|
View Poll Results: Which is your most used focal length on Full Format 35mm cameras
|
|
15
|
 
|
2 |
0.33% |
|
18
|
 
|
0 |
0% |
|
21
|
 
|
10 |
1.64% |
|
25
|
 
|
13 |
2.13% |
|
28
|
 
|
43 |
7.05% |
|
35
|
 
|
236 |
38.69% |
|
50
|
 
|
259 |
42.46% |
|
75
|
 
|
3 |
0.49% |
|
85
|
 
|
10 |
1.64% |
|
90
|
 
|
3 |
0.49% |
|
135
|
 
|
1 |
0.16% |
|
something else
|
 
|
30 |
4.92% |
 |
Which is your most used focal length on Full Format 35mm cameras |
 |
04-18-2012
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
135format is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 193
|
Which is your most used focal length on Full Format 35mm cameras
I did search to see if there was a poll already but couldn't find this exact question, so here it is:
Which is your most used focal length on full format 35mm cameras.
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#2
|
|
Grain Lover
ChrisP is offline
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Saskatoon, Sk, Canada
Posts: 405
|
Something else is going to be very popular. 40mm is big around because of the CV 40/1.4 and 40mm cron and because of the imperfect frame of rangefinders
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
folville is offline
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 21
|
35mm, but only with .7m focus
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Deep Fried is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CANADA
Posts: 140
|
most used is 35
why do you ask?
__________________
Jeff
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#5
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,703
|
40 sonnar from rollei also.
the 2 most popular will be 35 and 50...time to close the poll... 
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
uinku is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 107
|
40mm on all the compact fixed-lense rangefinders, too..
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#7
|
|
coarse art photographer
sebastel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: china
Posts: 707
|
currently 50.
next week maybe 28.
next month maybe i go back to 35?
this kind of poll is the perfect chance to get 42 different answers from 23 people.
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: evropa
Posts: 1,722
|
think 35 was the winner last time. now 50 seem to lead least so far.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
geertvn is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 40
|
50 almost exclusively on rangefinders
On SLRs I preferred standard zooms, 28-70. I didn't use a 50 prime for years, I had one but only used it as a loupe on a lighttable. Though I use it the las couple of years for shooting concerts.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Lund is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 99
|
Seems like I'm the only one that answered 85mm this far.
It takes some explaining however. I take more photos with my 5D2 even if I use it more seldom that my film cameras. Chimping and bracketing is sometimes the best thing about digital. And as I got hold of a 85L (older version) I have a hard time taking it of the camera. It is simply a little too good.
As I only own the 40/1.4 for my Bessa that is in close second.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#11
|
|
Moderator
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,785
|
50mm I think... but I switch freely back and forth between 35 and 50mm.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
EdwardKaraa is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bangkok
Age: 44
Posts: 520
|
Same here.
__________________
M9 ZM 25/2.8 35/2 50/2 85/4
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
John Lawrence is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,892
|
50mm for me too.
John
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#14
|
|
camera hunter & gatherer
Nikon Bob is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,829
|
These days it is a zoom.
Bob
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=557'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
daveleo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central Mass. (USA)
Posts: 1,175
|
for me 35mm focal length is #1 (in FF 35mm format)
most fun however is my CV 15mm  on the Bessa-T
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,302
|
50mm is a favorite, but on SLR I sometimes put on a 43mm to 70mm or 28mm to 70mm.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
boomguy57 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 30
Posts: 1,152
|
Judging by the poll results, this will turn into another 35 v. 50 thread...
__________________
Website ~ Blog ~ Flickr ~ Tumblr ~ Books
Enough of the black-white arguments, let's examine the (18%) gray area. After all:
"Only a Sith deals in absolutes." - Obi-Wan Kenobi
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
04-19-2012
|
#18
|
|
Wil O.
wilonstott is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Age: 32
Posts: 398
|
This is a weird thing to try and answer.
I really want to say 35mm, and indeed, I do use the 35mm more than any other focal length (currently running 21, 28, 35, & 50).
However, I find that most of what I consider my best shots were taken with a 50mm.
But, I have thought about why this is, and I think I know why this happens (and this may be overly analytical).
You see, because I favor the wide end (over the tele), I'm used to working close, and as I'm sure many of you know, it takes a while to get accustomed to getting your a$$ in there and taking the picture--if i'm comfortable, the subject is comfortable, hence the closer I can get, and so on. Being invisible from 3 feet away takes a helluva a lot of practice, and I still need work.
Anyway, you do this for a while (or rather, I did)--cut your teeth on the 28 and 21--and then the 35 is really comfortable, but the 50---shooting with the 50 starts feeling seamless. I feel like I don't even have to get involved when I shoot with the 50 now, no matter how close I am, and that level of comfort and confidence, I think, transfers to the subject.
__________________
LEICA M
flickr
|
|
|
|
 |
04-19-2012
|
#19
|
|
dc5
dc5 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In, USA
Posts: 22
|
40mm, a great substitute for the 35 and 50... one step closer or one step back.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#20
|
|
Personal Photography
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,582
|
35mm if I have a choice, 50mm if I don't.
If we want to analyze a trend, the poll should allow for multiple choices (limited to 3 for instance).
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
haempe is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,335
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc5
40mm, a great substitute for the 35 and 50... one step closer or one step back.
|
+1
Not really a substitute for 35 or 50, but a good compromise.
__________________
New is the new good.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
135format is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox
35mm if I have a choice, 50mm if I don't.
If we want to analyze a trend, the poll should allow for multiple choices (limited to 3 for instance).
|
I thought that but then thought if I do that it really doesn't prove anything (not that its going to anyway).
40 is very liberal ( indecisive )
The reason I asked is that I was looking at a few wedding shoots and it struck me the vast majority of images were shot on 50mm or close. And that includes a lot of head shots. 50 seems to be a very versatile focal length. You can get close or stand back for full length portraits.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#23
|
|
Noctilust survivor
thirtyfivefifty is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 167
|
Was a very big 50 user until I bought a 35 last year, 35 is now my workhorse, 50 plays second fiddle. Would enjoy a fast 28.
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
GaryLH is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,449
|
Did not have to think twice 40f2 Minolta m for CL and cv 40 f1.4.  . So I voted something else.
Gary
|
|
|
|
04-19-2012
|
#25
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,703
|
40 is indecisive?
i see it as more bold, independent...not a sheep...
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:52. |
|
|