Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > CSC : Compact System Cameras - > Fuji X-Pro1 / X-E1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Fuji Xpro1 native lens wish list (Fuji built lens)
Old 05-03-2012   #1
f16sunshine
Like boots in the dryer..
 
f16sunshine's Avatar
 
f16sunshine is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 3,105
Fuji Xpro1 native lens wish list (Fuji built lens)

I saw the so called "Road Map" although most of the future lenses are subject to change (with an */footnote next to them).

What lenses would you like to see from Fuji? Hopefully Fuji wants to know
I'm guessing third parties will likely get involved with lenses at some point as well.
It's difficult to imagine that SigmaTamron will produce anything as nice as has been offered by Fuji... for a price less than Fuji is already offering.

For my purposes I would love a fast Portrait prime to replace the Planar f2/100mm I currently use on my 5D.
A Fuji f1.4/70mm would effin rock!
__________________
Andy
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2012   #2
j.scooter
Registered User
 
j.scooter's Avatar
 
j.scooter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto-ish
Posts: 829
I would like a 90mm (135) equivalent 1.4 - 2
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2012   #3
Audii-Dudii
Registered User
 
Audii-Dudii is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 61
I'm certain this wish will be unique to me, but I would love to see a 16-18-21 W.A.T.E. clone...
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2012   #4
x.z.
Registered User
 
x.z. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 49
Whatever the focus length, I hope Fuji can release some lens with mechanical aperture and focus ring.
__________________
Xu, Zhe


My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2012   #5
dougi
Registered User
 
dougi is offline
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sydney
Age: 44
Posts: 74
Or at the very least something like the M-Hexanon 21-35 dual. I've always dreamt of having one of those.
__________________
x-pro 1, x-100, m8, k5, lx5, bessa R2, FED3, ep1,
35mm Summicron ASPH, 28mm M-Hexanon, 50mm F1.5 VC, 75mm F1.8 VC, 15mm F4.5 VC
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2012   #6
x.z.
Registered User
 
x.z. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 49
AF lens, of course.
__________________
Xu, Zhe


My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-03-2012   #7
majid
Registered User
 
majid's Avatar
 
majid is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 319
The roadmap they announced is already quite ambitious for a fairly niche product. I doubt they can make a business case for Leica-style exotics (and we must remember Leica's lens portfolio was built over many, many years).

I'd love seeing a MF or LF Fujinon like the 105mm from the GF617 turned into a tilt-shift lens, but that would run counter to the rangefinder ethos of the X series.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #8
gavinlg
Registered User
 
gavinlg's Avatar
 
gavinlg is online now
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 4,395
I really want a fast 23mm. The x100 23mm is tiny, so they can afford to go down to at least to f1.8, but f1.4 would be even better. If it were still fairly small, this would really set the system apart from other systems.

Also a tiny/slow wide angle like a 12mm f4 which is sharp corner to corner.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #9
olelovold
Registered User
 
olelovold is online now
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Age: 21
Posts: 64
I agree with Gavin, a 23mm f/1.4 would be lovely. A 60/70mm f/1.4 would be sweet as well.
__________________
website tumblr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #10
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,776
I'd like a pancake like Pentax makes... hopefully the 28mm f/2.8 they are supposedly making will be that. Outside of that, a smaller 50mm equiv lens and a fast 35mm equiv.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #11
Penceler
Registered User
 
Penceler is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by olelovold View Post
I agree with Gavin, a 23mm f/1.4 would be lovely. A 60/70mm f/1.4 would be sweet as well.
another vote - pancake 23mm, fast 60

John
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #12
noimmunity
phound photography
 
noimmunity's Avatar
 
noimmunity is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lyon/Taipei
Age: 50
Posts: 2,374
A wide, anywhere from 18-25 efov, that is small like the current 18 yet specified for corner-to-corner sharpness. Wide aperture not a concern.

A set of three compact lenses across a range of focal lengths each of which would be specified for small size and corner-to-corner sharpness rather than speed would be ideal (for travel/landscape).
__________________
jon 小強

搬到畫國後免疫系統變得超強,所過的生活宅到不行!

The old adage says: Seeing is believing. To me, that doesn't mean that the world seen is the truth, it means rather that seeing is a field in which the purity of heart is expressed--or not, depending upon whatever happens to cloud that purity at any given moment.

