Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Photography General Interest

Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 07-18-2012   #26
divewizard
perspicaz
 
divewizard's Avatar
 
divewizard is online now
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: California
Posts: 1,049
"Those are nice pictures, you must have an expensive camera"
__________________
RFs: Olympus 35SP, Fujica GW690, Fuji GSW690ii, Fuji GS645S, Mamiya 6, Wollensak Stereo 10

Chris Grossman
diver.net
3D-Photography.com


  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #27
JayM
Registered User
 
JayM is offline
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tucson, AZ
Age: 29
Posts: 305
Intellectual laziness. Sure it's easy for just about anyone to judge everything by nearly meaningless technical standards, but it isn't that hard to engage your brain a little.

edit: Also, "I just do this for fun." Everyone knows that challenging yourself is dumb, boring, and a waste of time.
__________________
Show me your film leaders and I will tell you what you are.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #28
Mike Riches
Registered User
 
Mike Riches is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 52
There are many but one of the best is , how come its all fuzzy in the front and back ?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #29
Pherdinand
5000 & call it a day!
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: er gaat niets boven groningen.
Age: 36
Posts: 7,073
what irritates me is rff people calling a Zeiss Ikon "cheap"
or Leica prices "reasonable"

More seriously, what annoys me is tourists complaining that people "get into their shot" which is the uber-important 23 243 344th shot of the Eiffel tower or such.
I managed however to convince my girlfriend, that it is OK to have people in her photos (people she doesnt know).

PS: whats the problem with Helmut Newton??
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2012   #30
Pherdinand
5000 & call it a day!
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: er gaat niets boven groningen.
Age: 36
Posts: 7,073
oh yea, reading through the other peoples' pet peeves..i remembered one more:
i went to a Madonna show (yea kick me), would have been actually nice and we were 10 meters from the stage but whenever she walked out there, a bazillion of smartphones were lifted up with two bazillions of arms to take that 257th burned-out blurry green shot of her and therefore it was nearly impossible to see anything. And i'm 1.80m - my girlfriend is 20cm lower, you can imagine her frustration between the Dutch.
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #31
radical7
Olivier Duong
 
radical7's Avatar
 
radical7 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 94
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by maddoc View Post
"International Street Photographer"
Care to elaborate? You find this title pretentious?
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #32
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by radical7 View Post
What irritates the living snot out of you, photographically speaking? ....................
People who take all of this too seriously and let things bother them.
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #33
stephen.s1
Registered User
 
stephen.s1 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 23
Huge watermarks/signatures.
__________________
Stephen
Southern Connecticut
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #34
thegman
Registered User
 
thegman is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Age: 33
Posts: 2,964
Probably people who say about their cameras "it's just a tool", but then insist on having various collectors edition Leicas. Basically photographers who pretend it's all about the photos, but only obsess over gear. Nothing wrong with loving the gear, but don't pretend you don't!
__________________
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #35
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,734
Digital vs. Film
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #36
radical7
Olivier Duong
 
radical7's Avatar
 
radical7 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels View Post
People who take all of this too seriously and let things bother them.
It's just a little pet peeve, nothin' serious
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #37
giellaleafapmu
Registered User
 
giellaleafapmu is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 598
When using film airport security controls.

All the time the existence of different standards for things which shouldn't require that. For example why so many cables to use Pocket Wizards with different flash/camera combinations, why a lens manufacturer produces a profile for correcting distortion of its lenses in Lightroom, another in Photoshop but you need to run a certain version, and having the same profile for any of the lenses in Gimp is a nightmare...

The paranoia against cameras many countries developed after 9.11 (I know, I know, terrorists take pictures of models in parks all the time and they use soft-boxes instead of umbrellas).

Not being able to print a large format colour film without passing through a digital scan.

Collectors inflating the value of old cameras they buy and don't even use...

GLF
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1808'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #38
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
 
coelacanth's Avatar
 
coelacanth is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,353
"There is a very small dent near xxxx" but no photo from that angle posted.

"Buyer pays the Paypal fee" Just FYI, Paypal prohibits that practice.

"Will take [item name]. I'm in [country name]. Can you give me some discount? LOL." Really? actually got this message with "LOL" included.
__________________
- Sug

b/w japanese dude.

flickr | Just started RFF Gallery | @SuguruN | Sug on G+ | Portfolio (beta)

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #39
Gary Briggs
mamiyaDude
 
Gary Briggs is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 91
someone has an expensive dslr, set on AUTO.....and always use the flash
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #40
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Briggs View Post
someone has an expensive dslr, set on AUTO.....and always use the flash
Martin Parr?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #41
matthewm
Registered User
 
matthewm's Avatar
 
matthewm is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by giellaleafapmu View Post
Collectors inflating the value of old cameras they buy and don't even use...
Haha! That's one that I didn't even know I had until you mentioned it.

Someone has already said it, but when people say, "Those photos are amazing! What camera do you use?"

