Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Sell Digital Gear for Film Gear
Old 10-18-2010   #1
Dwayneb9584
Registered User
 
Dwayneb9584 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 28
Posts: 270
Sell Digital Gear for Film Gear

Hello all,

Just wanted to know if anyone on here has ever sold there digital gear for film gear. Currently I'm in the market for a 35mm Nokton f1.4 lens but cannot fully afford the lens new yet. I have been looking in the classified section and nothing has popped up in the US for the lens yet. I have also searched craigslist. What I was thinking of doing is selling my Sigma 30mm f1.4 lens that I use for my Canon and use that money toward my Nokton 35mm f1.4. To replace the Sigma lens I was going to buy a 50mm 1.8 which run $100.00 or less. This probably isn't the best thing to do, but I am dying to shoot with my new rangefinder which is lensless at the moment. The purpose for this is for me to start my new body of work.

I'm sure the right thing to do would be to just save for a couple of more weeks. I might regret selling my sigma 30mm lens. I just don't know what to do. I work part-time, with freelance gigs once in a while with school loans to pay, and other bills. As you can see i'm confused and can use some help psychologically lol.

All help greatly appreciated.

Dwayne
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #2
MCTuomey
Registered User
 
MCTuomey's Avatar
 
MCTuomey is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: U.S.
Age: 59
Posts: 2,767
patience, fella

then again if you don't use the sig 30/1.4, then it's saleable.

you could look at a canon ltm equivalent. cheaper and very good, e.g. 50/1.4 or 35/2. or shoot a CV 35/2.5 until you've saved up the difference.

nah, save up for the nokton ...
__________________
Mike

Bill Pierce's "photographer's proposition": I saw something wonderful, let me show it to you.

Leica and Zeiss M
Minolta Autocord
Fuji GX680 (in process)


My Smugmug Website
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #3
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,712
I don't see any harm in selling one lens so you can buy two... the Nikon is still a good lens.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #4
h_A_Z
Registered User
 
h_A_Z is offline
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
I sold my Canon 135mm L f/2.0 and got myself a VC 40 1.4 with money to spare for films
__________________
Konica Hexar RF, M-Hexanon 50mm f/2.0
Canon 5D Mark 2, 50 1.8
Leica D-Lux 4
Olympus MJU-2/Stylus Epic
Superheadz UWS
Lomo LC-Wide
Blog
HS Photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #5
tanel
Registered User
 
tanel is offline
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Estonia
Posts: 110
Sold all my digital gear, few film bodies and lenses, bought M6 and have never looked back.
But I can't recommend this to everyone. People prefer different things.
For me, going to rangedinfer system was a perfect choice. But it's important to keep in mind, that cameras are just tools. Nothing more. It's what you use them for that matters.
__________________
Humble gallery at Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #6
keepright
matthew robertson
 
keepright's Avatar
 
keepright is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 38
Posts: 142
The Canon 50/1.8 is hardly a replacement for the Sigma 30/1.4. Unless the Sigma is a third-tier choice or worse, and you'd just get the 50/1.8 to have something brighter than a kit zoom but with no real expectations or even plans to use it, you'll be making a regrettable choice. Money is a function of time, so I'd urge you to wait until you've saved the extra that you need.

I sold most of an Olympus 4/3 system and bought my Ikon and a couple of my three lenses with the proceeds, but I still have other digital cameras that I can use when I need to.
__________________
thews'reviews & robertsonphoto
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #7
unixrevolution
Registered User
 
unixrevolution's Avatar
 
unixrevolution is offline
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 30
Posts: 434
The 50 f/1.8 will be much longer than you expect on the canon, if the 30/1.4 is a normal lens and it's aps-c.

I would just wait. That's what I'm doing to save up for a K-5, and to save up to fix my Leica M2.
__________________
Please, call me Erik.
Find me on: Flickr | PentaxForums | Large Format Photography Forum

"Cameras are for looking through, not looking at."
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #8
kossi008
Photon Counter
 
kossi008's Avatar
 
kossi008 is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dresden, Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by tanel View Post
Sold all my digital gear, few film bodies and lenses, bought M6 and have never looked back.
Me too, I financed the Zeiss Ikon and two ZM lenses by selling my 5D and a lot of EF glass. But I guess that this is not for everyone... Me, I wanted to downsize equipment-wise anyway...
__________________
Photon Counter
Zeiss Ikon, Bessa R4A, Sony Nex-5N; CV 15/4.5, ZM 25/2.8, ZM 35/2, ZM 50/2, CV 75/2.5
My flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25547701@N08/
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #9
The Meaness
Registered User
 
The Meaness's Avatar
 
The Meaness is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MD, USA
Age: 28
Posts: 265
I hope you've already considered the other nokton options - 40/1.4, 35/1.7, and 35/2.5 - all cheaper than the 35/1.4.

