Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

say if...
Old 07-27-2004   #1
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
say if...

say if...you were me...

and you had one bessa r body
and a cv 35/75 combo
and this really good deal came along where you could get a second body or the cv 90, either one for the same very good price.

which would you choose??

joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #2
taffer
void
 
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
Hehe, the second body dilemma eh ?

If these two were my only options, then I'd get a second body, and when I felt the need of a 90 I'd use the 75 taking one step ahead (the framelines for 85/100 are in fact combined in my Canon 7 and they are really very close to each other)...

But that only in the case you really need to get something Anyway sure better advices will come, but now it's time to look for my bed !
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #3
GeneW
aka StarbuckGuy
 
GeneW's Avatar
 
GeneW is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Port Credit, Ontario
Age: 68
Posts: 3,225
Tough one, Joe. I guess the question to ask yourself is 'do you see yourself as a two-body shooter?' Maybe one body loaded with B&W and one with colour (Richard must be chuckling by now...)

Or a second body for redundancy in case the first fails?

Me, I'd go with the lens. I own that lens and it's a honey. But I'm probably a more natural SLR shooter than RF shooter and I tend to favour longer focal lengths. Your natural tendency may be the opposite.

You'll get something good either way!

Gene
__________________
genewilburn.com
Bessa T, Zero Image 35mm Pinhole, Canon S90, Nikon F100, Lumix G2
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #4
ZeissFan
Registered User
 
ZeissFan is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,014
I would say that if you're just out and about, I'd get another lens. If you shoot professionally, I would always carry two bodies.

But I'll admit that it's nice being able to switch to another body rather than have to switch lenses -- especially when it's a screw-mount lens.
__________________
-Mike Elek
» MORE ABOUT CAMERAS »
My scanners: Epson Expression 1600 Pro and HP PhotoSmart S20
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #5
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,898
Which is the better deal? I would tend towards the lens, but if the price you are talking about for the lens is good, but not great, something that you will be able to find easily in the future I would go for the body.

You know what I am saying, which is the best deal right now? Where are you going to get the better bang for your buck?
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #6
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
 
SolaresLarrave's Avatar
 
SolaresLarrave is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DeKalb, IL, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 6,547
You already have two lenses, Joe, go for the body and fit the second lens on it. You'll have two cameras that way, not just one body and two lenses.

How's about it?
__________________
-Francisco
Check out
My Leica M4-2 Blog and/or
My Nikon D700 Neophyte's Guide
No longer selling any Nikon SLR glass...
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #7
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
it's a tough call.
the price up here is close for both items if bought new at the local camera shop. this would be a private deal and the seller is asking the same amount for body or lens, so no deal is better than the other.
it may, however, be out of my hands - as it turns out i'm second in line --- so the choice looks -at this moment- more like i would be in line for the 90.

i could live with that.
i've always liked the 85 to 100 lengths so i know i will like the 90. i bought the 75 cause i never had one before and wanted 'new' to help shake me up a bit.

i'm just waitin' on the email...

joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #8
Todd.Hanz
Registered User
 
Todd.Hanz's Avatar
 
Todd.Hanz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 48
Posts: 4,967
Me......I'd get the CV 21/4, but then I like 'em wide!
You could sell the 75mm and buy the 90mm and the body for a few more bucks.

Todd
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #9
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
todd, i like wide angle work from others but rarely do i see that wide myself.
years ago i had a 24 for some slr outfit i was using at the time. but i hardly ever used it and never really took a very good shot with it.
however, your idea is a good one.
if it works out that i get the 90 i just might sell the 75 and buy another used body.
or i could use the 90 when there is more light and keep the 75 as my 'fast' lil' tele.

of course, there are some who say that a 75 has a whole 'nother look from a 90...

joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #10
Rich Silfver
Batteries Not Included
 
Rich Silfver is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,709
Easy.
Buy the 90.
Then sell the 75.
Then buy a 50.

You then have a great 35/50/90 combination.

When Christmas comes around you will have had the lenses enough to know if it's so 'annoying' to change the lenses on the body so that you need to write St Nick asking for one more body.
__________________
My favorite RF cameras right now:
Leica III (F), Leica M3 and Contax IIIa



.........................
Blog.........................Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #11
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
damn you richard!

that's yet another really good idea and one that i had not thought of.
i'm still in 2 lens thought mode with the idea that a 35/75 combo is ideal.
damn!

now i don't want to buy anything - it's too confusing...
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #12
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
 
SolaresLarrave's Avatar
 
SolaresLarrave is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DeKalb, IL, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 6,547
I second Richard's motion. His proposal leaves you with the best focal length combo (I have it myself! )

All in favor say "Aye!"
__________________
-Francisco
Check out
My Leica M4-2 Blog and/or
My Nikon D700 Neophyte's Guide
No longer selling any Nikon SLR glass...
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #13
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,188
Between just those two options, I'd go for the second body, as the 75 and 90 are very close. A 35/75/90 combo just doesn't seem worthy. Opening the options beyond the two you specified, I like Richard's idea, and Todd's. With your gear as it is, I'd pass on both the body and 90mm and look for a 21 or 25, but that's just me.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #14
pvdhaar
Zoom with your feet!
 
pvdhaar's Avatar
 
pvdhaar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,863
First I'll answer your question, and then I'll give a second thought..

