Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF

Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF A dedicated forum to the first Digital rangefinder camera.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Capture one 3.7.1 to support Epson R-D1 Officially
Old 07-11-2005   #1
krimple
Registered User
 
krimple's Avatar
 
krimple is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newtown Square, PA, USA
Age: 44
Posts: 93
Capture one 3.7.1 to support Epson R-D1 Officially

Wow! I was floored! Acrobat link here:

http://www.phaseone.com/upload/co3_7_1_240605.pdf

This is a big step for us Epson users. I've been a big fan of Capture One's user interface and workflow from the start. I used it exclusively on the EOS 20D, and was looking for something like it on the R-D1, but found nothing. Its' color renditions, especially with the ESC profiles, were terrific.

I'm looking forward to trying my Epson RAW files with this converter. Very psyched. They state it will be delivered sometime in July, so I'll let everyone know once I get the update and have given it a test drive.

Ken
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=838'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #2
Larry Kellogg
Registered User
 
Larry Kellogg is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 130
Hey,
This sounds great. Could you explain a little more about the user interface and the workflow, and what makes it better than other products? I'm still trying to get comfortable with using Raw for all of my shooting and dealing with the files and conversions. How much does it cost to purchase Capture One?

Regards,

Larry
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1436'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #3
ulrik
Registered User
 
ulrik is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: copenhagen, denmark
Posts: 63
Capture One just knows how to process those RAW files - yyiiiiiiiihhhaaaa ... download the trial and try and you will soon forget about Epson Raw plugin and ACR
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #4
Dr. Chippendale
Registered User
 
Dr. Chippendale is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
I was waiting eagerly for this upgrade, as C-1 features prominently in my DSLR workflow. First conversion results from ERFs are promising: sharpness and detail extraction are excellent, noise is not increased, tonality and microcontrast are elegantly rendered and no more strange colour shifts as they even occured in Adobe Camera RAW in CS2.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1925'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #5
J. Borger
Registered User
 
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 922
How about B&W ...... can it compete with the Epson Raw converter?


Thanks in advance

Han
__________________
my website
my RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #6
krimple
Registered User
 
krimple's Avatar
 
krimple is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newtown Square, PA, USA
Age: 44
Posts: 93
Sorry, gang--I've been at work all day and just downloaded the (now released) 3.7.1 version.

In answer to a few questions:

1. The user interface for C1 is very easy to use, once you get the hang of it. You have thumbnails to the left, click on one and you see a very quick preview, then you can adjust color balance, brightness/contrast/curves/etc., and then sharpness. You can then generate any kind of output you want, scaled up, down, JPEG, TIFF 8 or 16 bit, etc., and it all works asynchronously. Simply the BEST user interface there is for RAW manipulation.

2. The problem with B&W is that you have to create a de-saturated profile for the camera--there are already ones out there for the EOS 20D, but I think someone will soon put together a few of them for the R-D1 that would do B&W in various ways. I don't think this tool is a serious contender for creating beautiful R-D1 B&W output yet.

If you already have C1 for another DSLR, this is a great upgrade. It is expensive, but well worth it if you go through a fair # of raw images in a week. If you can wait for it, the Epson converter is still the one to beat for quality on B&W, but for color I'm going to do a lot of testing.

The cool thing is that 99% of the changes you'd do with Adobe Photoshop can be done with C1 instead. And you can do the same adjustments to many images with a single click. It's still faster than Adobe Bridge and it works more efficiently in the background.

Ken
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=838'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #7
sreidvt
Registered User
 
sreidvt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 371
Re: B&W

The color rendition with C1 is likely to be great. In my conversations with Phil Amato at Epson I strongly encouraged them to get sample cameras to C1 for testing so that C1 could support those files. He said he would make that a priority and apparently he did (Kudos Phil, if you're reading). Uwe Steinmuller of Digital Outback Photo developed a good B&W workflow for C1 (and I added some tweaks to it that are on his site) *but* I suspect that PhotoRAW will still be my tool of choice for RAW to B&W conversions. I'm on the road now but look forward to testing this out when I get back next week.

