Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Fixed Lens Advanced Compacts > Fuji X Series > X100

X100 X100 including operation & reviews!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 09-20-2010   #426
tapesonthefloor
Registered User
 
tapesonthefloor's Avatar
 
tapesonthefloor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
Manual focus is not essential for street photography... fast AF works just fine as well.
Depends on if you're looking for a decisive moment or the decisive moment, I suppose. AF takes the art away from me, and turns the whole business into a guessing game. Personally, if I can't turn a focus wheel with my eye pressed against an optical viewfinder, it ain't photography.

But that's my opinion. I know it differs from most.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #427
M like Leica M6
Clemens
 
M like Leica M6 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany, Mainz
Age: 49
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by CameraQuest View Post
I just started a Fuji X100 forum.

This camera seems to have captured a lot of fan's imagination.

Stephen
Stephen, does Mr. Kobayashi have something similar, too, with a true rangefinder and M lens mount? Maybe with a "ZI" on it? Pleeeaaaasse....
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #428
tapesonthefloor
Registered User
 
tapesonthefloor's Avatar
 
tapesonthefloor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayPA View Post
I'm with you on this, Vincent. A focus/distance scale was one of the first things I looked for on the lens. It would have been a very nice addition indeed./
How about an audible, beeping distance scale, where A440 = 2M?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #429
wgerrard
Registered User
 
wgerrard's Avatar
 
wgerrard is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickett Wilson View Post
The video does sell the sizzle.
The narrator sounds like the guy who does the safety videos for United.
__________________
Bill
-------------------------------------
This is my only legible signature.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #430
Frankie
Speaking Frankly
 
Frankie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by PKR View Post
......My guess is this is the first in a line of high end compact cameras from Fuji. I'll buy one, and likely up grade as the newer variants are released.
An M9 plus any Leica 35mm lens will set you back $10,000.

For that money, you can afford to buy the X100 now [said to cost ~$1800], add a wider- or zoom-lens version later...and then some.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #431
ywenz
Registered User
 
ywenz's Avatar
 
ywenz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,493
Strange.. there are definitely two versions of the X100 from the pics we've seen one with 35mm lens one with 23mm lens. WTF!?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #432
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson's Avatar
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,373
The M9 killer?
__________________
______________________________________________
"There is something rather sad about a truckload of caviar"

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...0&ppuser=28005
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #433
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson's Avatar
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,373
ywenz, actually, I don't think there are ANY versions yet. It's an exercise in lust provocation.
__________________
______________________________________________
"There is something rather sad about a truckload of caviar"

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...0&ppuser=28005
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #434
ywenz
Registered User
 
ywenz's Avatar
 
ywenz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickett Wilson View Post
ywenz, actually, I don't think there are ANY versions yet. It's an exercise in lust provocation.
No there are different body and different lens. Lenses have different FOV and different size aperture ring tabs.



  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #435
PKR
Registered User
 
PKR is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by coelacanth View Post
Multiple Japanese articles are reporting expected MSRP of 120,000 - 150,000 yen so that sounds about right.
This camera is up for grabs next year. Today Silver is approaching $21/oz and Gold is close to $1,300/oz. What do you expect the exchange rate to be next year with a dollar losing value daily?

The value of gold and silver don't change. Only the relationship of the value changes, as it relates to the fluxuating value various world currencies. It's taking more dollars to buy the same amount of gold or Nikons, than it did last year at this time. And yes, the Yen changes too.

https://online.kitco.com/scripts/cgi-bin/texten.pl
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #436
M like Leica M6
Clemens
 
M like Leica M6 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany, Mainz
Age: 49
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by tapesonthefloor View Post
Depends on if you're looking for a decisive moment or the decisive moment, I suppose. AF takes the art away from me, and turns the whole business into a guessing game. Personally, if I can't turn a focus wheel with my eye pressed against an optical viewfinder, it ain't photography.

But that's my opinion. I know it differs from most.
I think we are similar.

AF, matrix-metering, many fps... that sounds like Kyūdō, the traditional japanese art of bow shooting, with a rocket launcher. Or driving a Ferrari with an automatic gearbox - and a chauffeur.

Am I getting old? Or wise?

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #437
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is online now
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by tapesonthefloor View Post
Depends on if you're looking for a decisive moment or the decisive moment, I suppose. AF takes the art away from me, and turns the whole business into a guessing game. Personally, if I can't turn a focus wheel with my eye pressed against an optical viewfinder, it ain't photography.

But that's my opinion. I know it differs from most.
A pretty narrow view of what photography is... I don't see much difference between fast AF and zone focus honestly. I know I prefer manual focus with an M, but I'm certainly not going to say that when I use AF I'm not making photos ...

The art is not in tools used, but the finished image (to most people viewing the image).
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit

Last edited by jsrockit : 09-20-2010 at 10:08.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #438
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit is online now
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 39
Posts: 11,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by ywenz View Post
Strange.. there are definitely two versions of the X100 from the pics we've seen one with 35mm lens one with 23mm lens. WTF!?
Prototype 1 and Prototype 2? I would go with the one in the brochure... by 35mm they probably meant equivilent on the one and actual on the other.
__________________
www.flickr.com/jsrockit
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #439
Miserere
Find Ranger
 
Miserere's Avatar
 
Miserere is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by arturo View Post
To those regretting or complaining about the fixed lens: I think this is a constraint imposed by the OVF. I would be too complicated, particularly for a first attempt, to build a zoom optical viewfinder.
That's the whole point of rangefinders, that the OVF doesn't zoom, it has frame lines. An interchangeable lens X100 would keep the same OVF, but the photographer would have the option of seeing through the lens by switching to EVF view.
__________________
My Gallery: World of Miserere

