| Photography General Interest Neat Photo stuff NOT particularly about Rangefinders. |
 |
Leica M6 vs Nikon FM |
 |
07-18-2010
|
#1
|
|
User
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
|
Leica M6 vs Nikon FM
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#2
|
|
[Pithy phrase]
dogberryjr is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WV, USA
Posts: 957
|
About $1000?
__________________
M, LTM, FD, F, Film, Digital, MF . . . Jack of all, master of none.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#3
|
|
coco frío
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
|
none at all.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
nobbylon is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nederlands
Posts: 1,857
|
You can't use M glass on an FM! personally I think FM's feel cheap and nasty, however they've proven themselves to be great cameras. Late FM2n's are the best with the aluminium shutter. I sold mine as i prefer my F's and F2's. M6 is a completely different experience and IMHO by far the best M ever. A true classic that gives you a mechanical M with a great meter and doesn't break the bank.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
le vrai rdu is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paris
Age: 28
Posts: 1,334
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero
|
the way you see in the finder
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#6
|
|
Preserving Old Technology
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: secret midwestern underground bunker
Posts: 3,413
|
The mirror slap can be greatly improved by using the F100. It has a very soft, gentle action. And the price is right for a used one.
__________________
“There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.”
--John Ruskin
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#7
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSU
I'm glad someone said this.
The Nikon is a SLR.
The Leica is a RF.
|
Ding ding, we have a winner!
If you like SLRs the FM series is very nice. Compact, reliable with a nice viewfinder. I have an FM2N that's been in my bag forever and never let me down.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#8
|
|
User
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
|
While we are at it (BTW it is raining outside, so I am chewing time), How about the Nikon FM3a VS Leica M7. About five times the price. Also le vrai rdu says the finder is different. Yes?
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#9
|
|
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero
|
why do you do this?
and why do people answer him?
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr
x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso
...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#10
|
|
ʎlʇuǝɹǝɟɟıp sƃuıɥʇ ǝǝS
kdemas is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,144
|
I'm kicking myself, you're right 
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Steve Bellayr is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,579
|
weight, portability, quiet, all the lenses for M6 are light weight and excellent...Nikon need to choose which lens to buy...in the 35mm f2.0 range they are as expensive as Ms. F3HP is probably a better camera than the FM for the money. M6 v. FM ... M6...my personal opionion only.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,438
|
Better still put the Nikon comparison aside and compare the M6 to an OM-1 or OM-2! The M6 will probably cost twenty times the price of the Oly and you can get three or four good Zuikos for the price of a used Summicron.
But as Joe said ... "why do we answer?" 
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#13
|
|
Truth is beauty
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero
How about the Nikon FM3a VS Leica M7?
|
Better construction and design: reliability... M7's require repairs a lot more...
A more fair fight would be FM3a vs. R3A...
It's true: no problems ever with my Nikons and Bessas...
And seeing through the lens is different, yes, and better some of the times...
Cheers,
Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#14
|
|
coco frío
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
why do you do this?
and why do people answer him?
|
He is chewing time. He says so himself. I'd rather chew escargot.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#15
|
|
Truth is beauty
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
|
I thought we were comparing forks.
Cheers,
Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#16
|
|
GASitis.. finally cured?
naruto is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 628
|
Akiva: I know the answer to this one.
M6/M7 needs CLA every two years
Nikons are too smooth to ever need any repairing.
*runs*
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Ranchu is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,090
|
Mirror blackout. The lenses.
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#18
|
|
curmudgeonly optimist
semilog is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,201
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by le vrai rdu
the way you see in the finder
|
The lenses that you can mount. E.g., the FM hasn't got anything remotely approaching the 35 'lux ASPH (the 24 and 28/1.4's don't count because they are designed for AF and comparatively huge).
|
|
|
|
07-18-2010
|
#19
|
|
Truth is beauty
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
|
If SLR's were considerably smaller and lighter than RF's, that would be different... I wouldn't love my RF's this much in that case...
Cheers,
Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
|
|
|
|
07-19-2010
|
#20
|
|
Truth is beauty
Juan Valdenebro is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barcelona and Colombia
Age: 41
Posts: 4,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog
The lenses that you can mount. E.g., the FM hasn't got anything remotely approaching the 35 'lux ASPH (the 24 and 28/1.4's don't count because they are designed for AF and comparatively huge).
|
Yes, with the lack of mirror the wides' design -and size- is a lot better...
Cheers,
Juan
__________________
F i l m means fun!
|
|
|
|
07-19-2010
|
#21
|
|
User
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by semilog
The lenses that you can mount. E.g., the FM hasn't got anything remotely approaching the 35 'lux ASPH (the 24 and 28/1.4's don't count because they are designed for AF and comparatively huge).
|
good point indeed.
|
|
|
|
07-19-2010
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
tj01 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 550
|
I couldn't focus night shots on my 50/1.8. With the M6 .72, it's still difficult but not as bad. There's also no way you could handheld that vertical shutter as compared to the horizontal cloth shutter on those slower shutter speeds.
|
|
|
|
07-19-2010
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
doolittle is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 343
|
I have both (M6 and FM2n) and am very fond of each of them.
The M6 with a 50mm/2 fits into my coat pocket, FM2 with a 50mm/1.8 doesn't. FM2 shutter speed goes to 1/4000, M6 to 1/1000, which is sometimes useful. I don't worry about the safety of FM2, where as the M6 is camouflaged with black tape to hide it's identity. I would shoot the FM2 on a tripod, but haven't considered using a tripod with the M6 (okay, it's not really a difference!). FM2 has self timer, but never felt the need for one on M6. FM2 feels less robust than the M6, but I know which I would be more upset dropping!
|
|
|
|
07-19-2010
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,154
|
There is no difference; the FM may even be better because of macro and tele capabilties. Due to my generous nature, I will send an FM camera to anyone who sends me their M6.

__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
|
|
|
|
07-19-2010
|
#25
|
|
User
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,058
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankS
There is no difference; the FM may even be better because of macro and tele capabilties. Due to my generous nature, I will send an FM camera to anyone who sends me their M6.

|
Ok I admit it, I just love my M6. 
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26. |
|
|