If you haven't, maybe one of those could be the quick fix you're looking for. The 35mms aren't as fast, but the 40mm is well regarded - some users like it more than the 35mm version.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #10
t.s.k.
Hooked on philm
 
t.s.k.'s Avatar
 
t.s.k. is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chi·ca'·go
Posts: 624
How long have you had this desire?
A year ago I seriously GASsed for an MP, with cash in hand, for over a month.
The craving subsided and now I'm glad I didn't buy one.
There are clearly substitutes that are equal to or better than your initial plans, including letting the urge pass.

In any case, g'luck in your decision.
__________________
- tony -

You can observe a lot by just watching.
-- Yogi Berra
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #11
Naumoski
Registered User
 
Naumoski's Avatar
 
Naumoski is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 254
Selling a system camera to buy another type of system might be good, but making one camera weaker because of using the money and making the other type of camera stronger might not be wise if you use both cameras similar effectively.

What about selling another thing and saving more and then afford the new lens?

Next weekend I will sell my Canon s5is, for less then half of the money which I paid for new + using that money and investing another half of that amount plus, to get a Rolleiflex. This sounds fine to me since I don't actualy use my canon, and might look for a P&S replace for the future in another small and pocketable model with newer techology.

Last edited by Naumoski : 10-18-2010 at 10:28.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #12
richardhkirkando
Registered User
 
richardhkirkando is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 30
Posts: 252
I used to have a bunch of Nikon SLR gear that I had accumulated before I discovered how much I prefer rangefinders, but have since gone mostly unused. Sold it all (except for my D70 and 80-200, which I keep around for sports, and a 55mm macro lens for ebay photos) and haven't missed it. My experience wasn't necessarily digital -> film (though it was to some extent), but more stuff I don't use -> stuff I will use.

OTOH, if I used the SLR system more often, I definitely would have wanted to keep at least some of it.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #13
Dwayneb9584
Registered User
 
Dwayneb9584 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 28
Posts: 270
Thanks for everyones help. I decided to keep my SLR gear as I will be needing it next month for two scheduled shoots. I plan to save the money for a lens which will take just two weeks. I just need to relax lol.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #14
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,647
consider the 40/1.4...it's a good lens too.
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100


"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso

...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #15
buzzardkid
packin' light
 
buzzardkid's Avatar
 
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,847
I sold my Nikon D300 kit to buy an M8 and that was a mistake. I set it right by selling the M8 and going back to film. M3, IIIa and screw mount lenses, Mamiya C330f. But, I'm not working profesionally so I can afford to do however I please It can be done, but only successfully by people it suits!
__________________
Cheers, Johan




Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom

Visit johanniels.com!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-18-2010   #16
Mister E
-
 
Mister E is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: I <3 NCPS
Posts: 1,698
I sold all my digital gear and went all film earlier this year.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-20-2010   #17
Yhbv24
Registered User
 
Yhbv24's Avatar
 
Yhbv24 is offline
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wellington
Age: 28
Posts: 45
I sold my entire digital kit to go film, then my film SLR kit to go rangefinder! I went to film for a number of reasons, then to a rangefinder for a number of reasons.

I don't regret the digital -> film move, and don't regret the SLR -> rangefinder move.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-23-2010   #18
heatherselkie
Registered User
 
heatherselkie is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: west coast canada
Posts: 40
I've gone from digital to film but didn't have anything to sell! My digital camera has devalued so much I am not sure if I should sell it or give it away. I did get a leica digulux 4.3 for a joke but it's a good little point and shoot for digital/immediate purposes. I'm buying film gear from scratch at this point as everything film was stolen some years ago.
Unless you plan on giving up on film and no longer want the digital gear, don't sell your digital gear just because you need the money today. I've regretted selling stuff just because I needed the money. Somehow I've never had the money to replace the gear so ended up losing all round!
By the way, people are always selling their film gear to go to digital, so you can get some great deals!
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-24-2010   #19
seakayaker1
Registered User
 
seakayaker1's Avatar
 
seakayaker1 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
consider the 40/1.4...it's a good lens too.
. . . . . the 40/1.4 is an excellent lens . . . . . and you can pick it up a couple of hundred dollars cheaper than the the 35/1.4.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2010   #20
PatrickONeill
Registered User
 
PatrickONeill's Avatar
 
PatrickONeill is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Weatherford, Tx
Age: 32
Posts: 368
I sold everything and got a nifty implant in my eye.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:39.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.