 |
Houston, we got a light leak (M2) |
 |
01-18-2010
|
#1
|
|
Don't call me Ron
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 1,584
|
Houston, we got a light leak (M2)
The last two rolls from my M2 both show a light leak. It's on only one frame on each roll, but it's there. Light obviously comes from the front (can be seen quite well in color). I have a band of light about three quarters up from the bottom of the frame, running almost the full width. Don't have a scan at hand right now, I will add that later.
I inspected the shutter curtains thoroughly with a small torch, no pinholes to be seen. The only thing i can think of is light getting in while changing lenses. However, I changed lenses all the time, also outside. Never saw any problems. The last two rolls were shot inside in dim lighting!
The only thing I can think off is a not completly light tight seal between the shutter curtains and the film gate. My FED5c showed this too.
Howevr, I changed lenses quite a few times on both rolls, so why is only one frame affected?
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#2
|
|
packin' light
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,854
|
Let Will van Manen in Zoetermeer have a look at it before you bring it along to India. Also, tell him you will be going there.
IMHO, considering your travel destination tinkering with this one is out of the question.There's a lot more sunlight in India, things will probably get worse once arriving over there. I remember Payasam shipping an M2 back and forth to Youxin Ye because of light leaks. He sold it in the end.
__________________
Cheers, Johan
Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom
Visit johanniels.com!
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#3
|
|
Don't call me Ron
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 1,584
|
I guess the M2 is out of the question for India then
When I bought this M2 two years ago Will CLA'd it. I have a lot of faith in him, but it might very well be he will also have trouble finding and solving such an intermittent problem. But no harm in contacting him.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#4
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,731
|
That’s a typical M2 intermittent leak, I have one that very occasionally does the same thing, I just ignore it
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#5
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
I've had this problem with an M2 and with a IIIc, and there is no way it can be intermittent. Probably depends on the angle at which the camera body is held and, therefore, the angle at which light strikes it. If you change lenses often, it makes the camera unusable.
Johan, the M2 whose story you remember actually came - twice - with one bad curtain.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#6
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,731
|
Very infrequently I get this, maybe one frame in 10 rolls, it’s so infrequent I’ve never been able to pin down which body it is.
I seldom change lenses so it’s nothing to do with that, my best guess is a poor fitting trap in the shutter gully

__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
Keeping track of camera bodies |
 |
01-18-2010
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Ljós is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 608
|
Keeping track of camera bodies
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
Very infrequently I get this, maybe one frame in 10 rolls, it’s so infrequent I’ve never been able to pin down which body it is.
|
That's a moment when you realize Al Kaplan is no longer with us. If he were, he would have chimed in with something like this: "You can file little notches in the film gate, then blacken the metal with a Sharpie. Every body will produce negatives with its distinctive mark."
RIP, Al!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#8
|
|
Don't call me Ron
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 1,584
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow
Very infrequently I get this, maybe one frame in 10 rolls, it’s so infrequent I’ve never been able to pin down which body it is.
I seldom change lenses so it’s nothing to do with that, my best guess is a poor fitting trap in the shutter gully
|
That's exactly what I see. I also found another thread on RFF dealing with the same problem:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru....php?p=1216239
Even if I see it rarely, it will eventually ruin an important shot. I obviously use the Leica when I want the best possible 35mm quality. No matter how hot, cold, bright or dark it might be.
What puzzles me is that you see it even without changing lenses. When I saw it know for a fact that I was changing them. Not that it proves anything... I mailed my repair guy, maybe he knows. Without the oppurtunity to change lenses at a whim, wherever I want, I might just as well sell the M2...
|
|
|
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#9
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,731
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ljós
That's a moment when you realize Al Kaplan is no longer with us. If he were, he would have chimed in with something like this: "You can file little notches in the film gate, then blacken the metal with a Sharpie. Every body will produce negatives with its distinctive mark."
RIP, Al!
|
he probably did, the last time this came up, and I probably would if it were more of a problem
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#10
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,731
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald_H
That's exactly what I see. I also found another thread on RFF dealing with the same problem:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru....php?p=1216239
Even if I see it rarely, it will eventually ruin an important shot. I obviously use the Leica when I want the best possible 35mm quality. No matter how hot, cold, bright or dark it might be.
What puzzles me is that you see it even without changing lenses. When I saw it know for a fact that I was changing them. Not that it proves anything... I mailed my repair guy, maybe he knows. Without the oppurtunity to change lenses at a whim, wherever I want, I might just as well sell the M2...
|
In that case I would have the gully light traps replaced, one per roll is too often
I think they fit the plastic M6 type these days the M2’s are a textile material
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
braver is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 340
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald_H
That's exactly what I see. I also found another thread on RFF dealing with the same problem:
Even if I see it rarely, it will eventually ruin an important shot. I obviously use the Leica when I want the best possible 35mm quality. No matter how hot, cold, bright or dark it might be.
