 |
Nokton 35/1.2 II + M9 = wow !! |
 |
08-31-2011
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Nokton 35/1.2 II + M9 = wow !!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Quick & Dirty focus test |
 |
08-31-2011
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quick & Dirty focus test
Here's a Quick & Dirty focus test series - All 100% crops
Shot at f1.2
Shot at f1.4
Shot at f2.0
Shot at f2.8
Shot at f4.0
Shot at f5.6
Shot at f8.0

|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Never Satisfied is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 320
|
Hey wobba, where did you get the lens from, the Camera Exchange?
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Never Satisfied
Hey wobba, where did you get the lens from, the Camera Exchange?
|
My lens came from Scott at Mainline. He is all out until the next shipment arrives but Camera Lane had one in their window today.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#5
|
|
ragamuffin
SimonSawSunlight is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Istanbul
Age: 24
Posts: 2,796
|
there seems to be less distortion than with v1, but I think I still like v1's OOF areas a little better.
whatever, so far it seems to be a great lens and a worthy replacement.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: evropa
Posts: 1,722
|
inspiring post and great photos 
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
leicashot is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,530
|
Looks nice, but I agree about the bokeh, which does seem smoother on the V1.
Quite honestly I think this bokeh may just have more character though....time will tell
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonSawSunlight
there seems to be less distortion than with v1, but I think I still like v1's OOF areas a little better.
whatever, so far it seems to be a great lens and a worthy replacement.
|
I can't comment on the V1 but the V2 requires +5 in Lightroom to correct distortion.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#9
|
|
ragamuffin
SimonSawSunlight is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Istanbul
Age: 24
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobba
I can't comment on the V1 but the V2 requires +5 in Lightroom to correct distortion.
|
oh ok, forget what I said then. I thought these were uncorrected files.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leicashot
Looks nice, but I agree about the bokeh, which does seem smoother on the V1.
Quite honestly I think this bokeh may just have more character though....time will tell
|
G'day Kris,
There is so much to like about the way this lens renders. I have owned the 35 V4, 35/2 ASPH and 35/1.4 ASPH and prefer the Nokton to all three. It helps that focus is spot on at every aperture and at all distances.
Vince
P.S. I'm hanging out for the 28 Summiduper.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonSawSunlight
oh ok, forget what I said then. I thought these were uncorrected files.
|
These files are all uncorrected. Distortion is very minimal that you won't see it in these images. I shot my garage roller door and the slight distortion that was visible was easily corrected with about +5, in LR.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
leicashot is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,530
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobba
G'day Kris,
There is so much to like about the way this lens renders. I have owned the 35 V4, 35/2 ASPH and 35/1.4 ASPH and prefer the Nokton to all three. It helps that focus is spot on at every aperture and at all distances.
Vince
P.S. I'm hanging out for the 28 Summiduper.
|
Thats a good sign Vince as I know how picky you are
I should have mine this week, and now missing the Summiduper 
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#13
|
|
ragamuffin
SimonSawSunlight is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Istanbul
Age: 24
Posts: 2,796
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wobba
These files are all uncorrected. Distortion is very minimal that you won't see it in these images. I shot my garage roller door and the slight distortion that was visible was easily corrected with about +5, in LR.
|
ok ok ok, I think I'm less confused now. 
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
leicashot is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,530
|
Vince, did you get the lens hood? How does it look? Big? How about a pic?
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#15
|
|
ragamuffin
SimonSawSunlight is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Istanbul
Age: 24
Posts: 2,796
|
too bad the price in germany is about 1860 USD... 
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leicashot
Vince, did you get the lens hood? How does it look? Big? How about a pic?
|
Unfortunately Scott did not receive the hoods. I think he said they will be in stock in a few weeks. I've been shooting outdoors in bright conditions without a hood and flare hasn't proven to be an issue at this stage.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimonSawSunlight
too bad the price in germany is about 1860 USD... 
|
That's a big ask. The list price in Australia is AUD $1250 including tax which works out to AUD $1136 ex. tax.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
DamenS is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 375
|
Great shots Wobba - so overall you like this lens more than the first version ? I was a little concerned (especially about build quality) when they discontinued the first lens stating that the glass had become too hard to get (or was too toxic ?) and that the lens had become too expensive to produce ... that made me think the Version II was going to be a bit "cheaper" when it came to the build and that the new glass may not be as nice.
Did Scott happen to mention when they expect the next shipment and do you know if this second version is available in chrome ?
Ta - lot of questions I know, LOL !!
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leicashot
Thats a good sign Vince as I know how picky you are
I should have mine this week, and now missing the Summiduper 
|
It'll be interesting to see how it compares to your shiny V1.
Here's a bunch of dopey test shots:
The real Wobba:
Some more bokeh samples:

Last edited by Wobba : 08-31-2011 at 02:24.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
08-31-2011
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamenS
Great shots Wobba - so overall you like this lens more than the first version ? I was a little concerned (especially about build quality) when they discontinued the first lens stating that the glass had become too hard to get (or was too toxic ?) and that the lens had become too expensive to produce ... that made me think the Version II was going to be a bit "cheaper" when it came to the build and that the new glass may not be as nice.
Did Scott happen to mention when they expect the next shipment and do you know if this second version is available in chrome ?
Ta - lot of questions I know, LOL !!
|
HI Damen, I don't have a great deal of first hand experience with the V1. I shot with one a coupe of years ago and it seemed quite sharp from wide open but contrast was very low and required quite a lift during PP. As I said earlier, I have owned a bunch of Leica 35's (including the 35 Summarit which I forgot to mention) and the V2 Nokton appeals to me more than any of the Leicas, except perhaps for the Summarit which had very sweet bokeh.
The build quality is top notch, irrespective of price. It is a steal for AUD $1250. This could easliy sell for a lot more.
Scott didn't say when the next batch was due but Camera Lane had one in their window today.
|
|
|
|
 |
08-31-2011
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
leicashot is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,530
|
Wobba thats looking sharper at f/1.2, and bokeh isn't as smooth, but I'm still liking it! Send me a full rez pic, shot wide open 
Last edited by leicashot : 08-31-2011 at 02:28.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
DamenS is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 375
|
Thanks for the response Wobba - darn I need an excuse to spend money like I need ... well, I don't need one ! Looks like a trip into the city might be on the cards tomorrow ...
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
leicashot is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,530
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamenS
Thanks for the response Wobba - darn I need an excuse to spend money like I need ... well, I don't need one ! Looks like a trip into the city might be on the cards tomorrow ...
|
Tell Al Kristian said to do a 2 for 1 special 
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leicashot
Wobba thats looking sharper at f/1.2. Send me a full rez pic, shot wide open 
|
Sure mate. I'll email a RAW sample to your gmail account.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2011
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
Wobba is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leicashot
Wobba thats looking sharper at f/1.2, and bokeh isn't as smooth, but I'm still liking it! Send me a full rez pic, shot wide open 
|
The last shot was stopped down a little, perhaps to f2.0.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50. |
|
|