Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Grainy pictures, please help.
Old 07-18-2005   #1
Apple Juice
Registered User
 
Apple Juice is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 18
Grainy pictures, please help.

Hello RFFers,

I have been shooting with my Bessa R2A + 35mm Summicron for a while now.

I don't have the time/skill to develop the photos myself so I would drop them off at a small photolab and collect them a few days later.
I usually ask them to directly burn the pictures onto a CD so I can see them on the computer.

Although I have been using Ilford 100, Lots of my pictures turn out quite grainy.
The weird thing is that on the same roll of film, some pictures are grainy and some turn out fine.

I know this is a really basic question but aside from the speed of the film, what are the other important factors that contribute to the grain of a film?

Thanks,

AJ.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1092'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2005   #2
XAos
Registered User
 
XAos's Avatar
 
XAos is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 501
Underexposing (or grossly overexposing I've found out) can increase grain. Also, I wouldn't expect this from commercial scans, but I've been getting a lot of grain and soft focus that of late I'm starting to think might be my scanner rather than the negative itself.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2005   #3
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Any conventional (silver-based) B&W film that's scanned will have more exaggerated grain than the same film printed "wet" because of an annoying phenomenon called grain aliasing. It's caused by an interaction between the random pattern of the grains and the regular pattern of the scanner's CCD.

One way to reduce the effect is to throw the image out of focus slightly in the scanner, so the fact that some of your files are grainier than others may reflect a slight focus variation from one frame to the next.
__________________
"Never trust a graph without error bars."
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2005   #4
jyl
Just learning to focus
 
jyl is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 118
Take some of the shots and have them printed from the negative. That will tell you if the apparent grain is in the negative, or in the scan.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=541'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2007   #5
Thardy
Registered User
 
Thardy is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,942
If you are viewing the photos from the CD provided by the lab you will be most likely disappointed.

I've found that those scans are low resolution and have the same function as an index print.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2007   #6
Ariya
Peter Williams
 
Ariya's Avatar
 
Ariya is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 81
The development of the negatives can affect the appearance of grain. The choice of developer, length of development, level of agitation, etc. all play a part. The very best way to control grain is to develop the film yourself. I personally use 510 Pyro developer for my 35mm negs and they come out very smooth.
__________________
We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.

Sir Winston Churchill
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-01-2007   #7
BILLC
Registered User
 
BILLC is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Amity, Oregon
Posts: 85
I was useing tmax 400 in my xa and had been in a shop so was wide open to get the exposure. I then went with our group to an apt. and saw a great shot out the window of a highrise apt. across the street. I quickly took the shot without changing the fstop. The camera took the picture but the negative was very dense, it took forever to print and unlike all of the other shots on the roll there was huge grain, so dense overexposure equals grain I guess.
Bill
__________________
So It Goes
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New pictures from the underground Marc Jutras Rangefinder Photography Discussion 0 07-09-2005 15:24
RFF pictures look better to me now! Rob Rangefinder Photography Discussion 5 07-02-2005 05:18
Italy pictures posted jon_flanders Rangefinder Photography Discussion 9 03-23-2005 17:38
Just purchased my Epson R-D1 rangefinder - First imperssions and pictures. driggett Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 14 02-01-2005 15:29
Zorki pictures jfbell20 FSU Former Soviet Union RF 2 09-19-2004 10:33



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:41.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.