Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > RFF Polls

View Poll Results: Will you buy the new M9M?
Yes 35 7.63%
No 351 76.47%
Will consider 73 15.90%
Voters: 459. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 05-13-2012   #26
edftwin
Street Wanderer
 
edftwin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 92
i cant find a point of creating such thread...why you want to know how many people are not going to buy? Because you want to convince yourself not to get one or you want to know how many people cant afford it? Just leave the rich to buy it and keep Leica moving forward with their business. It's hard to satisfy everyone at the end...
__________________
My film blog. http://edftwin.tumblr.com/

My Flickr.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/edwinng692/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #27
benmacphoto
Registered User
 
benmacphoto's Avatar
 
benmacphoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Age: 25
Posts: 762
Can't understand all the hate around this camera.
I'd consider getting one if I was able to do a side by side comparison with an M9.
__________________
My Site
Flickr
My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #28
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,104
Well to be honest as in... truly honest. This camera scares me a bit. I love digital for color. I'm happy that film represents bw images better (imo) than digital in the traditional way. If a digital camera is developed that can replace film it will be sad from a nostalgic standpoint. I love bw film workflow. It's that connection to the history of photography that still makes sense to spend time and effort to achieve. For sure it's fun to kid about the price of the M mono. It's not the price that "threatens" my sensibilities. It is the reality that bw film might soon be replicatable in a very undeniably more effiecient way. I won't buy this camera new. It could be the camera that paces the way for the one I may not be able to resist in the future.
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #29
Sunti
Registered User
 
Sunti is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Francisco bay area
Posts: 122
I won't pay that much for any digital camera. My M7 can do both color and BW just fine.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #30
maddoc
... likes film.
 
maddoc's Avatar
 
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,469
I would be interested into trying that camera because it is something new in 135 equivalent sensor size. Only problem, a backup is needed at some point (I would consider the M9-P to be also able to take color images) and that added amount of money is way out of reach. So ... without a first class lottery win it won`t happen for me any time and I will happily continue developing my own BW films (.. and meanwhile wait for hopefully stunning images others might take with the new M9-M)
__________________
- Gabor

flickr
pBase
blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #31
bobby_novatron
Photon Collector
 
bobby_novatron's Avatar
 
bobby_novatron is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: the Great White North (Canada)
Age: 43
Posts: 614
I like what f16sunshine said -- I feel very similar.

In related news, I was quite impressed by the results of the M9M ... when the conditions are right, there is some very pleasing tonality to the B+W images that really make me think there's really something special about that camera.

But then I went to flickr and looked up some images taken with a Leica M6 and Tri-X, and right away I thought 'WOW'. No hesitation -- the images grabbed me. Frankly, I think any half-decent photographer with a good camera and lens + some good B&W film can meet or exceed the results of the M9M for most mortals. And that's not even including enthusiasts who shoot strictly digital and love their digital workflow. There are beautiful images done by those people as well.

So I voted 'no' in the poll -- but I think the results will be more a reflection of the how much disposable income the members of RFF have, as opposed to their irrational love of the Leica brand. I mean, let's face it -- most of us have better things to do with $8000.

If I were to buy something with that kind of dough, it would be some fantastic glass -- Summilux, whatever. The left over money would buy me years of film to shoot afterward. Win-win!

It is truly a shame they priced this camera into the stratosphere -- otherwise it would have been a great 2nd body for a lot of pros and Leica enthusiasts alike. As it is, it will probably remain a low-volume niche product for a long time going forward.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #32
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,167
I will not be a buyer at any price, because a few years ago I realized that color is important to me. Back when I first got my M8 I used it in B&W mode exclusively... at first! I am impressed with the intriguing concept though.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-13-2012   #33
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black View Post
Not as long as I have my M6, Neopan and a hole in my arse.
Thanks for the levity. I wish you the best. Have many hundreds of rolls of Neopan in the freezer.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #34
armanius
Registered User
 
armanius's Avatar
 
armanius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 40
I would if I didn't already have a M9 and M7, really liked B&W photography, and had $ to spare.

High price is clearly a concern for most people. But does anyone have any reliable information on how much the production cost is for each MM?
__________________
M9 | M7
CV 21/4 35/1.4 50/1.5 50/2.5 75/2.5
Leica 50/1.4 90/2
Zeiss Biogon-C 35/2.8
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #35
Ryan1938
Registered User
 
Ryan1938 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 65
The bigger question for the future of Leica as an artist's tool:

What young relevant photographer/artist can afford anything Leica puts on the market?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #36
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,573
I have a change of heart on this one.
Last week I gave a typical knee-jerk reaction: No way!

But over the weekend, I realize that I was mainly reacting to the price. Now I think that it would actually be really nice to have B&W images straight from the camera.

I will always have another digital camera (or film) to do color images, so why not a B&W digital?