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
Photographer/Writer
Member WPJA
http://www.reidreviews.com
http://www.still-photo.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-12-2005   #8
J. Borger
Registered User
 
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 922
Ken , Sean

Thanks for your first thoughts on the B&W workflow with C1 .... !
I'll stay with the Epson converter for now and wait for your tests.

For colorwork .. what i notice lately is that white balance is often way off in ACR compared to the Epson Converter. Hope C1 is a lot better in this respect
I like pastel colors .... not the saturated Velvia Look .. but more the look of colorwork from the 70's (Eggleston, Shore, Levitt). Are there profiles or actions for colorprocessing like that ?? There are digital film simulators .... never found a similar action for simulating different color films .... with the exception of Digital Velvia??
The R-D1 with Leica lenses already got me a lot closer to that look when i compare it to the Canon DSLR's ... but i'm still not there ....



Han
__________________
my website
my RFF gallery

Last edited by J. Borger : 07-12-2005 at 21:41.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-13-2005   #9
KEH
Registered User
 
KEH's Avatar
 
KEH is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 606
I have always like C1 for Canon, and I am delighted it now does the RD1. The key points for me are (i) excellent white balance by default, and (ii) the control you get over tonality using the levels and curves before you export to TIF. I do all my b/w conversions in Photoshop using Power Retouche B/W Pro (reviewed on Outbackphoto).

Attached is a first colour sample (from Tanzania).

Cheers,
Kirk
__________________
My Gallery
My Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-13-2005   #10
sreidvt
Registered User
 
sreidvt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Borger
Ken , Sean

Thanks for your first thoughts on the B&W workflow with C1 .... !
I'll stay with the Epson converter for now and wait for your tests.

For colorwork .. what i notice lately is that white balance is often way off in ACR compared to the Epson Converter. Hope C1 is a lot better in this respect
I like pastel colors .... not the saturated Velvia Look .. but more the look of colorwork from the 70's (Eggleston, Shore, Levitt). Are there profiles or actions for colorprocessing like that ?? There are digital film simulators .... never found a similar action for simulating different color films .... with the exception of Digital Velvia??
The R-D1 with Leica lenses already got me a lot closer to that look when i compare it to the Canon DSLR's ... but i'm still not there ....


Han
J.


Eggleston, Stephen and Helen all have a different look to their color and the lenses play a big part in this. Stephen's work (from Uncommon Places) was done with a Schneider APO lens on an 8 x 10 Deardorf. Helen's lenses are mostly the older Leica lenses. I don't know Eggleston (I know his work but not him) so I don't know his lenses. So...try a Canon 28/2.8 or 35/2.8 on the R-D1 and convert with PhotoRAW and you may find yourself to be very close to the color you're looking for. Also, try older Leica lenses, of course. The older lenses weren't as well corrected for color as the newer lenses, so their color is less "perfect", a desirable trait sometimes.

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
Photographer/Writer
Member WPJA
http://www.reidreviews.com
http://www.still-photo.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-13-2005   #11
J. Borger
Registered User
 
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 922
Sean,

Yes different colors with all 3 of them but all 3 very different from "todays colors".
Thanks for pointing me to the lenses ................ It's perhaps silly to look for "imperfect" colors ..... but somehow i'm tired of the "perfect" colors (if they exist).
Levitt's colorwork is awesome ..... looking forward to her new book strictly focussing on her color work!

THe Canon 28/ 2.8 and 35/2,8 are in screw mount is not it? So i need an adapter.
I think i know a place where i can get one ..... there is only one or are there different versions?

For the older Leicas ..... Would a 35mm/2.8 summaron fit the bill ..... compared to the canon?