Urban Outfitters. Wait, what? Yeah. Walk into an Urban Outfitters and look at their asking prices on Holgas and Dianas. Umm... SIXTY FREAKIN' DOLLARS for a HOLGA!? Give me a break.

Family members at weddings. They always want to jump in and take photos during the posed shots. So what you end up with is grandma's camera in the corner of your shot. Or everyone looking at you, except for that one idiot in the back who is looking at his girlfriend while she snaps a picture on her Droid-whatever. My wife and I write it into our contract that people are to refrain from taking photos while we're shooting and that we aren't responsible for missed or poorly-directed images as a result of other photographers. I know it sounds stupid, but it's to protect us so that the bride can't come back and say, "I asked you to get a photo of all of us together and half of the people aren't looking at the camera!" Then I can say, "Well, if you look at your contract, I told you that no one else could take photos when I was and that I wasn't responsible for ruined photographs due to other photographers' interventions. Your Aunt Sally probably got a pretty good shot of it. Especially considering she was standing directly in front of me. Go ask her."
__________________
Ultimately, Photography is subversive, not when it frightens, repels, or even stigmatizes, but when it is pensive, when it thinks. --from Camera Lucida, Roland Barthes

---
Websites: Flickr | Blog
Cameras: Canon 5D2/5Dc | Ricoh GXR
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #42
finguanzo
Registered User
 
finguanzo's Avatar
 
finguanzo is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: newark, nj
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddoc View Post
"International Street Photographer"

LOL....
yes, agree..
__________________
For Sale:
Xpan with 45mm lens
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #43
hipsterdufus
Registered User
 
hipsterdufus's Avatar
 
hipsterdufus is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 778
To elaborate on the guy that disliked people taking cameras to museums to take pictures of paintings, I hate it when people take pictures of other peoples' art. It's fine to make an abstract of an interesting sculpture. But I see way too many folks at exhibitions just taking straight-on copy-work shots of other peoples' art. What a useless picture to take.

I also dislike talking to photographers who have found the "ONE TRUE PATH". You know the guy: the guy that only uses the zone system, HC-110, large format, etc. (or has some other strict set of guidelines for photographing) All of that would be fine, except this same guy is preaching as loudly and obnoxiously to everyone that will listen on the the Internet that this is the ONLY way to photograph.
__________________
-Eric K.

Revised portfolio website
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #44
Phothomas
Registered User
 
Phothomas's Avatar
 
Phothomas is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 85
"Can you really still get film for such an old camera?"
__________________
www.pixelbulimie.de
The analphabet of the future will not be illiterate in books but illiterate in photography (László Moholy-Nagy)
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #45
Bob Michaels
nobody special
 
Bob Michaels's Avatar
 
Bob Michaels is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Apopka FL (USA)
Age: 69
Posts: 2,938
I guess I should have put a smiley there since my original comment was "tongue in cheek"

Then I went back and read all the responses. Boy, there sure are a lot of people here who are peeved by what others do or say even though it has no impact on them at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels
People who take all of this too seriously and let things bother them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radical7 View Post
It's just a little pet peeve, nothin' serious
__________________
http://www.bobmichaels.org
the correct answer to 99% of photo related questions is "it depends"
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #46
bob338
Registered User
 
bob338's Avatar
 
bob338 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sausalito, CA
Posts: 1,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels View Post
Boy, there sure are a lot of people here who are peeved by what others do or say even though it has no impact on them at all.
This from the guy who posted a list of people who admitted to using pirated copies of Adobe software???
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #47
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,767
My first reaction would be to say I get a bit upset when someone steps in front of me while I'm shooting (taking my time...maybe at a car show...trying to get a nice angle) and this bozo is using his phone's camera...but maybe that makes me look a bit snobbish...

So I'll say that this irks me too but on a different level...
I shoot film (my choice) and standing next to me at an event I'm working there's that guy with his digital-whatever firing away at a rate of 20 shots/sec. and it's a boring scene...nothing really happening but now he's got 20 shots of it...and then the editing right afterwards...it bugs me because instead of waiting for something decent some of those digi-guys just fire away hoping one of them is what they were looking for...I don't get it...does that make me a snob too...???
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #48
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Michaels View Post
I guess I should have put a smiley there since my original comment was "tongue in cheek"

Then I went back and read all the responses. Boy, there sure are a lot of people here who are peeved by what others do or say even though it has no impact on them at all.
Sooooo true...that's why I asked if I was snobbish for my response....

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob338 View Post
This from the guy who posted a list of people who admitted to using pirated copies of Adobe software???
OUCH...!!!
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #49
darya150
Registered User
 
darya150 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 15
Brand snobbery, overly large dslrs used by those who chatter about technology as an end in itself, rather than viewpoint, working with light, and a hunger to capture imagery.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2012   #50
qhoti
Registered User
 
qhoti is offline
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 51
"Oh so that old camera only shoots black and white?"
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:55.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.