Of course, rhinos will quack before I could justify the price of an M9M, but if one of those oddball manufacturers like Ricoh or Olympus or Cosina came up with one... why not?
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #37
goo0h
Registered User
 
goo0h is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Texas, USA
Posts: 621
I'll probably buy a 2nd ZI and/or Bessa III before buying the M9M.
__________________
Amos

Me on flickr.
Me on G+.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #38
rizraz
Registered User
 
rizraz is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: kuala lumpur, malaysia
Posts: 197
If my calculation was correct, I may get 26,000ft of films to bulk roll (well not TriX or HP5, but who cares)....... I'm sticking with that much films.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #39
cosmonaut
Registered User
 
cosmonaut's Avatar
 
cosmonaut is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,171
What will it do that Lightroom won't and why didn't they just add it to the firmware? Oh I know they are to good to have art filters like everyone else.
__________________
Leica M4/M6 Classic
Sony a99

Cosmo
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #40
Lss
Registered User
 
Lss is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmonaut View Post
What will it do that Lightroom won't and why didn't they just add it to the firmware? Oh I know they are to good to have art filters like everyone else.
The approach is completely different. It is not cheating with art filters.
__________________
Lasse
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #41
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan1938 View Post
The bigger question for the future of Leica as an artist's tool:

What young relevant photographer/artist can afford anything Leica puts on the market?
That's sort of a loaded question. Who says an artists needs something Leica is putting on the market.
I don't consider myself an artist as much as a tradesman. When I started (mid 80's) there was no way I could afford even what Nikon was putting on the market. There were plenty of other tool options as there are today.
Leica is at this point not catering to young artist. That's their choice as a company and I guess I'm cool with it even if, I personally also am left out of their target demography (although for my own reasons).
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-14-2012   #42
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,734
25 people from this thread alone are buying? It appears Leica will do just fine with this camera.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #43
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
 
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
 
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ciudad de Jersey, Nuevo Jersey
Age: 36
Posts: 2,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
25 people from this thread alone are buying? It appears Leica will do just fine with this camera.
Exactly. $200000 right there.
Then take a conservative to liberal spread on a bell curve of the "will consider and you have an extra ~$128000 - ~$256000. I think Leica can reliably count on $.5M in sales from RFF users alone.

Phil Forrest
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #44
Araakii
Registered User
 
Araakii is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan1938 View Post
The bigger question for the future of Leica as an artist's tool:

What young relevant photographer/artist can afford anything Leica puts on the market?
A young relevant photographer/artist does not need a M9M to produce good work.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #45
Araakii
Registered User
 
Araakii is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by f16sunshine View Post
Leica is at this point not catering to young artist. That's their choice as a company and I guess I'm cool with it even if, I personally also am left out of their target demography (although for my own reasons).
At no point in history was Leica catering to broke young artist.
__________________
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #46
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
 
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
 
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ciudad de Jersey, Nuevo Jersey
Age: 36
Posts: 2,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Araakii View Post
At no point in history was Leica catering to broke young artist.
No but they WERE catering to the full-time working professional photographer. A craft that was never known for it's lucrative earnings.

Phil Forrest
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #47
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,182
. . . . . waited to repsond. On day one it was a definite NO!

Day five it is 'Will Consider' since it is price prohibited but would buy one under the right circumstances. (which of course could be having a GAS attack, causing a domino effect of selling of other gear in order to work with the M9M)

For the time being time and patience.
__________________
______________________

Life is Grand! ~~~ Dan
~ M9, M6 TTL & MP ~ Mamiya 7 II ~ GF1
~ Rolleiflex f3.5 with Carl Zeiss 75mm Planar (type 4) ~
The hardest part of starting a new project is starting it ~ Keith Carter
Flickr Sets: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26672618@N03/sets/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #48
dave lackey
Registered User
 
dave lackey's Avatar
 
dave lackey is online now
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 6,701
Like Dan, I waited until there was more information...the answer today is sure, I would definitely buy one down the road. Also would like an X2 Monochrome.

But then, I would want a color version of each, too....GAS indeed and no cash.
__________________
Peace, Love and Happiness...



Dave

David Bryan

Blog and Documentary Updates
http://davidbryanlackey.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #49
whitecat
Lone Range(find)er
 
whitecat's Avatar
 
whitecat is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,362
Looks like the ship is sinking.
__________________
My Gallery



Bessa III, Yashica Electro 35, Nikon 35 ti, Nikon 28 ti, Widelux F7, Contax TVS III, Minox, Contax N1, Minox 35 GT, Canonet QL17, and many more....
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-15-2012   #50
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave lackey View Post
Like Dan, I waited until there was more information...the answer today is sure, I would definitely buy one down the road. Also would like an X2 Monochrome.

But then, I would want a color version of each, too....GAS indeed and no cash.

Hang ... on don't those cameras you mention do both colour and black and white with appropriate software?
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:41.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.