Han
__________________
my website
my RFF gallery

Last edited by J. Borger : 07-13-2005 at 05:11.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-13-2005   #12
krimple
Registered User
 
krimple's Avatar
 
krimple is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newtown Square, PA, USA
Age: 44
Posts: 93
The screw mount adapters are coupled to various framelines -- there is a 28/90, a 35 and a 50 that I know of (Cosina / Voigtlander), and I know Leica had similar ones. However, if you are only shooting on the R-D1, you select the framelines by hand anyway with the top plate switch, so it isn't that big of a deal to get the wrong one (unless you shoot M cameras as well with the same lens).

One thing I've done a few times last night was play with the Color space of the camera. I was getting nice, deep saturated reds by switching the camera profile to the Nikon D2h profiles. If you purchase C1 Pro, you can adjust the color profile yourself and store it as another variation (in fact, that's how the B&W profile came about if I recall correctly. Sean stated above that he knows the guy who did it.

Ken
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=838'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #13
sreidvt
Registered User
 
sreidvt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Borger
Sean,

Yes different colors with all 3 of them but all 3 very different from "todays colors".
Thanks for pointing me to the lenses ................ It's perhaps silly to look for "imperfect" colors ..... but somehow i'm tired of the "perfect" colors (if they exist).
Levitt's colorwork is awesome ..... looking forward to her new book strictly focussing on her color work!

THe Canon 28/ 2.8 and 35/2,8 are in screw mount is not it? So i need an adapter.
I think i know a place where i can get one ..... there is only one or are there different versions?

For the older Leicas ..... Would a 35mm/2.8 summaron fit the bill ..... compared to the canon?

Han

Hi Han,

I don't think it's silly at all to be going after that kind of palette. Many like it. I can't, this morning, seem to remember how Helen's color prints are usually made (it's a special process that has its own look) but the lenses are likely going to be the missing piece of the puzzle for you. As far as that specific lens goes, shoot in RAW and try it out. Try out a bunch of lenses in a store and then see what you have in the RAW files.

I'm in Nova Scotia right now and carrying the R-D1 with 28/2.8 with me (because its so compact)...so my color has an "older" look to it. Some of the palette comes from a lower level of contrast and saturation. Also, the older lenses weren't quite optimized for color - leading to a good kind of imperfection.

Cheers,

Sean
__________________
Sean Reid
Photographer/Writer
Member WPJA
http://www.reidreviews.com
http://www.still-photo.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #14
J. Borger
Registered User
 
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 922
Ken & Sean,

Thanks for the pointers ... appreciate it!


Kind regards
Han
__________________
my website
my RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #15
DerrickC
Registered User
 
DerrickC is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 38
Is there a big difference in features comparing the Capture One Pro edition to the LE edition? The price difference is really huge. Are the extra features essential or very helpful?


Thanks,

Derrick
__________________
www.derrickchoo.com
My Blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #16
Jim Watts
Still trying to See.
 
Jim Watts's Avatar
 
Jim Watts is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreidvt
Hi Han,

I don't think it's silly at all to be going after that kind of palette. Many like it. I can't, this morning, seem to remember how Helen's color prints are usually made (it's a special process that has its own look) but the lenses are likely going to be the missing piece of the puzzle for you. As far as that specific lens goes, shoot in RAW and try it out. Try out a bunch of lenses in a store and then see what you have in the RAW files.
Hi Han & Sean,
Although I know what you mean in general terms with regard to the Shore, Levitt, Eggeston color pallet it does have to be viewed as a package including the printing and the artist can and does change the interpretation with time (if only forced to by a change in materials). I see quite a change in colour in Shore's work from the early vintage 10 x 8 (Kodak paper?) C type contacts to the present 20 x 24 (and larger) C type (Fuji paper?) enlargements. Both are good colour, but I much prefer the orginals, but memory of viewing these from the 70's will be (rose) coloured and I suspect there must be some deteriation with age now to the originals I have seen fairly recently, although they still look good.

