Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

View Poll Results: Your favourite FSU 50-52 mm lens
Industar 22 (50mm f3.5) 25 6.48%
Industar 50 (50mm f3.5) 18 4.66%
Industar 26 (52mm f2.8) 11 2.85%
Industar 61 (52mm f2.8) 63 16.32%
Jupiter 8 (50mm f2.0) 167 43.26%
Jupiter 3 (50mm f1.5) 108 27.98%
other 31 8.03%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 386. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 10-13-2011   #76
buzzardkid
packin' light
 
buzzardkid's Avatar
 
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,852
Just voted for the Industar 26.

Been pretty impressed with results from that lens lately!
__________________
Cheers, Johan




Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom

Visit johanniels.com!
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-21-2011   #77
tho60
Registered User
 
tho60 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 78
I prefer Industar-22 or 50 lenses to Jupiter-8 due to their greater resolving power. I use Jupiter-8 mostly for portraits.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-24-2011   #78
bowieknife
Registered User
 
bowieknife is offline
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 92
I voted the J-3, but also own the I-22, I-50 and Helios-103, all are very nice, and I'd like to mention also the quite rare FED Makro 50mm 3.5 ( pricey,like a J-3).
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-11-2012   #79
Spicy
Registered User
 
Spicy is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: back in Seoul
Age: 26
Posts: 329
the I-22 is the only one i've got.
__________________
IIc+
____F____
FM2^D700
M4-P
35S
XA
635
P



[:º] ['☼º]
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-15-2012   #80
robbiechad
RobbieChad
 
robbiechad's Avatar
 
robbiechad is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NW England
Age: 69
Posts: 120
Can I just say my Helios 103 is super sharp, and also the Helios 44M-4 in M42 is amazing as well, I in the process of comparing the Helios 44M-4 with my CZ T* 1.7 mounted on a Contax 137 the Helios using an M42 adapter, I will post results when I am done.
__________________
Oly 35RC(2), Fed 2,Ricoh500G,Kiev4a,Oly Mju1 & II, Oly Trip, Konica C35.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2012   #81
jarski
Registered User
 
jarski's Avatar
 
jarski is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: evropa
Posts: 1,720
strange result, would have expected J3 win.

my vote went to J3, though am not fan of FSU gear, sometimes good copies can be nice surprises.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-27-2012   #82
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
 
Juan Valdenebro's Avatar
 
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
I guess at 1.5 and considering their construction, apart from no shimming / less than perfect shimming issues, people can have seriously unpleasant J3 experiences... Even several times! But a good one is a very nice, sharp, fast and light thing with sweet bokeh!

Cheers,

Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-15-2012   #83
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
Anyone that wants to see actual results from J3 should try using it in Contax mount on Kiev or Contax. No shimming or adjustments required. But you have to have Contax or Kiev to begin with.
I used my J3 on my Kievs and Contaxes and liked the results very much.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-16-2012   #84
klapka
Registered User
 
klapka is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
I used to love Jupiter-3 when I shot Zorki.
But after using Leica for a couple of years I went 35mm.
So now my FSU favourite is Jupiter-12 (35mm f2.8)

Here is my review on it from my last trip to Moskow with my daughter and her class.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-17-2012   #85
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
 
rbiemer's Avatar
 
rbiemer is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raquette Lake!
Age: 52
Posts: 4,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by klapka View Post
I used to love Jupiter-3 when I shot Zorki.
But after using Leica for a couple of years I went 35mm.
So now my FSU favourite is Jupiter-12 (35mm f2.8)

Here is my review on it from my last trip to Moskow with my daughter and her class.
I have not yet used the Zorki 6, but I do like the J-12 and your use of it as seen in your review, is very good.
I like the first photo from the trip you posted with the kid's hands blurred.
Rob
__________________


The path of excess leads to the tower of wisdom.
-- William Blake
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-17-2012   #86
klapka
Registered User
 
klapka is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbiemer View Post
I have not yet used the Zorki 6, but I do like the J-12 and your use of it as seen in your review, is very good.
I like the first photo from the trip you posted with the kid's hands blurred.
Rob
Thanks. Almost the whole role was shot at 1/30s so I got blure every here and there.
Jupiter-12 is a great lens, I've bought ZM Biogon 35mm for my Leica inspired by it (Biogon also rocks)!
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-18-2012   #87
alei1180
Registered User
 
alei1180 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Russia
Posts: 38
I used industar-50









but 2 weeks later I would be in the hands of a lens "jupiter-3" 1950 year, Then I'll be able to compare, then one is better!
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2012   #88
alei1180
Registered User
 
alei1180 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Russia
Posts: 38
Jupiter-3 1950year



  Reply With Quote

Old 03-29-2012   #89
fotomachi
Registered User
 
fotomachi is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Бельгия
Posts: 8
I didn't vote because it is so difficult to choose one... Except for the I-26m, every lens listed has a specific characteristic that appeals to me in one way or the other.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-30-2012   #90
Steve M.
Registered User
 
Steve M. is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,988
I've owned nearly all of these except the J-3, and my favorite is the 61LD because it''s close to a Leica in IQ. Probably not the same in resolution power, but what do you expect for 1/10 the price. The Industar 22 would be a close second, but by it's very nature isn't as user friendly.

