Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Coffee With Mentors > Roger Hicks -- Author of The Rangefinder Book

Roger Hicks -- Author of The Rangefinder Book

Roger Hicks is a well known photographic writer, author of The Rangefinder Book, over three dozen other photographic books, and a frequent contributor to Shutterbug and Amateur Photographer. Unusually in today's photographic world, most of his camera reviews are film cameras, especially rangefinders. See www.rogerandfrances.com for further background (Frances is his wife Frances Schultz, acknowledged darkroom addict and fellow Shutterbug contributor) .


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 01-05-2011   #26
Paul Luscher
Registered User
 
Paul Luscher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 681
Maybe we should actually ask Don Goldberg, Sherry Krauter and John Hermanson why they do it. I'm just glad they're there.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2011   #27
oftheherd
Registered User
 
oftheherd's Avatar
 
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Z View Post
But camera manufacturers could choose to intro new models in longer increments of time, embracing more evolution in each. The fact they come out with new ones in very short order with very incremental feature upgrades is what leaves me suspicious there's an economic agenda at play.
The incremental time frame may have been a little different (but not that much), in the 70s and 80s with film, when auto exposure and auto focusing came along. Every manufacturer decided he could add some little twist that no one else had, to sell his cameras. New models abounded in SLR and P&S.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2011   #28
Ezzie
E. D. Russell Roberts
 
Ezzie's Avatar
 
Ezzie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 2,999
I just ordered a folder from Jurgen Kreckel of Saylorsburg. There might be a business in refurbishing old folders, being somewhat simpler in design, but I doubt it. I'm just glad there still are people like him around.
__________________
Eirik

RF: Leica M4-2 | Royal 35-M | Polaroid Land 250 | Polaroid 110A/600SE hybrid
VF: DIY 4x5 | DIY 6x17 | Voigtländer Vito CL | Foth Derby | Welta Weltix
SLR: Kowa Super 66 | Pentax SP1000
TLR: Rolleiflex 2.8E3 | Flexaret Va | Kalloflex K2
CSC: Fuji X-E1

My Flickr
Silver Halides - Pictures in B&W
My homepage
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2011   #29
BillBingham2
Registered User
 
BillBingham2 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Posts: 4,254
I think there is a wonderful opportunity for a young interested party to do some apprenticing and could find skills to make a reasonable living for the rest of his/her life. The internet has opened up the world market to shops like this. I do believe that with a little understanding and experience you can make a living for many years working for customers around the world.

B2 (;->
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #30
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,442
What I was really wondering is why anyone would take it up now. The youngest repairers I know are in their 40s; many are in their 50s and older (I've known some of them 25 years); and quite a few I've known are now dead. There have to be easier ways of earning more money.

I hope you're right, Bill, but equally, I can't help feeling that the internet provides so much extra scope for timewasters, whingers, liars and non-payers that it's a lot MORE risky than running a little shop like my nearest repairer's, maybe 15 miles away.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #31
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,228
Marty Forcher's shop, Professional Camera Repair was a thing of beauty. There was nothing else like it. A friend of mine apprenticed with Buddy, who did all the fancy machining and adapting different lenses to different cameras. Buddy's room was right across the hall from the main repair shop. Marty and Buddy designed the first Polaroid back for 35mm. Specifically the Nikon F. My friend Noah is somewhere up in Rhode Island these days, machining, repairing, and designing speciality photo gear. He is an expert repairing Polaroid cameras. He is a little over 50. I don't anyone else like him.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #32
bean_counter
Registered User
 
bean_counter's Avatar
 
bean_counter is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Chicago 'burbs
Posts: 324
there is a repair shop in this area that I use once in a while, saw a couple of 20-ish guys working at the benches in back; proprieter looks to be in his forties. pretty sure they're all from Russia. they seem to be keeping the doors open, even growing while everybody else has closed up

they did a decent job on my Barnacks.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #33
al1966
Feed Your Head
 
al1966's Avatar
 
al1966 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 605
Why repair camera could be down to many things we now buy, the replacement is often less than a repair. I am sick of this though, we are filling landfill full of stuff that if it was well made in the first place.. This is down right morally criminal but as Neil Young put it; 'Its a Piece of Crap'. Gone are the days of good serviceable cameras, stereos, cookers and so on. Its sad to see these craftsmen go but, we are all just being fed tat.
Rant over
__________________
Life is a series of photographs surrounded by the worthless bits

http://jamesagrady.blog.com/
http://randompicture.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41452653@N05/
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #34
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,795
The reason we have some repairmen today is that there is still a generation out there that believes in fixing rather than replacing...
Whenever something breaks in our home our 19 year old daughter says..."Let's go buy a new one..."
I tell her it doesn't need to be replace just fixed...
I am a Service Technician for Printing Presses (not copiers, presses) so fixing things is what I do...I have no problem taking the Washer or Dryer apart when they quit working and normally it's a minor part costing less than $20...
When our Instant Hot Water dispenser ($110) quit working I took it apart and found it was a $2 part that went bad...I saved $108...

We live in a time now where people have been trained that once it breaks we just bite the bullet and replace it...
There are some things that replacing rather than fixing is smarter like...Irons & Toasters...stuff like that...
There are cameras out there that get repaired and the repair is more than the street value of the camera...they get repaired by owners who love them and have a sentimental attachment to them...something my 19 year old doesn't understand due to her age and the age she grew up in...
I have a passion for fixing things and that may be the driving force behind people who repair cameras...just a plain old passion for cameras and things mechanical...troubleshooting and a curiosity for... "what's inside there???"
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #35
Livesteamer
Registered User
 
Livesteamer is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winston Salem North Carolina
Posts: 885
al1966 raises an important point. We have a new category of trash called e waste. Old cell phones, i pods, pda's and computers and it's nasty stuff that is difficult to recycle. Further, these products use up rare earth elements and other resources. It just may be that a long lasting film camera is more environmentally friendly. Joe
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2011   #36
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livesteamer View Post
al1966 raises an important point. We have a new category of trash called e waste. Old cell phones, i pods, pda's and computers and it's nasty stuff that is difficult to recycle. Further, these products use up rare earth elements and other resources. It just may be that a long lasting film camera is more environmentally friendly. Joe

Pretty soon we won't be able to throw away our light bulbs (CFL's) in the regular trash...they took away mercury batteries because they were/are bad for the environment and now they're cramming these things down our throats...all the while saying they're good for us...
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-08-2011   #37
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikon_sam View Post
Pretty soon we won't be able to throw away our light bulbs (CFL's) in the regular trash...they took away mercury batteries because they were/are bad for the environment and now they're cramming these things down our throats...all the while saying they're good for us...
Well, mercury batteries are bad for the environment -- twice. Once during manufacture, and them again in landfill. In the shop or in your camera, they're fine. Same with cadmium (as in old batteries, old photo papers, even some films -- it was cadmium that killed Super-XX). The water that leaches through landfill can end up in your drinking water...

If people recycled things more, fewer things might get banned. Or of course they could buy things that are reparable, as you say. Even a toaster is reparable if it's good enough quality (Dualit).

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-08-2011   #38
al1966
Feed Your Head
 
al1966's Avatar
 
al1966 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 605
We are looking into led based light bulbs as a alternative to these CFL things. The problem is I am plagued with migraines and those cfl bulbs are a trigger so as they are removing trad bulbs I have to find some form of alternative. LED based bulbs though cost an arm and a leg plus a kidney though.
__________________
Life is a series of photographs surrounded by the worthless bits

http://jamesagrady.blog.com/
http://randompicture.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41452653@N05/
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:19.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.