I've got the CV90 myself, and although it's a very nice lens that makes very nice pictures, I'd still recommend a second body over this tele.

The 90mm isn't really that different from a 75. Besides, you may find the 90mm a bit iffy to focus and frame. I can't say I really like peeping at the 90mm framelines (on a 0.6x viewfinder that is).

But more important, you need to think about whether you really need to buy a 90mm or a second body at all. Over the years I've found that the things I bought merely because of a discount haven't been the wisest purchase decisions. I rather spend the full sum on something I do really need and use than half money on stuff that ends up in a closet. In your case, I'd keep the money and save up for something that really does something for you (wow, that's almost Zen, isn't it ;-)
__________________
Kind regards,

Peter

My Hexländer Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-27-2004   #15
Rich Silfver
Batteries Not Included
 
Rich Silfver is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,709
If the Bessa R's viewfinder magnification is 0.6x I would definetively try out how easy it is to focus that thing before even thinking about buying one.

May be that 35/75 will be your zen-ultimate-combo

I'd second Pete's 'alternative suggestion' about maybe passing on both the body and lens and instead buy something completely different to both challenge and entertain you.
__________________
My favorite RF cameras right now:
Leica III (F), Leica M3 and Contax IIIa



.........................
Blog.........................Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #16
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,898
I have to say that I have not even considered the 90 for my R because of those tiny framelines. I like Richards idea about the 35, 50, 75 (in my case), but you have a stable of Russian 50s to fill that slot.

I will be definative now, get the body, or save up some more for an R2 or R3. That is more or less what I am doing right now. It itches though, my ebay account hasn't been abused in so long.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #17
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
all very wise words and much to think about for my very tired little brain.
but i seems the gods are conspiring against my using free will in this matter.
the seller just emiled me and said he may sell to a dealer, i assume trade in, and i may just be totally out of the picture anyway.
more to come in what was once a simple little deal...

joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #18
taffer
void
 
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
Don't worry Joe, things end like that 90% of the times...

In these cases, I just take a deep breath and go for something completely different, you can invest some of those bucks in a good dinner somewhere, you know you deserve it

And then, keep the rest and save for that film scanner
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #19
JohnL
Very confused
 
JohnL's Avatar
 
JohnL is offline
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brazil
Posts: 694
When I last had more than one body, it was to carry them all, with different lenses mounted. I try to avoid changing lenses in the field, whenever I can. I still think that is the way to go, at least for me. Now I have two cameras, but only one with interchangeable lenses. Rather than change lenses, I'll try to configure things so I can just use the other camera.
Maybe I'm just not very agile at changing lenses
John
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #20
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
i'm pretty much the same. i like 2 bodies w/ a different lens on each so i don't have to switch out lenses.
sometimes i like to shoot a scene with a 35mm then with a longer lens for a different perspective. later on, in editing, i can then decide if i prefer one over the other.
to each his/her own.

oscar, i may just order a pizza for dinner tonite, always a favourite.
joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #21
Huck Finn
Registered User
 
Huck Finn is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,957
I'd choose the body because of the time it takes to change a screw mount lens. I have the 75 & prefer it to the 90 because it is faster & easier to focus, so I would not give it up in favor of the 90.
__________________
Zeiss Ikon
Zeiss 35/2 Biogon, Zeiss 50/1.5 C-Sonnar, Rollei 40/2.8 Sonnar, Voigtlander 28/3.5 Skopar, Voigtlander 75/2.5 Heliar


<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=352'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #22
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
 
SolaresLarrave's Avatar
 
SolaresLarrave is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DeKalb, IL, USA
Age: 53
Posts: 6,547
<Chanting in a whisper á la Homer Simpson>

Hmmmmm, Joe... Body, body, body...

Ooops! Seller backpedaled? Hmph! No fair...

In cases like this one, pizza heals all wounds!
__________________
-Francisco
Check out
My Leica M4-2 Blog and/or
My Nikon D700 Neophyte's Guide
No longer selling any Nikon SLR glass...

Last edited by SolaresLarrave : 07-28-2004 at 11:10.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2004   #23
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
yeah!!!

i'm thinking that if this deal falls through that i'm gonna head out to the store, buy a whole swack of film and just shoot my lil a** off!
and maybe pick up a new camera bag...

joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-29-2004   #24
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 35,104
so the deal is still alive!
i'm waiting on a call or email, not likely tonite but maybe tomorrow.

i decided on the body.

joe
__________________
what can i say?
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
xd11...28/35/58/135/200
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-29-2004   #25
Wayne R. Scott
Half fast Leica User
 
Wayne R. Scott's Avatar
 
Wayne R. Scott is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Iowa
Age: 61
Posts: 1,307
Joe,

I like the number 3 apparently, I have 3 4x5's, 3 Bronica ETRs, 3 Nikon SLR's (4 actually), and 3 Contax mount rangefinders.

So bear this in mind when I say that I would get the second body.

Wayne

Last edited by Wayne R. Scott : 07-30-2004 at 17:38.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:41.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.