Egglestone has prints made in C type and Dye Transfer (I believe he has brought up all the remaining Dye Transfer materials). His Dye Transfers are some of the best colour prints I have ever seen and of course are very permanent, but are quite different from the C types. A lot of his work is shot on early Leica's (111F, 111G with early Leitz screw lenses) & also a Rollieflex, so this is also part of the package.
A lot of Egglestones original C types that I have seen recently now look to a a distinctive yellow colour cast from age.

I have only seen a very few original Levitt colour prints so can't really comment, but they are good and there does seem to be something process specific.

The pallet finally output from an R-D1 is still going to vary according to how the prints are finally made Inkjet, C type, Lambada etc. no matter how well your screen is calibrated and how good your profiles and raw conversion, as well as from the specific attributes of the lenses used. As always its a case of using all the available tools to try to match your intentions.

Cheers
Jim

Last edited by Jim Watts : 07-14-2005 at 09:49.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #17
ulrik
Registered User
 
ulrik is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: copenhagen, denmark
Posts: 63
Shore's older work is 8x10 contact prints - the enlargments you'll see now are fuji archival (lambda prints), digitally remastered.
Recent Eggelston work are c-prints.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #18
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerrickC
Is there a big difference in features comparing the Capture One Pro edition to the LE edition? The price difference is really huge.
According to the info on Phase One's
website, ONLY the pro version supports the R-D 1.

So, that'll be 500 Federal diplomas, please.

Of course, if you've also got a DSLR, medium-format back, etc., which you also can use with the software, it might make a lot more economic sense. But if not... sheesh! I know the R-D 1 is expensive, but for now I'm going to stick with Raw Developer.

I'll be very interested in reading about the experiences of Capture One users, though, and (ideally) seeing some side-by-side conversion examples that demonstrate why it's superior. At least that way I'll know what I'm missing!
__________________
"Never trust a graph without error bars."
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #19
pfogle
Registered User
 
pfogle's Avatar
 
pfogle is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London UK
Posts: 726
Well, I just downloaded 3.7.1 LE, using a license I got last year (cost $99) and at first glance it looks fine with ERF files. I'm breathing a huge sigh of relief, as I use C-1 with the 20D. I'll have to do some comparisons to see which rendering I like best...

Anyway, thanks to Ken for pointing this upgrade out.

Phil

ps it says on the P-1 website that LE does R-D1 files a bit further down.
__________________
Phil Fogle

My Gallery

Last edited by pfogle : 07-14-2005 at 15:06.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #20
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfogle
Well, I just downloaded 3.7.1 LE, using a license I got last year (cost $99) and at first glance it looks fine with ERF files.
Wow, that'll be lucky for you (and the rest of us) if the LE version DOES work with R-D 1 files! So please do keep us posted!!

(You're certainly entitled to a stroke of good luck, after all the bad luck you had with duff R-D 1s!)
__________________
"Never trust a graph without error bars."
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-14-2005   #21
pfogle
Registered User
 
pfogle's Avatar
 
pfogle is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London UK
Posts: 726
No no, jlw! This isn't luck, it's just an update But let me try it out over the weekend, and I'll put some comments up then.

cheers
Phil
__________________
Phil Fogle

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-15-2005   #22
J. Borger
Registered User
 
J. Borger is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 922
Jim & Ulrik,

Thanks for the very interesting additional info on the Eggleston/ Shorer prints.

Jim i think you are right about the lens being just one element in the whole pallet to a final print ..........

