an APS-C sensor just like the X-E1 --
http://jimfisher.smugmug.com/keyword...8537&k=Z8W4Gg7
Nothing too exciting photographically (some shots from CES 2012), but shows you what you can expect.
I shoot with a Pentax-110 18mm lens on the NEX-5N, which covers a smaller frame than the Industar. Darkened, soft corners, but very sharp in the center.
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
rbelyell is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 801
|
ive seen results from olympus pen film lenses on apsc and at 40mm and above they looked very good to my eye, but i have no personal experience.
tony
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Lawrence Sheperd is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Charleston SC
Age: 54
Posts: 181
|
Thanks Jim. Looks plenty good to me. Just looking for something inexpensive and compact for the X. I've got the LTM-XF adapter and use my Canon LTM lenses on it, but don't have anything wider than my 50/1.8. My J12 works fairly well, but is not quite wide enough. Think I'll have a go at the I-69. What sort of adapter do you have for the Pentax 110 lenses?
Thanks Tony. Having looked at the price of Pen F lenses these days, it's probably going to be something from the Bloc for me!
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Lawrence Sheperd is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Charleston SC
Age: 54
Posts: 181
|
Pretty impressive Jim! I've always thought it would be neat to have a Pentax 110 kit - such a cool little SLR. Now that the 110 cassettes are available again, it might be something to think about.
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
jpfisher is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Glen Ridge, NJ
Posts: 158
|
Yeah, I actually got the 18mm along with an Auto 110 body. Might have to pick up some 110 from Lomo and see if the camera works.
I shot a bit with the NEX-5N and the 110-18mm lens today and tried to take some straight comparison shots with it versus the Alpha 99 + Zeiss 24-70mm... might turn it into a blog post over the weekend if I have time--I've been meaning to write a bit on the combo. I've seen a few other people using 110 lenses with the NEX on forums, but haven't really read anything in detail about others' experiences.
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
drew.saunders is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawrence Sheperd
Would the imaging circle of a lens, such as the Industar 69 or for an Oly Pen, for a half-frame camera cover the sensor of the X-E1? I suppose since the crop factor is 1.5 then it might vignette the corners?
|
Half frame is 24mm x 18mm. The X-E1 is 23.6 x 15.6 mm, so the half frame image circle is larger than any APS-C sensor needs, so all half frame lenses should be fine.
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#9
|
|
Recovering Leicaholic
Buzz40 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpfisher
I shot a very little bit with the Industar-69 on the NEX-5N, which is an APS-C sensor just like the X-E1 --
http://jimfisher.smugmug.com/keyword...8537&k=Z8W4Gg7
Nothing too exciting photographically (some shots from CES 2012), but shows you what you can expect.
I shoot with a Pentax-110 18mm lens on the NEX-5N, which covers a smaller frame than the Industar. Darkened, soft corners, but very sharp in the center.
|
Isn't 110 about a quarter of a 35mm frame? Approximately 1/2 L x 1/2 H, if I recall correctly.
__________________
Cheers!
Buzz
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#10
|
|
Registered Nice Guy
bellyface is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: san antonio, tx
Age: 40
Posts: 238
|
the i69 is a sweet little lens. I own one and shimmied it down to get infinity focus. used it on the epson R-D1 with success, but on the NEX it casts a weird magenta vignette towards the edges. I might be trying it on the X-E1 this weekend, should work fine I trust. It's small and compact.
__________________
Ivan A.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
my flickr gallery
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Photographers deal in things which are continually
vanishing and when they have vanished there is no
contrivance on earth which can make them come
back again."
-Henri Cartier Bresson
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Brody LeBlanc is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 63
|
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
daveleo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central Mass. (USA)
Posts: 1,162
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzz40
Isn't 110 about a quarter of a 35mm frame? Approximately 1/2 L x 1/2 H, if I recall correctly.
|
yes, it's 13X17 mm's
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
newspaperguy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern Maryland US of A
Age: 81
Posts: 1,889
|
If my memory serves (always a ?), Kirk Tuck has touted the original Pen lenses for years.
__________________
Rick Beckrich
"We photographers deal in things
which are continually vanishing,
and when they have vanished,
there is no contrivance on earth
which can make them come back again.
"We cannot develop and print a memory."
HENRI CARTIER-BRESSON, The Decisive Moment, 1952
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Lawrence Sheperd is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Charleston SC
Age: 54
Posts: 181
|
Thanks for that info, Drew. Should have thought to just look up aps-c sensor size. On with the hunt for an I-69.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2013
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
jody36 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macon Ga. USA
Posts: 257
|
what are we looking at as far as focal length? is a 20 mm pen still a 20 on a fuji pro? what would it be 35 mm equivalent?
|
|
|
|
02-14-2013
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Brody LeBlanc is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jody36
what are we looking at as far as focal length? is a 20 mm pen still a 20 on a fuji pro? what would it be 35 mm equivalent?
|
Hey,
It's still the same crop factor, e.i. the 42mm is around 60mm.
Whats great about the pen lenses is their speed and size.
I'm not positive but I've been told the 42/1.2 is the smallest f1.2 lens that's been made.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2013
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
jody36 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Macon Ga. USA
Posts: 257
|
thanks for info
|
|
|
|
02-15-2013
|
#18
|
|
ЗоркийКат:Sharpeyed Kitty
ZorkiKat is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lungsod Quezon, PILIPINAS/Philippines/Филиппины
Posts: 2,200
|
I have used the I-69 lens with the Epson R-D1s and recently, the Fuji XE-1. I would say that the lens is superb. This fast Tessar-type lens covers the APS area quite nicely. Vignetting is not obvious, if there is any. Here are two photos shot today with the XE-1 + Industar-69:
It does have difficulty when shooting against the light. But then again, any lens from its time would likely have the same problem.
|
|
|
|
02-17-2013
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Brody LeBlanc is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 63
|
Just a heads up if anyone is interested, I'm letting go of my 42/1.2. Just dropped the price to $660.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:59. |
|
|