Like all things FSU, your sample may vary....A LOT! If you're lucky, it will at least focus. I've owned more than a few that had been taken apart and put back together in a "less than optimal manner". Don't expect great build quality w/ the 61LD, but at least it has click stops, nice coatings, and a wonderful way of making images. The J-8 is sharper and of better construction (at least the later black ones are), but that sharpness comes at the expense of some character, for lack of a better word. If you shoot Leica vs Zeiss, then you know what I mean. Best bang for the buck, buy an 61LD w/ any variety of FSU body/lens cap and have a ball.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #91
reagan
hey, they're only Zorkis
 
reagan's Avatar
 
reagan is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Америка
Posts: 2,252
I like the Jupiter.8 ... except for a particular "black & white" Industar.22 that I have. It's not razor sharp, but for some reason it has a little different *look* to color photos - to my 57 yr. old bi-focaled eyes, anyway.







__________________
...
...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-23-2012   #92
dotur
od karnevala
 
dotur's Avatar
 
dotur is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 1,365
www.ivanlozica.com

I have voted for J-3 (Kiev mount with Amedeo adapter on M8), love Industar-22 (on Zorki 1 and Leica IIIf), J-8 is great on Leica CL... but my latest love is Orion-15 on white Pana GF1 as a daylight street combo for zone focusing...


0769dot2012 by dotur, on Flickr


0727dot2012 by dotur, on Flickr


0763dot2012 by dotur, on Flickr


0756dot2012 by dotur, on Flickr


0755dot2012 by dotur, on Flickr


0758dot2012 by dotur, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2012   #93
Skulls Road
Registered User
 
Skulls Road is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 35
I really want one of those Orions. They just cost too much money now.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-25-2012   #94
dotur
od karnevala
 
dotur's Avatar
 
dotur is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 1,365
www.ivanlozica.com


Mine was cheap... but that was long ago. Excellent lens for MFT, telecentric Zeiss Topogon design for aerial photography is ideal - sharp throughout the frame. And it is small, with no need for extra hood. A pleasure to use.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-04-2012   #95
Crazy Fedya
Registered User
 
Crazy Fedya's Avatar
 
Crazy Fedya is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by reagan View Post
I like the Jupiter.8 ... except for a particular "black & white" Industar.22 that I have. It's not razor sharp, but for some reason it has a little different *look* to color photos - to my 57 yr. old bi-focaled eyes, anyway.









Good looking camera and lens produce excellent photos. I like those colors as well.
__________________
Thanks,
Sam.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-2012   #96
alei1180
Registered User
 
alei1180 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Russia
Posts: 38
jupiter-8 1956 m39 kmz


Zorki-4 + Jupiter-8 + Agfa Vista 200 by alei1180, on Flickr


Zorki-4 + Jupiter-8 + Agfa Vista 200 by alei1180, on Flickr


Zorki-4 + Jupiter-8 + Agfa Vista 200 by alei1180, on Flickr


Zorki-4 + Jupiter-8 + Agfa Vista 200 by alei1180, on Flickr


Zorki-4 + Jupiter-8 + Agfa Vista 200 by alei1180, on Flickr


Zorki-4 + Jupiter-8 + Agfa Vista 200 by alei1180, on Flickr
__________________
flickr
500px
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-2012   #97
Nikos72
Registered User
 
Nikos72's Avatar
 
Nikos72 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Athens, Greece
Age: 40
Posts: 240
I like my Industar 61 on my Zorki Festival as it delivers quite sharp photos. My Jupiter 8 on my Kiev 4am is not that sharp (although I am not 100% sure if it is due to some barely noticeable haze on the back element of the lens. I will definitely replace it with a better one.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-27-2012   #98
bogdanb
Registered User
 
bogdanb is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevo View Post
Helios-103
+1
Very sharp, excellent colour rendition. Too bad it isn't available in LTM. I wish I could convert mine, if possible.
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-27-2012   #99
lxmike
Scale focus fan
 
lxmike's Avatar
 
lxmike is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Co Durham NE England
Posts: 1,050
I quite like the J-8
__________________
Presently loaded: Olympus 35 Trip, AX4, XA, XA2, AX2 (blue), Rollei 35T, and Rollei 35B.
Soon to arrive: Rollei 35 original (German), Rollei 35 S (Singapore)
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-27-2012   #100
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
 
Phil_F_NM's Avatar
 
Phil_F_NM is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ciudad de Jersey, Nuevo Jersey
Age: 36
Posts: 2,111
Helios-103

Phil Forrest
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.