What puzzles me is that you see it even without changing lenses. When I saw it know for a fact that I was changing them. Not that it proves anything... I mailed my repair guy, maybe he knows. Without the oppurtunity to change lenses at a whim, wherever I want, I might just as well sell the M2...
|
I had that same issue with my M6, figured it probably happened while changing lenses too. Sent it to Will for CLA and he replaced all the light seals and guards. He ensured me it had nothing to do with changing lenses, as basically it either got in through the back door or the black box you peer into through the lens mount started leaking (I don't remember). Will will be able to fix it no doubt.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#12
|
|
packin' light
buzzardkid is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Assen, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 6,854
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by braver
I had that same issue with my M6, figured it probably happened while changing lenses too. Sent it to Will for CLA and he replaced all the light seals and guards. He ensured me it had nothing to do with changing lenses, as basically it either got in through the back door or the black box you peer into through the lens mount started leaking (I don't remember). Will will be able to fix it no doubt.
|
The answer to your problem might be in this post already.
If the light were to get in past the rear door, that would explain the sharp edge on one side of Stuarts shot, and the 'fade-out' on the other side. Any play on the rear door while it is closed?
If so, why not cut two narrow strips of tape (preferably real gaffers tape or duct tape, something that sticks very well) and put these on the sides of the rear doors 'door posts', which are covered by the closed rear door.
I actually like the filed-notches idea and might do this with my camera's.
__________________
Cheers, Johan
Leica II (1932), Elmars 50 & 135, Heliar 50: the nickel kit
Leica II (1942), Minifinder, Canon 28, W-Nikkor 35, Elmar 90: the chrome kit
Ricoh GXR Monochrom
Visit johanniels.com!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#13
|
|
Stewart McBride
Sparrow is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perfidious Albion
Age: 61
Posts: 9,731
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLE-RF
The answer to your problem might be in this post already.
If the light were to get in past the rear door, that would explain the sharp edge on one side of Stuarts shot, and the 'fade-out' on the other side. Any play on the rear door while it is closed?
If so, why not cut two narrow strips of tape (preferably real gaffers tape or duct tape, something that sticks very well) and put these on the sides of the rear doors 'door posts', which are covered by the closed rear door.
I actually like the filed-notches idea and might do this with my camera's.
|
I always reasoned that it had to be from the front because the pressure plate is against the film so even if the door leaked light it couldn’t get to the back of the film
__________________
Regards Stewart
Stewart McBride
My  ... mostly the chaff ... these are a bit better ...
You’re only young once, but one can always be immature.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#14
|
|
Don't call me Ron
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 1,584
|
[quote=CLE-RF;1238429]
If the light were to get in past the rear door, that would explain the sharp edge on one side of Stuarts shot, and the 'fade-out' on the other side. Any play on the rear door while it is closed?
quote]
Actually, there is some play... but if the light comes via the back, the stripes would be orange, not whiteish, right? Assuming C41 color film, not chromes. Mine definitely are white.
If Will says it btw, I believe him. Any idea what he charged? His work is excellent, but my pockets aren't overly deep at the moment... Leica's are supposed to last forever, but owning and using such an old camera starts to feel like owning a classic sports car... My Nikon FM is 20 years younger, but looks battered like hell and sees a lot more use. And it has been absolutely flawless. I think it will see India soon.
Last edited by Ronald_H : 01-18-2010 at 06:43.
|
|
|
|
 |
01-18-2010
|
#15
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
It's from the front.
"I might just as well sell the M2...". Not the solution, as you will probably buy another M body and that may develop the same problem.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Philip Whiteman is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 100
|
This problem seems to have beset M Leicas of all vintages and with some frequency – but few people know what causes it/what's the fix (it's those light seals).
As I've suggested before; we really ought to have a sticky on the forum dealing with faults like this – it would save an awful lot of misunderstanding/searching/duplicate effort!
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Ronald M is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,652
|
New light seals around the shutter will cure it.
You can screw around with a lens cap for while, but eventualyy it must be repaired.
Both my M6 camera bought new in 198X when they first came out, developed the problem after 15 years and very little use. There is a mylar replacement which will not go bad.
My M3 also has been upgraded also.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2010
|
#18
|
|
sad M2 is sad
mooge is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Austenite Bay, Canada
Age: 20
Posts: 752
|
these are the light seals, by the way.
this baffle is the one you see when you take the lens off... it's upside down on the photo.
maybe it's something with the shutter?...
good luck!
(sorry the pic is so bad...)
__________________
"There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks." - E. Schrödinger
|
|
|
|
01-19-2010
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Philip Whiteman is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 100
|
Actually, that is a very good and very informative photo, dragunov. A picture is worth a thousand words and all that…
One thing that caused worse and ever more frequent fogging with my M6 was the lens mount working loose. This allowed light to get behind the box-like pressed metal baffle shown in dragunov's picture, and was cured easily enough by tightening the screws that secure the mounting ring to the body.
|
|
|
|
01-19-2010
|
#20
|
|
Dim Bulb
spyder2000 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 213
|
There are several seals that can be out of place or misplaced. My light leak occurred in all types of light and ONLY on the important frames. It was light leaking in from the rf window, down a shaft, and into the frame. It exposed film whether the shutter opened or not.
I spotted it and my tech fixed it.
__________________
-- Mark
Standard, M2, M3, IIS2, IIIa, Signet 35, IIIC, Ia ...
|
|
|
|
01-19-2010
|
#21
|
|
Don't call me Ron
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 41
Posts: 1,584
|
The M2 will go to Will van Manen tomorrow. It's unlikely I will give it a good workout before I go to India so I think it's out for that trip. I'll only take a camera I'm 100% sure about. A bit ironic it will be one that cost me about one tenth of the M2...
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:24. |
|
|