Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Xpan & Other Panoramics

Xpan & Other Panoramics For Hasselblad Xpan, Xpan II, Fuji TX-1 and TX-2, and all other Panoramic cameras

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

XPAN Scanning on a flatbed.
Old 07-03-2005   #1
mfs
Registered User
 
mfs is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 85
XPAN Scanning on a flatbed.

There are a number of newer flat bed scanners that have transparency adapters (Epson, Canon). Does anyone have experience using them with Xpan slides??
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=87'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2005   #2
glenn0004
Registered User
 
glenn0004 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oldham UK
Age: 42
Posts: 7
Hi

I have used my Epson 3170 to scan slides produced by a Horizon 202 - using the strip adaptor for non mounted slides and have had no problem.

The only thing i have had to do is enter a new format size for the final scan as I use dedicated Epson panoramic paper, but this all depends on your prefered method of scanning in order to achive your final print size

Happy Scanning

Glenn
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-03-2005   #3
schaubild
light chaser
 
schaubild's Avatar
 
schaubild is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: near Lucerne, Switzerland
Posts: 255
I use a Canon 9900 for "contact sheets" and quick XPan scans. The software lacks some functionality, but the results are fine.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-05-2005   #4
skimmel
Registered User
 
skimmel is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by schaubild
I use a Canon 9900 for "contact sheets" and quick XPan scans. The software lacks some functionality, but the results are fine.
Do you have another method for doing scan for large prints?
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1515'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-05-2005   #5
schaubild
light chaser
 
schaubild's Avatar
 
schaubild is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: near Lucerne, Switzerland
Posts: 255
If I go for print quality I use a Nikon 8000 scanner. Together with Silverfast and a glass holder the quality is more than sufficient even for big enlargements.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-05-2005   #6
skimmel
Registered User
 
skimmel is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by schaubild
If I go for print quality I use a Nikon 8000 scanner. Together with Silverfast and a glass holder the quality is more than sufficient even for big enlargements.
Thanks! How large can you print from the flatbed before you move to the Nikon? I'm considering getting the Xpan and a scanner but am struggling with the decision, due to the high cost of a dedicated medium format scanner.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1515'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-05-2005   #7
schaubild
light chaser
 
schaubild's Avatar
 
schaubild is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: near Lucerne, Switzerland
Posts: 255
I used to do A3+ with it, results were fine. But a dedicated film scanner with true 4000dpi resolution makes a big difference even at this (compareably small?) print size. I have never printed from the flatbed since (expect 4x5 scans), almost all of my presentation negatives/slides have been rescanned/reworked. This might sound like a lot of work, but I'm very picky with my images, it's all about quality, in the end I will get about 10 a year.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2005   #8
skimmel
Registered User
 
skimmel is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by schaubild
I used to do A3+ with it, results were fine. But a dedicated film scanner with true 4000dpi resolution makes a big difference even at this (compareably small?) print size. I have never printed from the flatbed since (expect 4x5 scans), almost all of my presentation negatives/slides have been rescanned/reworked. This might sound like a lot of work, but I'm very picky with my images, it's all about quality, in the end I will get about 10 a year.
Thanks schaubild. This is my philosophy too. Just not sure I can justify the cost for a medium format scanner.

In terms of the canon flatbed scanner: does it scan a whole XPan frame at once? Also, how would an A4 print look off the flatbed? (One option for me is to get a flatbed to scan for smaller prints and then have my local pro shop do high resolution scanning for the minority of prints I'd like to do at a larger size.)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1515'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2005   #9
schaubild
light chaser
 
schaubild's Avatar
 
schaubild is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: near Lucerne, Switzerland
Posts: 255
A4 is so small, with the right postprocessing there shouldn't be a big difference. As already mentioned, the Canon scans up to 4x5.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2005   #10
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,168
I just got the Epson 4990 Photo. It comes bundled with Silverfast scanning software, which I highly recommend. The scanner is great. Around $400 shipped from Buy.com.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2005   #11
skimmel
Registered User
 
skimmel is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 78
Thanks everyone. Is there a specific mask for xpan negatives that you use with flatbeds? (I've never done any scanning before so I apologize if my questions are a bit naive.)
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1515'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-06-2005   #12
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,168
The Epson comes with various masks. I use the mask for film strips. I print 13"x19" on an Epson 2200 with no problems.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-07-2005   #13
DavidMcSpadden
Registered User
 
DavidMcSpadden is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Belfast, N Ireland
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfs
There are a number of newer flat bed scanners that have transparency adapters (Epson, Canon). Does anyone have experience using them with Xpan slides??
I have been using an Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, which allows you to scan strips of Xpan negatives as positive film. You simply use the lassoo tool to edit out the unexposed portion of the film. The scans are saved as JPEGs which can then be edited in photoshop. I usually print them to A4 size on my HP photosmart 7960 printer, or sometimes smaller on 10x15cm photo paper. Hope this helps. Keep on xpanding your portfolio !!
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2003'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scanning XPan - Tested berci Xpan & Other Panoramics 27 01-13-2009 14:53
Xpan newbie and a few Q's Tom_W Xpan & Other Panoramics 3 05-12-2005 16:21
Scanning XPan...? berci Xpan & Other Panoramics 3 03-13-2005 15:25
Hasselblad announce XPan II MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 0 07-31-2003 08:39



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:33.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.