No-immunity Bodies: DP Merrills, Fuji X-Pro1, Leica M-E. Too much dust made me immune to film T_T

my neglected flickr
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-04-2012   #13
Dante_Stella
Rex canum cattorumque
 
Dante_Stella's Avatar
 
Dante_Stella is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 568
The planned 14 or the 12-24 would be fine... and better than the hateful 28mm equivalent in the 18mm.

Has anyone figured out the maximum angle of view for the finder in 0.3x mode? It looks like almost 20mm in 24x36 terms. The camera doesn't seem to generate framelines for "other" lenses wider than 24mm (interestingly, it seems to be able to generate arbitrary lengths like 38mm) but that might be a firmware limitation.

All of this assumes I do not suffer a psychotic breakdown from the inability to process RAF files with Lightroom.

Dante
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-07-2012   #14
JasperD
Registered User
 
JasperD's Avatar
 
JasperD is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 25
I´m still hoping for the 23mm being F1.4...

Not on the roadmap, but would really like a 90/2 too.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-21-2012   #15
GaryLH
Registered User
 
GaryLH's Avatar
 
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,446
A 16 f2.8, 16-55 zoom, and 50 or 60 f1.2 or 1.4

Gary
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #16
anorphirith
Registered User
 
anorphirith is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 154
2.8 normal zoom lens
or I'd also pay 3K for a 2.0 normal zoom lens
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #17
umcelinho
Marcelo
 
umcelinho's Avatar
 
umcelinho is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sao Paulo
Age: 30
Posts: 1,290
a really compact 23/1.4, as many others have said.
also, a 14/2 would be really awesome.

35mm and 21mm fov, i really like both.
__________________
Gear:
• right eye
• right index finger
• cameras & lenses

What I've seen around: flickr

  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #18
fotomeow
name under my name
 
fotomeow's Avatar
 
fotomeow is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,053
I want a fast dual lens 35mm equivalent to 35/50mm, so with the crop factor,
would be a 23mm/34mm f2.0!! if they can do that, they can tell Leica to eat their shorts.

And, of course we need a fast 35mm/1.4 equivalent, as stated.
__________________
--> Gary G

"HELP: I need an arm for my MOOLY!! (i'm serious, contact me if you know of one that is available!

Galleria RFF
[size=1]old stuff, new stuff, stuff that works and stuff that doesn't.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #19
Brody LeBlanc
Registered User
 
Brody LeBlanc is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 63
As long as they come out with a 23mm f1.4, I'll be happy.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #20
valdas
Registered User
 
valdas's Avatar
 
valdas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 528
Off topic. I don't want any lnew ens from Fuji. I want from Fuji digital, manual focus FF RF that will accept my M lenses (I am happy with what I have in M mount) and cost less than 2000$
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #21
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by valdas View Post
I want from Fuji digital, manual focus FF RF that will accept my M lenses (I am happy with what I have in M mount) and cost less than 2000$
You and every other rangefinder fan that isn't opposed to digital.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #22
geertvn
Registered User
 
geertvn is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 40
23mm/2.0 or 1.4 - no pancake, no compromise on quality. Has to be lots better than the 18mm, which I think is one of the worst system lenses I've ever used.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #23
Eric T
Registered User
 
Eric T is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 500
Fast zooms.
__________________
Eric Triplett in sunny Florida
Mostly shoot with Sigma SD1m, Sigma DP1m and DP2m, Fuji X-Pro1, Panasonic G3 and GX1, and Canon 5D Mark II.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #24
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,832
Ditto. A fast (aperture & focus speed, too) 35mm equivalent would be nice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavinlg View Post
I really want a fast 23mm. The x100 23mm is tiny, so they can afford to go down to at least to f1.8, but f1.4 would be even better. If it were still fairly small, this would really set the system apart from other systems.

Also a tiny/slow wide angle like a 12mm f4 which is sharp corner to corner.
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2012   #25
Matthieu
Registered User
 
Matthieu's Avatar
 
Matthieu is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 34
Now that I have it with all three lenses, I think I'm good.

I just may buy a 23mm if it has a good maximum apperture, is small and focuses fast. And probably a stabilized telezoom or teleprime.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.