Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Photography General Interest

Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Leica M6 vs Nikon FM
Old 07-18-2010   #1
kshapero
User
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
Cool Leica M6 vs Nikon FM

Other than the M6 costing 10 times the cost of an FM and an FM having Shutter Clap/mirror slap what are really are the differences?
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #2
dogberryjr
[Pithy phrase]
 
dogberryjr's Avatar
 
dogberryjr is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WV, USA
Posts: 957
About $1000?
__________________
M, LTM, FD, F, Film, Digital, MF . . . Jack of all, master of none.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #3
Pablito
coco frío
 
Pablito's Avatar
 
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
none at all.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #4
nobbylon
Registered User
 
nobbylon's Avatar
 
nobbylon is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nederlands
Posts: 1,857
You can't use M glass on an FM! personally I think FM's feel cheap and nasty, however they've proven themselves to be great cameras. Late FM2n's are the best with the aluminium shutter. I sold mine as i prefer my F's and F2's. M6 is a completely different experience and IMHO by far the best M ever. A true classic that gives you a mechanical M with a great meter and doesn't break the bank.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #5
le vrai rdu
Registered User
 
le vrai rdu's Avatar
 
le vrai rdu is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paris
Age: 28
Posts: 1,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero View Post
Other than the M6 costing 10 times the cost of an FM and an FM having Shutter Clap/mirror slap what are really are the differences?
the way you see in the finder
__________________
SITE WEB|| flickr||my book : North Sea ||blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #6
Rob-F
Preserving Old Technology
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: secret midwestern underground bunker
Posts: 3,413
The mirror slap can be greatly improved by using the F100. It has a very soft, gentle action. And the price is right for a used one.
__________________
“There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.”
--John Ruskin
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #7
kdemas
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
 
kdemas's Avatar
 
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSU View Post
I'm glad someone said this.

The Nikon is a SLR.

The Leica is a RF.
Ding ding, we have a winner!

If you like SLRs the FM series is very nice. Compact, reliable with a nice viewfinder. I have an FM2N that's been in my bag forever and never let me down.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------
Open Iris. Life, Captured.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #8
kshapero
User
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
While we are at it (BTW it is raining outside, so I am chewing time), How about the Nikon FM3a VS Leica M7. About five times the price. Also le vrai rdu says the finder is different. Yes?
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #9
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero View Post
Other than the M6 costing 10 times the cost of an FM and an FM having Shutter Clap/mirror slap what are really are the differences?
why do you do this?

and why do people answer him?
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100


"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso

...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #10
kdemas
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
 
kdemas's Avatar
 
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,144
I'm kicking myself, you're right
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------
Open Iris. Life, Captured.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #11
Steve Bellayr
Registered User
 
Steve Bellayr's Avatar
 
Steve Bellayr is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,579
weight, portability, quiet, all the lenses for M6 are light weight and excellent...Nikon need to choose which lens to buy...in the 35mm f2.0 range they are as expensive as Ms. F3HP is probably a better camera than the FM for the money. M6 v. FM ... M6...my personal opionion only.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #12
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,438
Better still put the Nikon comparison aside and compare the M6 to an OM-1 or OM-2! The M6 will probably cost twenty times the price of the Oly and you can get three or four good Zuikos for the price of a used Summicron.

But as Joe said ... "why do we answer?"
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #13
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
 
Juan Valdenebro's Avatar
 
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero View Post
How about the Nikon FM3a VS Leica M7?
Better construction and design: reliability... M7's require repairs a lot more...

A more fair fight would be FM3a vs. R3A...

It's true: no problems ever with my Nikons and Bessas...

And seeing through the lens is different, yes, and better some of the times...

Cheers,

Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #14
Pablito
coco frío
 
Pablito's Avatar
 
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post
why do you do this?

and why do people answer him?
He is chewing time. He says so himself. I'd rather chew escargot.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #15
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
 
Juan Valdenebro's Avatar
 
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
I thought we were comparing forks.

Cheers,

Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #16
naruto
GASitis.. finally cured?
 
naruto's Avatar
 
naruto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 628
Akiva: I know the answer to this one.

M6/M7 needs CLA every two years
Nikons are too smooth to ever need any repairing.

*runs*
__________________
~ash
-------

me @ Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #17
Ranchu
Registered User
 
Ranchu's Avatar
 
Ranchu is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,090
Mirror blackout. The lenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #18
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
 
semilog's Avatar
 
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by le vrai rdu View Post
the way you see in the finder
The lenses that you can mount. E.g., the FM hasn't got anything remotely approaching the 35 'lux ASPH (the 24 and 28/1.4's don't count because they are designed for AF and comparatively huge).
__________________
There are two kinds of photographers:
those who are interested in what a particular camera can't do,
and those who are interested in what it can do.

semilog.smugmug.com | flickr.com/photos/semilog/
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2010   #19
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
 
Juan Valdenebro's Avatar
 
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
If SLR's were considerably smaller and lighter than RF's, that would be different... I wouldn't love my RF's this much in that case...

Cheers,

Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2010   #20
Juan Valdenebro
Truth is beauty
 
Juan Valdenebro's Avatar
 
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog View Post
The lenses that you can mount. E.g., the FM hasn't got anything remotely approaching the 35 'lux ASPH (the 24 and 28/1.4's don't count because they are designed for AF and comparatively huge).
Yes, with the lack of mirror the wides' design -and size- is a lot better...

Cheers,

Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2010   #21
kshapero
User
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog View Post
The lenses that you can mount. E.g., the FM hasn't got anything remotely approaching the 35 'lux ASPH (the 24 and 28/1.4's don't count because they are designed for AF and comparatively huge).
good point indeed.
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2010   #22
tj01
Registered User
 
tj01's Avatar
 
tj01 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 550
I couldn't focus night shots on my 50/1.8. With the M6 .72, it's still difficult but not as bad. There's also no way you could handheld that vertical shutter as compared to the horizontal cloth shutter on those slower shutter speeds.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2010   #23
doolittle
Registered User
 
doolittle's Avatar
 
doolittle is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 343
I have both (M6 and FM2n) and am very fond of each of them.

The M6 with a 50mm/2 fits into my coat pocket, FM2 with a 50mm/1.8 doesn't. FM2 shutter speed goes to 1/4000, M6 to 1/1000, which is sometimes useful. I don't worry about the safety of FM2, where as the M6 is camouflaged with black tape to hide it's identity. I would shoot the FM2 on a tripod, but haven't considered using a tripod with the M6 (okay, it's not really a difference!). FM2 has self timer, but never felt the need for one on M6. FM2 feels less robust than the M6, but I know which I would be more upset dropping!
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2010   #24
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS's Avatar
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,154
There is no difference; the FM may even be better because of macro and tele capabilties. Due to my generous nature, I will send an FM camera to anyone who sends me their M6.

__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-19-2010   #25
kshapero
User
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankS View Post
There is no difference; the FM may even be better because of macro and tele capabilties. Due to my generous nature, I will send an FM camera to anyone who sends me their M6.

Ok I admit it, I just love my M6.
__________________
Akiva S.

bodies and glass

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.