Best Regards

Han
__________________
my website
my RFF gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-16-2005   #23
DerrickC
Registered User
 
DerrickC is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 38
Did a quick comparison on the posted features of the Pro vs the LE Mac edition. The full features of the Pro edition are listed with the ones in bold not in the LE edition

CAPTURE ONE PRO FEATURES AND FUNCTIONS
Features & Functions:

Optimize
image file
workflow*:

• Patent pending image processing algorithms.
• Flexible white balance adjustment.
• Full ICC compatible color management.
• Camera profiles are provided.
• Noise reduction and sharpening algorithms.
• Multiple tone response curves.
• Focus and sharpness verification in full RAW resolution.
• IPTC/EXIF (meta data) support.
• Memory card importer

Maximize
image
quality*:

• Real time adjustment and preview of all parameter changes.
• Thumbnails always reflect the conversion settings currently set for each RAW file.
• All image and adjustment changes are stored for later use.
• All image settings can easily and instantly be applied to all image files.
• Comprehensive file management provisions.
• Dual view for comparing similar image files.
• Conversion settings can be archived and restored.
• Direct conversion to black and white.


Mac Features In CApture One PRO

Image Quality Features (Mac)

• Phase One patent pending RAW conversion algorithms
• Auto White balance algorithm
• Individual R/G/B channels can be adjusted in the curves dialogue
Midtone slider
• Warmer and cooler color temperature slider
• Saturation adjustment
• Contrast adjustment
• Individual noise reduction slider for each image
• Integrated noise reduction slider
• 16 bit output
• Multiple tone response curves
• Superior ICC profiles provided
• 3rd party camera ICC profiles accepted
• Individual ICC camera profile for each image

Image quality and Workflow (Mac)
• Phase One special sharpening algorithms
• White balance color correction
• Levels & curves adjustment
• Over and under exposure compensation (+/- 2.5 EV)
• User definable thresholds in auto exposure
• High / low exposure warnings with variable thresholds
• Ability to select custom target color settings
• Color editor selective ICC profiling color control
• Picker values on curves and histograms
• CMYK output
• Black & white preview option
• Selective soft proof simulation
• Output interpolation (up and down resizing / scaling)
• Output down sampling (Quick ProofTM)
• Apply settings to any or all images

Workflow (Mac)
• Number of differently formatted output files per conversion
• Background batch conversions max queue size
• Adjust images while batch processing in the background
• Crop Alignment grid
• Dual screen support with separate thumbnail browser
• Image stitching for Phase One digital backs
• Composition overlay with support for TIFF/JPEG
• Real-time preview with thumbnails always reflecting conversion settings
• Full page thumbnail browser
• Fastest RAW conversion speed using Phase One QuickProof™ technology
• Auto-renaming of output files (1, 2, 3, etc.)
• Auto exposure adjustment
• Rotation (+/- 90 degrees)
• Arbitrary rotation
• Portrait or landscape screen orientation
• Custom Crop both fixed aspect ratios and unconstrained
• MetaData
• Add text notes (annotations) to RAW files - includes search facility
• CF card importer
• Preview zoom and fit within window
• Auto-save
• Keyboard shortcuts
• Embed watermark of an image into the output file
• Add copyright text into output image file (watermark)
• Before and after for previewing changes
• Create HTML index / Export image index
• Simple tagging & sorting of images
• Advanced tagging & sorting of images (1-9 +?-)
• User customizable toolbar
• Full session folder support
• Single session folder support
• Dual image view to compare 2 images (4 Mac/Pro)
• JPEG browsing
• TIFF browsing
• 4 channel histogram display
• A complete color managed workflow
• Focus display at 100%
• IIQ Raw for Phase One camera backs support
• Composition mode when shooting tethered
• Selectable file extensions for conversions
• Anti-moire plugin for Photoshop
• Auto open output in Photoshop or other editor
• Archive and restore conversion settings
• Auto preview cache management for a faster worflow
• Automatic on-line software updates
• Tethered support for Canon: 1Ds MKII / 1D MKII / 1Ds / 1D / 20D / 10D / 300D / D60 / D30
• Chroma noise suppression slider
• Hot folder (for tethered refresh through other software)
__________________
www.derrickchoo.com
My Blog
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I prefer Epson Raw but it won't stay loaded edlaurpic Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 0 04-11-2005 18:05
Epson Launches the World's First Rangefinder Digital Camera MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 25 11-17-2004 07:16



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.