My website on Photography: Enticing the Light

Miserere on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #440
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
Prototype 1 and Prototype 2? I would go with the one in the brochure... by 35mm they probably meant equivilent on the one and actual on the other.
Pretty obvious that that's what's going on here.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #441
tapesonthefloor
Registered User
 
tapesonthefloor's Avatar
 
tapesonthefloor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
A pretty narrow view of what photography is...
Definitely. But I'm a pretty narrow guy, and photography can be whatever I want it to be. Fortunately for us all, I am both unable and unwilling to impose that definition on anyone else.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #442
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaime M View Post
But there looks like 2 cameras! One 35mm lens, big strap lugs and the MF, AF-S, AF-C dial on left position


And the other one 23mm lens, little strap lugs, and the MF, AF-S, AF-C dial on right position


Maybe both are pre-production, maybe prototipes, or maybe an epic fail
Maybe it is secretly an interchangeable lens camera
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #443
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson's Avatar
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,373
By the time this camera is actually introduced, it will never live up to the hype it has received from those lusting after it!
__________________
______________________________________________
"There is something rather sad about a truckload of caviar"

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...0&ppuser=28005
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #444
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by tapesonthefloor View Post
Definitely. But I'm a pretty narrow guy, and photography can be whatever I want it to be. Fortunately for us all, I am both unable and unwilling to impose that definition on anyone else.
I think that we all have to adapt to our tools, to their strengths and weaknesses, to a greater or lesser extent.

Many of us have a very, very tight relationship with our MF rangefinders, and I daresay that this is especially so with Leica M's.

Perhaps we should remember that all tools require compromise. Even our beloved rangefinders!

This new camera offers some things that the film and even digital M's never offered.

Real-time DOF preview.
DOF scales in the finder.
Focusing to 10 cm.
Perfect parallax correction, all the way down to 10 cm.
Real-time in-finder histogram.
In-finder display of aperture and shutter speed.
etc.

All of this is potentially very useful.

If I can have one or two scale-focus presets (even *just* 2 m would do), I'm good to go.
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #445
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
 
coelacanth's Avatar
 
coelacanth is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,353
I really hope this E/OVF hybrid will become a new trend and adapted to other large sensor compacts.
__________________
- Sug

b/w japanese dude.

flickr | Just started RFF Gallery | @SuguruN | Sug on G+ | Portfolio (beta)

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #446
PKR
Registered User
 
PKR is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by xayraa33 View Post
Maybe it is secretly an interchangeable lens camera
Not likely, but maybe in a second or third generation. The camera(s) we are looking at are prototypes. Until you can put your hands on one or read several reviews, it's a guessing game. Who knows, there may be some major advance in the chip driving the AF servo by the time the camera is in production.

It's foolish to get too carried away at this point. But, since it's Fuji, a major player.. there will likely be a camera of this type on the market next year.

I have no idea as to the cost. i would hope under $2,500, given the price point and their claim of "professional" in the description. It could be a lot more. $1,700 would fit both Pro and Amateur markets. Who knows what the dollar vs. Yen will be next year?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #447
Matus
Registered User
 
Matus's Avatar
 
Matus is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,813
This camera was compared to fuji MF fixed focal cameras, but I do not think that this is a reasonable comparison especially because this camera is digital. I do not doubt the quality of the lens or of the body to make it clear. But the sensor will be old at the time it will be released. With a film camera you would just buy a new film once it would hit the market. With digital in 2 - 3 years you have a camera in hand which, if you want to get a newer model, you will get very little $$$ for and money wise you start from beginning. Realizing this I would be willing to invest less to digital camera than to equivalent film camera (just forget the huge differences in workflow here). So I do not expect buyers standing in a queue if the price will be around $1500. Whether the camera Fuji is preparing for us can be made for less is something I do not know.

Still - this camera jut may be the last nail in the coffin of my resistance going to Photokina this year.
__________________
________
Matus
... Flickr galleries: New Zealand , Spain
... per camera: Olympus XA , Jupiter J3 , Rolleiflex T, Mamiya 6, Ricoh GRDIII shots
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #448
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
 
coelacanth's Avatar
 
coelacanth is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,353
Looks like my Fujica will meet her granddaughter in the spring.

__________________
- Sug

b/w japanese dude.

flickr | Just started RFF Gallery | @SuguruN | Sug on G+ | Portfolio (beta)

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #449
ywenz
Registered User
 
ywenz's Avatar
 
ywenz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matus View Post
This camera was compared to fuji MF fixed focal cameras, but I do not think that this is a reasonable comparison especially because this camera is digital. I do not doubt the quality of the lens or of the body to make it clear. But the sensor will be old at the time it will be released. With a film camera you would just buy a new film once it would hit the market. With digital in 2 - 3 years you have a camera in hand which, if you want to get a newer model, you will get very little $$$ for and money wise you start from beginning. Realizing this I would be willing to invest less to digital camera than to equivalent film camera (just forget the huge differences in workflow here). So I do not expect buyers standing in a queue if the price will be around $1500. Whether the camera Fuji is preparing for us can be made for less is something I do not know.
seriously are we really going to start the digital vs film talk again?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-20-2010   #450
PKR
Registered User
 
PKR is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,418
Still - this camera jut may be the last nail in the coffin of my resistance going to Photokina this year.[/quote]

Matus; Please go to Photokina and shoot some photos of the cameras and report back. Get your hands on some of these "vapor" cameras and tell us what you think. I'll send you beer money!

pkr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.